Welcome to Debate Club! Please be aware that this is a space for respectful debate, and that your ideas will be challenged here. Please remember to critique the argument, not the author.

Is it the same for everyone ?

Options
healthy491
healthy491 Posts: 384 Member
So we can all agree that CI<CO leads to weight loss for everyone, which is awesome. BUT when it comes to certain facts ( or myths ? idk ) like sugar being addictive , vegetables are fulfilling etc.. are they the same for everyone ? I am asking this because when I was eating chicken , vegetables etc and no sugar , I used to feel extremely hungry and sad and end up eating more and more. Now I basically eat chocolate and sweet stuff during the day and some proteins at night and I feel happy and full while still staying under my calorie goal.
«134

Replies

  • lemurcat12
    lemurcat12 Posts: 30,886 Member
    Options
    People seem to differ as to what they find satiating. I think that's a combination of physical differences and satiety being largely psychological too.

    Sugar being "addictive" is a minefield. I don't happen to think it is, in the sense that we typically use addiction, but eating can be. The evidence (to the extent one accepts the addiction model here) is that highly palatable foods tend to be the triggers (and they vary from person to person), and studies show that the vaulted brain responses to sugar also happen with fat and, especially, combinations of sugar/fat or salt/fat or the like. Related to this, people tend to feel less satiety on mixed foods (like potatoes + fat + salt like fries or chips) vs. plain potatoes without the fat (which tend to score high on satiety tests), even though the plain potatoes have a higher glycemic index and are basically carbs without much fiber.
  • ndj1979
    ndj1979 Posts: 29,139 Member
    Options
    healthy491 wrote: »
    So we can all agree that CI<CO leads to weight loss for everyone, which is awesome. BUT when it comes to certain facts ( or myths ? idk ) like sugar being addictive , vegetables are fulfilling etc.. are they the same for everyone ? I am asking this because when I was eating chicken , vegetables etc and no sugar , I used to feel extremely hungry and sad and end up eating more and more. Now I basically eat chocolate and sweet stuff during the day and some proteins at night and I feel happy and full while still staying under my calorie goal.

    lets take them one by one.

    sugar is not addictive.
    vegetables are dense so they are more filling, and it should be the same for everyone.

    if you are curious about CICO just google the twinkie diet. The guy ate a diet of primarily twinkies and lost weight and had improved blood labs.
  • RoxieDawn
    RoxieDawn Posts: 15,488 Member
    Options
    Maybe going back to chocolate and sweet stuff and smaller amounts of protein is more mental. Meaning perhaps there is a psychological factor there that you are feeling more satisfied with the things you are enjoying and really hated eating chicken, veggies and no sugar.

    "we can all agree that CI<CO leads to weight loss for everyone" .. YES

  • crzycatlady1
    crzycatlady1 Posts: 1,930 Member
    edited October 2016
    Options
    usmcmp wrote: »
    There is a lot of personal preference in eating patterns. Some people cannot control themselves when it comes to eating sweets and others can. These are also factors that can change over time or under different circumstances. That's why many of us suggest people ditch eating plans or restrictive diets to discover eating patterns that will work for them long term.

    This. CICO is the bottom line for weight loss, weight gain and weight maintenance. But....we're all different and have varied food preferences, schedules, lifestyles, cultural backgrounds etc. I personally can take or leave sweet stuff. Halloween candy does nothing for me and I won't be tempted at all to skim my kids. However, you put a can of Pringles in my cupboard and that thing is toast! My sister is the complete opposite and has admitted to eating an entire package of oreos by herself before. She loves the sweet stuff like candy and cookies and for her they can be an issue. Figuring out what works/doesn't work for yourself is key, and also realize that what works for you may not work for someone else. But all said and done-regardless of how you decide go about things-CICO is king :)
  • Lounmoun
    Lounmoun Posts: 8,426 Member
    Options
    healthy491 wrote: »
    So we can all agree that CI<CO leads to weight loss for everyone, which is awesome. BUT when it comes to certain facts ( or myths ? idk ) like sugar being addictive , vegetables are fulfilling etc.. are they the same for everyone ? I am asking this because when I was eating chicken , vegetables etc and no sugar , I used to feel extremely hungry and sad and end up eating more and more. Now I basically eat chocolate and sweet stuff during the day and some proteins at night and I feel happy and full while still staying under my calorie goal.

    Different people find different foods filling and tasty. Usually if you are meeting your calorie, protein, fat and fiber goal you will feel pretty satisfied. Some people feel they need more carbs than other people. You can use the same calorie goal but eat different foods and get results.

    Sweet things taste good to many people. Some people prefer sweet flavors over all else. If you suddenly stop eating sugar food tastes different. You want it because you are used to it and it tastes nice to you. Your tastes could adjust to a lower sugar diet.

    Some people prefer other flavors more strongly.
    I like salty and sour foods. They taste good to me. I feel happier when I eat foods that taste good to me and less happy when foods are bland. It isn't an addiction. It is habit and preference. I could get used to blander foods or learn to get more flavor from other ingredients.

    Fat makes things taste good to a lot of people too. You can find plenty of threads on the forum about people preferring full fat dairy products because they taste better and other people preferring a lower fat alternative.
  • elisa123gal
    elisa123gal Posts: 4,287 Member
    Options
    I don't buy into the CICO philosophy whole heartedly. ..with so many of us eating at a deficit for weeks and we don't lose? See all those "help" posts.

    Or take the show The Biggest Loser.. where they workout 8 hours a day ..eat 1200 calories and contestants gain a pound or only lose one or two pounds..in a week..to if you do the CICO math they should be losing 10 pounds. So.. i think counting calories is a tool..that works most of the time but not all of the time. Boosting metabolism and finding what works for ones nutritional needs all matter.

    It isn't a single simple solution. You just have to eat right and move more.. and mix a lot of time into the equation ...that is what works.
  • psuLemon
    psuLemon Posts: 38,389 MFP Moderator
    Options
    I don't buy into the CICO philosophy whole heartedly. ..with so many of us eating at a deficit for weeks and we don't lose? See all those "help" posts.

    Or take the show The Biggest Loser.. where they workout 8 hours a day ..eat 1200 calories and contestants gain a pound or only lose one or two pounds..in a week..to if you do the CICO math they should be losing 10 pounds. So.. i think counting calories is a tool..that works most of the time but not all of the time. Boosting metabolism and finding what works for ones nutritional needs all matter.

    It isn't a single simple solution. You just have to eat right and move more.. and mix a lot of time into the equation ...that is what works.

    If you look at the overall concept of biggest loser, they all lost weight. Weight fluctuates daily. It's just a natural occurrence that is can be influenced by exercise, sodium consumption, TOM, food waste in your GI system, etc.. So just because you don't lose every week, doesn't invalidate CICO. That is why it is important to look at weight loss over long periods to look at net weight change.

    Also, not many things actually boost metabolism (at least basal metabolic rate). Exercise will increase expenditure and resistance training (especially can cause increase to resting metabolic rate) but if you want prolonged increase to metabolism, large amounts of muscle gain are required and even than you only burn about 6 calories per day with every lb of muscle gained.
  • GottaBurnEmAll
    GottaBurnEmAll Posts: 7,722 Member
    Options
    I don't buy into the CICO philosophy whole heartedly. ..with so many of us eating at a deficit for weeks and we don't lose? See all those "help" posts.

    Or take the show The Biggest Loser.. where they workout 8 hours a day ..eat 1200 calories and contestants gain a pound or only lose one or two pounds..in a week..to if you do the CICO math they should be losing 10 pounds. So.. i think counting calories is a tool..that works most of the time but not all of the time. Boosting metabolism and finding what works for ones nutritional needs all matter.

    It isn't a single simple solution. You just have to eat right and move more.. and mix a lot of time into the equation ...that is what works.

    In addition to the points already made, there were glaring flaws in the model used to compute the "metabolic damage" done to the Biggest Loser contestants.

    I have found that people who say that CICO isn't the whole picture don't understand just how complex CICO is meant to be. It's a simple acronym that covers everything people say it doesn't cover.
  • ndj1979
    ndj1979 Posts: 29,139 Member
    Options
    I don't buy into the CICO philosophy whole heartedly. ..with so many of us eating at a deficit for weeks and we don't lose? See all those "help" posts.

    Or take the show The Biggest Loser.. where they workout 8 hours a day ..eat 1200 calories and contestants gain a pound or only lose one or two pounds..in a week..to if you do the CICO math they should be losing 10 pounds. So.. i think counting calories is a tool..that works most of the time but not all of the time. Boosting metabolism and finding what works for ones nutritional needs all matter.

    It isn't a single simple solution. You just have to eat right and move more.. and mix a lot of time into the equation ...that is what works.

    CICO is not a philosophy it is an establishment mathematical fat..

    if you don't believe in it, try eating more calories then you burn and see what happens...

    In regards to your biggest loser comment, it takes your body three to four weeks to adapt to any change, and those people go from zero exercise to working out eight hours a day, so they are retaining a massive amount of water in the first few weeks..

    has anyone ever ate 1200 calories and exercised 8 hours a day on that show and lost no weight at all??
  • chubbybword123
    chubbybword123 Posts: 54 Member
    edited October 2016
    Options
    CICO is the real deal, basic science.

    I think if you eat your sweets without any protein or fat, then you will crave it more because of the blood sugar spikes.

    Feeling full is usually a combo between fat, protein, carbs and fiber. If you're only having high protein (chicken has very little fat) and low carb/fiber (veggies) you'll still feel hungry. Also related to blood sugar levels, cravings and overall feeling of satisfaction.

    There's also so much more in play... like stress levels (hello, cortisol!), hormonal imbalances etc. But if you're healthy, CICO plus watching your Macros should work just fine.