Viewing the message boards in:

Build muscle and lose fat at the same time?

2»

Replies

  • Posts: 119 Member
    More bro science that it can't be done. It is correct that if you are a body builder and putting on muscle mass that you will also put on some fat.

    But if you are "getting in shape", muscle gain and fat loss is absolutely a normal occurrence.

    At some point you won't be able to build mass at a calorie deficit but that takes a while.

    R


  • Posts: 27,167 Member
    Rhyalus wrote: »
    More bro science that it can't be done. It is correct that if you are a body builder and putting on muscle mass that you will also put on some fat.

    But if you are "getting in shape", muscle gain and fat loss is absolutely a normal occurrence.

    At some point you won't be able to build mass at a calorie deficit but that takes a while.

    R


    @Rhyalus - so how much mass are we talking?
  • Posts: 119 Member
    I don't have a scientific answer - but from personal experience it is true... recomp is pretty easy in people who are not in shape.

    Again, at some point it is not possible to gain one without the other, and I pray I get to that point one day. :-)

    Recently I lost a lot of fat and gained muscle - unfortunately I never did a body fat % test first, so I can't give #s.

    R

  • Posts: 27,167 Member
    Rhyalus wrote: »
    I don't have a scientific answer - but from personal experience it is true... recomp is pretty easy in people who are not in shape.

    Again, at some point it is not possible to gain one without the other, and I pray I get to that point one day. :-)

    Recently I lost a lot of fat and gained muscle - unfortunately I never did a body fat % test first, so I can't give #s.

    R

    I don't think anyone will argue that at the beginning of exercise there is some muscle added while fat loss occurred but it is not a huge amount.
    What most people think is muscle building is actually fat loss which exposed unlying muscle, giving a more muscular look.
  • You really can't lose weight and gain weight at the same time. First work on reducing your body fat %, then start building muscle through strength training!

    I can't agree more. :)
  • Posts: 203 Member
    How do you reconcile an overall gain in weight with eating in a deficit?

    Maybe he was blood doping?

    Put 4lb's of blood into his body amirite?

    rite guys??

    rite?

    Maybe he was blood doping?

    Put 4lb's of blood into his body amirite?

    rite guys??

    rite?

    Nutritional periodization, cyclical dieting. It is "possible", which was the question. Is it likely the average joe will replicate "my" results? No, everyone is DIFFERENT, genetics, diet composition.

    Care to post any scientific studies stating its not possible?
    You cant
  • Posts: 7,097 Member
    I gather you can add muscle in a deficit IF that deficit is less than 500 calories.

    https://www.t-nation.com/training/5-dumbest-muscle-myths

    (#5)
  • Posts: 3,358 Member
    arb037 wrote: »

    Nutritional periodization, cyclical dieting. It is "possible", which was the question. Is it likely the average joe will replicate "my" results? No, everyone is DIFFERENT, genetics, diet composition.

    Care to post any scientific studies stating its not possible?
    You cant

    And I can't find any evidence on the world being run by lizard people either... weird.
  • Posts: 203 Member

    And I can't find any evidence on the world being run by lizard people either... weird.

    Thought so.
    A simple google search will give you countless websites itemizing the criteria that losing fat and gaining muscle or LBM can happen.
    If you wish to speculate about my results we can continue this convo elsewhere.
  • Posts: 210 Member
    edited September 2015
    Interesting thread haha
  • Posts: 1 Member
    Panone2 wrote: »
    How can I do that?
    This is actually very possible. It requires a lot of energy for your body to sustain skeletal muscle. That is why when you stop working out your muscle reduce in size quickly. Because your body doesn't want to waste precious energy on something it is not using. Where I'm going with this is when you increase the muscle mass in your body, (increase at a healthy rate) your body will actually burn more calories just trying to sustain the additional muscle mass. Therefore if you keep your calories at maintenance (or even deficit) your body will use up fat stores in order to support its "need for additional skeletal muscle". However, the gains will be slower than if you were to focus purely on gaining size (eating more, less care for losing body fat).
  • Posts: 157 Member
    If you lift weights correctly, you will build muscle. If you are eating at a deficit, the necessary energy comes from your stored fat so your fat stores decrease in size and you will look smaller. Now, if the question is will I look like a bodybuilder, then the answer is probably not until long hours of work after losing all the excess weight. Building muscle is not the same thing as body building. When you lift the right amount of weight, you cause tiny tears in your muscle. When these are repaired, the muscle increases in size. It takes time to do this, which is why you don't want to exercise the same muscle groups every day.
  • Posts: 3,358 Member
    If you lift weights correctly, you will build muscle. If you are eating at a deficit, the necessary energy comes from your stored fat so your fat stores decrease in size and you will look smaller. Now, if the question is will I look like a bodybuilder, then the answer is probably not until long hours of work after losing all the excess weight. Building muscle is not the same thing as body building. When you lift the right amount of weight, you cause tiny tears in your muscle. When these are repaired, the muscle increases in size. It takes time to do this, which is why you don't want to exercise the same muscle groups every day.

    Depends on how much body fat you have, I believe?

  • Posts: 8,911 Member
    arb037 wrote: »

    Thought so.
    A simple google search will give you countless websites itemizing the criteria that losing fat and gaining muscle or LBM can happen.
    If you wish to speculate about my results we can continue this convo elsewhere.

    A simple google search will also give you countless websites telling you how to detox your body with coffee enemas and other crap.
  • Posts: 8,911 Member

    Depends on how much body fat you have, I believe?

    Very much, yes. Your body doesn't like wasting precious energy on building more muscles, especially at a deficit. They take more energy to keep up, they are less energy dense as a fuel source, all stuff your body doesn't want in a situation in which it already needs to use up stores just to keep your body running.
  • Posts: 3,358 Member

    Very much, yes. Your body doesn't like wasting precious energy on building more muscles, especially at a deficit. They take more energy to keep up, they are less energy dense as a fuel source, all stuff your body doesn't want in a situation in which it already needs to use up stores just to keep your body running.

    So if someone has a body fat percentage of 40, they're more likely to build some muscle in a deficit compared to someone who has a 20% body fat?

    Granted, it wouldn't be a lot, just a small amount
  • Posts: 8,911 Member
    For the record, I was at a deficit for a year and maintenance for a good part of another year. In that time I gained maybe 5-10 pounds of muscle, and that's a big maybe and I rather think it's on the lower side than the higher one.
  • Posts: 1,326 Member

    I don't think anyone will argue that at the beginning of exercise there is some muscle added while fat loss occurred but it is not a huge amount.
    What most people think is muscle building is actually fat loss which exposed unlying muscle, giving a more muscular look.

    Yup.
  • Posts: 8,911 Member

    So if someone has a body fat percentage of 40, they're more likely to build some muscle in a deficit compared to someone who has a 20% body fat?

    Granted, it wouldn't be a lot, just a small amount

    I think so. And someone at 10-15% can basically forget it outright.
    You need to look at it from the evolutionary aspect. Your body doesn't know you're trying to lose fat on purpose, all it knows is that you're not taking in enough energy to keep your body running as is. The last thing it wants to do in that situation is make you use up even more energy by building more muscle mass.
  • Posts: 14,260 Member

    A simple google search will also give you countless websites telling you how to detox your body with coffee enemas and other crap.

    So if someone has a body fat percentage of 40, they're more likely to build some muscle in a deficit compared to someone who has a 20% body fat?

    Granted, it wouldn't be a lot, just a small amount

    Yes. "Overfat" people (using Lyle Mcdonald's words) can build muscle in a deficit. From the anecdotal info I've seen, re comping at a higher body fat is also easier than at a lower body fat %. I'm talking about 26-30ish % for a woman so in an average to high average range, not obese range.
  • This content has been removed.
  • Posts: 31 Member
    My body fat is 24% and I don't want to lose that much fat. Maybe just drop a pants size or two. I'm not looking to become a body builder. I just want a more tone look. So if I do cardio and strength training and eat 1200-1400 calories a day will that help me reach my goal?
  • Posts: 3,358 Member
    Panone2 wrote: »
    My body fat is 24% and I don't want to lose that much fat. Maybe just drop a pants size or two. I'm not looking to become a body builder. I just want a more tone look. So if I do cardio and strength training and eat 1200-1400 calories a day will that help me reach my goal?

    Are you male or female?
  • Posts: 14,260 Member
    Panone2 wrote: »
    My body fat is 24% and I don't want to lose that much fat. Maybe just drop a pants size or two. I'm not looking to become a body builder. I just want a more tone look. So if I do cardio and strength training and eat 1200-1400 calories a day will that help me reach my goal?

    Assuming 1200-1400 calories puts you in an overall caloric deficit or at maintenence, yes.
  • Posts: 31 Member
    I'm a female and 1200-1400 is a calorie deficit for me
  • Posts: 9,603 Member
    Panone2 wrote: »
    My body fat is 24% and I don't want to lose that much fat. Maybe just drop a pants size or two. I'm not looking to become a body builder. I just want a more tone look. So if I do cardio and strength training and eat 1200-1400 calories a day will that help me reach my goal?
    Yes, it will help. If you use your muscles, they're going to respond. That's what they do. :)

    Remember that weight lifting isn't just for bodybuilders and 22 year old guys who want to get all beefy. It's good for everyone. Even if you don't want bigger muscles, it's good for your bones, etc. I certainly don't want bigger muscles and I do it. :)
  • Posts: 203 Member

    A simple google search will also give you countless websites telling you how to detox your body with coffee enemas and other crap.

    And coffee enemas relates to the topic how?
    Not even a "nice try".



  • Posts: 2,395 Member

    I don't think anyone will argue that at the beginning of exercise there is some muscle added while fat loss occurred but it is not a huge amount.
    What most people think is muscle building is actually fat loss which exposed unlying muscle, giving a more muscular look.

    Or they confuse strength gains with muscle gains. Quite a bit of strength gains in the beginning are due to CNS activation (i.e. your central nervous system activating more of your existing muscle) not actual muscle synthesis/gain.

  • Posts: 7,097 Member
    arb037 wrote: »

    And coffee enemas relates to the topic how?
    Not even a "nice try".



    How? Google it.
  • Posts: 6,652 Member
    arb037 wrote: »

    And coffee enemas relates to the topic how?


    I believe his point was that "a simple Google search," while it will definitely yield information, may yield some less than scientifically credible information. Happy to help.

This discussion has been closed.