Doubts about 1200cal diet.. :O
nehaghag
Posts: 20 Member
I follow a diet mainly consisting on Indian food.I wonder if its okay to exceed 1200cals by 50-100cals once a while..i count everything from a spoon of olive oil to Ketchup..plz help.Thank you
2
Replies
-
You might not need to ever eat that low. What is your weight and height?3
-
Anything within 100 give or take from your goal is fine. Having said that, are you sure 1200 calories is right for you. 1200 is the minimum for women, and usually when people get that it is because they have set their goal too aggressively. Also realize you are supposed to eat the calories you burn from exercise as well, so on days you exercise you should be eating more.2
-
Yes its ok to go over just use exercise to balance it all out.1
-
RuNaRoUnDaFiEld wrote: »You might not need to ever eat that low. What is your weight and height?rileysowner wrote: »Anything within 100 give or take from your goal is fine. Having said that, are you sure 1200 calories is right for you. 1200 is the minimum for women, and usually when people get that it is because they have set their goal too aggressively. Also realize you are supposed to eat the calories you burn from exercise as well, so on days you exercise you should be eating more.
Cosigned.
I'm 5'6" and lose weight on 1500 calories before exercise, and I exercise.2 -
weight is approx. 67kgs and height 5.6inchs
0 -
I'm 50 years old, 5'4" and lose on 1600 calories per day. You might want to recalculate your caloric need.1
-
Thanks for the quick replies..yes i workout 4days a week..without equipments..Squatvaritations, lunges skippings moutain climbs etc...
If anyone is on a weightloss or fitness journey here..id be glad to be friends0 -
kshama2001 wrote: »RuNaRoUnDaFiEld wrote: »You might not need to ever eat that low. What is your weight and height?rileysowner wrote: »Anything within 100 give or take from your goal is fine. Having said that, are you sure 1200 calories is right for you. 1200 is the minimum for women, and usually when people get that it is because they have set their goal too aggressively. Also realize you are supposed to eat the calories you burn from exercise as well, so on days you exercise you should be eating more.
Cosigned.
I'm 5'6" and lose weight on 1500 calories before exercise, and I exercise.
i have always been an active person..sports and all.so its difficult to shed those few pounds..0 -
-
I follow a diet mainly consisting on Indian food.I wonder if its okay to exceed 1200cals by 50-100cals once a while..i count everything from a spoon of olive oil to Ketchup..plz help.Thank you
How are you getting the caloric value of your food? Are you making it at home and using the recipe builder? Calorie counts can vary widely from one cook to the next.0 -
rileysowner wrote: »Anything within 100 give or take from your goal is fine. Having said that, are you sure 1200 calories is right for you. 1200 is the minimum for women, and usually when people get that it is because they have set their goal too aggressively. Also realize you are supposed to eat the calories you burn from exercise as well, so on days you exercise you should be eating more.
Sorry to butt in, but this is not necessarily the case, you don't have to eat the calories you burn specifically from exercise, it's also a bit dangerous because the calculations for calories burned from certain exercises, apps and gym machines are not consistent.
You should work out your BMR (base metabolic rate) and TDEE (total daily energy expenditure) from your height, weight, general activity levels and age, and then adjust your calorie intake around that to suit either weight loss, maintenance or weight gain - this is the proven most accurate scientific way of doing things.
Something else to bear in mind, is that if you go too hard at reducing calorie intake, it can interfere with your metabolism, so it's best to reduce slowly slowly
3 -
At 67kg, 1200 is okay, especially if you're eating back your activity. If you're not (I recommend you don't), you'd probably want to raise your calories a bit, maybe to 1400-1500.
But to answer your question, no, it's not a big deal to go a few calories under or over. I try to keep my calories within 50, but if I go 100 or 150 over, the world isn't going to end
To put it into perspective, a pound is about 3500 calories. So if you were to go 100 calories over, then that is ~0.013kg that you could have lost, but didn't (that's nothing).2 -
If you are active you should be able to eat more than 1200 calories.1
-
rileysowner wrote: »rileysowner wrote: »
M not very fat as such but goal would be around 62..havent weighed myself since i started working out (2 months).i dont loose weight easily..I love rice and dessert.so thats something i want to control0 -
rileysowner wrote: »Anything within 100 give or take from your goal is fine. Having said that, are you sure 1200 calories is right for you. 1200 is the minimum for women, and usually when people get that it is because they have set their goal too aggressively. Also realize you are supposed to eat the calories you burn from exercise as well, so on days you exercise you should be eating more.
Sorry to butt in, but this is not necessarily the case, you don't have to eat the calories you burn specifically from exercise, it's also a bit dangerous because the calculations for calories burned from certain exercises, apps and gym machines are not consistent.
You should work out your BMR (base metabolic rate) and TDEE (total daily energy expenditure) from your height, weight and age, and adjust your calorie intake around that to suit either weight loss, maintenance or weight gain - this is the proven most accurate scientific way of doing things.
Actually, if a person is using this tool as it is designed they are supposed to. MFP does not factor intended exercise into its calorie goal for a person with the intention that when they exercise they eat those calories (try reading the various stickies about how this tool works). As for calculation of BMR and TDEE MFP does that albeit using a NEAT based formula that does not include intended exercise since often people do not do the exercise they say they will, or do more than they say, hence eating back exercise calories. If a person wants to figure out TDEE that is fine, but it is unnecessary as the MFP approach is based on the same formulas.5 -
kshama2001 wrote: »RuNaRoUnDaFiEld wrote: »You might not need to ever eat that low. What is your weight and height?rileysowner wrote: »Anything within 100 give or take from your goal is fine. Having said that, are you sure 1200 calories is right for you. 1200 is the minimum for women, and usually when people get that it is because they have set their goal too aggressively. Also realize you are supposed to eat the calories you burn from exercise as well, so on days you exercise you should be eating more.
Cosigned.
I'm 5'6" and lose weight on 1500 calories before exercise, and I exercise.
i have always been an active person..sports and all.so its difficult to shed those few pounds..
Wait. Wut?1 -
rileysowner wrote: »Anything within 100 give or take from your goal is fine. Having said that, are you sure 1200 calories is right for you. 1200 is the minimum for women, and usually when people get that it is because they have set their goal too aggressively. Also realize you are supposed to eat the calories you burn from exercise as well, so on days you exercise you should be eating more.
Sorry to butt in, but this is not necessarily the case, you don't have to eat the calories you burn specifically from exercise, it's also a bit dangerous because the calculations for calories burned from certain exercises, apps and gym machines are not consistent.
You should work out your BMR (base metabolic rate) and TDEE (total daily energy expenditure) from your height, weight, general activity levels and age, and then adjust your calorie intake around that to suit either weight loss, maintenance or weight gain - this is the proven most accurate scientific way of doing things.
Something else to bear in mind, is that if you go too hard at reducing calorie intake, it can interfere with your metabolism, so it's best to reduce slowly slowly0 -
rileysowner wrote: »rileysowner wrote: »Anything within 100 give or take from your goal is fine. Having said that, are you sure 1200 calories is right for you. 1200 is the minimum for women, and usually when people get that it is because they have set their goal too aggressively. Also realize you are supposed to eat the calories you burn from exercise as well, so on days you exercise you should be eating more.
Sorry to butt in, but this is not necessarily the case, you don't have to eat the calories you burn specifically from exercise, it's also a bit dangerous because the calculations for calories burned from certain exercises, apps and gym machines are not consistent.
You should work out your BMR (base metabolic rate) and TDEE (total daily energy expenditure) from your height, weight and age, and adjust your calorie intake around that to suit either weight loss, maintenance or weight gain - this is the proven most accurate scientific way of doing things.
Actually, if a person is using this tool as it is designed they are supposed to. MFP does not factor intended exercise into its calorie goal for a person with the intention that when they exercise they eat those calories (try reading the various stickies about how this tool works). As for calculation of BMR and TDEE MFP does that albeit using a NEAT based formula that does not include intended exercise since often people do not do the exercise they say they will, or do more than they say, hence eating back exercise calories. If a person wants to figure out TDEE that is fine, but it is unnecessary as the MFP approach is based on the same formulas.
Agreed. Both ways are valid and require monitoring and adjustment depending on results.1 -
jofjltncb6 wrote: »kshama2001 wrote: »RuNaRoUnDaFiEld wrote: »You might not need to ever eat that low. What is your weight and height?rileysowner wrote: »Anything within 100 give or take from your goal is fine. Having said that, are you sure 1200 calories is right for you. 1200 is the minimum for women, and usually when people get that it is because they have set their goal too aggressively. Also realize you are supposed to eat the calories you burn from exercise as well, so on days you exercise you should be eating more.
Cosigned.
I'm 5'6" and lose weight on 1500 calories before exercise, and I exercise.
i have always been an active person..sports and all.so its difficult to shed those few pounds..
Wait. Wut?
whats the doubt>? :P0 -
rileysowner wrote: »Anything within 100 give or take from your goal is fine. Having said that, are you sure 1200 calories is right for you. 1200 is the minimum for women, and usually when people get that it is because they have set their goal too aggressively. Also realize you are supposed to eat the calories you burn from exercise as well, so on days you exercise you should be eating more.
Sorry to butt in, but this is not necessarily the case, you don't have to eat the calories you burn specifically from exercise, it's also a bit dangerous because the calculations for calories burned from certain exercises, apps and gym machines are not consistent.
You should work out your BMR (base metabolic rate) and TDEE (total daily energy expenditure) from your height, weight, general activity levels and age, and then adjust your calorie intake around that to suit either weight loss, maintenance or weight gain - this is the proven most accurate scientific way of doing things.
Something else to bear in mind, is that if you go too hard at reducing calorie intake, it can interfere with your metabolism, so it's best to reduce slowly slowly
try this
http://scoobysworkshop.com/calorie-calculator/1 -
M not very fat as such but goal would be around 62..havent weighed myself since i started working out (2 months).i dont loose weight easily..I love rice and dessert.so thats something i want to control
If only there were a weigh to tell if your diet plan was working or needed adjustment.
5 -
rileysowner wrote: »Anything within 100 give or take from your goal is fine. Having said that, are you sure 1200 calories is right for you. 1200 is the minimum for women, and usually when people get that it is because they have set their goal too aggressively. Also realize you are supposed to eat the calories you burn from exercise as well, so on days you exercise you should be eating more.
Sorry to butt in, but this is not necessarily the case, you don't have to eat the calories you burn specifically from exercise, it's also a bit dangerous because the calculations for calories burned from certain exercises, apps and gym machines are not consistent.
You should work out your BMR (base metabolic rate) and TDEE (total daily energy expenditure) from your height, weight, general activity levels and age, and then adjust your calorie intake around that to suit either weight loss, maintenance or weight gain - this is the proven most accurate scientific way of doing things.
Something else to bear in mind, is that if you go too hard at reducing calorie intake, it can interfere with your metabolism, so it's best to reduce slowly slowly
MFP did this for you when you entered your information. You don't have to do it again.
Far more helpful is making sure your information entered here is correct, and set your goal as .5 pounds per week.
Then make sure your logging is as good as it can be. That means measuring all solids with a digital kitchen scale including those that are ground and grated, an example of that would be your rice, a scale will give a far better measure of how much you are eating than measuring cups. Also, make sure you are logging everything you eat and drink, and that the database entries you are using match the calories of what you are eating since there are regional differences even in similar products.
1 -
Many people can efficiently lose weight eating well over 1200 calories...1200 calories is an aggressive weight loss goal.1
-
rileysowner wrote: »rileysowner wrote: »Anything within 100 give or take from your goal is fine. Having said that, are you sure 1200 calories is right for you. 1200 is the minimum for women, and usually when people get that it is because they have set their goal too aggressively. Also realize you are supposed to eat the calories you burn from exercise as well, so on days you exercise you should be eating more.
Sorry to butt in, but this is not necessarily the case, you don't have to eat the calories you burn specifically from exercise, it's also a bit dangerous because the calculations for calories burned from certain exercises, apps and gym machines are not consistent.
You should work out your BMR (base metabolic rate) and TDEE (total daily energy expenditure) from your height, weight and age, and adjust your calorie intake around that to suit either weight loss, maintenance or weight gain - this is the proven most accurate scientific way of doing things.
Actually, if a person is using this tool as it is designed they are supposed to. MFP does not factor intended exercise into its calorie goal for a person with the intention that when they exercise they eat those calories (try reading the various stickies about how this tool works). As for calculation of BMR and TDEE MFP does that albeit using a NEAT based formula that does not include intended exercise since often people do not do the exercise they say they will, or do more than they say, hence eating back exercise calories. If a person wants to figure out TDEE that is fine, but it is unnecessary as the MFP approach is based on the same formulas.
And, if you figure correctly, both methods will get you to approximately the same numbers when averaged over the week.2 -
cwolfman13 wrote: »Many people can efficiently lose weight eating well over 1200 calories...1200 calories is an aggressive weight loss goal.
i have been woking out for 2 months now..but end up eating bad junk..Got hammered by my instructor.Hence trying this for a month0 -
jofjltncb6 wrote: »kshama2001 wrote: »RuNaRoUnDaFiEld wrote: »You might not need to ever eat that low. What is your weight and height?rileysowner wrote: »Anything within 100 give or take from your goal is fine. Having said that, are you sure 1200 calories is right for you. 1200 is the minimum for women, and usually when people get that it is because they have set their goal too aggressively. Also realize you are supposed to eat the calories you burn from exercise as well, so on days you exercise you should be eating more.
Cosigned.
I'm 5'6" and lose weight on 1500 calories before exercise, and I exercise.
i have always been an active person..sports and all.so its difficult to shed those few pounds..
Wait. Wut?
whats the doubt>? :P
Here's the doubt: If you're active, you're burning more calories. You have more of a deficit at the same input calorie level and lose weight faster than if you were not active. Therefore, what you said doesn't make sense.
However, if you're active you also can't create a big calorie deficit without having it negatively impact your performance. Plus, people who are active tend to eat more to compensate. So, if your tracking isn't really on point being more active may not help you lose faster.0 -
jofjltncb6 wrote: »kshama2001 wrote: »RuNaRoUnDaFiEld wrote: »You might not need to ever eat that low. What is your weight and height?rileysowner wrote: »Anything within 100 give or take from your goal is fine. Having said that, are you sure 1200 calories is right for you. 1200 is the minimum for women, and usually when people get that it is because they have set their goal too aggressively. Also realize you are supposed to eat the calories you burn from exercise as well, so on days you exercise you should be eating more.
Cosigned.
I'm 5'6" and lose weight on 1500 calories before exercise, and I exercise.
i have always been an active person..sports and all.so its difficult to shed those few pounds..
Wait. Wut?
whats the doubt>? :P
Here's the doubt: If you're active, you're burning more calories. You have more of a deficit at the same input calorie level and lose weight faster than if you were not active. Therefore, what you said doesn't make sense.
However, if you're active you also can't create a big calorie deficit without having it negatively impact your performance. Plus, people who are active tend to eat more to compensate. So, if your tracking isn't really on point being more active may not help you lose faster.
it hasnt even been a week since i started with this diet change..good chance this will show effects since ve cut on sugar and rice..vl havto wait for a month to see..0 -
3dogsrunning wrote: »rileysowner wrote: »rileysowner wrote: »Anything within 100 give or take from your goal is fine. Having said that, are you sure 1200 calories is right for you. 1200 is the minimum for women, and usually when people get that it is because they have set their goal too aggressively. Also realize you are supposed to eat the calories you burn from exercise as well, so on days you exercise you should be eating more.
Sorry to butt in, but this is not necessarily the case, you don't have to eat the calories you burn specifically from exercise, it's also a bit dangerous because the calculations for calories burned from certain exercises, apps and gym machines are not consistent.
You should work out your BMR (base metabolic rate) and TDEE (total daily energy expenditure) from your height, weight and age, and adjust your calorie intake around that to suit either weight loss, maintenance or weight gain - this is the proven most accurate scientific way of doing things.
Actually, if a person is using this tool as it is designed they are supposed to. MFP does not factor intended exercise into its calorie goal for a person with the intention that when they exercise they eat those calories (try reading the various stickies about how this tool works). As for calculation of BMR and TDEE MFP does that albeit using a NEAT based formula that does not include intended exercise since often people do not do the exercise they say they will, or do more than they say, hence eating back exercise calories. If a person wants to figure out TDEE that is fine, but it is unnecessary as the MFP approach is based on the same formulas.
And, if you figure correctly, both methods will get you to approximately the same numbers when averaged over the week.
Precisely.0 -
Easiest route:
Set your weight goal and activity level before deliberate exercise on mfp.
Log your exercise.
Eat your calorie allowance plus most of your exercise calories.
After a few weeks, evaluate whether you're losing weight at the 0.5-1lb per week you most likely want.
Tweak your intake, accordingly.1 -
You should work out your BMR (base metabolic rate) and TDEE (total daily energy expenditure) from your height, weight, general activity levels and age, and then adjust your calorie intake around that to suit either weight loss, maintenance or weight gain - this is the proven most accurate scientific way of doing things.
Question about this-if you base your daily calories on your TDEE then do you not take your exercise calorie credit that MFP gives you into consideration? If I'm understanding correctly if a website like the Scooby calorie counter gave you a daily calorie number based on the personal stats you entered and your activity level would that be what you would eat daily and just turn off the exercise calories option?
0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions