Welcome to Debate Club! Please be aware that this is a space for respectful debate, and that your ideas will be challenged here. Please remember to critique the argument, not the author.
Should junk food be taxed?
Replies
-
No it doesn't.0
-
This content has been removed.
-
Sugar is sugar...0
-
This content has been removed.
-
jen_mccusker wrote: »When you take one sugar and add it to something else like food. It's a chemical reaction as it cannot go back to its natural state.2
-
adding sugar to another food is a physical reaction and is not a chemical reaction - the sugar does not combine with the chemicals that make up the food that it is added to, the sugar exists along sied the food (and can be separated out using only physical processes).
edited for clarity2 -
This content has been removed.
-
jen_mccusker wrote: »When you take one sugar and add it to something else like food. It's a chemical reaction as it cannot go back to its natural state.
So what chemical reaction occurs when you add some sugar to steel cut oats? How does this compare to the chemical reaction that occurs when you slice up a banana and add it to the oats?2 -
I tend to believe science2
-
jen_mccusker wrote: »If you want me to bore you I would but at end of it everyone makes there on beliefs in things so........
Oh, I'm sure it wouldn't be boring, and chemical reactions aren't really a question of faith, so not something that we can just believe in or not. They happen or they don't and it's provable.2 -
This content has been removed.
-
The irony of this is that I have a chemistry degree and used to teach physical science, chemistry and physics so I'm eager to learn how adding sugar to something is a chemical reaction. Must be my pesky belief system getting in the way of facts again.2
-
This content has been removed.
-
jen_mccusker wrote: »So you take sugar from a apple say then you at it to processed food once you start heating process it a chemical reaction which then turns to a new substance which is a new compound. Which means all the added sugar which merge with other things in the food when heat has turned into something else. So it hasn't kept its natural form or state of what it was first put in as
Um no.0 -
This content has been removed.
-
Wait, this turned from a taxing-the-evil-sugar thread to a regular sugar-is-evil thread? But it's only Wednesday...2
-
jen_mccusker wrote: »So you take sugar from a apple say then you at it to processed food once you start heating process it a chemical reaction which then turns to a new substance which is a new compound. Which means all the added sugar which merge with other things in the food when heat has turned into something else. So it hasn't kept its natural form or state of what it was first put in as
if this was actually true it would defeat the whole reason to add sugar to any food item - i.e. to make it more palatable to the human tongue. Since the food is still sweet after it is heated, the SUGAR is still there in it's natural form (or else you wouldn't be able to taste it).0 -
jen_mccusker wrote: »Erm yes
Where are you getting this info from?0 -
This content has been removed.
-
This content has been removed.
-
This content has been removed.
-
jen_mccusker wrote: »WinoGelato wrote: »The irony of this is that I have a chemistry degree and used to teach physical science, chemistry and physics so I'm eager to learn how adding sugar to something is a chemical reaction. Must be my pesky belief system getting in the way of facts again.
If this is true you can't argue with me at all!!!!!
If what is true? I didn't quite follow your explanation of a chemical reaction above. Can you try again?
First, why is the sugar extracted from the apple?
Second, you said then it is added to a processed food. What processed food? And why is it added again?
Then you said you start the heating process and that is a chemical reaction - perhaps. Depends on how much it is heated, if the molecules undergo a chemical change. Simply applying heat to something is not a chemical reaction.
You are correct that a chemical reaction results in a new compound, but we haven't established that a chem rxn took place.
1 -
That's not how it works at all0
-
lemurcat12 wrote: »jen_mccusker wrote: »When you take one sugar and add it to something else like food. It's a chemical reaction as it cannot go back to its natural state.
So what chemical reaction occurs when you add some sugar to steel cut oats? How does this compare to the chemical reaction that occurs when you slice up a banana and add it to the oats?
Something like this apparently:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ODf_sPexS2Q1 -
This content has been removed.
-
Wow...this got derpy!
1 -
This content has been removed.
-
jen_mccusker wrote: »All you need to do is Google and if you don't get it. I forgive you all
Actually I recommend scientific papers and text books over Google.1 -
This content has been removed.
-
jen_mccusker wrote: »Omg any heating process between chemicals makes a reaction doesn't matter how high the heat
again, wrong! know what happens when you light C4 on fire (you can google that too). I'll give you a hint, it doesn't explode.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.6K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions