Why do many here not consider themselves runners despite running regularly?

I have noticed on some running threads some people comment on not being a runner but then go on to describe running atleast 3 times a week a distance I would consider long or speed I would see as fast. When is one considered a runner? Or rather when would you consider yourself a runner?
«134

Replies

  • Clarewho
    Clarewho Posts: 494 Member
    edited October 2015
    Guilty! You're right it's a thing! Personally I think it's still challenging to do more than a few miles so I'm not a 'natural' so us hesitate to say I'm 'a runner'. But realistically yes I accept I'm probably doing better than many others. I suppose it's how you measure yourself against personal goals?? Maybe one day...
  • MelodyandBarbells
    MelodyandBarbells Posts: 7,724 Member
    Maybe if they don't get into races and such? Or have the stereotypical runner's build? According to this post, though, if we're human, running is our jam :)

    http://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/discussion/1217573/so-you-want-to-start-running/p1
  • mbaker566
    mbaker566 Posts: 11,233 Member
    I don't think I am because I am still very slow. My perception is runners are 10 min milers
  • ninerbuff
    ninerbuff Posts: 48,974 Member
    I jog slowly. I'm not trying to get under a 10 minute mile, nor plan to compete in any 5-10K. I only jog because so I can get the distance (3 miles) done faster.

    A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition

    9285851.png
  • PeachyCarol
    PeachyCarol Posts: 8,029 Member
    edited October 2015
    I'm just starting. I did C25K week 7 day 1 and jogged 1.8 miles this morning. I'll only ever jog slowly for medical reasons, and my goals are all time-focused in that I want to be able to do it for an hour.

    If I end up jogging faster during that hour and covering more distance in that time? That's cool. If not, I'll just walk the rest of my usual route. Right now, it currently takes me 1:25 to walk it.

    Will I be a runner then? I don't know. I'll be a jogger, I guess.
  • nordlead2005
    nordlead2005 Posts: 1,303 Member
    I'm not a runner, but play ultimate and just jogged for 12 minutes on the treadmill before making pizza for dinner. I don't run for enjoyment, and the only reason I want to run is to do a obstacle course run next summer (sort of as proof I'm fit after being obese), and all of those come with 5-10k distances.

    The runners I do know compete in most of the local runs and some of the big runs (Boston Marathon, etc...). I have no intention of doing any of that. Those are the people I call runners.
  • mommarnurse
    mommarnurse Posts: 515 Member
    moyer566 wrote: »
    I don't think I am because I am still very slow. My perception is runners are 10 min milers

    Why would pace matter at all? If you run at least once per week, I'd say you're a runner. That's like saying you're not a driver because you drive slow. You're still driving.
  • beachhouse758
    beachhouse758 Posts: 371 Member
    I don't really define myself by the exercise that I choose to do. I am a slow-runner/fast-shuffler, but I am not into the running lifestyle (running groups, races, Personal Records, collecting race t-shirts, little number bumper stickers with my prefer distance etc...)
    I also do yoga, but I don't consider myself a yogi/yogini.

    I am not "dedicated" to a certain sport. I just do it, sometimes.

    Just like I wouldn't say "I am a driver" -- I just drive when I have to.
  • 3dogsrunning
    3dogsrunning Posts: 27,167 Member
    I don't really define myself by the exercise that I choose to do. I am a slow-runner/fast-shuffler, but I am not into the running lifestyle (running groups, races, Personal Records, collecting race t-shirts, little number bumper stickers with my prefer distance etc...)
    I also do yoga, but I don't consider myself a yogi/yogini.

    I am not "dedicated" to a certain sport. I just do it, sometimes.

    Just like I wouldn't say "I am a driver" -- I just drive when I have to.

    While I totally believe you are free to identify or not identify as you choose, this isn't an argument that you *should*, I did want to throw out there there are "runners" who are not into racing, PRs, bumper sticker or groups. There is a type of runner that just runs for the sake of running.
    That's not me but there are people out there.
  • beachhouse758
    beachhouse758 Posts: 371 Member
    edited October 2015
    I don't really define myself by the exercise that I choose to do. I am a slow-runner/fast-shuffler, but I am not into the running lifestyle (running groups, races, Personal Records, collecting race t-shirts, little number bumper stickers with my prefer distance etc...)
    I also do yoga, but I don't consider myself a yogi/yogini.

    I am not "dedicated" to a certain sport. I just do it, sometimes.

    Just like I wouldn't say "I am a driver" -- I just drive when I have to.

    While I totally believe you are free to identify or not identify as you choose, this isn't an argument that you *should*, I did want to throw out there there are "runners" who are not into racing, PRs, bumper sticker or groups. There is a type of runner that just runs for the sake of running.
    That's not me but there are people out there.

    I am sure there are runners who are not into what I listed under what I consider to be characteristics of the "runner lifestyle/generalization"

    As I am sure there are just as many people who are into a lot of the "stuff" and then end up doing very little running.

    That's neither here or there. I guess I just don't call myself "a runner" because it is not a huge, defining part of my life.

    I don't have a passion for running, it's more like an inclination.

    Just something to do.

    *shrugs*
  • 3dogsrunning
    3dogsrunning Posts: 27,167 Member
    edited October 2015
    I don't really define myself by the exercise that I choose to do. I am a slow-runner/fast-shuffler, but I am not into the running lifestyle (running groups, races, Personal Records, collecting race t-shirts, little number bumper stickers with my prefer distance etc...)
    I also do yoga, but I don't consider myself a yogi/yogini.

    I am not "dedicated" to a certain sport. I just do it, sometimes.

    Just like I wouldn't say "I am a driver" -- I just drive when I have to.

    While I totally believe you are free to identify or not identify as you choose, this isn't an argument that you *should*, I did want to throw out there there are "runners" who are not into racing, PRs, bumper sticker or groups. There is a type of runner that just runs for the sake of running.
    That's not me but there are people out there.

    I am sure there are runners who are not into what I listed under what I consider to be characteristics of the "runner lifestyle/generalization"

    As I am sure there are just as many people who are into a lot of the "stuff" and then end up doing very little running.

    That's neither here or there. I guess I just don't call myself "a runner" because it is not a huge, defining part of my life.

    I don't have a passion for running, it's more like an inclination.

    Just something to do.

    *shrugs*

    My point wasn't that you should call yourself a runner. I specifically said it's up to you. My point was for others who might be reading this thread that that there are other, almost contradictory, definitions of what a runner is.
  • LoveIshie
    LoveIshie Posts: 94 Member
    :smile:
  • beachhouse758
    beachhouse758 Posts: 371 Member
    edited October 2015
    I don't really define myself by the exercise that I choose to do. I am a slow-runner/fast-shuffler, but I am not into the running lifestyle (running groups, races, Personal Records, collecting race t-shirts, little number bumper stickers with my prefer distance etc...)
    I also do yoga, but I don't consider myself a yogi/yogini.

    I am not "dedicated" to a certain sport. I just do it, sometimes.

    Just like I wouldn't say "I am a driver" -- I just drive when I have to.

    While I totally believe you are free to identify or not identify as you choose, this isn't an argument that you *should*, I did want to throw out there there are "runners" who are not into racing, PRs, bumper sticker or groups. There is a type of runner that just runs for the sake of running.
    That's not me but there are people out there.

    I am sure there are runners who are not into what I listed under what I consider to be characteristics of the "runner lifestyle/generalization"

    As I am sure there are just as many people who are into a lot of the "stuff" and then end up doing very little running.

    That's neither here or there. I guess I just don't call myself "a runner" because it is not a huge, defining part of my life.

    I don't have a passion for running, it's more like an inclination.

    Just something to do.

    *shrugs*

    My point wasn't that you should call yourself a runner. I specifically said it's up to you. My point was for others who might be reading this thread that that there are other, almost contradictory, definitions of what a runner is.

    hmmm, my bad. I was trying to clarify my answer as it pertains to the original question. I wasn't directing my response to you or trying to argue your point (shouldn't have used the quote level thing on my earlier post)
  • AllonsYtotheTardis
    AllonsYtotheTardis Posts: 16,947 Member
    moyer566 wrote: »
    I don't think I am because I am still very slow. My perception is runners are 10 min milers

    that's a misconception.

    If you run - you are a runner.
  • MobyCarp
    MobyCarp Posts: 2,927 Member
    moyer566 wrote: »
    I don't think I am because I am still very slow. My perception is runners are 10 min milers

    I did not consider myself a runner until I was able to run for 30 minutes continually. Why 30 minutes? No reason, it's just the amount of time I got stuck in my head.

    I think it's pretty common for newer runners to have some arbitrary idea of what it is that makes someone "a runner," and not to think of themselves as runners until either they meet that arbitrary standard or they see enough runners that they revise their standard.

    As to the 10 minute mile . . . I know a runner who has never run a 10 minute mile in her life. This has not prevented her from completing multiple marathons, half marathons, and ultras. I might walk and almost keep up with her easy running pace, but she is definitely a runner.
  • segacs
    segacs Posts: 4,599 Member
    I think of a "runner" as someone who runs competitively and seriously. People who train for half-marathons or marathons, people who run daily or regularly, rain or shine, people who time their intervals and splits, people who have all sorts of fancy gear.

    In my mind, I'm not a runner, not really. I started C25K last spring and just ran my first-ever 5k race in September. But I'd never run before that in my life. I only go when the weather's nice and the urge hits. I jog more than run. I don't have fancy gear and I don't worry about my times. And I will do other stuff in the winter 'cause the idea of running indoors on a treadmill bores me to tears. I'd rather ski.

    (FWIW, I do consider myself a skier. But that's probably because I've been skiing for 30 years. I've been running -- sort of -- for 6 months.)
  • dewd2
    dewd2 Posts: 2,445 Member
    I 'became' a runner when I started looking forward to 10 mile runs on Saturday morning. Before that I ran but never really enjoyed it. I wasn't "a runner".
  • ephiemarie
    ephiemarie Posts: 264 Member
    I used to consider myself a runner (sort of...it took almost a year before it didn't feel weird saying it out loud), but then I decided to train for triathlons. I still run 30 miles/week and have a half marathon coming up in a couple weeks, but calling myself a "runner" feels like a partial definition, as would calling myself a "cyclist" or "swimmer."
  • MelodyandBarbells
    MelodyandBarbells Posts: 7,724 Member
    segacs wrote: »
    I think of a "runner" as someone who runs competitively and seriously. People who train for half-marathons or marathons, people who run daily or regularly, rain or shine, people who time their intervals and splits, people who have all sorts of fancy gear.

    In my mind, I'm not a runner, not really. I started C25K last spring and just ran my first-ever 5k race in September. But I'd never run before that in my life. I only go when the weather's nice and the urge hits. I jog more than run. I don't have fancy gear and I don't worry about my times. And I will do other stuff in the winter 'cause the idea of running indoors on a treadmill bores me to tears. I'd rather ski.

    (FWIW, I do consider myself a skier. But that's probably because I've been skiing for 30 years. I've been running -- sort of -- for 6 months.)

    Your post made me think of the Nike "No Games, just Sport" ad in the movie "What Women Want"

    Like "running does not care if you...."

    ... :bigsmile:
  • EllaIsNotEnchanted
    EllaIsNotEnchanted Posts: 226 Member
    edited October 2015
    I hate running, but that's kind of a big deal for obstacle course races (which I looove).
    Because I hate running I let everyone know that I am not a runner...
    however, the marathons, half marathons, 5ks, 10ks, 50ks--all make people assume I'm a runner.

    I would consider myself a runner if I enjoyed running and competing in running events, looked forward to the next PR, not stop bragging about a PR, talked splits amongst other runners, Dreamt that pacing would be a fun job, Read running blogs, Blogged about running, Obsess over certain shoes/socks/watches, donate a crap ton of running shirts because it's overflowing the clothes cabinet.
  • annekka
    annekka Posts: 517 Member
    In my mind you are a runner if you go out there and run for any reason voluntarily. Now if you're just running away as fast as you can from a zombie apocalypse then I'd say 'no'. Why limit those who can call themselves runners to certain standards? You may be an avid-runner, or a 'if I feel like it I'll go for a run runner' or a 'if I ran any slower I'd be crawling runner' or a 'I'm just happy I can run for 10 seconds without dying runner' or a 'so fast you're an Olympian runner'. But regardless you're a runner.

    I've always felt that running has less restrictions on the usage of the term than say some other careers would have. But that's me, and there's plenty of people who would argue that I'm full of it.
  • Leyshinka
    Leyshinka Posts: 54 Member
    annekka wrote: »
    In my mind you are a runner if you go out there and run for any reason voluntarily. Now if you're just running away as fast as you can from a zombie apocalypse then I'd say 'no'. Why limit those who can call themselves runners to certain standards? You may be an avid-runner, or a 'if I feel like it I'll go for a run runner' or a 'if I ran any slower I'd be crawling runner' or a 'I'm just happy I can run for 10 seconds without dying runner' or a 'so fast you're an Olympian runner'. But regardless you're a runner.

    I've always felt that running has less restrictions on the usage of the term than say some other careers would have. But that's me, and there's plenty of people who would argue that I'm full of it.

    This is how I see it too..
  • EvgeniZyntx
    EvgeniZyntx Posts: 24,208 Member
    edited October 2015
    Personally, although I do run, I do not consider myself or describe myself a runner - I've never organised my life around the sport and it is an activity that I use to feed other activity - i'm interested in running as complement to activity in such a way that I might even complete things like tri's, etc and still would not consider myself a runner. My physiology, attitude, weight, speed and attention for this sport are not dedicated, nor have they ever been to serious level. I life weights but I'm not a weight-lifter. I climb and but don't call myself a climber. I reserve these monikers for people with aptitude or attitude or perseverance to levels beyond my own. I would call myself a cyclist (on a good day or in my heyday) and differentiate how I look at running vs. how I look at cycling.

    Probably the attitude I have about the sport creates a minor barrier to how much I practice it - surely if I embraced it more, I'd practice it more - chicken and egg problem.

    But, since it will likely never be my primary focus, I'm pretty ok just saying "I run" rather than "I'm a runner".

    edit: how other people describe themselves is their own business. If you run slower than me, less than me and still call yourself a "runner" - that's great! I have zero cares in the world on how the term is personally used.
  • mbaker566
    mbaker566 Posts: 11,233 Member
    I don't really define myself by the exercise that I choose to do. I am a slow-runner/fast-shuffler, but I am not into the running lifestyle (running groups, races, Personal Records, collecting race t-shirts, little number bumper stickers with my prefer distance etc...)
    I also do yoga, but I don't consider myself a yogi/yogini.

    I am not "dedicated" to a certain sport. I just do it, sometimes.

    Just like I wouldn't say "I am a driver" -- I just drive when I have to.

    thats pretty much how i feel. I mean i am specific in the activities that i do but i don't take them super serious. It's just stuff i do.
  • patrikc333
    patrikc333 Posts: 436 Member
    I think people underestimate their efforts

    people become runners as soon as they go out and start to move their legs, despite the pace or distance

    obviously commitment is needed, if you get out once a month the situation is different

    on the contrary, maybe this is just my experience, but people tend to forget how hard is to get out 2-3-4-5 days a week and run, just because you got used to it
  • McCloud33
    McCloud33 Posts: 959 Member
    I think a lot of people look at it much like they would a carpenter/chef/mechanic. Just because I can nail two boards together doesn't make me a carpenter...just because I can cook dinner doesn't make me a chef...and just because I can change the oil/headlights on my car doesn't make me a mechanic.

    There are all sorts of things in life that we do that doesn't mean we're proficient in. That's why a lot of people will say "I run" but not "I'm a runner".
  • lporter229
    lporter229 Posts: 4,907 Member
    McCloud33 wrote: »
    I think a lot of people look at it much like they would a carpenter/chef/mechanic. Just because I can nail two boards together doesn't make me a carpenter...just because I can cook dinner doesn't make me a chef...and just because I can change the oil/headlights on my car doesn't make me a mechanic.

    There are all sorts of things in life that we do that doesn't mean we're proficient in. That's why a lot of people will say "I run" but not "I'm a runner".

    This is a good post. I am not sure why this " I am not a runner" mindset exists, but it does. I have been running consistently for over 17 years. I have run numerous HMs, and several marathons. I have run a sub 4 hour marathon. I have been averaging between 40-60 miles per week this year. I plan to attempt to qualify for the Boston marathon next weekend. Most of my free time is spent either running, reading about running or thinking about running. People refer to me as a runner all the time and that's okay. But I still find it uncomfortable to refer to myself as a runner.
  • Leyshinka
    Leyshinka Posts: 54 Member
    McCloud33 wrote: »
    I think a lot of people look at it much like they would a carpenter/chef/mechanic. Just because I can nail two boards together doesn't make me a carpenter...just because I can cook dinner doesn't make me a chef...and just because I can change the oil/headlights on my car doesn't make me a mechanic.

    There are all sorts of things in life that we do that doesn't mean we're proficient in. That's why a lot of people will say "I run" but not "I'm a runner".


    Fair enough! Makes sense when viewed this way...
  • GillianLF
    GillianLF Posts: 410 Member
    I think I'd be one of those.

    I run 5k in just under 29 minutes. I run 2-3 times a week. I don't call myself a runner at the moment because I used to be a runner and for me there is a difference. I used to be able to just head off for a 2 hour run and I'd feel amazing for it. I'm struggling to build up my running fitness. Its slow work. I run but I'm not a runner, not yet. When I am running fit and can do 10k in under an hour again I'll then be a runner.

    If I never get that back at least I'll be fit with running as part of my fitness programme. Sure I have a Garmin Forerunner and wont wear it until I'm "a runner" again. Silly I know.
  • segacs
    segacs Posts: 4,599 Member
    JaneiR36 wrote: »
    Your post made me think of the Nike "No Games, just Sport" ad in the movie "What Women Want"

    Like "running does not care if you...."

    ... :bigsmile:

    Hehe, yeah, I actually quite like that movie, despite having a hard time watching anything with Mel Gibson in it without wanting to smash the television set. The ad campaign they created in the movie was one of the better fictional ones I've seen, and that includes everything they did on Mad Men.

    (I work in advertising, by the way.)