My take on refeeds
pinggolfer96
Posts: 2,248 Member
so many people have questions about refeeds and when to do them/ how to do them/ how much to eat/ macro breakdown...etc. here is my take and tips: if you are overweight, you may not need a refeed for some time. Don't make it an excuse to cheat. If weight stalls, it may by be a refeed you need, but to reduce calories or increase energy expenditure. Refeeds are optimal once you get in that low body fat range and leptin is low, as well as overall energy and performance levels. If you have hit that point and a refeed is necessary, here is my take: track your weight, perform your refeed going low fat, high carb, moderate (or lower) protein than usual. Increase cals to maintenance or slightly above. After the day of your refeed you maybe be heavier or lighter. go back to your deficit of calories for the week and if you weigh less than you did before your refeed 3-4 maybe 5 days later, then that is a good sign. If you're 1-2lbs lighter by the next week and feeling a lack of energy, take another refeed. If you are progressively losing weight after your refeed, then keep on performing the STRUCTURED refeeds. If your weight stays stagnant or increases, cut out the refeed and reduce the calories in your overall deficit. Sometimes we look at refeed as an excuse to cheat/ binge, or can potentially lead to a binge. So in conclusion, refeed when in low body fat, if weight doesn't drop after refeeds then it's time to burn or reduce calories, if you feel the need for a mental break from dieting, just fit it into your daily calories. Remember it's life, we need to live a little and enjoy ourselves, but don't go crazy ruining your deficit. If you have any other questions, you can ask me or leave a comment(:
0
Replies
-
pinggolfer96 wrote: »If you have any other questions, you can ask me or leave a comment(:
What's your take on paragraphs?-1 -
my coach has had me doing a refeed once a week since i started with him almost 6 months ago and it hasn't hindered any of my progress whatsoever.. and yes, i am/was OVERWEIGHT. a refeed isn't a cheat day at all - i think this is where people get confused. i get an additional 80g of carbs compared to regular training days which i am supposed to utilize for lower body training. plus my fat and protein go down a little for the day.0
-
my coach has had me doing a refeed once a week since i started with him almost 6 months ago and it hasn't hindered any of my progress whatsoever.. and yes, i am/was OVERWEIGHT. a refeed isn't a cheat day at all - i think this is where people get confused. i get an additional 80g of carbs compared to regular training days which i am supposed to utilize for lower body training. plus my fat and protein go down a little for the day.
Sounds like you are on some low carb thing. I don't think that's what the OP is talking about.0 -
pinggolfer96 wrote: »If you have any other questions, you can ask me or leave a comment(:
What's your take on paragraphs?
Probably a little different if this was a forum on writing/ english/ literature...etc. good thing it's a fitness forum and not a test.... I don't remember hearing of a paragraph in a gym or in my food...
0 -
pinggolfer96 wrote: »pinggolfer96 wrote: »If you have any other questions, you can ask me or leave a comment(:
What's your take on paragraphs?
Probably a little different if this was a forum on writing/ english/ literature...etc. good thing it's a fitness forum and not a test.... I don't remember hearing of a paragraph in a gym or in my food...
So readability is very low on your priority list when composing a post you want people to read.....unless you're specifically posting in writing/literature forums.
Got it and I Appreciate your honest answer. Carry on.0 -
pinggolfer96 wrote: »pinggolfer96 wrote: »If you have any other questions, you can ask me or leave a comment(:
What's your take on paragraphs?
Probably a little different if this was a forum on writing/ english/ literature...etc. good thing it's a fitness forum and not a test.... I don't remember hearing of a paragraph in a gym or in my food...
So readability is very low on your priority list when composing a post you want people to read.....unless you're specifically posting in writing/literature forums.
Got it and I Appreciate your honest answer. Carry on.
Readability is a priority.....on the other hand proper format and structure isn't my focus on a post where I am trying to help people. The fact some people have the disrespect to comment on someone's format on a fitness related post is kind of ridiculous. I'm sorry if I offended you for not having perfect format and structure. It's a forum post....if you have an negative statement on my topic or varying view, then go ahead and post it, but if you're going to ridicule my format....then just keep it to yourself instead of the arrogance/ rudeness?0 -
My body fat is low and roughly around 8-9% at the minute so I like to have a refeed as and when I need one which is usually once every 1-2 weeks.
I only have one when I'm feeling carb depleted and I need the surplus energy to aid my training0 -
Kie_Hughes wrote: »My body fat is low and roughly around 8-9% at the minute so I like to have a refeed as and when I need one which is usually once every 1-2 weeks.
I only have one when I'm feeling carb depleted and I need the surplus energy to aid my training
Completely agree!
0 -
Oh mighty low body fat people, what is a "refeed"? I don't think you mean what I think it means.0
-
pinggolfer96 wrote: »pinggolfer96 wrote: »pinggolfer96 wrote: »If you have any other questions, you can ask me or leave a comment(:
What's your take on paragraphs?
Probably a little different if this was a forum on writing/ english/ literature...etc. good thing it's a fitness forum and not a test.... I don't remember hearing of a paragraph in a gym or in my food...
So readability is very low on your priority list when composing a post you want people to read.....unless you're specifically posting in writing/literature forums.
Got it and I Appreciate your honest answer. Carry on.
Readability is a priority.....on the other hand proper format and structure isn't my focus on a post where I am trying to help people. The fact some people have the disrespect to comment on someone's format on a fitness related post is kind of ridiculous. I'm sorry if I offended you for not having perfect format and structure. It's a forum post....if you have an negative statement on my topic or varying view, then go ahead and post it, but if you're going to ridicule my format....then just keep it to yourself instead of the arrogance/ rudeness?
TL;DR-1 -
pinggolfer96 wrote: »If weight stalls, it may by be a refeed you need
I'm trying to follow but I don't understand what this means. The refeed causes my weight to stall or I need one? This isn't clear.
0 -
JeromeBarry1 wrote: »Oh mighty low body fat people, what is a "refeed"? I don't think you mean what I think it means.
I always thought "refeed" was just a fancy term for cheat/eating at maintenance day.0 -
JeromeBarry1 wrote: »Oh mighty low body fat people, what is a "refeed"? I don't think you mean what I think it means.
I always thought "refeed" was just a fancy term for cheat/eating at maintenance day.
Whatever it is, only people with low body fat deserve one.
Or at least that's how far I got before I was crushed by the wall of text.0 -
jofjltncb6 wrote: »JeromeBarry1 wrote: »Oh mighty low body fat people, what is a "refeed"? I don't think you mean what I think it means.
I always thought "refeed" was just a fancy term for cheat/eating at maintenance day.
Whatever it is, only people with low body fat deserve one.
Or at least that's how far I got before I was crushed by the wall of text.
Need*
I never said anything about deserve. I said it's not necessary if you're overweight as you still have body fat to lose.0 -
pinggolfer96 wrote: »jofjltncb6 wrote: »JeromeBarry1 wrote: »Oh mighty low body fat people, what is a "refeed"? I don't think you mean what I think it means.
I always thought "refeed" was just a fancy term for cheat/eating at maintenance day.
Whatever it is, only people with low body fat deserve one.
Or at least that's how far I got before I was crushed by the wall of text.
Need*
I never said anything about deserve. I said it's not necessary if you're overweight as you still have body fat to lose.
On that particular note, you said...
Refeeds are optimal once you get in that low body fat range and leptin is low,
Seems vague. How are you defining low body fat range? How do I measure if my leptin is low?0 -
pinggolfer96 wrote: »jofjltncb6 wrote: »JeromeBarry1 wrote: »Oh mighty low body fat people, what is a "refeed"? I don't think you mean what I think it means.
I always thought "refeed" was just a fancy term for cheat/eating at maintenance day.
Whatever it is, only people with low body fat deserve one.
Or at least that's how far I got before I was crushed by the wall of text.
Need*
I never said anything about deserve. I said it's not necessary if you're overweight as you still have body fat to lose.
So people at higher weight and/or above single-digit BF% don't ever suffer from lowered leptin levels and/or metabolic downregulation due to prolonged caloric deficits?
And FWIW, I agree that the OP was difficult to read.0 -
pinggolfer96 wrote: »pinggolfer96 wrote: »pinggolfer96 wrote: »If you have any other questions, you can ask me or leave a comment(:
What's your take on paragraphs?
Probably a little different if this was a forum on writing/ english/ literature...etc. good thing it's a fitness forum and not a test.... I don't remember hearing of a paragraph in a gym or in my food...
So readability is very low on your priority list when composing a post you want people to read.....unless you're specifically posting in writing/literature forums.
Got it and I Appreciate your honest answer. Carry on.
Readability is a priority.....on the other hand proper format and structure isn't my focus on a post where I am trying to help people. The fact some people have the disrespect to comment on someone's format on a fitness related post is kind of ridiculous. I'm sorry if I offended you for not having perfect format and structure. It's a forum post....if you have an negative statement on my topic or varying view, then go ahead and post it, but if you're going to ridicule my format....then just keep it to yourself instead of the arrogance/ rudeness?
Well there's the fact that I didn't actually read your whole post initially because it may actually hurt me to hate so many issues at once. I may not be the only one.
Your post is nice and all, but if you want to be taken seriously you write properly and format your information in an appropriate way. You lashing out rather than accepting, "yep, I may be trying to present intelligent information but it looks like a very unintelligent person wrote it!" isn't a great quality either.
If you want to be taken seriously and intelligently, organize your information. Being all over the place made your post very confusing and I'd have to go back and take notes to be able to walk away with any use able information. It honestly made me sit and wonder "What makes this person qualified to be giving out any kind of information at all?"
Organization is a friend not a foe.0 -
pinggolfer96 wrote: »jofjltncb6 wrote: »JeromeBarry1 wrote: »Oh mighty low body fat people, what is a "refeed"? I don't think you mean what I think it means.
I always thought "refeed" was just a fancy term for cheat/eating at maintenance day.
Whatever it is, only people with low body fat deserve one.
Or at least that's how far I got before I was crushed by the wall of text.
Need*
I never said anything about deserve. I said it's not necessary if you're overweight as you still have body fat to lose.
So people at higher weight and/or above single-digit BF% don't ever suffer from lowered leptin levels and/or metabolic downregulation due to prolonged caloric deficits?
And FWIW, I agree that the OP was difficult to read.
Most of the time lowered leptin is a result of low body fat. Metabolic adaptation may be present, but that is when calories need to be reduced, not a structured refeed. I never said single digit body fat btw, but if you have someone starting at 35% bodyfat, and are in a prolonged deficit and still at 25%, they still have energy stores to diminish before they need to/ should incorporate a refeed. I'm all for bringing calories up to maintencase to enjoy yourself or even further or maybe have a cheat meal, but I put my take on a proper structured refeed.0 -
pinggolfer96 wrote: »pinggolfer96 wrote: »pinggolfer96 wrote: »If you have any other questions, you can ask me or leave a comment(:
What's your take on paragraphs?
Probably a little different if this was a forum on writing/ english/ literature...etc. good thing it's a fitness forum and not a test.... I don't remember hearing of a paragraph in a gym or in my food...
So readability is very low on your priority list when composing a post you want people to read.....unless you're specifically posting in writing/literature forums.
Got it and I Appreciate your honest answer. Carry on.
Readability is a priority.....on the other hand proper format and structure isn't my focus on a post where I am trying to help people. The fact some people have the disrespect to comment on someone's format on a fitness related post is kind of ridiculous. I'm sorry if I offended you for not having perfect format and structure. It's a forum post....if you have an negative statement on my topic or varying view, then go ahead and post it, but if you're going to ridicule my format....then just keep it to yourself instead of the arrogance/ rudeness?
Well there's the fact that I didn't actually read your whole post initially because it may actually hurt me to hate so many issues at once. I may not be the only one.
Your post is nice and all, but if you want to be taken seriously you write properly and format your information in an appropriate way. You lashing out rather than accepting, "yep, I may be trying to present intelligent information but it looks like a very unintelligent person wrote it!" isn't a great quality either.
If you want to be taken seriously and intelligently, organize your information. Being all over the place made your post very confusing and I'd have to go back and take notes to be able to walk away with any use able information. It honestly made me sit and wonder "What makes this person qualified to be giving out any kind of information at all?"
Organization is a friend not a foe.
Y SO MUCH ARROGANT RUDENESS?0 -
pinggolfer96 wrote: »pinggolfer96 wrote: »jofjltncb6 wrote: »JeromeBarry1 wrote: »Oh mighty low body fat people, what is a "refeed"? I don't think you mean what I think it means.
I always thought "refeed" was just a fancy term for cheat/eating at maintenance day.
Whatever it is, only people with low body fat deserve one.
Or at least that's how far I got before I was crushed by the wall of text.
Need*
I never said anything about deserve. I said it's not necessary if you're overweight as you still have body fat to lose.
So people at higher weight and/or above single-digit BF% don't ever suffer from lowered leptin levels and/or metabolic downregulation due to prolonged caloric deficits?
And FWIW, I agree that the OP was difficult to read.
Most of the time lowered leptin is a result of low body fat. Metabolic adaptation may be present, but that is when calories need to be reduced, not a structured refeed. I never said single digit body fat btw, but if you have someone starting at 35% bodyfat, and are in a prolonged deficit and still at 25%, they still have energy stores to diminish before they need to/ should incorporate a refeed. I'm all for bringing calories up to maintencase to enjoy yourself or even further or maybe have a cheat meal, but I put my take on a proper structured refeed.
You never stated *any* body fat range or specific number. What is the magical number below whence a person will benefit from a refeed?
Also, what's the difference between a "proper structured refeed" and a "refeed"?0 -
Agree that leaner people need more frequent refeeds/ diet breaks but they also have a role for fatter people and those with a lot to lose or people dieting for extended periods.
Feedback - think you are focussing on a small niche so General Diet and Weight Loss maybe not a great place for this. Your use of "binge", "excuse" and "cheat" doesn't come across at all well, very judgemental.0 -
pinggolfer96 wrote: »pinggolfer96 wrote: »jofjltncb6 wrote: »JeromeBarry1 wrote: »Oh mighty low body fat people, what is a "refeed"? I don't think you mean what I think it means.
I always thought "refeed" was just a fancy term for cheat/eating at maintenance day.
Whatever it is, only people with low body fat deserve one.
Or at least that's how far I got before I was crushed by the wall of text.
Need*
I never said anything about deserve. I said it's not necessary if you're overweight as you still have body fat to lose.
So people at higher weight and/or above single-digit BF% don't ever suffer from lowered leptin levels and/or metabolic downregulation due to prolonged caloric deficits?
And FWIW, I agree that the OP was difficult to read.
Most of the time lowered leptin is a result of low body fat. Metabolic adaptation may be present, but that is when calories need to be reduced, not a structured refeed. I never said single digit body fat btw, but if you have someone starting at 35% bodyfat, and are in a prolonged deficit and still at 25%, they still have energy stores to diminish before they need to/ should incorporate a refeed. I'm all for bringing calories up to maintencase to enjoy yourself or even further or maybe have a cheat meal, but I put my take on a proper structured refeed.
You never stated *any* body fat range or specific number. What is the magical number below whence a person will benefit from a refeed?
Also, what's the difference between a "proper structured refeed" and a "refeed"?
Propriety and structure.0 -
pinggolfer96 wrote: »pinggolfer96 wrote: »jofjltncb6 wrote: »JeromeBarry1 wrote: »Oh mighty low body fat people, what is a "refeed"? I don't think you mean what I think it means.
I always thought "refeed" was just a fancy term for cheat/eating at maintenance day.
Whatever it is, only people with low body fat deserve one.
Or at least that's how far I got before I was crushed by the wall of text.
Need*
I never said anything about deserve. I said it's not necessary if you're overweight as you still have body fat to lose.
So people at higher weight and/or above single-digit BF% don't ever suffer from lowered leptin levels and/or metabolic downregulation due to prolonged caloric deficits?
And FWIW, I agree that the OP was difficult to read.
Most of the time lowered leptin is a result of low body fat. Metabolic adaptation may be present, but that is when calories need to be reduced, not a structured refeed. I never said single digit body fat btw, but if you have someone starting at 35% bodyfat, and are in a prolonged deficit and still at 25%, they still have energy stores to diminish before they need to/ should incorporate a refeed. I'm all for bringing calories up to maintencase to enjoy yourself or even further or maybe have a cheat meal, but I put my take on a proper structured refeed.
So what's the difference between a "refeed" and a "cheat day"? We high BF% people would like to know.0 -
pinggolfer96 wrote: »pinggolfer96 wrote: »jofjltncb6 wrote: »JeromeBarry1 wrote: »Oh mighty low body fat people, what is a "refeed"? I don't think you mean what I think it means.
I always thought "refeed" was just a fancy term for cheat/eating at maintenance day.
Whatever it is, only people with low body fat deserve one.
Or at least that's how far I got before I was crushed by the wall of text.
Need*
I never said anything about deserve. I said it's not necessary if you're overweight as you still have body fat to lose.
So people at higher weight and/or above single-digit BF% don't ever suffer from lowered leptin levels and/or metabolic downregulation due to prolonged caloric deficits?
And FWIW, I agree that the OP was difficult to read.
Most of the time lowered leptin is a result of low body fat. Metabolic adaptation may be present, but that is when calories need to be reduced, not a structured refeed. I never said single digit body fat btw, but if you have someone starting at 35% bodyfat, and are in a prolonged deficit and still at 25%, they still have energy stores to diminish before they need to/ should incorporate a refeed. I'm all for bringing calories up to maintencase to enjoy yourself or even further or maybe have a cheat meal, but I put my take on a proper structured refeed.
So what's the difference between a "refeed" and a "cheat day"? We high BF% people would like to know.
Refeed: reaching macro/ calorie goals usually pertaining to a low fat/ high carb day to increase leptin/ energy levels.
Cheat day: whatever the h*ll you want it to be. a cheat day to ME is not tracking/caring/ thinking about numbers or restriction. Enjoying myself. Not using a food scale or worrying about the macro composition of every meal.
You're also assuming I'm calling out higher bodyfat people? I just stated its not necessary at higher bodyfat levels as it is towards those cutting down to lean phase. 10...maybe 12% and under. No one has to listen to me, you can diet how you want, I did say MY take on the forum...so I just listed my stance.0 -
pinggolfer96 wrote: »pinggolfer96 wrote: »pinggolfer96 wrote: »jofjltncb6 wrote: »JeromeBarry1 wrote: »Oh mighty low body fat people, what is a "refeed"? I don't think you mean what I think it means.
I always thought "refeed" was just a fancy term for cheat/eating at maintenance day.
Whatever it is, only people with low body fat deserve one.
Or at least that's how far I got before I was crushed by the wall of text.
Need*
I never said anything about deserve. I said it's not necessary if you're overweight as you still have body fat to lose.
So people at higher weight and/or above single-digit BF% don't ever suffer from lowered leptin levels and/or metabolic downregulation due to prolonged caloric deficits?
And FWIW, I agree that the OP was difficult to read.
Most of the time lowered leptin is a result of low body fat. Metabolic adaptation may be present, but that is when calories need to be reduced, not a structured refeed. I never said single digit body fat btw, but if you have someone starting at 35% bodyfat, and are in a prolonged deficit and still at 25%, they still have energy stores to diminish before they need to/ should incorporate a refeed. I'm all for bringing calories up to maintencase to enjoy yourself or even further or maybe have a cheat meal, but I put my take on a proper structured refeed.
So what's the difference between a "refeed" and a "cheat day"? We high BF% people would like to know.
Refeed: reaching macro/ calorie goals usually pertaining to a low fat/ high carb day to increase leptin/ energy levels.
Cheat day: whatever the h*ll you want it to be. a cheat day to ME is not tracking/caring/ thinking about numbers or restriction. Enjoying myself. Not using a food scale or worrying about the macro composition of every meal.
You're also assuming I'm calling out higher bodyfat people? I just stated its not necessary at higher bodyfat levels as it is towards those cutting down to lean phase. 10...maybe 12% and under. No one has to listen to me, you can diet how you want, I did say MY take on the forum...so I just listed my stance.
So will a cheat day (using your definition) not increase leptin/energy levels?0 -
pinggolfer96 wrote: »pinggolfer96 wrote: »pinggolfer96 wrote: »If you have any other questions, you can ask me or leave a comment(:
What's your take on paragraphs?
Probably a little different if this was a forum on writing/ english/ literature...etc. good thing it's a fitness forum and not a test.... I don't remember hearing of a paragraph in a gym or in my food...
So readability is very low on your priority list when composing a post you want people to read.....unless you're specifically posting in writing/literature forums.
Got it and I Appreciate your honest answer. Carry on.
Readability is a priority.....on the other hand proper format and structure isn't my focus on a post where I am trying to help people. The fact some people have the disrespect to comment on someone's format on a fitness related post is kind of ridiculous. I'm sorry if I offended you for not having perfect format and structure. It's a forum post....if you have an negative statement on my topic or varying view, then go ahead and post it, but if you're going to ridicule my format....then just keep it to yourself instead of the arrogance/ rudeness?
Well there's the fact that I didn't actually read your whole post initially because it may actually hurt me to hate so many issues at once. I may not be the only one.
Your post is nice and all, but if you want to be taken seriously you write properly and format your information in an appropriate way. You lashing out rather than accepting, "yep, I may be trying to present intelligent information but it looks like a very unintelligent person wrote it!" isn't a great quality either.
If you want to be taken seriously and intelligently, organize your information. Being all over the place made your post very confusing and I'd have to go back and take notes to be able to walk away with any use able information. It honestly made me sit and wonder "What makes this person qualified to be giving out any kind of information at all?"
Organization is a friend not a foe.
I really can't praise white space enough. I feel like in the age of twitter and short attention spans, it's more important than ever.
I almost always scroll past walls of text.0 -
OP, you should be happy to know the overlord of integrity, virtue and medical knowledge <<cough, cough>> (sorry that was a bit difficult to swallow) Dr. Oz agrees with you:
http://www.doctoroz.com/article/leptin-resistance-fact-sheet0 -
pinggolfer96 wrote: »pinggolfer96 wrote: »pinggolfer96 wrote: »jofjltncb6 wrote: »JeromeBarry1 wrote: »Oh mighty low body fat people, what is a "refeed"? I don't think you mean what I think it means.
I always thought "refeed" was just a fancy term for cheat/eating at maintenance day.
Whatever it is, only people with low body fat deserve one.
Or at least that's how far I got before I was crushed by the wall of text.
Need*
I never said anything about deserve. I said it's not necessary if you're overweight as you still have body fat to lose.
So people at higher weight and/or above single-digit BF% don't ever suffer from lowered leptin levels and/or metabolic downregulation due to prolonged caloric deficits?
And FWIW, I agree that the OP was difficult to read.
Most of the time lowered leptin is a result of low body fat. Metabolic adaptation may be present, but that is when calories need to be reduced, not a structured refeed. I never said single digit body fat btw, but if you have someone starting at 35% bodyfat, and are in a prolonged deficit and still at 25%, they still have energy stores to diminish before they need to/ should incorporate a refeed. I'm all for bringing calories up to maintencase to enjoy yourself or even further or maybe have a cheat meal, but I put my take on a proper structured refeed.
So what's the difference between a "refeed" and a "cheat day"? We high BF% people would like to know.
Refeed: reaching macro/ calorie goals usually pertaining to a low fat/ high carb day to increase leptin/ energy levels.
Cheat day: whatever the h*ll you want it to be. a cheat day to ME is not tracking/caring/ thinking about numbers or restriction. Enjoying myself. Not using a food scale or worrying about the macro composition of every meal.
You're also assuming I'm calling out higher bodyfat people? I just stated its not necessary at higher bodyfat levels as it is towards those cutting down to lean phase. 10...maybe 12% and under. No one has to listen to me, you can diet how you want, I did say MY take on the forum...so I just listed my stance.
So will a cheat day (using your definition) not increase leptin/energy levels?
It can, but focusing and knowing you're going higher carb, lower fat, you will have a greater effect on leptin0 -
pinggolfer96 wrote: »pinggolfer96 wrote: »pinggolfer96 wrote: »pinggolfer96 wrote: »jofjltncb6 wrote: »JeromeBarry1 wrote: »Oh mighty low body fat people, what is a "refeed"? I don't think you mean what I think it means.
I always thought "refeed" was just a fancy term for cheat/eating at maintenance day.
Whatever it is, only people with low body fat deserve one.
Or at least that's how far I got before I was crushed by the wall of text.
Need*
I never said anything about deserve. I said it's not necessary if you're overweight as you still have body fat to lose.
So people at higher weight and/or above single-digit BF% don't ever suffer from lowered leptin levels and/or metabolic downregulation due to prolonged caloric deficits?
And FWIW, I agree that the OP was difficult to read.
Most of the time lowered leptin is a result of low body fat. Metabolic adaptation may be present, but that is when calories need to be reduced, not a structured refeed. I never said single digit body fat btw, but if you have someone starting at 35% bodyfat, and are in a prolonged deficit and still at 25%, they still have energy stores to diminish before they need to/ should incorporate a refeed. I'm all for bringing calories up to maintencase to enjoy yourself or even further or maybe have a cheat meal, but I put my take on a proper structured refeed.
So what's the difference between a "refeed" and a "cheat day"? We high BF% people would like to know.
Refeed: reaching macro/ calorie goals usually pertaining to a low fat/ high carb day to increase leptin/ energy levels.
Cheat day: whatever the h*ll you want it to be. a cheat day to ME is not tracking/caring/ thinking about numbers or restriction. Enjoying myself. Not using a food scale or worrying about the macro composition of every meal.
You're also assuming I'm calling out higher bodyfat people? I just stated its not necessary at higher bodyfat levels as it is towards those cutting down to lean phase. 10...maybe 12% and under. No one has to listen to me, you can diet how you want, I did say MY take on the forum...so I just listed my stance.
So will a cheat day (using your definition) not increase leptin/energy levels?
It can, but focusing and knowing you're going higher carb, lower fat, you will have a greater effect on leptin
Focusing and knowing while eating will have a greater effect on leptin than if I'm not focusing and knowing while eating?
0 -
A 19 year old who writes like an 11 year old. Surely this is an well thought-out and informative post. I'll just go ahead and ...oh no!
-1
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 426 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions