Welcome to Fun and Games! Many of the discussions in this category are games based on responding to the most recent comment. Please take a moment to refresh the page and make sure you are replying to the most recent comment to keep the game going!
If you could meet anyone from mfp ...
Replies
-
Mr_Stabbems wrote: »Mr_Stabbems wrote: »Mr_Stabbems wrote: »I need advice on shopping for remote controlled devices. Range specifically so I'll meet anyone who's prepared to test them with me.
I've not had a lot of experience with various remotes, but I do have extensive research experience I'd love to put to use. Care for a partner Stabbems?
You're most welcome to join, I have some prerequisites for choosing the remote, range, waterproof and battery life.
This research experience, how often should it be used?
Well a reliable study needs a minimum of three trials I think. With varying degrees of difficulty to test the rigor of the device .
OK buy what about multiple remotes? Simultaneous testing?
That might over tax the subject. It's feasible but tolerance has to be built or it could break, rendering the study invalid.
Fair point. Wow this research stuff has really paid dividends. When do we test irl situations?0 -
-
Mr_Stabbems wrote: »Mr_Stabbems wrote: »Mr_Stabbems wrote: »Mr_Stabbems wrote: »I need advice on shopping for remote controlled devices. Range specifically so I'll meet anyone who's prepared to test them with me.
I've not had a lot of experience with various remotes, but I do have extensive research experience I'd love to put to use. Care for a partner Stabbems?
You're most welcome to join, I have some prerequisites for choosing the remote, range, waterproof and battery life.
This research experience, how often should it be used?
Well a reliable study needs a minimum of three trials I think. With varying degrees of difficulty to test the rigor of the device .
OK buy what about multiple remotes? Simultaneous testing?
That might over tax the subject. It's feasible but tolerance has to be built or it could break, rendering the study invalid.
Fair point. Wow this research stuff has really paid dividends. When do we test irl situations?
Depends. How much time do you need? Want?
0 -
Mr_Stabbems wrote: »Mr_Stabbems wrote: »Mr_Stabbems wrote: »Mr_Stabbems wrote: »I need advice on shopping for remote controlled devices. Range specifically so I'll meet anyone who's prepared to test them with me.
I've not had a lot of experience with various remotes, but I do have extensive research experience I'd love to put to use. Care for a partner Stabbems?
You're most welcome to join, I have some prerequisites for choosing the remote, range, waterproof and battery life.
This research experience, how often should it be used?
Well a reliable study needs a minimum of three trials I think. With varying degrees of difficulty to test the rigor of the device .
OK buy what about multiple remotes? Simultaneous testing?
That might over tax the subject. It's feasible but tolerance has to be built or it could break, rendering the study invalid.
Fair point. Wow this research stuff has really paid dividends. When do we test irl situations?
Depends. How much time do you need? Want?
Well usual testing say 3 sessions a week? 1-2hours each with a longer one on say Sunday to test battery life.
Reasonable?0 -
I wanna meet @Kvm11628
@slimgirljo15
@jenjencin78
my special one
and lots who don't post on the board who I love and would meet in a heartbeat1 -
Mr_Stabbems wrote: »Mr_Stabbems wrote: »Mr_Stabbems wrote: »Mr_Stabbems wrote: »Mr_Stabbems wrote: »I need advice on shopping for remote controlled devices. Range specifically so I'll meet anyone who's prepared to test them with me.
I've not had a lot of experience with various remotes, but I do have extensive research experience I'd love to put to use. Care for a partner Stabbems?
You're most welcome to join, I have some prerequisites for choosing the remote, range, waterproof and battery life.
This research experience, how often should it be used?
Well a reliable study needs a minimum of three trials I think. With varying degrees of difficulty to test the rigor of the device .
OK buy what about multiple remotes? Simultaneous testing?
That might over tax the subject. It's feasible but tolerance has to be built or it could break, rendering the study invalid.
Fair point. Wow this research stuff has really paid dividends. When do we test irl situations?
Depends. How much time do you need? Want?
Well usual testing say 3 sessions a week? 1-2hours each with a longer one on say Sunday to test battery life.
Reasonable?
Very reasonable. What's August look like for you? I gave some time in my research calendar. But I might need compensation for my time.0 -
Mr_Stabbems wrote: »Mr_Stabbems wrote: »Mr_Stabbems wrote: »Mr_Stabbems wrote: »Mr_Stabbems wrote: »I need advice on shopping for remote controlled devices. Range specifically so I'll meet anyone who's prepared to test them with me.
I've not had a lot of experience with various remotes, but I do have extensive research experience I'd love to put to use. Care for a partner Stabbems?
You're most welcome to join, I have some prerequisites for choosing the remote, range, waterproof and battery life.
This research experience, how often should it be used?
Well a reliable study needs a minimum of three trials I think. With varying degrees of difficulty to test the rigor of the device .
OK buy what about multiple remotes? Simultaneous testing?
That might over tax the subject. It's feasible but tolerance has to be built or it could break, rendering the study invalid.
Fair point. Wow this research stuff has really paid dividends. When do we test irl situations?
Depends. How much time do you need? Want?
Well usual testing say 3 sessions a week? 1-2hours each with a longer one on say Sunday to test battery life.
Reasonable?
Very reasonable. What's August look like for you? I gave some time in my research calendar. But I might need compensation for my time.
August looks busy but I'm sure I could squeeze it in.
What sort of compensation?0 -
I wanna meet @Kvm11628
@slimgirljo15
@jenjencin78
my special one
and lots who don't post on the board who I love and would meet in a heartbeat
It's a date!0 -
I wanna meet @Kvm11628
@slimgirljo15
@jenjencin78
my special one
and lots who don't post on the board who I love and would meet in a heartbeat
0 -
Boys better hide0
-
omg the wedge would be in full force0
-
But we can't fight each other over one. Deal?1
-
I wanna meet @Kvm11628
@slimgirljo15
@jenjencin78
my special one
and lots who don't post on the board who I love and would meet in a heartbeat
Am I driving?0 -
deal!!! we will probably scare them away anyway0
-
-
Awww Vik our chauffeur
He'll get me first we're practically neighbours0 -
Jen and I can carpool unless @Mr_Stabbems wants to drive us. I hear he's pretty good with taking directions0
-
Jen and I can carpool unless @Mr_Stabbems wants to drive us. I hear he's pretty good with taking directions
That's cool. And yes I know how to take direction, I get good milage too.0 -
Just don't hit the has too quickly. Sometimes the getting there can be as fun as the destination0
-
Many but @BoryBreezy5 and @Need2BFitAgain for starters I talk to them a lot! Special places in my heart! Hugs1
-
@strozman oh wait, already have!1
-
-
Mr_Stabbems wrote: »
Well sure. But the mechanical is less important than the creativity0 -
slinkybinkydog wrote: »Many but @BoryBreezy5 and @Need2BFitAgain for starters I talk to them a lot! Special places in my heart! Hugs
Awww. I'd love to meet you too @slinkybinkydog0 -
@azfire5 because he's awesome, @JP_909 because he makes me laugh whenever we talk, @ballcoach_08 because he's a GREAT listener and then of course @slinkybinkydog and @BoryBreezy5 because we would have so much fun and prob get into trouble. Lmao0
-
jaedizzle01 wrote: »@azfire5 because he's awesome, @JP_909 because he makes me laugh whenever we talk, @ballcoach_08 because he's a GREAT listener and then of course @slinkybinkydog and @BoryBreezy5 because we would have so much fun and prob get into trouble. Lmao
Me? Trouble? No! See this halo over my head.
Awww. So sweet! I'd love to meet you too. But I wouldn't get you into trouble...on the first day1 -
jaedizzle01 wrote: »@azfire5 because he's awesome, @JP_909 because he makes me laugh whenever we talk, @ballcoach_08 because he's a GREAT listener and then of course @slinkybinkydog and @BoryBreezy5 because we would have so much fun and prob get into trouble. Lmao
Aww hugs want to meet all above too!1 -
I cant say.0
-
You can, you just won't...0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 426 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions