1 simple way to reduce your diabetes risk
Replies
-
Need2Exerc1se wrote: »Need2Exerc1se wrote: »Need2Exerc1se wrote: »Need2Exerc1se wrote: »I've seen other (some more recent) studies that showed the same thing. And this recent study --
http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/videos/news/Fructose_Glucose_051615.html
http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=1555133
24 healthy people were asked to drink a beverage sweetened with fructose one day and glucose another. Before and after each session, blood samples were taken and the participants rated their hunger level and motivation for food on a scale of 1 to 10. They also underwent brain scans while they were shown images of high-calorie foods. The men and women reported greater appetite after drinking fructose compared with glucose. Their scans also showed more activity in areas of the brain related to food cue reaction in response to the images. When offered a choice between delayed monetary rewards or immediate high-calorie food rewards, participants were more willing to choose food after ingesting fructose.The study authors say these findings suggest fructose may not produce the same feelings of fullness and satisfaction as glucose.
-- makes me wonder if HFCS isn't the problem so many have preached for a while now. Certainly more research is needed, but maybe all sugars aren't created equal, as is commonly preached by others on these forums.
It might also explain why eating apples and pears alone always makes me hungry.
How many people are ingesting either 75g of pure fructose or glucose in a single sitting?
I give up. How many?
I'm asking you, you're the one who posted the study and felt it was relevant to the discussion
The differences in reactions not the number of people living as if they were in a study.
Except what are the real world implications? Is there a difference in reactions to pure fructose and either HFCS or sucrose, compounds that they might actually ingest that amount?
There are rarely real world applications to one study, other than the need for further study.
I don't understand your second question. That who might actually ingest what amount?
The study used pure fructose and glucose in dosages of 75g, perhaps the differences between the two aren't significantly different if they used a real amount dosage. Regardless the point is moot as most aren't ingesting pure fructose or glucose in any meaningful amounts
Perhaps they aren't significantly different in real world application, perhaps they are. Hence the need for further study.
That doesn't make it any less interesting to me.0 -
This content has been removed.
-
Yup. People are just being more deliberately obtuse than normal today.Need2Exerc1se wrote: »Need2Exerc1se wrote: »Need2Exerc1se wrote: »Need2Exerc1se wrote: »I've seen other (some more recent) studies that showed the same thing. And this recent study --
http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/videos/news/Fructose_Glucose_051615.html
http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=1555133
24 healthy people were asked to drink a beverage sweetened with fructose one day and glucose another. Before and after each session, blood samples were taken and the participants rated their hunger level and motivation for food on a scale of 1 to 10. They also underwent brain scans while they were shown images of high-calorie foods. The men and women reported greater appetite after drinking fructose compared with glucose. Their scans also showed more activity in areas of the brain related to food cue reaction in response to the images. When offered a choice between delayed monetary rewards or immediate high-calorie food rewards, participants were more willing to choose food after ingesting fructose.The study authors say these findings suggest fructose may not produce the same feelings of fullness and satisfaction as glucose.
-- makes me wonder if HFCS isn't the problem so many have preached for a while now. Certainly more research is needed, but maybe all sugars aren't created equal, as is commonly preached by others on these forums.
It might also explain why eating apples and pears alone always makes me hungry.
How many people are ingesting either 75g of pure fructose or glucose in a single sitting?
I give up. How many?
I'm asking you, you're the one who posted the study and felt it was relevant to the discussion
The differences in reactions not the number of people living as if they were in a study.
Except what are the real world implications? Is there a difference in reactions to pure fructose and either HFCS or sucrose, compounds that they might actually ingest that amount?
There are rarely real world applications to one study, other than the need for further study.
I don't understand your second question. That who might actually ingest what amount?
The study used pure fructose and glucose in dosages of 75g, perhaps the differences between the two aren't significantly different if they used a real amount dosage. Regardless the point is moot as most aren't ingesting pure fructose or glucose in any meaningful amounts
All day she's just been giving non answers today when she clearly know that no one is having 75g of fructose at once.
Am I 'she'? Sorry, I didn't see anyone ask me that. What does it matter?0 -
This content has been removed.
-
Need2Exerc1se wrote: »
Yup. People are just being more deliberately obtuse than normal today.Need2Exerc1se wrote: »Need2Exerc1se wrote: »Need2Exerc1se wrote: »Need2Exerc1se wrote: »I've seen other (some more recent) studies that showed the same thing. And this recent study --
http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/videos/news/Fructose_Glucose_051615.html
http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=1555133
24 healthy people were asked to drink a beverage sweetened with fructose one day and glucose another. Before and after each session, blood samples were taken and the participants rated their hunger level and motivation for food on a scale of 1 to 10. They also underwent brain scans while they were shown images of high-calorie foods. The men and women reported greater appetite after drinking fructose compared with glucose. Their scans also showed more activity in areas of the brain related to food cue reaction in response to the images. When offered a choice between delayed monetary rewards or immediate high-calorie food rewards, participants were more willing to choose food after ingesting fructose.The study authors say these findings suggest fructose may not produce the same feelings of fullness and satisfaction as glucose.
-- makes me wonder if HFCS isn't the problem so many have preached for a while now. Certainly more research is needed, but maybe all sugars aren't created equal, as is commonly preached by others on these forums.
It might also explain why eating apples and pears alone always makes me hungry.
How many people are ingesting either 75g of pure fructose or glucose in a single sitting?
I give up. How many?
I'm asking you, you're the one who posted the study and felt it was relevant to the discussion
The differences in reactions not the number of people living as if they were in a study.
Except what are the real world implications? Is there a difference in reactions to pure fructose and either HFCS or sucrose, compounds that they might actually ingest that amount?
There are rarely real world applications to one study, other than the need for further study.
I don't understand your second question. That who might actually ingest what amount?
The study used pure fructose and glucose in dosages of 75g, perhaps the differences between the two aren't significantly different if they used a real amount dosage. Regardless the point is moot as most aren't ingesting pure fructose or glucose in any meaningful amounts
All day she's just been giving non answers today when she clearly know that no one is having 75g of fructose at once.
Am I 'she'? Sorry, I didn't see anyone ask me that. What does it matter?
Just like this morning you're pretending you didn't see something.
You even responded to ACG on the previous page when he asked "How many people are ingesting either 75g of pure fructose or glucose in a single sitting?" So either you're just trying to antagonize people, bait them or you have no memory of things.
I responded. Sorry if you think "I don't know" is not a valid response. It does explain some things though.0 -
Meh, I don't have an issue with the article. The take away....The findings from this large study add to the growing evidence we have that sugary beverages adversely affect your risk for diabetes.
If you’re a newbie on the fitness journey, and are looking for one simple way to eat and drink healthier, cut down on sugary beverages. Not only will it help you reduce diabetes risk, but it’ll also help trim unnecessary calories (and pounds). Choose water and unsweetened tea/coffee whenever possible. Check out this post if you want to kick the soda habit.
Seems right to me. Cutting down sugary beverages can't hurt.
0 -
This content has been removed.
-
Need2Exerc1se wrote: »Need2Exerc1se wrote: »
Yup. People are just being more deliberately obtuse than normal today.Need2Exerc1se wrote: »Need2Exerc1se wrote: »Need2Exerc1se wrote: »Need2Exerc1se wrote: »I've seen other (some more recent) studies that showed the same thing. And this recent study --
http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/videos/news/Fructose_Glucose_051615.html
http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=1555133
24 healthy people were asked to drink a beverage sweetened with fructose one day and glucose another. Before and after each session, blood samples were taken and the participants rated their hunger level and motivation for food on a scale of 1 to 10. They also underwent brain scans while they were shown images of high-calorie foods. The men and women reported greater appetite after drinking fructose compared with glucose. Their scans also showed more activity in areas of the brain related to food cue reaction in response to the images. When offered a choice between delayed monetary rewards or immediate high-calorie food rewards, participants were more willing to choose food after ingesting fructose.The study authors say these findings suggest fructose may not produce the same feelings of fullness and satisfaction as glucose.
-- makes me wonder if HFCS isn't the problem so many have preached for a while now. Certainly more research is needed, but maybe all sugars aren't created equal, as is commonly preached by others on these forums.
It might also explain why eating apples and pears alone always makes me hungry.
How many people are ingesting either 75g of pure fructose or glucose in a single sitting?
I give up. How many?
I'm asking you, you're the one who posted the study and felt it was relevant to the discussion
The differences in reactions not the number of people living as if they were in a study.
Except what are the real world implications? Is there a difference in reactions to pure fructose and either HFCS or sucrose, compounds that they might actually ingest that amount?
There are rarely real world applications to one study, other than the need for further study.
I don't understand your second question. That who might actually ingest what amount?
The study used pure fructose and glucose in dosages of 75g, perhaps the differences between the two aren't significantly different if they used a real amount dosage. Regardless the point is moot as most aren't ingesting pure fructose or glucose in any meaningful amounts
All day she's just been giving non answers today when she clearly know that no one is having 75g of fructose at once.
Am I 'she'? Sorry, I didn't see anyone ask me that. What does it matter?
Just like this morning you're pretending you didn't see something.
You even responded to ACG on the previous page when he asked "How many people are ingesting either 75g of pure fructose or glucose in a single sitting?" So either you're just trying to antagonize people, bait them or you have no memory of things.
I responded. Sorry if you think "I don't know" is not a valid response. It does explain some things though.
How cute. Look at you trying to say that "I give up. How many?" is you saying I don't know. Nice backpeddle.
Yes, why would I give up if I knew?0 -
This content has been removed.
-
Need2Exerc1se wrote: »Need2Exerc1se wrote: »Need2Exerc1se wrote: »
Yup. People are just being more deliberately obtuse than normal today.Need2Exerc1se wrote: »Need2Exerc1se wrote: »Need2Exerc1se wrote: »Need2Exerc1se wrote: »I've seen other (some more recent) studies that showed the same thing. And this recent study --
http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/videos/news/Fructose_Glucose_051615.html
http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=1555133
24 healthy people were asked to drink a beverage sweetened with fructose one day and glucose another. Before and after each session, blood samples were taken and the participants rated their hunger level and motivation for food on a scale of 1 to 10. They also underwent brain scans while they were shown images of high-calorie foods. The men and women reported greater appetite after drinking fructose compared with glucose. Their scans also showed more activity in areas of the brain related to food cue reaction in response to the images. When offered a choice between delayed monetary rewards or immediate high-calorie food rewards, participants were more willing to choose food after ingesting fructose.The study authors say these findings suggest fructose may not produce the same feelings of fullness and satisfaction as glucose.
-- makes me wonder if HFCS isn't the problem so many have preached for a while now. Certainly more research is needed, but maybe all sugars aren't created equal, as is commonly preached by others on these forums.
It might also explain why eating apples and pears alone always makes me hungry.
How many people are ingesting either 75g of pure fructose or glucose in a single sitting?
I give up. How many?
I'm asking you, you're the one who posted the study and felt it was relevant to the discussion
The differences in reactions not the number of people living as if they were in a study.
Except what are the real world implications? Is there a difference in reactions to pure fructose and either HFCS or sucrose, compounds that they might actually ingest that amount?
There are rarely real world applications to one study, other than the need for further study.
I don't understand your second question. That who might actually ingest what amount?
The study used pure fructose and glucose in dosages of 75g, perhaps the differences between the two aren't significantly different if they used a real amount dosage. Regardless the point is moot as most aren't ingesting pure fructose or glucose in any meaningful amounts
All day she's just been giving non answers today when she clearly know that no one is having 75g of fructose at once.
Am I 'she'? Sorry, I didn't see anyone ask me that. What does it matter?
Just like this morning you're pretending you didn't see something.
You even responded to ACG on the previous page when he asked "How many people are ingesting either 75g of pure fructose or glucose in a single sitting?" So either you're just trying to antagonize people, bait them or you have no memory of things.
I responded. Sorry if you think "I don't know" is not a valid response. It does explain some things though.
How cute. Look at you trying to say that "I give up. How many?" is you saying I don't know. Nice backpeddle.
Yes, why would I give up if I knew?
Lol. You need to work on your game better.
Oh, the game again. I wish I had a rule book to this game.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.8K Introduce Yourself
- 43.9K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 176K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.6K Fitness and Exercise
- 430 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8.1K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.4K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 22 News and Announcements
- 1.2K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions