Macros vs. calories
BetterBod91
Posts: 32 Member
Which is better, counting based on macros or calories? What are the benefits of counting macros?
0
Replies
-
Counting macros, I imagine, can work for certain circumstances, such as weight lifting (need a lot of protein) or if you have diabetes (gotta watch those carbs) but it doesn't always tell the whole story if you're just trying to lose weight.0
-
If you're counting macros, then you're literally just a simple math problem away from knowing the calories as well. Why would these two things be mutually exclusive?0
-
Oh god, this is not going to end well.0
-
Mycophilia wrote: »If you're counting macros, then you're literally just a simple math problem away from knowing the calories as well. Why would these two things be mutually exclusive?
They aren't always. But if you're just starting out, seeing "500 calories" for a meal is easier than figuring out how many calories it is from the fat, carbs and protein counts.0 -
Okay because I've heard of people who have lost weight that count just macros and don't pay much attention to calories. I thought that there may be some benefits to doing things that way.0
-
I'd say that if you want to just "lose weight", counting calories will be just fine for you. If you are wanting to change body composition, macros may be the better way to go so you're fueling your body sufficiently for muscle growth, fat loss, etc. I have done both but have been more successful changing my body by macros.0
-
BetterBod91 wrote: »Okay because I've heard of people who have lost weight that count just macros and don't pay much attention to calories. I thought that there may be some benefits to doing things that way.
I'd say MAYBE. It depends on the person. But really, keeping a leash on your macros is just another, slightly different way of counting calories since, like the person said above, each macro has a certain calorie count per gram.0 -
I always count both, it's not particularly hard maths at all.
Lets say, you're eating 1800 calories.
It's 60g protons, 270g harbocydrates and 52g fats.
Protein; 63g x 4 = 252 calories
Carbs; 270 x 4 = 1080 calories
Fats; 52 x 9 = 468 calories
TOTAL; 252 + 1080 + 468 = 1800
Idk, I coun't both.0 -
Pretty simple to count both, especially with mfp as it gives you a running total of both.0
-
Weight loss is all about the calories. People sometimes ask a question like, "I've hit my calorie goal for the day, but am under on protein. Should I eat more to hit the protein goal?" That's a personal decision. Depends on your personal goal.
I gave up on macros. I was forever eating protein foods that I didn't want and skipping foods I did want. It was a mess. I cannot eat to a number.
Now, I eat healthy food and watch my micros. I want to try to get all my nutrients from my diet and am working on that. The macros just have to fall where they may. Very often, I'm under on protein and over on carbs. I'm fine with it.
I don't eat X amount of calories a day, either. Some days, I'm hungrier than others. When I'm hungrier, I eat more. When I'm less hungry, I eat less. Some people call it "intuitive eating."
0 -
IsaackGMOON wrote: »
It's 60g protons
Protons are delicious but they don't give you as much energy as eating electrons.
1 -
MarziPanda95 wrote: »IsaackGMOON wrote: »
It's 60g protons
Protons are delicious but they don't give you as much energy as eating electrons.
no.
0 -
MarziPanda95 wrote: »IsaackGMOON wrote: »
It's 60g protons
Protons are delicious but they don't give you as much energy as eating electrons.
I laughed
0 -
BetterBod91 wrote: »Which is better, counting based on macros or calories? What are the benefits of counting macros?
Whatever keeps you at your required calorie goal for weight loss or whatever your goal is. Hunger signals and energy output depend on the macros, but weight change depends only on the calories.
So...both? Its a Catch 220 -
MarziPanda95 wrote: »IsaackGMOON wrote: »
It's 60g protons
Protons are delicious but they don't give you as much energy as eating electrons.
Eat as many neutrons as you want though. Those are free :-)0 -
BetterBod91 wrote: »Okay because I've heard of people who have lost weight that count just macros and don't pay much attention to calories. I thought that there may be some benefits to doing things that way.
Its anecdotal. Some people eat in such a way that, if they count their macros, their body will only take in a certain range of calories, or they won't need to eat more than is necessary.0 -
This content has been removed.
-
If you are counting anything at all, then its calories you need to count to lose weight. But macros are important too. You need balance in your diet. You need a good amount of protein. You don't want to restrict your fats too severely because your food won't taste good and you won't be able to sustain your calorie reduction. No one has trouble getting enough carbs. Carbs are in just about everything.
Eat quality food - unprocessed food and lots and lots of fruit and vegetables.0 -
This content has been removed.
-
In my opinion, you can optimize performance and likelihood of reaching your goals if you count macros, but it depends on if you want to put the time and effort into doing it0
-
MarziPanda95 wrote: »IsaackGMOON wrote: »
It's 60g protons
Protons are delicious but they don't give you as much energy as eating electrons.
Lol wow0 -
So much helpful information. Thanks guys ❤️0
-
If you're counting macros you're inadvertently also counting calories. If you have a goal of for example 100g protein, 50 g fat, 150 g carbs that would be 1450 calories.0
-
MarziPanda95 wrote: »IsaackGMOON wrote: »
It's 60g protons
Protons are delicious but they don't give you as much energy as eating electrons.
I laughed
Awesome...0 -
To sum it up from many previous posts.
* Counting a set number of macro's is counting calories.
* Counting macro's is an invaluable tool to fine tune your body composition, gain muscle, and improve athletic performance.
If you keep under your calories you'll loose weight even with the all twinkie diet. But your body will stay flabby, you'll be tired, and athletic performance would be terrible.
0 -
just out of interest and i would never do this if i had 5 double cheeseburger from macdonalds everyday with a total of 2185 calories would i lose weight? My allowance is over 2200 in order to lose a pound a week. If the answer is no then we have to keep an eye on the macros a little. (i know this is a stupid post)0
-
woodhouse_j2 wrote: »just out of interest and i would never do this if i had 5 double cheeseburger from macdonalds everyday with a total of 2185 calories would i lose weight? My allowance is over 2200 in order to lose a pound a week. If the answer is no then we have to keep an eye on the macros a little. (i know this is a stupid post)
You would lose just the same. Maybe retain some water.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.3K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 423 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions