Fitbit works for me because...

tiffanylacourse

Bmoremama wrote: »

MiscCatFunt wrote: »

I've had the one for a couple of years and it's an absolutely awesome bit of kit. Especially at the start of my journey. Once you get down to the lowest reaches of body fat it definitely over calculates calories but I no longer use it for that function and merely keep it for the steps.

I'm awaiting the next generation of these wearables, one that calculates calories based on heart rate not just steps. Also one that knows when I am lifting weights, what I'm doing, can help with form and such. Has GPS, has smartphone linkage, waterproof and at least a weeks battery between charges. Basically I want everything, cos that's how I am.

I feel the same. I love my fitbit but today I took a non-strenuous walk for 23 minutes and later ran (fast! hard! sweaty!) on the elliptical for 23 minutes. My Alta logged me as basically the same calorie burn for each of these activities. There is no way that is accurate. I know the Alta does not have HR but from what I understand the HR function would not solve this problem with current models anyway.

I'm not so sure that's true. I have the Charge HR and I definitely get more calorie burn for a jog/run than I do for a leisurely walk.

Bmoremama

tiffanylacourse wrote: »

Bmoremama wrote: »

MiscCatFunt wrote: »

I've had the one for a couple of years and it's an absolutely awesome bit of kit. Especially at the start of my journey. Once you get down to the lowest reaches of body fat it definitely over calculates calories but I no longer use it for that function and merely keep it for the steps.

I'm awaiting the next generation of these wearables, one that calculates calories based on heart rate not just steps. Also one that knows when I am lifting weights, what I'm doing, can help with form and such. Has GPS, has smartphone linkage, waterproof and at least a weeks battery between charges. Basically I want everything, cos that's how I am.

I feel the same. I love my fitbit but today I took a non-strenuous walk for 23 minutes and later ran (fast! hard! sweaty!) on the elliptical for 23 minutes. My Alta logged me as basically the same calorie burn for each of these activities. There is no way that is accurate. I know the Alta does not have HR but from what I understand the HR function would not solve this problem with current models anyway.

I'm not so sure that's true. I have the Charge HR and I definitely get more calorie burn for a jog/run than I do for a leisurely walk.

Oh, good to know! Thanks!

tiffanylacourse

Bmoremama wrote: »

tiffanylacourse wrote: »

Bmoremama wrote: »

MiscCatFunt wrote: »

I've had the one for a couple of years and it's an absolutely awesome bit of kit. Especially at the start of my journey. Once you get down to the lowest reaches of body fat it definitely over calculates calories but I no longer use it for that function and merely keep it for the steps.

I'm awaiting the next generation of these wearables, one that calculates calories based on heart rate not just steps. Also one that knows when I am lifting weights, what I'm doing, can help with form and such. Has GPS, has smartphone linkage, waterproof and at least a weeks battery between charges. Basically I want everything, cos that's how I am.

I feel the same. I love my fitbit but today I took a non-strenuous walk for 23 minutes and later ran (fast! hard! sweaty!) on the elliptical for 23 minutes. My Alta logged me as basically the same calorie burn for each of these activities. There is no way that is accurate. I know the Alta does not have HR but from what I understand the HR function would not solve this problem with current models anyway.

I'm not so sure that's true. I have the Charge HR and I definitely get more calorie burn for a jog/run than I do for a leisurely walk.

Oh, good to know! Thanks!

No problem at all! :flowerforyou:

nh5nh5

I bought a fitbit hr charge. This has helped me a lot. I have a desk job and i utilise all the features such as the silent alarms to prompt me to do the 150 steps an hour - down the stairs, to the water cooler and back up again as opposed to the one outside my office. I have it set at 5000 steps just to make sure i move around at least this a day. when walking making sure my heart raised stays in burn is a good aspect of it too. I don't take any notice of the info of calories burnt on the fit bit, i let the app work with my fitness pal and take that as the correct amount. Sometimes i eat them sometimes I don't - works for me anyway

lax75

tiffanylacourse wrote: »

Bmoremama wrote: »

MiscCatFunt wrote: »

I've had the one for a couple of years and it's an absolutely awesome bit of kit. Especially at the start of my journey. Once you get down to the lowest reaches of body fat it definitely over calculates calories but I no longer use it for that function and merely keep it for the steps.

I'm awaiting the next generation of these wearables, one that calculates calories based on heart rate not just steps. Also one that knows when I am lifting weights, what I'm doing, can help with form and such. Has GPS, has smartphone linkage, waterproof and at least a weeks battery between charges. Basically I want everything, cos that's how I am.

I feel the same. I love my fitbit but today I took a non-strenuous walk for 23 minutes and later ran (fast! hard! sweaty!) on the elliptical for 23 minutes. My Alta logged me as basically the same calorie burn for each of these activities. There is no way that is accurate. I know the Alta does not have HR but from what I understand the HR function would not solve this problem with current models anyway.

I'm not so sure that's true. I have the Charge HR and I definitely get more calorie burn for a jog/run than I do for a leisurely walk.

Love my FB - and I have the tan line too! I have the ChargeHR and I definitely get different calorie numbers depending on the activity - run, walk, row, whatever. (and I can see the breakdown when I click on the calorie "tile".) For the price it obviously won't be as accurate as more expensive monitors, but I assume that if some activity numbers are high and some are low, it averages out enough for my purposes.

The "maximum heart rate" numbers are annoyingly one-formula-fits-all (it uses 220-age) and there's no way to change it manually without gaming some of the other numbers (like age), tho supposedly they're working on it. Mine is higher (which I know b/c we did specific testing in my erg class), making the color coded ranges on the FB out of whack for me, so I just keep that in mind when I'm looking at how hard I worked. For resting heart rate numbers, I care less about the absolute number on a given day than about the trend over time, and for heart rate during activities I only care about getting the rate "up" for a certain period of time. I run/row for general health purposes and don't do the kind of particularized training where I'm trying to hit specific numbers.

I find that if I charge it every time I take a shower, that tops up the charge pretty well.

natyyl85510

I love my Fitbit and mfp I was struggling to hit 10000 steps a day now I'm on 20000 a day with a 20 kg weight loss

CatherineLaurel

Just got mine and I stay at the gym twice as long and burn twice as much because I love seeing my stats go up

Redwineandmuscles

I'm a bit geeky

Orphia

mdnorthside wrote: »

It's pretty darn accurate. I've seen a lot of complaints on the internet about Fitbit products being inaccurate, and that has not been my experience. They're not as accurate as more expensive, or more complicated equipment, which is to be expected. However, my Charge HR has been an absolutely instrumental part of my weight loss. I have been on and off the bandwagon for many years. I generally picked a calorie limit and just stuck with it, adding extra calories for exercise. But that misses out on this whole other category of movement! There are days when I'm sitting on the couch the whole day, and day's when I walk nearly 15 miles just going around campus. That's a huge difference in calories - and it needs to be taken into account.

I have been steadily losing about 1.5lbs a week by:

1. Eating 1,000 calories less than my Fitbit calorie count at the end of the day
2. Doing 4 sets, 12 reps of two weight exercises each morning to build muscle

That's all! If that doesn't sound like a good deal to you I don't know what would.

Yep, I love my Fitbit Charge HR! It's helped me eat little enough to lose 38 kg and get to my goal weight, but eat enough so I don't starve myself and crash and burn.

I hope you don't think I'm being too personal, but I looked at your profile and it says you only need to lose 19 lbs.

I'm concerned your calorie deficit is too aggressive.

The general rule is that you should aim to lose 0.5 lbs per week if you have 15 lbs to lose.

You might find it easier to stick to your eating plan for longer if you increase your calories, rather than risking a crash and burn.

My kindest regards.

Lorraine7486

Hey thinking of buying well. In a nutshell do they measure your steps, measure how many calories you burn throw the day and measure your heartbeart? Also it says sleep, what does it do while you sleep?

Orphia

Lorraine7486 wrote: »

Hey thinking of buying well. In a nutshell do they measure your steps, measure how many calories you burn throw the day and measure your heartbeart? Also it says sleep, what does it do while you sleep?

Yes, they measure your steps and calories burned.

Some measure your heart rate (Charge HR, Surge, and maybe others).

The ones that monitor your sleep tell you how many hours you've slept, and how many times you've been restless.

Compare different fitbits at: https://www.fitbit.com/au/compare

They also sync with the wireless Aria scale, if that interests you.

I've found the capability of Fitbit syncing with MFP to be invaluable.

My Fitbit Charge HR doesn't just send step counts to MFP, but calories burned information, which means that my runs are accurately calculated and I earn more calories when I make more effort.

Lorraine7486

Orphia wrote: »

Lorraine7486 wrote: »

Hey thinking of buying well. In a nutshell do they measure your steps, measure how many calories you burn throw the day and measure your heartbeart? Also it says sleep, what does it do while you sleep?

Yes, they measure your steps and calories burned.

Some measure your heart rate (Charge HR, Surge, and maybe others).

The ones that monitor your sleep tell you how many hours you've slept, and how many times you've been restless.

Compare different fitbits at: https://www.fitbit.com/au/compare

They also sync with the wireless Aria scale, if that interests you.

I've found the capability of Fitbit syncing with MFP to be invaluable.

My Fitbit Charge HR doesn't just send step counts to MFP, but calories burned information, which means that my runs are accurately calculated and I earn more calories when I make more effort.

Brilliant. thanks for the info. think I'll have to invest in one

TheBlizz35

I love my Fitbit too. I have the Alta and love that I can see stats daily as well as the weekly comparison. I have definitely become more active wearing it, and it motivates me to move more. I've had it almost a month now and feel great walking 5 miles/day. Never ever thought I'd say that, but it really is addicting (in a healthy way). It's wonderful to see it syncing so easily with MFP.

nina4w

I have a fitbit and I use it as a motivator for me to get pass 10,000 steps. Also, I can link it to MFP. I know the numbers will be fudged (just as most things will) but I can use it as a starting point and go from there.

AddieOverhaul

I have the Flex (for now, will upgarde eventually) and it works for me because it helps me see how active I've been, so when I'm lagging behind usual stats, I will make more of an effort to get up and move. Also, I'm competitive, so the challenges with my friends help a lot. I do things now like get off the bus early, walk between errands instead of taking the bus, etc.

Ricardinho88

I have the Charge HR and I think it's a fantastic bit of kit. There's something pretty addictive about seeing your stats go up and up!