Barcode versus Package Label Nutritional Values
![AMRROL](https://dakd0cjsv8wfa.cloudfront.net/images/photos/user/3424/ab55/9f43/f1bd/16ce/28d0/fc2f/4cd7a5098a41d0071527f77b4ee211b3ef45.jpg)
AMRROL
Posts: 168 Member
Which do you think is the most accurate? Often I find that the barcode when scanned, comes in much lower that the values noted on the product packaging. Example, a chicken leg quarter when the barcode is scanned results in calories of 150 per 100 grams. The package lists it as 185 calories per 100 grams. And the USDA site has it a 176 calories per 100 grams. I know that these are not big differences based on 100 grams, but the average chicken leg quarter weighs much more than 100 grams, so it does add up.
0
Replies
-
Trust the package, the barcode info is entered by other MFP users and the product can differ between areas.2
-
The barcode just links to an MFP data entry which could be incorrect. It can even be the wrong product in some cases. Usually I find the barcode works well but occasionally MFPer's have put in the per serving data and called it per 100g or something along those lines, so I scan to do the heavy lifting then check the label and tweak accordingly.2
-
I'd go by the packaging, I've come across barcodes that have linked to entirely different products. I'm sure there's no REAL way of knowing precisely due to there being so many variables, but the packaging should be close enough.1
-
Depends. Always the packaging over a scanned code, but I double check with USDA values because sometimes packages are wrong too (45 calories for 3oz of shrimp on a bag bought at Walmart - nope).1
-
Which do you think is the most accurate? Often I find that the barcode when scanned, comes in much lower that the values noted on the product packaging. Example, a chicken leg quarter when the barcode is scanned results in calories of 150 per 100 grams. The package lists it as 185 calories per 100 grams. And the USDA site has it a 176 calories per 100 grams. I know that these are not big differences based on 100 grams, but the average chicken leg quarter weighs much more than 100 grams, so it does add up.
I'll scan the barcode, and if what's on MFP doesn't reflect the label I go with the label, as there has most likely been a recipe change and the MFP entry hasn't been updated yet (had this problem with my grapefruit juice recently).1 -
I manually enter all my foods from the packaging and don't save them to the database. That way I know they're accurate and won't be edited by another MFP user.1
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 394.2K Introduce Yourself
- 43.9K Getting Started
- 260.4K Health and Weight Loss
- 176.1K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.6K Fitness and Exercise
- 439 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153.1K Motivation and Support
- 8.1K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.4K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.9K MyFitnessPal Information
- 15 News and Announcements
- 1.2K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.7K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions