Quality heart rate monitor

2»

Replies

  • erickirb
    erickirb Posts: 12,294 Member
    jensquish1 wrote: »
    i was set on getting a polar HRM but have heard awful things about the cheat strap not working right. I am looking for some other suggestions!

    Don't get one, they are just the closest estimate ... might as well as use the free estimate... unless your loaded then just buy whatever....

    In my opinion, a heart rate monitor (which not 100% all the time) can really assist one in training, depending on the type of trading. And if one takes the time to find his or her max rate, the monitor can help one be more specific in zone training. The willy nilly method is not very advantageous, in my opinion.

    if by zones you mean fat burning vs. carbs, that is a crock of *kitten*. If you mean for intensity and recovery purposes, it can have its place, and would really depend on what you are training for. Buuut for cals burned they are only good under one type of exercise, steady state cardio, assuming you have the correct max HR and V02Max entered.
  • BasicGreatGuy
    BasicGreatGuy Posts: 857 Member
    erickirb wrote: »
    jensquish1 wrote: »
    i was set on getting a polar HRM but have heard awful things about the cheat strap not working right. I am looking for some other suggestions!

    Don't get one, they are just the closest estimate ... might as well as use the free estimate... unless your loaded then just buy whatever....

    In my opinion, a heart rate monitor (which not 100% all the time) can really assist one in training, depending on the type of trading. And if one takes the time to find his or her max rate, the monitor can help one be more specific in zone training. The willy nilly method is not very advantageous, in my opinion.

    if by zones you mean fat burning vs. carbs, that is a crock of *kitten*. If you mean for intensity and recovery purposes, it can have its place, and would really depend on what you are training for. Buuut for cals burned they are only good under one type of exercise, steady state cardio, assuming you have the correct max HR and V02Max entered.
    No, I wasn't referring to fat zone / carb zone rhetoric.
  • walker306
    walker306 Posts: 92 Member
    I have the HeartQ and have been very satisfied with it. It has a chest strap and I hardly can tell it's on. Love this HRM.
  • ScubaSteve1962
    ScubaSteve1962 Posts: 609 Member
    jensquish1 wrote: »
    I'm probably not going to get one. It's almost pointless I suppose. And I'm messing around with technology while working out I'm going to flip out lol

    Just wondering, why do you feel you will have to mess with it while working out, I've had 3 polar devices, they all still work, once i start it to recording, I don't have to touch it again until I stop it.
  • ECTexan
    ECTexan Posts: 195 Member
    I've had a Polar FT60 for a couple years now and I've never had a problem with mine, I love it. The only thing is that you have to make sure the chest strap is tight. If it's remotely loose, no signal. I tuck mine under my bra band and can't even feel it.
  • TnTWalter
    TnTWalter Posts: 345 Member
    I highly recommend the Polar brand. They work great. Have used them for years. I think they are more accurate than fitbits.
  • VegasFit
    VegasFit Posts: 1,232 Member
    I had an F11 Polar that I used for years with no problems and it is still working, I just retired it. I did have the Loop with the chest strap and I did have a lot of issues with it. It didn't consistently pair properly and unlike my F11 chest strap the one with the Loop was a hassle to change even though by appearance they appeared to be the same. I am now using the Garmin Vivosmart with the chest strap and so far I like it.
  • conqueringsquidlette
    conqueringsquidlette Posts: 383 Member
    I have a polar h7 now and it's never given me any problems. I use it with my phone.
  • SaffronSunrise
    SaffronSunrise Posts: 182 Member
    I've had a Polar Ft 7 for a few months & it's working great. It's pretty basic, but it does what I need it to do.
This discussion has been closed.