Intermittent fasting for weight loss?
ilovefastcarstoo
Posts: 115 Member
Has anyone had any luck with intermittent fasting for progressive weight loss? I'd like to speed things up a little and change things up on my body. Maybe fast from sunset to sunrise or maybe no dinner? What has worked for most folks? Thanks !
0
Replies
-
I do run IF often, but I haven't noticed any accelerated pace of fat loss, but it hasn't hurt either. I do it purely out of convenience, because it means that I don't have to carry food around with me. It also means that I can spend lunch breaks playing video games, instead of wasting it on trivialities, like food.
3 -
Have you taken a look in the intermittent fasting groups in "Groups"?
I naturally eat that way anyway. I like having larger meals a couple times a day, and I'm not that hungry in the morning for the first few hours - so it works for me. I've been doing 16-8 for years. I just think it's easier for me - and it is the way I ate as a youngster. An eight hour window is perfect for me.
As far as losing weight, it isn't faster or slower. It isn't a magical weight-loss gimmick. It just makes adherence to a calorie goal easier.3 -
At its core, IF is just an alternate way to achieve a calorie deficit. I'm 5'3" and 109 pounds, but started here a year ago at 139 pounds. For the past 8 months I've been doing daily IF 16:8, sometimes 15:9 or 14:10 (which is the recommended fast/feast window for women). I do notice that it's helped with my hunger levels, but I lost weight just fine before IF as well.4
-
IF can help some with hunger management and, as a result, calorie management but on its own, it does not speed up weight loss. Your weight loss will be based on your calorie deficit. So if you are eating at a 500 calorie deficit with meals spread throughout the day and then at a 500 calorie deficit with all of your meals eaten in a shortened time span, your overall loss will be the same.
I think there are several IF groups here on MFP. Hopefully people will post the links for you.1 -
As others have mentioned already, IF isn't really any faster or slower than any other diet plans. It is really just another way of structuring your daily intake.
For people who are fine without eating breakfast by only eating 2 meals per day you can split your daily calorie goals over only 2 meals instead of 3, allowing you a bit more flexibility in what you want to eat.
Say you have a 1300 a day target, you can eat 600 for lunch and 700 for dinner. Or 500 lunch and 800 dinner. However you want to structure it. It's a more enjoyable way for some people to plan out their meals.
The main thing that is important is to stick to a deficit. To lose 1lbs a week, thats 3500 kcal deficit that needs to be created throughout the entire week. Maintaining the deficit is the only way to achieve weight loss.
So if intermittent fasting is an easier more enjoyable way for you to achieve your deficit goals, then give it a try.1 -
As @jemhh and @cwang125 said. It's not to speed up weight loss, but rather a method that helps some people stay consistent.
Here's a link to a couple groups......lots of info
http://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/group/49-intermittent-fasting
http://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/group/100058-5-2-fasting4 -
I've lost 49lbs since March 1st while Intermittent Fasting so yeah...has to be something to it!2
-
DresdenSinn wrote: »I've lost 49lbs since March 1st while Intermittent Fasting so yeah...has to be something to it!
IF isn't the reason you lost weight. The reason you lost weight is because you consumed less then you burned. This isn't to discount IF. It works wonderfully for some people to manage hunger. It's not for everyone but it's worth a try.3 -
I did an IF protocol to lose my weight (5:2) - it's not magic, just a different way to budget your weekly calorie/food intake. Same as the more common Leangains/16:8 protocol is a different way to budget your daily calories/food.
I tried that as well when maintaining, worked OK for me as I can easily skip breakfast and quite enjoy two bigger meals.
Do some research and experiment if it appeals, may suit you or it may not. Definite pros and cons.
But if you think it will speed up the process for the same amount of calories then I think you will be disappointed.
0 -
thiosulfate wrote: »DresdenSinn wrote: »I've lost 49lbs since March 1st while Intermittent Fasting so yeah...has to be something to it!
IF isn't the reason you lost weight. The reason you lost weight is because you consumed less then you burned
I didn't say I lost 49lbs because of IF, I said while IF, hear/see the difference? I know how/why I lost weight, IF was only a contributing factor.
0 -
I really like intermittent fasting and I feel like it has helped me with managing my diet and my weight loss a lot. Plus, it has other benefits and may even slow down the aging process.1
-
DresdenSinn wrote: »thiosulfate wrote: »DresdenSinn wrote: »I've lost 49lbs since March 1st while Intermittent Fasting so yeah...has to be something to it!
IF isn't the reason you lost weight. The reason you lost weight is because you consumed less then you burned
I didn't say I lost 49lbs because of IF, I said while IF, hear/see the difference? I know how/why I lost weight, IF was only a contributing factor.
Except......has to be something to it!
You're giving credit to IF for the weight loss.3 -
thiosulfate wrote: »DresdenSinn wrote: »thiosulfate wrote: »DresdenSinn wrote: »I've lost 49lbs since March 1st while Intermittent Fasting so yeah...has to be something to it!
IF isn't the reason you lost weight. The reason you lost weight is because you consumed less then you burned
I didn't say I lost 49lbs because of IF, I said while IF, hear/see the difference? I know how/why I lost weight, IF was only a contributing factor.
Except......has to be something to it!
You're giving credit to IF for the weight loss.
I got what he said.. it was a "probable" or "maybe" IF had something to do with weight loss, not that IF was his magic bullet!
OP, follow what @sijomial said in his post!
0 -
thiosulfate wrote: »DresdenSinn wrote: »thiosulfate wrote: »DresdenSinn wrote: »I've lost 49lbs since March 1st while Intermittent Fasting so yeah...has to be something to it!
IF isn't the reason you lost weight. The reason you lost weight is because you consumed less then you burned
I didn't say I lost 49lbs because of IF, I said while IF, hear/see the difference? I know how/why I lost weight, IF was only a contributing factor.
Except......has to be something to it!
You're giving credit to IF for the weight loss.
I understood him perfectly too. IF was/is part of a successful strategy for him. He didn't mention calories - you did.
You are reading too much into it.0 -
"has something to so with it" is miles away from "is because of".
Anyhoo...I have found IF to be helpful in managing my hunger (and calories). It really isn't anything crazy, I eat breakfast late and nothing after dinner-but that's what I gravitate towards naturally. When I eat first thing in the morning I am ravenous all day long.0 -
Not to derail from the topic, but I understand what @thiosulfate is saying too as I feel like the initial comment can be read in both ways and no harm was meant.
"I've lost 49lbs since March 1st while Intermittent Fasting so yeah...has to be something to it!"
"Has to be something to it" kind of implies that there has to be something about it specifically that makes it effective, which is why it was pointed out that the "something to it" is the caloric deficit itself. Regardless, I'm glad that poster lost 49 pounds since March and I'm glad others, including myself, find benefits in practicing IF. Whatever works in the end, right?3 -
I could be wrong, but I think there's also a hormonal element to it that helps minimize hunger throughout the day.5
-
If is just a way of eating. No matter what is yor WOE, you must have a calorie deficit to lose weight. The only magic in it is the magic we give it.1
-
I've been doing IF for about one month. Down twelve or so pounds. Nothing magic about it. It's still CICO. I read "The 2 Meal Solution" by Mike O'donnell, and this short guide got me started. I love IF b/c I don't waste calories or money on "snacks." Also, I'm not so sure about the Set Point thing; however, IF is supposed to reset it. So for me IF works. Do what works for you! Good luck!!2
-
It works for me because it helps manage my calories. It isn't for everyone though.0
-
IF will cause you to lose weight however it can help you by restricting the hours in which you eat. Fasted cardio and workouts can increase fat burning though.0
-
There is no empirical evidence that it works any better than 6 meals a day or 3 meals a day. It's the same thing rearranged. It comes down to what works for you. For some it's better because they have trouble not eating too much or feeling full. Try it for a week if you like it use it if not dont. The first day or so will be difficult though.0
-
Just don't listen to anyone telling you that you can eat as much as you want in your eating window...you can blow your whole week's deficit easily in 8 hours3
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 427 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions