Dinner Calories
jenniejoy07
Posts: 78 Member
I eat most of my calories at dinner; but am still in a deficit. I've heard it's better to eat your calories during the day so you burn them off. Does it matter? I'm still losing slowly, but just wondering what everyone elses experiences are.
0
Replies
-
Meal timing does not matter. Eat whenever suits you and your schedule.0
-
My experience: I save most of my calories for the end of the day and my weight loss is progressing well.0
-
As long as you're in a deficit it doesn't matter when you consume the calories. Your body is burning calories constantly just by keeping you alive, and it doesn't care about our standard 24 hour clock.0
-
Good to hear! Thanks all!0
-
What everyone else said. I lost 16lbs and am now maintaining and have always had most of my cals for dinner and afternoon-evening snacks.
What you realise when using MFP is that 99% of 'diet tips' are nonsense.0 -
Big breakfast. Big lunch. Sometimes dinner.0
-
cleanbulk_hatersgfy wrote: »Big breakfast. Big lunch. Sometimes dinner.
Sometimes breakfast. Decent lunch. Big dinner. Same same... But different0 -
pinkteapot3 wrote: »What you realise when using MFP is that 99% of 'diet tips' are nonsense.
I wish I could give you an award for this statement.
I frequently eat most of my calories in the evening, and my cut is undeniably working (I've gone from a 34 to a 32 pant size over the last month). Anyone wanting to dispute the efficacy of this, feel free to take a look at just about anyone that follows the Warrior Diet or variants under Intermittent Fasting, and you'll see irrefutable results that make it hard to argue that this kind of lifestyle "doesn't work".0 -
40-50% of my calories usually come in the evening.0
-
Agree with the others- I usually have half or more of my daily calories left at dinner time, hasn't hindered my weight loss at all0
-
I hate to be the lone dissenting voice here BUT, I recently read the results of a published study comparing two groups, the first ate at will the second ate the majority of calories before 3 PM. All other variables being controlled the second group lost more weight than the first. Like other things in our bodies, metabolism has a baseline but is not linear. There are times it is more active. So what you eat and when you eat it does matter. By way of example, if you're going to do vigorous exercise you take your carbs at least 60 minutes before and have protein WITH carbs within 30 minutes following.0
-
As long as you're meeting your calorie goal, arrange your meal sizes/calorie content however keeps you fullest, gives you the most energy, and fits with your life best0
-
KarenJanine wrote: »Meal timing does not matter. Eat whenever suits you and your schedule.
This.0 -
Small breakfast, small lunch, medium dinner and popcorn . Lots an lots of popcorn nearly every night. Down 38 lbs0
-
Most of my calories are saved for a large dinner. I don't feel deprived of restricted in any way if I can pig out at night. Definitely seeing results!0
-
dscottwiner wrote: »I hate to be the lone dissenting voice here BUT, I recently read the results of a published study comparing two groups, the first ate at will the second ate the majority of calories before 3 PM. All other variables being controlled the second group lost more weight than the first. Like other things in our bodies, metabolism has a baseline but is not linear. There are times it is more active. So what you eat and when you eat it does matter. By way of example, if you're going to do vigorous exercise you take your carbs at least 60 minutes before and have protein WITH carbs within 30 minutes following.
Let's not make weight loss harder/more confusing for people. Also, does a "published" study somehow correlate with credibility?
OP: Eat when you're hungry. You're losing, so you're doing it right.0 -
dscottwiner wrote: »I hate to be the lone dissenting voice here BUT, I recently read the results of a published study comparing two groups, the first ate at will the second ate the majority of calories before 3 PM. All other variables being controlled the second group lost more weight than the first. Like other things in our bodies, metabolism has a baseline but is not linear. There are times it is more active. So what you eat and when you eat it does matter. By way of example, if you're going to do vigorous exercise you take your carbs at least 60 minutes before and have protein WITH carbs within 30 minutes following.
How much more weight? What variables were equal? Were they equal to everyone not in the study?
I would agree that meal timing can make a difference in your weight loss rate. BUT, the difference isn't great and the timing would not be the same for everyone. The optimal timing would depend on your lifestyle and schedule.
For me, satiety and enjoyment are most important for the long haul in weight control. I like to eat most of calories at night, so I do. I don't really care if I could lose a smidge faster by eating at different times. This isn't a race for me, it's my life. I want to enjoy it.0 -
timing doesn't matter.
most of the time my largest meal is lunch (mainly because we often eat out for lunch). but as far as weight loss goes, it really does not make a difference.0 -
The time of day really doesn’t matter. My schedule can be pretty hectic so sometimes I don’t eat dinner until around 8-9pm. I usually spread my meals out so I can eat a lot at dinner since I love dinner time lol. I’m only just starting out with MFP but so far this is working for me as I’m losing weight and feeling comfortable with hunger levels.0
-
jenniejoy07 wrote: »I eat most of my calories at dinner; but am still in a deficit. I've heard it's better to eat your calories during the day so you burn them off. Does it matter? I'm still losing slowly, but just wondering what everyone elses experiences are.
I work for a company where we have a gym (now, they didnt until March this year) and they hired a personal trainer and nutritionist. I've been working with her twice a week for the last couple of months and she has said it's better to space your calories out over the day. Your body can handle only so much at one sitting. She basically drew out a diagram on a whiteboard that was showing how your body processes your calorie intake from when you wake up to when you eat and what you eat. You should always eat two types of macronutrients together, protein and carb or protein and fat. Nothing should be alone because of how it spikes your sugar levels and metabolism. You want to gradually bring it up rather than spiking. She also told me that you should never eat more than 400 to 500 calories in one sitting. Also you should eat at least five to six meals a day, so breakfast, snack, lunch, snack, dinner, snack.
While you may be able to lose the weight doing it the way you are, if you go off it, you'll gain it back fast and possibly double what you lost. You're not only training your mind to eat right, you're training your body to burn the fuel you're giving it correctly.
I have to run, but you can message me if you would like and I can give you more info on what she's told me. Chin up, you can do it!
0 -
livingleanlivingclean wrote: »
Sometimes breakfast. Decent lunch. Big dinner. Same same... But different
^ That's what I do. I would advise against hoarding calories for the end of the day because I feel it's more sustainable to feel comfortably full after lunch, but it's a habit that a lot of people have. Dinner is still my biggest meal.
0 -
dscottwiner wrote: »I hate to be the lone dissenting voice here BUT, I recently read the results of a published study comparing two groups, the first ate at will the second ate the majority of calories before 3 PM. All other variables being controlled the second group lost more weight than the first. Like other things in our bodies, metabolism has a baseline but is not linear. There are times it is more active. So what you eat and when you eat it does matter. By way of example, if you're going to do vigorous exercise you take your carbs at least 60 minutes before and have protein WITH carbs within 30 minutes following.
Were all of the participant eating the same calorie deficit based on their individual starting weight and activity level? Were all of the participants weighing and logging all of their food? Did all of the participants start out needing to loose the same amount of weight? How many participants were there in the study?
Was the researcher who did this study able to duplicate his results under the exact same circumstances using a different set of subjects?
0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 426 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions