Rather specific question regarding calories.

jmidd97
jmidd97 Posts: 84 Member
edited December 1 in Health and Weight Loss
Hi everyone,

I just have a quick question regarding required calories for today. I'm an 18 year old 5'4" female (119 lbs), and I have my activity level set at Active, due to doing martial arts, swimming and a lot of walking at uni. This gives me 1590 calories a day. Today was a strange day however, and I'm confused about how my calories should be adjusted for it: I went to work, which involved 7 hours of standing (not really walking, pretty stationary). There was also some lifting of 16kg boxes, about one every 5 minutes.
Should I keep to 1590 today? Or decrease it? My 1590 is for losing 1lb a week, BTW.

Thanks in advance, hope this isn't a silly question.
«1

Replies

  • flower8330
    flower8330 Posts: 7 Member
    You can go into the mfp settings and change your activity level or goal and it will show you the different calorie goals. This helped me when I went over by a few calories to understand how much "cushion" there really was
  • CharlieBeansmomTracey
    CharlieBeansmomTracey Posts: 7,682 Member
    you are already at a healthy weight,why do you want to lose weight?
  • Lounmoun
    Lounmoun Posts: 8,423 Member
    I would just keep it at 1590 if it is one day.
    At your height and weight losing .5lb a week would be a more appropriate goal.
  • jmidd97
    jmidd97 Posts: 84 Member
    Thanks for your quick replies!
    CharlieBeansmomTracey: I'm losing because despite being a healthy weight, I store a lot of fat on my hips, thighs and stomach, which I really want to be rid of.

    Thanks Lounmoun, that makes sense. Didn't realise it should be .5; now I'm not so unhappy about not losing anything last week.
  • Francl27
    Francl27 Posts: 26,371 Member
    Get some help. You don't need to lose any weight.
  • Sued0nim
    Sued0nim Posts: 17,456 Member
    jmidd97 wrote: »
    Hi everyone,

    I just have a quick question regarding required calories for today. I'm an 18 year old 5'4" female (119 lbs), and I have my activity level set at Active, due to doing martial arts, swimming and a lot of walking at uni. This gives me 1590 calories a day. Today was a strange day however, and I'm confused about how my calories should be adjusted for it: I went to work, which involved 7 hours of standing (not really walking, pretty stationary). There was also some lifting of 16kg boxes, about one every 5 minutes.
    Should I keep to 1590 today? Or decrease it? My 1590 is for losing 1lb a week, BTW.

    Thanks in advance, hope this isn't a silly question.

    So if you're set to active on MFP that's supposed to exclude purposeful exercise

    Are you active (hitting 7500 steps or more) just from walking at uni? and then your basic calories are 1590 and then you add the calories from martial arts and swimming (recommend half the MFP database allowance) and eat those too

    But as a one off on this day no - eat to your 1590 .. you'll be fine
  • CharlieBeansmomTracey
    CharlieBeansmomTracey Posts: 7,682 Member
    Xxlune wrote: »
    What is up with people suggesting someone needs help when you're at a healthy weight and want to lose weight?

    A healthy weight range can be up to 10kg or bigger.. If this person wants to lose weight and isn't underweight, they can.

    I could probably drop below my healthy range based on BMI, because I don't have much muscle mass at all, which would make me heavier.

    Don't judge someone who is at a healthy weight. They might need to lose weight more than someone who is over.

    muscle mass if you have enough of it will make you heavier but you will be healthier and stronger. you dont want to lose lean muscle,that can cause health problems itself and once you lose it its almost impossible to get it back.how do you know how much muscle mass you have and why would you not want to have decent muscle mass? its what helps us move easily,without decent muscle you will have a hard time to get around.muscle loss/wasting is nothing to sneeze at.
  • janejellyroll
    janejellyroll Posts: 25,763 Member
    Francl27 wrote: »
    Get some help. You don't need to lose any weight.

    It's okay to want to be in a lower part of the healthy BMI range. I myself kept losing weight after I hit "healthy," just because I thought I could look better. It's okay for someone who doesn't *need* to lose weight to want to be lighter. People can have appearance goals as well as health goals.
  • Yes it's a strange world for a young woman. Thin bodies are glorified but if you aspire to one then you "need help". I am also a healthy weight. I have never been overweight or underweight. However it makes a huge difference in the way you feel about yourself to be at the heavy end of your healthy bmi or the light end. Do what makes you feel good and stay healthy. I agree though that .5 lb loss a week is a more practical goal (the one I have set for myself).
  • LazSommer
    LazSommer Posts: 1,851 Member
    edited April 2016
    synacious wrote: »
    Francl27 wrote: »
    Get some help. You don't need to lose any weight.

    Sorry, but what the hell is this comment? Not everyone aspires to be at the top of their BMI range. I'm 5'3" and right now I weigh 113 pounds and I'm in the process of cutting off five pounds after coming off a bulk. When I'm done, I'll still be in a healthy weight range for my height.

    Overall the forums here are useful, but it's over the top comments like these that test my patience. I've seen people advocate for others to stay higher on the BMI scale if they feel comfortable, yet if someone feels comfortable at the lower end they need help? I don't think so. BMI isn't everything but sheesh. People have fitness goals other than going from obese or overweight to a normal weight. A 5'4", 95 pound person needs to get help, not the OP.

    People tend to feel unnecessarily defensive when someone is more successful than they are, but still wants to push themself. We are in a society that is slowly trying to lower the bar so we can feel better about our own mediocrity.
  • Afura
    Afura Posts: 2,054 Member
    LazSommer wrote: »
    synacious wrote: »
    Francl27 wrote: »
    Get some help. You don't need to lose any weight.

    Sorry, but what the hell is this comment? Not everyone aspires to be at the top of their BMI range. I'm 5'3" and right now I weigh 113 pounds and I'm in the process of cutting off five pounds after coming off a bulk. When I'm done, I'll still be in a healthy weight range for my height.

    Overall the forums here are useful, but it's over the top comments like these that test my patience. I've seen people advocate for others to stay higher on the BMI scale if they feel comfortable, yet if someone feels comfortable at the lower end they need help? I don't think so. BMI isn't everything but sheesh. People have fitness goals other than going from obese or overweight to a normal weight. A 5'4", 95 pound person needs to get help, not the OP.

    People tend to feel unnecessarily defensive when someone is more successful than they are, but still wants to push themself. We are in a society that is slowly trying to lower the bar so we can feel better about our own mediocrity.

    Or because we often see people on here with disorders. But yeah, sure. It's us.

    OP: I wouldn't worry about changing your settings for one day, but if it becomes routine for your day to be more stationary then think about it.
  • LazSommer
    LazSommer Posts: 1,851 Member
    Afura wrote: »
    LazSommer wrote: »
    synacious wrote: »
    Francl27 wrote: »
    Get some help. You don't need to lose any weight.

    Sorry, but what the hell is this comment? Not everyone aspires to be at the top of their BMI range. I'm 5'3" and right now I weigh 113 pounds and I'm in the process of cutting off five pounds after coming off a bulk. When I'm done, I'll still be in a healthy weight range for my height.

    Overall the forums here are useful, but it's over the top comments like these that test my patience. I've seen people advocate for others to stay higher on the BMI scale if they feel comfortable, yet if someone feels comfortable at the lower end they need help? I don't think so. BMI isn't everything but sheesh. People have fitness goals other than going from obese or overweight to a normal weight. A 5'4", 95 pound person needs to get help, not the OP.

    People tend to feel unnecessarily defensive when someone is more successful than they are, but still wants to push themself. We are in a society that is slowly trying to lower the bar so we can feel better about our own mediocrity.

    Or because we often see people on here with disorders. But yeah, sure. It's us.

    OP: I wouldn't worry about changing your settings for one day, but if it becomes routine for your day to be more stationary then think about it.

    Except if you read the post OP has reasonable goals and is eating a decent number of calories.
  • richardgavel
    richardgavel Posts: 1,001 Member
    jmidd97 wrote: »
    Hi everyone,

    I just have a quick question regarding required calories for today. I'm an 18 year old 5'4" female (119 lbs), and I have my activity level set at Active, due to doing martial arts, swimming and a lot of walking at uni. This gives me 1590 calories a day. Today was a strange day however, and I'm confused about how my calories should be adjusted for it: I went to work, which involved 7 hours of standing (not really walking, pretty stationary). There was also some lifting of 16kg boxes, about one every 5 minutes.
    Should I keep to 1590 today? Or decrease it? My 1590 is for losing 1lb a week, BTW.

    Thanks in advance, hope this isn't a silly question.

    Activity level is generally used to cover non-exercise related activity (amount of activity on the job, if you walk/bike to/from work, activity at home), mainly because it's hard to measure and it's consistent on a day to day basis. Your martial arts and swimming would then be add-on exercises added separately when you execute them.
  • LazSommer
    LazSommer Posts: 1,851 Member
    LazSommer wrote: »
    synacious wrote: »
    Francl27 wrote: »
    Get some help. You don't need to lose any weight.

    Sorry, but what the hell is this comment? Not everyone aspires to be at the top of their BMI range. I'm 5'3" and right now I weigh 113 pounds and I'm in the process of cutting off five pounds after coming off a bulk. When I'm done, I'll still be in a healthy weight range for my height.

    Overall the forums here are useful, but it's over the top comments like these that test my patience. I've seen people advocate for others to stay higher on the BMI scale if they feel comfortable, yet if someone feels comfortable at the lower end they need help? I don't think so. BMI isn't everything but sheesh. People have fitness goals other than going from obese or overweight to a normal weight. A 5'4", 95 pound person needs to get help, not the OP.

    People tend to feel unnecessarily defensive when someone is more successful than they are, but still wants to push themself. We are in a society that is slowly trying to lower the bar so we can feel better about our own mediocrity.

    Ugh, whatever you may think about the comment, the "jealous fatties" nonsense is a ridiculous rebuttal. The poster has done an excellent job losing weight and we see a constant parade on here of people (often young women, but not always), with clear food issues. Whether the OP is one of those people is an open question, but showing some concern doesn't make one mediocre.

    I never said jealous fatties. You did.
  • RobD520
    RobD520 Posts: 420 Member
    It makes me sad that going lower in one's healthy BMI range can make a HUGE difference in the way people feel about themselves.
  • LazSommer
    LazSommer Posts: 1,851 Member
    edited April 2016
    LazSommer wrote: »
    LazSommer wrote: »
    synacious wrote: »
    Francl27 wrote: »
    Get some help. You don't need to lose any weight.

    Sorry, but what the hell is this comment? Not everyone aspires to be at the top of their BMI range. I'm 5'3" and right now I weigh 113 pounds and I'm in the process of cutting off five pounds after coming off a bulk. When I'm done, I'll still be in a healthy weight range for my height.

    Overall the forums here are useful, but it's over the top comments like these that test my patience. I've seen people advocate for others to stay higher on the BMI scale if they feel comfortable, yet if someone feels comfortable at the lower end they need help? I don't think so. BMI isn't everything but sheesh. People have fitness goals other than going from obese or overweight to a normal weight. A 5'4", 95 pound person needs to get help, not the OP.

    People tend to feel unnecessarily defensive when someone is more successful than they are, but still wants to push themself. We are in a society that is slowly trying to lower the bar so we can feel better about our own mediocrity.

    Ugh, whatever you may think about the comment, the "jealous fatties" nonsense is a ridiculous rebuttal. The poster has done an excellent job losing weight and we see a constant parade on here of people (often young women, but not always), with clear food issues. Whether the OP is one of those people is an open question, but showing some concern doesn't make one mediocre.

    I never said jealous fatties. You did.

    You used more words to imply the same meaning in a passive-aggressive way.

    No, I didn't. You are free to project all you'd like, but I was simply commenting on how others like to tear people down who are successful for no reason. Telling someone to "get help" for trying to shave off unwanted belly fat is ridiculous and unwarranted.
  • Also this idea that we should not want to lose weight if we are already healthy has sometimes made me feel embarrassed to even be trying. After dieting people will compliment me on looking good and thinner but I'm shy to discuss dieting because I worry I will seem silly or vain because I am not overweight. Society loves skinny girls but I guess it has to appear effortless.
  • LazSommer
    LazSommer Posts: 1,851 Member
    LazSommer wrote: »
    LazSommer wrote: »
    LazSommer wrote: »
    synacious wrote: »
    Francl27 wrote: »
    Get some help. You don't need to lose any weight.

    Sorry, but what the hell is this comment? Not everyone aspires to be at the top of their BMI range. I'm 5'3" and right now I weigh 113 pounds and I'm in the process of cutting off five pounds after coming off a bulk. When I'm done, I'll still be in a healthy weight range for my height.

    Overall the forums here are useful, but it's over the top comments like these that test my patience. I've seen people advocate for others to stay higher on the BMI scale if they feel comfortable, yet if someone feels comfortable at the lower end they need help? I don't think so. BMI isn't everything but sheesh. People have fitness goals other than going from obese or overweight to a normal weight. A 5'4", 95 pound person needs to get help, not the OP.

    People tend to feel unnecessarily defensive when someone is more successful than they are, but still wants to push themself. We are in a society that is slowly trying to lower the bar so we can feel better about our own mediocrity.

    Ugh, whatever you may think about the comment, the "jealous fatties" nonsense is a ridiculous rebuttal. The poster has done an excellent job losing weight and we see a constant parade on here of people (often young women, but not always), with clear food issues. Whether the OP is one of those people is an open question, but showing some concern doesn't make one mediocre.

    I never said jealous fatties. You did.

    You used more words to imply the same meaning in a passive-aggressive way.

    No, I didn't. You are free to project all you'd like, but I was simply commenting on how others like to tear people down who are successful for no reason. Telling someone to "get help" for trying to shave off unwanted belly fat is ridiculous and unwarranted.

    First it was "unnecessarily defensive when someone is more successful than they are," (directed at a poster who's lost 80 freakin pounds) now it's "no reason."

    No, there was no reason for them to tear them down and you know it. OP posted reasonable stats and goals, and people told them to get help. I don't really care how much the other posters lost, I don't check all profiles and assume the weights lost or profile pictures are currently accurate. Any person who would be at OP'S level would not have told them to get help, so it's not difficult to assume where others are based on their responses.
  • LazSommer
    LazSommer Posts: 1,851 Member
    LazSommer wrote: »
    LazSommer wrote: »
    LazSommer wrote: »
    LazSommer wrote: »
    synacious wrote: »
    Francl27 wrote: »
    Get some help. You don't need to lose any weight.

    Sorry, but what the hell is this comment? Not everyone aspires to be at the top of their BMI range. I'm 5'3" and right now I weigh 113 pounds and I'm in the process of cutting off five pounds after coming off a bulk. When I'm done, I'll still be in a healthy weight range for my height.

    Overall the forums here are useful, but it's over the top comments like these that test my patience. I've seen people advocate for others to stay higher on the BMI scale if they feel comfortable, yet if someone feels comfortable at the lower end they need help? I don't think so. BMI isn't everything but sheesh. People have fitness goals other than going from obese or overweight to a normal weight. A 5'4", 95 pound person needs to get help, not the OP.

    People tend to feel unnecessarily defensive when someone is more successful than they are, but still wants to push themself. We are in a society that is slowly trying to lower the bar so we can feel better about our own mediocrity.

    Ugh, whatever you may think about the comment, the "jealous fatties" nonsense is a ridiculous rebuttal. The poster has done an excellent job losing weight and we see a constant parade on here of people (often young women, but not always), with clear food issues. Whether the OP is one of those people is an open question, but showing some concern doesn't make one mediocre.

    I never said jealous fatties. You did.

    You used more words to imply the same meaning in a passive-aggressive way.

    No, I didn't. You are free to project all you'd like, but I was simply commenting on how others like to tear people down who are successful for no reason. Telling someone to "get help" for trying to shave off unwanted belly fat is ridiculous and unwarranted.

    First it was "unnecessarily defensive when someone is more successful than they are," (directed at a poster who's lost 80 freakin pounds) now it's "no reason."

    No, there was no reason for them to tear them down and you know it. OP posted reasonable stats and goals, and people told them to get help. I don't really care how much the other posters lost, I don't check all profiles and assume the weights lost or profile pictures are currently accurate. Any person who would be at OP'S level would not have told them to get help, so it's not difficult to assume where others are based on their responses.

    So rather than just disagreeing, you ascribed motivations to the poster without actually knowing anything about her. Got it. Enjoy your assumptions.

    Yes I did, as did the poster, I'm glad you finally figured that out. I apologize if I struck a nerve.
  • sunnybeaches105
    sunnybeaches105 Posts: 2,831 Member
    edited April 2016
    synacious wrote: »
    Francl27 wrote: »
    Get some help. You don't need to lose any weight.

    Sorry, but what the hell is this comment? Not everyone aspires to be at the top of their BMI range. I'm 5'3" and right now I weigh 113 pounds and I'm in the process of cutting off five pounds after coming off a bulk. When I'm done, I'll still be in a healthy weight range for my height.

    Overall the forums here are useful, but it's over the top comments like these that test my patience. I've seen people advocate for others to stay higher on the BMI scale if they feel comfortable, yet if someone feels comfortable at the lower end they need help? I don't think so. BMI isn't everything but sheesh. People have fitness goals other than going from obese or overweight to a normal weight. A 5'4", 95 pound person needs to get help, not the OP.

    Agree 100%. It's funny how we have fat acceptance but anyone on the low end of the scale gets these kind of comments. My daughter is already hearing it at school and I have to keep assuring her that she's actually the healthy one. Just love the new normal . . . It's almost as if we can't have "love your body" without "hate everyone else's"
  • psuLemon
    psuLemon Posts: 38,431 MFP Moderator
    edited April 2016
    I would look into a good lifting routine or resistance (body) routine. Have protein around .6-.8g per lb of weight, a moderate deficit, a food scale for accuracy and give it time. You still have 10 lbs before dropping into the underweight category. If you get down there and still have areas, you can either recomp with a good heavy lifting routine or bulk/cut to add muscle to fill out the body. If you need a recommendation, either strong curve or NROL4W are good routines. But below is a pretty comprehensive list of the routines out there. And as I find more, I keep adding them.


    http://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/discussion/10332083/which-lifting-program-is-the-best-for-you/p1
  • Francl27
    Francl27 Posts: 26,371 Member
    edited April 2016
    synacious wrote: »
    Francl27 wrote: »
    Get some help. You don't need to lose any weight.

    Sorry, but what the hell is this comment? Not everyone aspires to be at the top of their BMI range. I'm 5'3" and right now I weigh 113 pounds and I'm in the process of cutting off five pounds after coming off a bulk. When I'm done, I'll still be in a healthy weight range for my height.

    Overall the forums here are useful, but it's over the top comments like these that test my patience. I've seen people advocate for others to stay higher on the BMI scale if they feel comfortable, yet if someone feels comfortable at the lower end they need help? I don't think so. BMI isn't everything but sheesh. People have fitness goals other than going from obese or overweight to a normal weight. A 5'4", 95 pound person needs to get help, not the OP.

    ... 5'4" and 119 pounds is hardly the 'top of the healthy BMI range', or we're not looking at the same chart at all.

    And wanting to lose even 1 pound a week at that weight IS extremely unhealthy. And eating 1590 calories while being as active as OP at 18 IS also extremely unhealthy (I'm not getting anything from her post about her eating back exercise calories).
  • sunnybeaches105
    sunnybeaches105 Posts: 2,831 Member
    Francl27 wrote: »
    synacious wrote: »
    Francl27 wrote: »
    Get some help. You don't need to lose any weight.

    Sorry, but what the hell is this comment? Not everyone aspires to be at the top of their BMI range. I'm 5'3" and right now I weigh 113 pounds and I'm in the process of cutting off five pounds after coming off a bulk. When I'm done, I'll still be in a healthy weight range for my height.

    Overall the forums here are useful, but it's over the top comments like these that test my patience. I've seen people advocate for others to stay higher on the BMI scale if they feel comfortable, yet if someone feels comfortable at the lower end they need help? I don't think so. BMI isn't everything but sheesh. People have fitness goals other than going from obese or overweight to a normal weight. A 5'4", 95 pound person needs to get help, not the OP.

    ... 5'4" and 119 pounds is hardly the 'top of the healthy BMI range', or we're not looking at the same chart at all.

    And wanting to lose even 1 pound a week at that weight IS extremely unhealthy. And eating 1590 calories while being as active as OP at 18 IS also extremely unhealthy.

    Depends on the calculator used and the age of the individual. The bottom end using BMI for a 5'4" woman at age 25 is around 108 pounds. The ideal using several other forumulae is around 119-123 pounds. I'd suggest the overweight folks start focusing on their own weights rather than consistently going after the lighter folks and visa versa.
  • Francl27
    Francl27 Posts: 26,371 Member
    Francl27 wrote: »
    synacious wrote: »
    Francl27 wrote: »
    Get some help. You don't need to lose any weight.

    Sorry, but what the hell is this comment? Not everyone aspires to be at the top of their BMI range. I'm 5'3" and right now I weigh 113 pounds and I'm in the process of cutting off five pounds after coming off a bulk. When I'm done, I'll still be in a healthy weight range for my height.

    Overall the forums here are useful, but it's over the top comments like these that test my patience. I've seen people advocate for others to stay higher on the BMI scale if they feel comfortable, yet if someone feels comfortable at the lower end they need help? I don't think so. BMI isn't everything but sheesh. People have fitness goals other than going from obese or overweight to a normal weight. A 5'4", 95 pound person needs to get help, not the OP.

    ... 5'4" and 119 pounds is hardly the 'top of the healthy BMI range', or we're not looking at the same chart at all.

    And wanting to lose even 1 pound a week at that weight IS extremely unhealthy. And eating 1590 calories while being as active as OP at 18 IS also extremely unhealthy.

    Depends on the calculator used and the age of the individual. The bottom end using BMI for a 5'4" woman at age 25 is around 108 pounds. The ideal using several other forumulae is around 119-123 pounds. I'd suggest the overweight folks start focusing on their own weights rather than consistently going after the lighter folks and visa versa.

    I am not overweight by a long shot but thank you for the advice I guess? So rude.

    But I guess it's fine, let's just encourage kids who want to starve themselves.
  • sunnybeaches105
    sunnybeaches105 Posts: 2,831 Member
    edited April 2016
    Francl27 wrote: »
    Francl27 wrote: »
    synacious wrote: »
    Francl27 wrote: »
    Get some help. You don't need to lose any weight.

    Sorry, but what the hell is this comment? Not everyone aspires to be at the top of their BMI range. I'm 5'3" and right now I weigh 113 pounds and I'm in the process of cutting off five pounds after coming off a bulk. When I'm done, I'll still be in a healthy weight range for my height.

    Overall the forums here are useful, but it's over the top comments like these that test my patience. I've seen people advocate for others to stay higher on the BMI scale if they feel comfortable, yet if someone feels comfortable at the lower end they need help? I don't think so. BMI isn't everything but sheesh. People have fitness goals other than going from obese or overweight to a normal weight. A 5'4", 95 pound person needs to get help, not the OP.

    ... 5'4" and 119 pounds is hardly the 'top of the healthy BMI range', or we're not looking at the same chart at all.

    And wanting to lose even 1 pound a week at that weight IS extremely unhealthy. And eating 1590 calories while being as active as OP at 18 IS also extremely unhealthy.

    Depends on the calculator used and the age of the individual. The bottom end using BMI for a 5'4" woman at age 25 is around 108 pounds. The ideal using several other forumulae is around 119-123 pounds. I'd suggest the overweight folks start focusing on their own weights rather than consistently going after the lighter folks and visa versa.

    I am not overweight by a long shot but thank you for the advice I guess? So rude.

    But I guess it's fine, let's just encourage kids who want to starve themselves.

    How much do you weigh and how tall are you? You should definitely let the internet be the judge of that, considering you're so willing to diagnose the OP of an eating disorder.

    Again, you should probably educate yourself before accusing someone of starving herself.

    ETA: I find it funny that you find my post rude and yet you don't subject your own response to the OP to the same evaluation.
  • sunnybeaches105
    sunnybeaches105 Posts: 2,831 Member
    Consider another angle.

    Here is some height/weight information on elite U.S. runners This is a link to one runner, but you can navigate through the page to find others. http://www.usatf.org/Athlete-Bios/Desiree-(Desi)-Davila.aspx

    Are these people healthy or unhealthy? We don't have their blood stastics, etc. but I think it's a fair bet that they're pretty healthy. At least healthy enough to be competing at an elite level. And yes, that level of sports does demand some serious attention to nutrition and it may sacrifice something in the long run.

    The point though is that the BMI charts and other formulae are not the beginning and end of the question. We have very little information on the OP. It's way too early to start deciding that she's too thin.
This discussion has been closed.