"Eating clean" and Exercising...not losing weight

92_sweetheart
92_sweetheart Posts: 131 Member
edited December 2024 in Health and Weight Loss
Hi everyone!

I recently started back on my weight loss journey. I've been at it strong for about 9 days. In the first maybe 3-5 days, I lost about 2.6lbs. Starting was 186.2lbs got down to about 183.6. I didn't log that 183.6 but prior to that I was weighing in at 184.6lbs. So I did gain and now I've been stuck at 184.6 to 184.8 for days now. I consume about 1200 calories but net about 700-800 with exercise. I'm not sure if I'm not giving it enough time or if I am not eating enough or if this is actually good lost or what. I'm 5ft2 if that matters.

Thanks :smile:
«13

Replies

  • inertiastrength
    inertiastrength Posts: 2,343 Member
    You got excited as you dropped the initial glycogen stores but as far as fat loss, like a pp mentioned, 2lbs a week is a pipe dream at yor weight and height. Unfortunately the shorter you are the less room for error you have in terms of accuracy in your logging. 180 is stil rather heavy for your height so 1lb a week would probably be as aggressive as I'd expect and as I said, not too much room for error
  • 92_sweetheart
    92_sweetheart Posts: 131 Member
    Do you weigh everything you eat? You might be eating more than you think you are.

    I weigh literally everything.
  • 92_sweetheart
    92_sweetheart Posts: 131 Member

    If you are weighing everything you eat and truly only eating 1200 (and netting 700?) then that is very low. Too low.

    You can eat more than 1200 and lose weight! What did MFP set your daily goal at?

    I weigh everything. I set it at 2lb a week. My net is usually around 800-850 net but some days on the higher end of 700 like 780-790. I honestly don't think I could handle eating more than 1200 calories. I eat more now than before I really got on board with. Probably in the past 2 meals a day and not healthy choices.
  • DancingMoosie
    DancingMoosie Posts: 8,619 Member
    Try to only weigh yourself once a week. There will be daily water fluctuations that can be frustrating if you look at the scale more often. Stick to eating 1200, try not to net under that very often. You need to fuel your body. Be patient, it will happen.
  • 92_sweetheart
    92_sweetheart Posts: 131 Member

    At 5'2", there really is no way to lose 2 pounds a week unless you are very, very, very obese. And you are not.

    Did you set yourself to lose more than one pound a week? What is your training like that you're getting so many exercise calories?

    I kept my goal at 2lbs per week the same when I started my weigh loss plan at 221lbs. I was obese during that time. I got down to about 175. I have medically induce hypothyroidism so I recently around March my weight got up to about 205. My thyroid is not 100% controlled but medicine is keeping at an okay range that I can lose weight (lost about 20lbs since March with no exercising or dieting) but my metoblism is slower so I thought 1200 calories was good because probably anymore I would just gain weight. I've been circuit training everyday for since starting.
  • ninerbuff
    ninerbuff Posts: 49,042 Member
    You're netting too low and your weight loss expectation a week is too high. Never a great combination. With an approximate BMR of 1650, then adding exercise along with daily physical activity, I'd imagine you'd be easily in the 2000 range TDEE. Even if you took a 1000 off of that, you'd net 1000 (still too low).
    Eat no less than 1200 calories NET. Stay consistent and the weight will come off.

    A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition

    9285851.png
  • BarbaraJatmfp
    BarbaraJatmfp Posts: 463 Member
    Be sure you eat three vegetables and two fruits each day. There is something about the nutrients in those foods that help digest the other foods you eat. I don't lose weight if I skimp on the veggies, but I do lose weight if I eat them.

  • 92_sweetheart
    92_sweetheart Posts: 131 Member
    ninerbuff wrote: »
    You're netting too low and your weight loss expectation a week is too high. Never a great combination. With an approximate BMR of 1650, then adding exercise along with daily physical activity, I'd imagine you'd be easily in the 2000 range TDEE. Even if you took a 1000 off of that, you'd net 1000 (still too low).
    Eat no less than 1200 calories NET. Stay consistent and the weight will come off.

    A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition

    9285851.png

    I never changed it from nearly 2 yrs ago just entered my updated weight. I've been exercising everyday since starting which I entered and I plan on doing for the most part.


    I just set it at 1lb a week MFP is still giving 1200 Calories. Am I suppose to eat 1200 with/after exercise?
  • 92_sweetheart
    92_sweetheart Posts: 131 Member
    I set it at 1lb per week and still getting 1200 Calorie daily goal.
  • roamingtiger
    roamingtiger Posts: 747 Member
    You can't expect weight loss to happen overnight. You've only been at it for 9 days, and this takes time. It's taken me a little over a year..
  • GottaBurnEmAll
    GottaBurnEmAll Posts: 7,722 Member
    I set it at 1lb per week and still getting 1200 Calorie daily goal.

    You can likely EAT more than 1200 calories. Unlike everyone else here, I'm not one who's totally convinced you're fully netting exactly what MFP says.

    Tell us exactly how long your exercise sessions are and how you get the calorie burns for them... do you enter them into MFP?
  • 92_sweetheart
    92_sweetheart Posts: 131 Member
    I set it at 1lb per week and still getting 1200 Calorie daily goal.

    You can likely EAT more than 1200 calories. Unlike everyone else here, I'm not one who's totally convinced you're fully netting exactly what MFP says.

    Tell us exactly how long your exercise sessions are and how you get the calorie burns for them... do you enter them into MFP?

    I actually probably actually eat 1050-1200 a day. I was going by MFP telling me 1000-1200 is okay. I LITERALLY log everything and weigh everything and pre-plan my meals days in advance. The only thing I log that could or possibly inaccurate is the calories for fruits and veggies. I exercise 20 minutes a day and with the exercise I do I burn around 230 Calories occurring to MFP (circuit training). I plan on getting a heart rate and calorie tracker to be sure I actually am burning that. Maybe I'm not burning what I it is saying.
  • roamingtiger
    roamingtiger Posts: 747 Member
    You shouldn't eat less than your BMR because then your body thinks it's starving which means it'll store your fat to use for later. The MFP activity calories is way off. It says I burn about 300 more than I actually do, so I go by my HR monitor.
  • GottaBurnEmAll
    GottaBurnEmAll Posts: 7,722 Member
    I set it at 1lb per week and still getting 1200 Calorie daily goal.

    You can likely EAT more than 1200 calories. Unlike everyone else here, I'm not one who's totally convinced you're fully netting exactly what MFP says.

    Tell us exactly how long your exercise sessions are and how you get the calorie burns for them... do you enter them into MFP?

    I actually probably actually eat 1050-1200 a day. I was going by MFP telling me 1000-1200 is okay. I LITERALLY log everything and weigh everything and pre-plan my meals days in advance. The only thing I log that could or possibly inaccurate is the calories for fruits and veggies. I exercise 20 minutes a day and with the exercise I do I burn around 230 Calories occurring to MFP (circuit training). I plan on getting a heart rate and calorie tracker to be sure I actually am burning that. Maybe I'm not burning what I it is saying.

    Wait. You said you were netting 700-800, but let's not quibble over numbers.

    If you're circuit training for just 20 minutes a day, you're not burning 230 calories. You're lucking to be burning 100. I think the notion that you're netting too few calories can be laid to rest.

    As far as heart rate trackers, they're only useful for steady state cardio. They won't really work for circuit training.

    Stop eating less than 1200 calories, okay?

    If you're logging accurately, weighing your food with a food scale, and selecting the correct data base entries, just stay the course. The weight will come off.
  • 92_sweetheart
    92_sweetheart Posts: 131 Member
    You shouldn't eat less than your BMR because then your body thinks it's starving which means it'll store your fat to use for later. The MFP activity calories is way off. It says I burn about 300 more than I actually do, so I go by my HR monitor.

    Starvation mode doesn't exist. You shouldn't eat below your BMR that much is true.. but the whole starvation mode and storing it as fat.. is not true at all.

    Which I also read years ago when first starting my journey
  • roamingtiger
    roamingtiger Posts: 747 Member
    You shouldn't eat less than your BMR because then your body thinks it's starving which means it'll store your fat to use for later. The MFP activity calories is way off. It says I burn about 300 more than I actually do, so I go by my HR monitor.

    Starvation mode doesn't exist. You shouldn't eat below your BMR that much is true.. but the whole starvation mode and storing it as fat.. is not true at all.

    Just wondering why you say it isn't true. I'd like some science articles. Thanks in advance.
  • 92_sweetheart
    92_sweetheart Posts: 131 Member
    Highly unlikely you are burning 230 calories in 20 minutes of exercise. You might be burning half of that to be honest. MFP way over estimates calorie burns in my experience.

    I figured that it is was off but I'm looking to getting a heart rate monitor soon.
  • GottaBurnEmAll
    GottaBurnEmAll Posts: 7,722 Member
    You shouldn't eat less than your BMR because then your body thinks it's starving which means it'll store your fat to use for later. The MFP activity calories is way off. It says I burn about 300 more than I actually do, so I go by my HR monitor.

    Starvation mode doesn't exist. You shouldn't eat below your BMR that much is true.. but the whole starvation mode and storing it as fat.. is not true at all.

    Well, sometimes we shorter folks do end up eating below our BMR because that's just how the math works. It's not a big deal.

    When I first started losing weight at 210 pounds and was eating 1200 calories, I was eating below my BMR. And yet, that wasn't an aggressive rate of loss for me. It was only a pound a week deficit.
  • MalkinMagic71
    MalkinMagic71 Posts: 1,433 Member
    You shouldn't eat less than your BMR because then your body thinks it's starving which means it'll store your fat to use for later. The MFP activity calories is way off. It says I burn about 300 more than I actually do, so I go by my HR monitor.

    Starvation mode doesn't exist. You shouldn't eat below your BMR that much is true.. but the whole starvation mode and storing it as fat.. is not true at all.

    Well, sometimes we shorter folks do end up eating below our BMR because that's just how the math works. It's not a big deal.

    When I first started losing weight at 210 pounds and was eating 1200 calories, I was eating below my BMR. And yet, that wasn't an aggressive rate of loss for me. It was only a pound a week deficit.

    Obviously they are exceptions, but for most people it's not the best way to go about things. I started similar when I was at my heaviest(390ish).. eating very low calorie just to get the weight off quick, but was under doctors supervision at this time.

    Anyway you do it, you have to make sure it is something sustainable for the long haul.
This discussion has been closed.