Intermittent fasting

2»

Replies

  • accidentalpancake
    accidentalpancake Posts: 484 Member
    freak4iron wrote: »
    christinev297 wrote: »
    freak4iron wrote: »
    christinev297 wrote: »
    Mr_Knight wrote: »
    pinggolfer96 wrote: »
    It's just a dietary preference/ schedule. Whether you're eating 2500 cals in 8 hours or 14 hours, you're body composition will remain the same.

    A number of studies are now showing that fasting periods of 16 hours or greater increase the rate at which the body metabolizes fast, even under isocaloric conditions.

    This makes perfect sense to me.

    Makes perfect sense huh? Ok Then You go ahead and try eating once every 24hrs also you could pour a Gallon of hot sAuce over every bit of food(cause that supposedly speed up metabolism), or drink two Gallons of water For every bite you eat, or eat your candy bar with the wrapper still on it while upside down. Do what ever you want. Let me know how your pseudoscience diet methods work. I'm gona stick with the realistic stuff that actually gives me results.

    Jeez rightio then :huh:

    And that is pretty much exactly what I did, minus the "hot sauce"...

    I ate once a day, 500 calories, every second day.
    On the alternate days I ate close to my TDEE. I had nearly 28lbs to lose, 24 of those came off in 4mths doing IF.

    I'd say those are pretty decent RESULTS.

    You are missing my point honey. I'm not debating the fact you lost weight. I lost over fifty pounds eating with only a spork... Assume that is a true statement....does that mean sporks are great weight loss tools? Hell freaking no. Quit encouraging eating disorder behavior!

    You should just stop talking now.

    Those who have researched IF know the benefits and drawbacks. You obviously have done no similar research.
This discussion has been closed.

Categories