How much to run
Okohme
Posts: 152 Member
So I was hoping I could get a little input from experienced runner here. I did some research but can't come up with a great answer for my particular situation.
I started walking months ago and eventually the goal became to do a little running. I started running and ended up with some significant leg pain that I went to PT for. Now that I do daily resistance exercises I am able to run again. My training has been really imprecise to this point. I have run one 5k race, with a time of just over 30 minutes. Pretty slow, but I ran the whole thing. This was over a month ago. I walk daily for about an hour. The course is the same most days, about 4 miles. Wednesday and Thursday I ran the whole course in about 33 minutes both times. I run pretty steadily and I'm feeling stronger, but not faster. I know If i really want to increase my endurance and speed I need to run more, but just how much more at starting is my question. I know that I can, obviously, run two 4.5 mile runs a week. How much more can I run, per week, to start with. I'm in decent shape up to this point, I can run for 35 minutes without having to stop and walk (I haven't pushed beyond that because I'm a little paranoid of re-injuring myself and being unable to run at all for a while again.)
So what's a good starting point for someone who has eased into running but it is in shape enough to run?
I started walking months ago and eventually the goal became to do a little running. I started running and ended up with some significant leg pain that I went to PT for. Now that I do daily resistance exercises I am able to run again. My training has been really imprecise to this point. I have run one 5k race, with a time of just over 30 minutes. Pretty slow, but I ran the whole thing. This was over a month ago. I walk daily for about an hour. The course is the same most days, about 4 miles. Wednesday and Thursday I ran the whole course in about 33 minutes both times. I run pretty steadily and I'm feeling stronger, but not faster. I know If i really want to increase my endurance and speed I need to run more, but just how much more at starting is my question. I know that I can, obviously, run two 4.5 mile runs a week. How much more can I run, per week, to start with. I'm in decent shape up to this point, I can run for 35 minutes without having to stop and walk (I haven't pushed beyond that because I'm a little paranoid of re-injuring myself and being unable to run at all for a while again.)
So what's a good starting point for someone who has eased into running but it is in shape enough to run?
0
Replies
-
The general rule of thumb is to increase your long run each week by 10%. Also, start incorporating some track workouts or tempo workouts to get faster. If you want to go fast you have to start running fast.1
-
Okay, but if I am just starting, what is week one? 10% of nothing is nothing.1
-
How about start at a mile?0
-
Mine (and many others') usual advice to someone starting to run is to follow the C25K plan, but you are already there. Google 'Bridge to 10K' - that is the follow-up program. BTW, I don't consider just over 30 minutes for a 5K 'pretty slow'. You did great!6
-
There is no need for any kind of speed/tempo work when you are beginning. The risk of injury is high and the benefits are very minimal. Run slowly and increase your distance over 6-12 months then perhaps you can incorporate some speed work into your training.
Also, going from nothing to 3-4 miles may work for you now, but you may end up with over use injuries down the road because you went too fast and too far too soon.
As for what to do next, do you have a goal in mind? Is there a race you'd like to do? Maybe train for a 10k and then think about a half marathon. I would slowly build up mileage over the next couple weeks and then start training for something in the new year. Look for novice or intro training plans.
Good luck.3 -
-
You could afford to add a third run, as upthread start at two miles and build that to four over a month or so.
Then start adding a bit too one of those until you get to six miles, then build the other two up to six miles each.
At that point you could afford to start thinking about something a bit more sophisticated than long steady, but there isn't much value until that point.1 -
TavistockToad wrote: »
Agree.
Or if you're running 4.5 miles twice a week, you could spread those 9 miles out to 3 or 4 days a week. Lower mileage, more days should help if you're injury prone or just starting out. You'll want to be running at least 3 days a week for endurance anyhow.
When you're ready, you can add distance or time (I train by time- go "run" 30 minutes and as the distance increases, increase the time a bit). The 10% rule works, but I find there's no hard fast formula for everyone. Work in cut back weeks every 3-4 weeks.
Example:
week one-5 miles
week 2- 8 miles
weeks 3 - 4 miles
Week 4 - 10 miles
week 5 -6 miles
There's no reason every run can't be the same distance at the same slow pace. That's base building. Don't worry about long runs or speed work until you get comfortable with your form and distance (and stave off injury).
Jeff Galloway has some beginner plans you might want to look at. Just set your weekly mileage intentionally, don't push the distance.
As far as the 10% rule- use it if it works for you. But my opinion, is to just add a 4th running day at 1-2 miles and work from there. If you are running comfortably 3x a week, you can add 3 miles, 4x a week add 4. Just space it out. Run the same or less distance for a few weeks before adding mileage. Usually, you'll just keep running one day and know it's time to add distance or mix it up.
TL:dr
Starting out, I personally would set a goal of 30 miles a month. Increase that by 10 miles per month as you feel able. Run at least 3x a week.
Happy running!
ETA- rest days are as important as running days. It's okay to scrap a run for recovery. Good cross training day, swim, bike, walk ect.2 -
Okay, but if I am just starting, what is week one? 10% of nothing is nothing.
Well, you can already run four...how many miles total are you running in a week...increase that distance by 10% next week and so on and so forth.
There are also a myriad of structured running programs out there that you could look into.0 -
Thanks! I just feel like the Pokey Little Puppy. lol At least I'm steady! Reading on the Bridge to 10k now.Mine (and many others') usual advice to someone starting to run is to follow the C25K plan, but you are already there. Google 'Bridge to 10K' - that is the follow-up program. BTW, I don't consider just over 30 minutes for a 5K 'pretty slow'. You did great!There is no need for any kind of speed/tempo work when you are beginning. The risk of injury is high and the benefits are very minimal. Run slowly and increase your distance over 6-12 months then perhaps you can incorporate some speed work into your training.
Also, going from nothing to 3-4 miles may work for you now, but you may end up with over use injuries down the road because you went too fast and too far too soon.
As for what to do next, do you have a goal in mind? Is there a race you'd like to do? Maybe train for a 10k and then think about a half marathon. I would slowly build up mileage over the next couple weeks and then start training for something in the new year. Look for novice or intro training plans.
Good luck.
The thing I was least clear on is the fact that It's not really "from nothing" I walk 5 or 6 miles a day and was running some, then stopped and just lately I've been throwing some jogging back in, this week I ran my little 5k course (the course I designed for myself looping around my neighbourhood just happened to come out around 5k) 3 times. So, while I haven't really been doing any running to speak of, I have been getting 60min+ cardio daily for like six months now.
I would like to run a 10k as my next goal. There is one in March I thought I might shoot for, that would give me plenty of time, I would think, even over the winter when a good deal of my running may end up being on a treadmill.0 -
MeanderingMammal wrote: »You could afford to add a third run, as upthread start at two miles and build that to four over a month or so.
Then start adding a bit too one of those until you get to six miles, then build the other two up to six miles each.
At that point you could afford to start thinking about something a bit more sophisticated than long steady, but there isn't much value until that point.
I will try that next week, I think. I already did 3 runs this week at ~3 miles, so I'll call that good to avoid tempting injury.
I'm not entirely clear on your meaning in the last sentence of your post. Do you mean more sophisticated training methods?0 -
TavistockToad wrote: »
Agree.
Or if you're running 4.5 miles twice a week, you could spread those 9 miles out to 3 or 4 days a week. Lower mileage, more days should help if you're injury prone or just starting out. You'll want to be running at least 3 days a week for endurance anyhow.
When you're ready, you can add distance or time (I train by time- go "run" 30 minutes and as the distance increases, increase the time a bit). The 10% rule works, but I find there's no hard fast formula for everyone. Work in cut back weeks every 3-4 weeks.
Example:
week one-5 miles
week 2- 8 miles
weeks 3 - 4 miles
Week 4 - 10 miles
week 5 -6 miles
There's no reason every run can't be the same distance at the same slow pace. That's base building. Don't worry about long runs or speed work until you get comfortable with your form and distance (and stave off injury).
Jeff Galloway has some beginner plans you might want to look at. Just set your weekly mileage intentionally, don't push the distance.
As far as the 10% rule- use it if it works for you. But my opinion, is to just add a 4th running day at 1-2 miles and work from there. If you are running comfortably 3x a week, you can add 3 miles, 4x a week add 4. Just space it out. Run the same or less distance for a few weeks before adding mileage. Usually, you'll just keep running one day and know it's time to add distance or mix it up.
TL:dr
Starting out, I personally would set a goal of 30 miles a month. Increase that by 10 miles per month as you feel able. Run at least 3x a week.
Happy running!
ETA- rest days are as important as running days. It's okay to scrap a run for recovery. Good cross training day, swim, bike, walk ect.
Just to clarify, the 30 miles a month is ONLY RUNNING, yes? I can sub in my daily power walks or stair stepping or whatever, on days I don't run?0 -
TavistockToad wrote: »
Agree.
Or if you're running 4.5 miles twice a week, you could spread those 9 miles out to 3 or 4 days a week. Lower mileage, more days should help if you're injury prone or just starting out. You'll want to be running at least 3 days a week for endurance anyhow.
When you're ready, you can add distance or time (I train by time- go "run" 30 minutes and as the distance increases, increase the time a bit). The 10% rule works, but I find there's no hard fast formula for everyone. Work in cut back weeks every 3-4 weeks.
Example:
week one-5 miles
week 2- 8 miles
weeks 3 - 4 miles
Week 4 - 10 miles
week 5 -6 miles
There's no reason every run can't be the same distance at the same slow pace. That's base building. Don't worry about long runs or speed work until you get comfortable with your form and distance (and stave off injury).
Jeff Galloway has some beginner plans you might want to look at. Just set your weekly mileage intentionally, don't push the distance.
As far as the 10% rule- use it if it works for you. But my opinion, is to just add a 4th running day at 1-2 miles and work from there. If you are running comfortably 3x a week, you can add 3 miles, 4x a week add 4. Just space it out. Run the same or less distance for a few weeks before adding mileage. Usually, you'll just keep running one day and know it's time to add distance or mix it up.
TL:dr
Starting out, I personally would set a goal of 30 miles a month. Increase that by 10 miles per month as you feel able. Run at least 3x a week.
Happy running!
ETA- rest days are as important as running days. It's okay to scrap a run for recovery. Good cross training day, swim, bike, walk ect.
Just to clarify, the 30 miles a month is ONLY RUNNING, yes? I can sub in my daily power walks or stair stepping or whatever, on days I don't run?
Do it as you see fit. I count all my deliberate miles in my monthly mileage goal, walks and runs. Mostly because I train with walk breaks Incorporated, half mile-2 mile run, 0.1 mile walk, repeat. So either way works.
This month I'm nearing 60 miles, all walking (recovering from surgery). As I'm able, I'll replace the distance with some running as I return.0 -
TavistockToad wrote: »
Agree.
Or if you're running 4.5 miles twice a week, you could spread those 9 miles out to 3 or 4 days a week. Lower mileage, more days should help if you're injury prone or just starting out. You'll want to be running at least 3 days a week for endurance anyhow.
When you're ready, you can add distance or time (I train by time- go "run" 30 minutes and as the distance increases, increase the time a bit). The 10% rule works, but I find there's no hard fast formula for everyone. Work in cut back weeks every 3-4 weeks.
Example:
week one-5 miles
week 2- 8 miles
weeks 3 - 4 miles
Week 4 - 10 miles
week 5 -6 miles
There's no reason every run can't be the same distance at the same slow pace. That's base building. Don't worry about long runs or speed work until you get comfortable with your form and distance (and stave off injury).
Jeff Galloway has some beginner plans you might want to look at. Just set your weekly mileage intentionally, don't push the distance.
As far as the 10% rule- use it if it works for you. But my opinion, is to just add a 4th running day at 1-2 miles and work from there. If you are running comfortably 3x a week, you can add 3 miles, 4x a week add 4. Just space it out. Run the same or less distance for a few weeks before adding mileage. Usually, you'll just keep running one day and know it's time to add distance or mix it up.
TL:dr
Starting out, I personally would set a goal of 30 miles a month. Increase that by 10 miles per month as you feel able. Run at least 3x a week.
Happy running!
ETA- rest days are as important as running days. It's okay to scrap a run for recovery. Good cross training day, swim, bike, walk ect.
Just to clarify, the 30 miles a month is ONLY RUNNING, yes? I can sub in my daily power walks or stair stepping or whatever, on days I don't run?
Do it as you see fit. I count all my deliberate miles in my monthly mileage goal, walks and runs. Mostly because I train with walk breaks Incorporated, half mile-2 mile run, 0.1 mile walk, repeat. So either way works.
This month I'm nearing 60 miles, all walking (recovering from surgery). As I'm able, I'll replace the distance with some running as I return.
I mean, I walk about 35 miles a WEEK at this point, so I'm guessing I should probably just convert some of that into running by and by.0 -
Thanks! I just feel like the Pokey Little Puppy. lol At least I'm steady! Reading on the Bridge to 10k now.Mine (and many others') usual advice to someone starting to run is to follow the C25K plan, but you are already there. Google 'Bridge to 10K' - that is the follow-up program. BTW, I don't consider just over 30 minutes for a 5K 'pretty slow'. You did great!There is no need for any kind of speed/tempo work when you are beginning. The risk of injury is high and the benefits are very minimal. Run slowly and increase your distance over 6-12 months then perhaps you can incorporate some speed work into your training.
Also, going from nothing to 3-4 miles may work for you now, but you may end up with over use injuries down the road because you went too fast and too far too soon.
As for what to do next, do you have a goal in mind? Is there a race you'd like to do? Maybe train for a 10k and then think about a half marathon. I would slowly build up mileage over the next couple weeks and then start training for something in the new year. Look for novice or intro training plans.
Good luck.
The thing I was least clear on is the fact that It's not really "from nothing" I walk 5 or 6 miles a day and was running some, then stopped and just lately I've been throwing some jogging back in, this week I ran my little 5k course (the course I designed for myself looping around my neighbourhood just happened to come out around 5k) 3 times. So, while I haven't really been doing any running to speak of, I have been getting 60min+ cardio daily for like six months now.
I would like to run a 10k as my next goal. There is one in March I thought I might shoot for, that would give me plenty of time, I would think, even over the winter when a good deal of my running may end up being on a treadmill.
Keep in mind walking does not equal running. Nothing prepares you for running but running. Starting up doing several miles after not doing any (or very little) running can lead to injuries down the road. It is best to start off slow and stick to a structured program. Many don't and pay for it later (trust me on this
). 0 -
I wonder how you got injured. Striking the ground with your heal puts a lot of stress on your joints. Striking mid- foot to front foot will have your calves absorb some of that impact.0
-
Thanks! I just feel like the Pokey Little Puppy. lol At least I'm steady! Reading on the Bridge to 10k now.Mine (and many others') usual advice to someone starting to run is to follow the C25K plan, but you are already there. Google 'Bridge to 10K' - that is the follow-up program. BTW, I don't consider just over 30 minutes for a 5K 'pretty slow'. You did great!There is no need for any kind of speed/tempo work when you are beginning. The risk of injury is high and the benefits are very minimal. Run slowly and increase your distance over 6-12 months then perhaps you can incorporate some speed work into your training.
Also, going from nothing to 3-4 miles may work for you now, but you may end up with over use injuries down the road because you went too fast and too far too soon.
As for what to do next, do you have a goal in mind? Is there a race you'd like to do? Maybe train for a 10k and then think about a half marathon. I would slowly build up mileage over the next couple weeks and then start training for something in the new year. Look for novice or intro training plans.
Good luck.
The thing I was least clear on is the fact that It's not really "from nothing" I walk 5 or 6 miles a day and was running some, then stopped and just lately I've been throwing some jogging back in, this week I ran my little 5k course (the course I designed for myself looping around my neighbourhood just happened to come out around 5k) 3 times. So, while I haven't really been doing any running to speak of, I have been getting 60min+ cardio daily for like six months now.
I would like to run a 10k as my next goal. There is one in March I thought I might shoot for, that would give me plenty of time, I would think, even over the winter when a good deal of my running may end up being on a treadmill.
Keep in mind walking does not equal running. Nothing prepares you for running but running. Starting up doing several miles after not doing any (or very little) running can lead to injuries down the road. It is best to start off slow and stick to a structured program. Many don't and pay for it later (trust me on this ).
So what do you recommend in terms of starting miles?0 -
Start out running every other day for 30 or so minutes, at a slow and easy pace. There is a program called One Hour Runner that you might use to get your mileage up to 6 or so miles. It essentially adds 5 minutes a week to one or more of your runs. You don't have to do a 10 minute mile pace, just run at whatever pace allows you to carry on a conversation without gasping for breath. If you really like your four mile loop, then start with a 5 minute walk, then run 30 or 40 minutes, and walk the rest to cool down. I like having a variety of routes, but it's up to you whether you want to find some new routes as you increase your mileage.
You can walk on your off days, or in addition to your runs. I have a big dog and I walk 2-3 miles every day, with a once a week longer hike in addition, and I run 5 days a week. I think the walking helps keep me loose after hard runs.0 -
mgalovic01 wrote: »I wonder how you got injured. Striking the ground with your heal puts a lot of stress on your joints. Striking mid- foot to front foot will have your calves absorb some of that impact.
Who are you asking?
And please show me the evidence that this is the case (heel strikers that is). Plus, who here is talking about form? Very confused.....0 -
Thanks! I just feel like the Pokey Little Puppy. lol At least I'm steady! Reading on the Bridge to 10k now.Mine (and many others') usual advice to someone starting to run is to follow the C25K plan, but you are already there. Google 'Bridge to 10K' - that is the follow-up program. BTW, I don't consider just over 30 minutes for a 5K 'pretty slow'. You did great!There is no need for any kind of speed/tempo work when you are beginning. The risk of injury is high and the benefits are very minimal. Run slowly and increase your distance over 6-12 months then perhaps you can incorporate some speed work into your training.
Also, going from nothing to 3-4 miles may work for you now, but you may end up with over use injuries down the road because you went too fast and too far too soon.
As for what to do next, do you have a goal in mind? Is there a race you'd like to do? Maybe train for a 10k and then think about a half marathon. I would slowly build up mileage over the next couple weeks and then start training for something in the new year. Look for novice or intro training plans.
Good luck.
The thing I was least clear on is the fact that It's not really "from nothing" I walk 5 or 6 miles a day and was running some, then stopped and just lately I've been throwing some jogging back in, this week I ran my little 5k course (the course I designed for myself looping around my neighbourhood just happened to come out around 5k) 3 times. So, while I haven't really been doing any running to speak of, I have been getting 60min+ cardio daily for like six months now.
I would like to run a 10k as my next goal. There is one in March I thought I might shoot for, that would give me plenty of time, I would think, even over the winter when a good deal of my running may end up being on a treadmill.
Keep in mind walking does not equal running. Nothing prepares you for running but running. Starting up doing several miles after not doing any (or very little) running can lead to injuries down the road. It is best to start off slow and stick to a structured program. Many don't and pay for it later (trust me on this ).
So what do you recommend in terms of starting miles?
Just a general 'take it easy' type thing. You already can run several miles, just don't try to add to them too quickly. Get used to running 3-4 miles once a week and add 2-3 other shorter runs in between. Then up the short and long runs slightly.
Check this plan out from Hal Higdon for a 10k race. Follow it loosely as long as you feel good. Or you could check out the Bridge to 10k as was already suggested.
http://www.halhigdon.com/training/51122/10K-Novice-Training-Program0 -
MeanderingMammal wrote: »You could afford to add a third run, as upthread start at two miles and build that to four over a month or so.
Then start adding a bit too one of those until you get to six miles, then build the other two up to six miles each.
At that point you could afford to start thinking about something a bit more sophisticated than long steady, but there isn't much value until that point.
I will try that next week, I think. I already did 3 runs this week at ~3 miles, so I'll call that good to avoid tempting injury.
I'm not entirely clear on your meaning in the last sentence of your post. Do you mean more sophisticated training methods?
Generally I wouldn't go below three rings per week, so add that for now. Your current mileage is about where is suggest for starting to build up. You just need to keep it gentle from that perspective, as upthread.
In this kind of thread you frequently find non runners recommending stuff like sprints. That's generally inadvisable for most new runners until they have a really solid training base.
Noting the suggestion of Galloway above, personally I don't like that approach. It's good for coming in to running but I'm less convinced about it beyond there.0 -
mgalovic01 wrote: »I wonder how you got injured. Striking the ground with your heal puts a lot of stress on your joints. Striking mid- foot to front foot will have your calves absorb some of that impact.
Who are you asking?
And please show me the evidence that this is the case (heel strikers that is). Plus, who here is talking about form? Very confused.....
I'm asking the OP. I speak from personal experience. If the OP is still doing something wrong, form-wise, that caused him to get injured, he'll just get injured again.0 -
mgalovic01 wrote: »mgalovic01 wrote: »I wonder how you got injured. Striking the ground with your heal puts a lot of stress on your joints. Striking mid- foot to front foot will have your calves absorb some of that impact.
Who are you asking?
And please show me the evidence that this is the case (heel strikers that is). Plus, who here is talking about form? Very confused.....
I'm asking the OP. I speak from personal experience. If the OP is still doing something wrong, form-wise, that caused him to get injured, he'll just get injured again.
Problem is, your observations on footstrike don't really contribute anything of any value to the originator, and potentially confuse the issue.0 -
MeanderingMammal wrote: »mgalovic01 wrote: »mgalovic01 wrote: »I wonder how you got injured. Striking the ground with your heal puts a lot of stress on your joints. Striking mid- foot to front foot will have your calves absorb some of that impact.
Who are you asking?
And please show me the evidence that this is the case (heel strikers that is). Plus, who here is talking about form? Very confused.....
I'm asking the OP. I speak from personal experience. If the OP is still doing something wrong, form-wise, that caused him to get injured, he'll just get injured again.
Problem is, your observations on footstrike don't really contribute anything of any value to the originator, and potentially confuse the issue.
The OP said that after starting running he "ended up with some significant leg pain" and that he's a "little paranoid of re-injuring" himself.0 -
mgalovic01 wrote: »MeanderingMammal wrote: »mgalovic01 wrote: »mgalovic01 wrote: »I wonder how you got injured. Striking the ground with your heal puts a lot of stress on your joints. Striking mid- foot to front foot will have your calves absorb some of that impact.
Who are you asking?
And please show me the evidence that this is the case (heel strikers that is). Plus, who here is talking about form? Very confused.....
I'm asking the OP. I speak from personal experience. If the OP is still doing something wrong, form-wise, that caused him to get injured, he'll just get injured again.
Problem is, your observations on footstrike don't really contribute anything of any value to the originator, and potentially confuse the issue.
The OP said that after starting running he "ended up with some significant leg pain" and that he's a "little paranoid of re-injuring" himself.
Entirely accurate. There are a wide ranging set of potential causes for that, one of which might be foot strike. The snag is the evidence on foot strike is weak compared to other issues and may be completely irrelevant.
We have no indication of what that pain is, when it manifests and the range of other factors that contribute, so going straight to the least likely source isn't helpful.0 -
MeanderingMammal wrote: »mgalovic01 wrote: »MeanderingMammal wrote: »mgalovic01 wrote: »mgalovic01 wrote: »I wonder how you got injured. Striking the ground with your heal puts a lot of stress on your joints. Striking mid- foot to front foot will have your calves absorb some of that impact.
Who are you asking?
And please show me the evidence that this is the case (heel strikers that is). Plus, who here is talking about form? Very confused.....
I'm asking the OP. I speak from personal experience. If the OP is still doing something wrong, form-wise, that caused him to get injured, he'll just get injured again.
Problem is, your observations on footstrike don't really contribute anything of any value to the originator, and potentially confuse the issue.
The OP said that after starting running he "ended up with some significant leg pain" and that he's a "little paranoid of re-injuring" himself.
Entirely accurate. There are a wide ranging set of potential causes for that, one of which might be foot strike. The snag is the evidence on foot strike is weak compared to other issues and may be completely irrelevant.
We have no indication of what that pain is, when it manifests and the range of other factors that contribute, so going straight to the least likely source isn't helpful.
That's why I began by asking how he got injured. The injury appears to be running related. From my own experience, I began having leg pain when I used to strike with my heal, so I threw that out there. The "least likely source"? I don't think so.0 -
Most likely is overuse, with much of the current research indicating that intentional changes to gait don't reduce injury rate, merely change the injury type.
I'd also observed that heel striking itself isn't so much an issue, but over extending the leading leg is. That increases vertical oscillation, increases inefficiency and can contribute to lumbar pain. One of the sources of lower leg pain is weakness in the hips and core.2 -
MeanderingMammal wrote: »Most likely is overuse, with much of the current research indicating that intentional changes to gait don't reduce injury rate, merely change the injury type.
I'd also observed that heel striking itself isn't so much an issue, but over extending the leading leg is. That increases vertical oscillation, increases inefficiency and can contribute to lumbar pain. One of the sources of lower leg pain is weakness in the hips and core.
It's easy to get overused quickly when you're putting all that stress on your joints that striking with the heal causes. When I switched to striking with the outer, mid-foot, it took some getting used to. The bottom of my foot and calves got more sore, but I got relief in my ankles, knees and lower back.
I haven't seen over extending the lead leg to be an issue. Distance runners are rarely in the condition to maintain that level of stride. Only high level distance runners extend long, and it's not an issue.
I don't see how core strength plays into leg pain. It would affect your lower back.0 -
mgalovic01 wrote: »I haven't seen over extending the lead leg to be an issue. Distance runners are rarely in the condition to maintain that level of stride. Only high level distance runners extend long, and it's not an issue.
Distance runners don't stride like that because it's inefficient and poor form. Essentially heel strike isn't the issue, but it can be indicative of other sources of difficulty.I don't see how core strength plays into leg pain.
I'd noticed...
4 -
MeanderingMammal wrote: »mgalovic01 wrote: »I haven't seen over extending the lead leg to be an issue. Distance runners are rarely in the condition to maintain that level of stride. Only high level distance runners extend long, and it's not an issue.
Distance runners don't stride like that because it's inefficient and poor form. Essentially heel strike isn't the issue, but it can be indicative of other sources of difficulty.I don't see how core strength plays into leg pain.
I'd noticed...
Ten minutes into this video is the end of the race, and the longest lead leg stride you'll see from a distance runner. Anything more extended than that is just plain ridiculous. No one runs like that.
As far as core strength playing into leg pain, you offer nothing of substance to support it. I know that one could have sciatic nerve pain that radiates from the lower back, down the leg. That could be the result of an injury related to inadequate core strength. However, it is less likely to be the cause of leg pain related to running, than lets say the stress caused by repeatedly striking the ground with your heel. If the leg pain is in the glute and ham, it might be Piriformis Syndrome.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p3uXV2bJr2M 0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 394K Introduce Yourself
- 43.9K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 176K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.6K Fitness and Exercise
- 432 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153.1K Motivation and Support
- 8.1K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.4K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.9K MyFitnessPal Information
- 15 News and Announcements
- 1.2K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.7K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions