Premium?

burreld

It's way to expensive. It cost more than Netflix.

Chef_Barbell

Dano74 wrote: »

kshama2001 wrote: »

Dano74 wrote: »

I'll break ranks here and say "Yes". As a macro type of guy, the ability to change calories by day and the addition of the macro counter front and center was worth the price alone.

As for accuracy, you can always find an "accurate" nutritional profile in the database. Considering nutritional labels allow for variance anyway, there will always be variance no matter how accurate one label is compared to the next. Do this long enough and you'll have a pretty good approximation to know what's right and wrong- generally speaking, we're talking relatively accurate ballpark for calorie counts anyway.

What some of us are complaining about is the inability to differentiate user-created entries based on God knows what vs system entries that were pulled from the USDA database. We were able to differentiate before the Verified update via the asterisk vs no asterisk system. Now, if user-created Verified entries had yellow check marks and the system entries continued to have the green check marks, that would be a start.

The ridiculous number of duplicates for the same foods should be removed as well.

Agreed. I, personally, just don't find it all that troublesome or problematic as once I log an accurate item, it's in my personal database for easy reference later. And really, it's the features I pay for- not the free database:

Ad-Free
Focus on meeting your goals without distraction

Macronutrients by Gram
Set macronutrient goals by either gram or percentage

Quick Add Macronutrients
Quick Add users can now add macros to their calorie entries

Different Goals by Day
Set custom calorie and macronutrient goals for any day of the week

Home Screen Dashboard
Easily keep an eye on your nutrient goals rather than focusing solely on calories

I use an ad-blocker for years and haven't seen an ad in a long time and that's free. The other stuff does not interest me enough to pay for it. *shrug*