Welcome to Debate Club! Please be aware that this is a space for respectful debate, and that your ideas will be challenged here. Please remember to critique the argument, not the author.
Understanding the "starvation mode" myth.
Replies
-
Some people have reading comprehension (or attention) issues. But the biggest probelem with starvation mode is math, not literacy.
Give the body fewer calories than you burn, you'll lose weight. I guarantee it. I weighed every morsel of food to the .05 of an ounce, and logged it here. I lost. I didn't hold on to fat, at all. It's just simple math. Really, really hard to do. But an incredibly wasy concept.
If it isn't working for someone, it's not a problem of comprehension or metabolism. It's because they aren't actually counting.4 -
Many people do have slower metabolisms than others, but it's not because they were destroyed through dieting. "Destroyed" is the wrong way to look at it anyways since in nature it's an advantage to be more efficient. In today's society though it means that these people can't eat as much as their siblings or best friends without spending an hour at the gym because they burn fewer calories just sitting around than others do. Sometimes it takes years to realize this and make the general/habitual changes required to keep at a healthy weight long-term. Sometimes people never figure it out and just go from diet to diet forever.
The Biggest Loser examples only prove that people who have lived one way all their lives, changed for a few weeks under extremely rigorous and heavily scrutinized conditions and then were released back into the wild to fend for themselves will revert to their old habits... Just like almost everyone who goes on a drastic diet and loses a lot of weight in a short amount of time. It doesn't work in the long term to drop 80 lbs in a few months, and then go back to out-eating your burn (which just decreased even more since you now weigh less.) But it doesn't mean you destroyed or even harmed your metabolism.
0 -
Char231023 wrote: »Char231023 wrote: »Sounds like someone's hangry. This may sound bitchy but seriously stop trying to blame starvation mode (that is not what causes thyroid problems btw). You were judging you self to someone who is taller than you, and that obviously makes their metabolism higher. There are a lot of people who have dieting issues. You are not a special snowflake. Stop blaming everything and everyone for your bad decisions on what you put in your mouth.
You didnt read everything, did you. Understandable. Literacy in the US is no longer a top agenda. And no, im not "hangry". Actually eating for me is a nuisance. I dont like to waste time with it and rarely feel hungry. Taller does not equal higher metabolism. Ask the over weight tall people..Or the under 5 foot waif.. Im sure they would disagree with that statement. Your attempt at playing "mean girl" is almost adorable. However, the effort is wasted on the apathetic.
I did read every word. While it was very well thought out and written I don't agree with your attempt of portraying your lack of weight loss on "starvation mode". Thinking you have damaged you metabolism beyond repair by going on three crash diets no it doesn't work that way. The hanry statement was a joke lighten up.
Sorry, that you think you can eat as much as someone who is 7 inches taller than you, and still be under the delusion you will be able lose weight like they can. If you think I am trying to attempt to be a "Mean Girl" you obviously haven't been on the MFP boards that long. Trust me I was being nicer than a lot of other posters.
OK, Ill simplify this for you because if you DID read what I wrote, you misunderstood or skimmed over a few points.
1. ( I don't agree with your attempt of portraying your lack of weight loss on "starvation mode") I never blamed my lack of weight loss on starvation mode. Not ONCE. I blamed it on coming OFF of starving myself and gaining over what my base weight originally started at. 150 to 180 to be precise. My metabolism said, "F U.. You wanna play hard ball, lets" I re-lost the weight QUITE easily by restarving myself. However, I couldnt seem to go below 140 while at it.
2. (Thinking you have damaged you metabolism beyond repair) You seriously did NOT read what I wrote at all. AT ALL. I actually said the OPPOSITE. I said I dont think its possible to damage it beyond repair and in fact you can FIX it.
3. (Sorry, that you think you can eat as much as someone who is 7 inches taller than you, and still be under the delusion you will be able lose weight like they can. ) Where the hell are you getting your info from? I ate LESS than and HEALTHIER than my SAME HEIGHT sister and daughter. SAME. My 7 inches taller friend was the twinkie eating, couch sitting, pot head. She was mentioned ONCE the entire story..and she is what you focus on? Is there something in particular that drew you to that character?
4. (Trust me I was being nicer than a lot of other posters) Perhaps you are missing the whole idea behind "support" group? I dont expect to be "coddled" or "encouraged". Hell, I dont expect empathy at all. I actually didnt come here to gain others support. I came here to OFFER it. I am the first to admit that I dont play well with others, but being able to encourage another person, for me, is the motivation that drives my will to succeed in life. We are to encourage one another and build each other up. Edify and not tear down.2 -
In my opinion starvation mode is the body slowing metabolism to conserve whats left. I don't see how weight gain could be the result unless calories increase over the long term.
That is the basics of what I believe. Weight gain isnt the result of slowing the metabolism, its the result of falling of the wagon. Here is the basic break up of what I have seen and experienced.
Stage 1: 150lbs, consume 2000 calories a day, walk 2 miles a day.
Stage 2: Consume 800 calories a day,Starve myself to 130, Walk 5 miles a day.
Stage 3: 3 day binge just cause.. Start recounting calories after but this time..eh, I feel like I was over doing it, so consume 1500 calories a day and redrop my walking to 2 miles a day. Gain to 180 lbs.
Stage 4: hover at 180 for 2 years. Redrop calories to 800 a day, walk 2 miles every day. Lose to 140. Also lose my gall bladder.. Surgeon said it was because of the yo-yo dieting.
Stage 5: Fall off again.. eat 2000 calories a day, walk 3 miles 3 times a week, gain to 215 and hold steady.
None of this makes sense until this stage
Stage 6: F it. No walking, no exercise, PTSD, consume who knows what at 3pm every night cause eating breakfast and lunch just isnt your thing, gain to 300. (THAT makes sense. I deserved that.)
What doesnt make sense is the holding steady at the other ridiculous levels when everyone else around you does less and eats more but retains their weight they originally started with because they didnt feel the need to starve off the excess fluff. Every hear a skinny girl brag about how much she eats and how much she eats? Ever witness it...
I understand each persons metabolism is unique unto themselves. Two 5' 1 girls can jog 2 miles a day, weight train 30 minutes every other day, and consume 1800 calories each.. And one could be consuming those 1800 calories in nothing but twinkies and ho-ho's while the other is more self-conscious and never touches packaged foods at all. And the Twinkie lover can be 10-15 lbs lighter than her more anxious counter part. I understand this, but I still dont "get' it. And like I pointed out before. I was the active one in my family with no health issues and was the over weight one. My sister was the one who couldnt walk half a mile without sitting down to take a break while I danced in place impatiently wanting to get moving again. This wasnt my need to work out, this was my energy level. I had an entire world to explore and she was holding me up. She had bad asthma so she had her excuse.
To properly diagnose this you have to take yourself out of the equation. Metabolism is not that terribly different from person to person. The predominant physiological factor is lean muscle mass. Still the dominating factor in weight management is caloric intake. You can either accept this and be successful, or continue to construct excuses.
It is very difficult for trained professionals to estimate calories, which is why many weight management professionals discard calorie counting for the average person doing this on their own. You also have to incorporate the 20% margin of error in calorie estimation, hence the 1000 calorie day you just logged per the label is somewhere between 800 and 1200 calories. You can use MFP successfully by checking your logs to see where the error may have occurred if you are not hitting your goals.
Model your behavior to those who have succeeded and lost 100+ lbs and maintained this over years. In all of these situations the successful share distinct common behaviors:
1. They implemented small changes - rarely anything drastic.
2. They continually set small goals, met the goals, and set new loftier goals.
3. Weight loss was a smaller goal to a larger vision (long life, improved life, kids, athletic performance, etc.)
Here's a link to the National Weight Control Registry - one of the most informative sites on long term success:
http://nwcr.ws/2 -
You have to be a yo-yo dieter to truly understand what the starvation mode truly is.
I am not sure what prompted this -- maybe the discussion of dieting myths in which starvation mode was mentioned? Maybe that background would be helpful.
However, as some others have mentioned, I think you seem to be unaware of how starvation mode is so often used: to claim that one can eat too little and as a result your body starts holding onto fat and you cannot lose, and even gain weight. Many people claim to have gotten fat from "eating too little" (NOT from bingeing after a period of eating too little or some such, which I agree happens), or worry too much about hitting a sweet spot where they will lose and if they don't assume it's as likely to be eating too little as eating too much (or just not being patient).
I totally agree there are bad effects from eating too little and that dieting over time (especially with an aggressive deficit) can affect metabolism, but wouldn't call that starvation mode.
The rest of it seems more about a lot of other issues. I'd agree that you don't need to be some idealized weight and there is a range of weights at which people can be healthy (and really it's no one's business). I also think trying to compare how much you eat/workout to others and feeling (or so I sense) that it's unfair is never useful and often not accurate (but even if my sister is effortlessly 110 at 5'3, as I used to think (incorrectly, she put in effort), so what?).2 -
3. (Sorry, that you think you can eat as much as someone who is 7 inches taller than you, and still be under the delusion you will be able lose weight like they can. ) Where the hell are you getting your info from? I ate LESS than and HEALTHIER than my SAME HEIGHT sister and daughter. SAME. My 7 inches taller friend was the twinkie eating, couch sitting, pot head. She was mentioned ONCE the entire story..and she is what you focus on? Is there something in particular that drew you to that character?
4. (Trust me I was being nicer than a lot of other posters) Perhaps you are missing the whole idea behind "support" group? I dont expect to be "coddled" or "encouraged". Hell, I dont expect empathy at all. I actually didnt come here to gain others support. I came here to OFFER it. I am the first to admit that I dont play well with others, but being able to encourage another person, for me, is the motivation that drives my will to succeed in life. We are to encourage one another and build each other up. Edify and not tear down. [/quote]
No. 3 No you were still were comparing yourself to everyone around you not just the Twinkie eating pot head. My point was everyone is different. So what if she was able to eat her weight in Twinkies. There are plenty of people who struggle to lose weight too while having depression and health issues. That is what I mean by saying you are not a special snowflake.
No. 4 This is the debate section you want to motivated and supported post on that board. Not everyone on here is nice and some of us take different approaches when debating a subject. You took it upon yourself to insult my literacy when I was trying to address what I though you meant by you extremely long story on, how you think you can't lose weight like everyone else.
1 -
lemurcat12 wrote: »You have to be a yo-yo dieter to truly understand what the starvation mode truly is.
I am not sure what prompted this -- maybe the discussion of dieting myths in which starvation mode was mentioned? Maybe that background would be helpful.
However, as some others have mentioned, I think you seem to be unaware of how starvation mode is so often used: to claim that one can eat too little and as a result your body starts holding onto fat and you cannot lose, and even gain weight. Many people claim to have gotten fat from "eating too little" (NOT from bingeing after a period of eating too little or some such, which I agree happens), or worry too much about hitting a sweet spot where they will lose and if they don't assume it's as likely to be eating too little as eating too much (or just not being patient).
I totally agree there are bad effects from eating too little and that dieting over time (especially with an aggressive deficit) can affect metabolism, but wouldn't call that starvation mode.
The rest of it seems more about a lot of other issues. I'd agree that you don't need to be some idealized weight and there is a range of weights at which people can be healthy (and really it's no one's business). I also think trying to compare how much you eat/workout to others and feeling (or so I sense) that it's unfair is never useful and often not accurate (but even if my sister is effortlessly 110 at 5'3, as I used to think (incorrectly, she put in effort), so what?).
I can't like this post enough.
1 -
singingflutelady wrote: »@Reaverie you do realize that you posted this in the debate forum where the focus is debating things? Debating is not a support group or motivation. It's debating
I concede to that fact. However, disparaging remarks because you disagree with someones post hardly falls under the category of debate. Trigdens "Starvation mode is a myth", as eloquently put as it was, came closer to resembling a debate than accusing me of being hangry and comparing me to a special snowflake. Though I have to agree with the snowflake rhetoric. I am cold, round, pale as the beach sand, and misshapen. Observation courtesy of my 15 year old daughter.3 -
I am rather impressed with the turn this impromptu debate has taken. So many well thought out opinions and beliefs! And some not so well thought out.. But it makes for an entertaining distraction.0
-
That is the basics of what I believe...
So if we move beyond feelz and beliefs, here is an actual scientific explanation of why "starvation mode", as it is commonly defined, doesn't exist - authored by a PhD in the field: http://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/discussion/1077746/starvation-mode-adaptive-thermogenesis-and-weight-loss/p1
There's no question that metabolic adaptation exists and is A Thing. But not to the extent that it stops and/or reverses weight loss.4 -
janejellyroll wrote: »
You seem really angry. If you're looking to vent, you might find the "Support and Motivation" area more helpful than "Debate."
Not saying you aren't welcome here, of course, but I just feel so much anger and frustration radiating from your posts and I'm wondering if debate is the best help for that right now.[/quote]
Not at all. Actually Im finding this all rather amusing. My sarcasm is lost on most people.
0 -
In my opinion starvation mode is the body slowing metabolism to conserve whats left. I don't see how weight gain could be the result unless calories increase over the long term.
That is the basics of what I believe. Weight gain isnt the result of slowing the metabolism, its the result of falling of the wagon. Here is the basic break up of what I have seen and experienced.
Stage 1: 150lbs, consume 2000 calories a day, walk 2 miles a day.
Stage 2: Consume 800 calories a day,Starve myself to 130, Walk 5 miles a day.
Stage 3: 3 day binge just cause.. Start recounting calories after but this time..eh, I feel like I was over doing it, so consume 1500 calories a day and redrop my walking to 2 miles a day. Gain to 180 lbs.
Stage 4: hover at 180 for 2 years. Redrop calories to 800 a day, walk 2 miles every day. Lose to 140. Also lose my gall bladder.. Surgeon said it was because of the yo-yo dieting.
Stage 5: Fall off again.. eat 2000 calories a day, walk 3 miles 3 times a week, gain to 215 and hold steady.
None of this makes sense until this stage
Stage 6: F it. No walking, no exercise, PTSD, consume who knows what at 3pm every night cause eating breakfast and lunch just isnt your thing, gain to 300. (THAT makes sense. I deserved that.)
What doesnt make sense is the holding steady at the other ridiculous levels when everyone else around you does less and eats more but retains their weight they originally started with because they didnt feel the need to starve off the excess fluff. Every hear a skinny girl brag about how much she eats and how much she eats? Ever witness it...
I understand each persons metabolism is unique unto themselves. Two 5' 1 girls can jog 2 miles a day, weight train 30 minutes every other day, and consume 1800 calories each.. And one could be consuming those 1800 calories in nothing but twinkies and ho-ho's while the other is more self-conscious and never touches packaged foods at all. And the Twinkie lover can be 10-15 lbs lighter than her more anxious counter part. I understand this, but I still dont "get' it. And like I pointed out before. I was the active one in my family with no health issues and was the over weight one. My sister was the one who couldnt walk half a mile without sitting down to take a break while I danced in place impatiently wanting to get moving again. This wasnt my need to work out, this was my energy level. I had an entire world to explore and she was holding me up. She had bad asthma so she had her excuse.
To properly diagnose this you have to take yourself out of the equation. Metabolism is not that terribly different from person to person. The predominant physiological factor is lean muscle mass. Still the dominating factor in weight management is caloric intake. You can either accept this and be successful, or continue to construct excuses.
It is very difficult for trained professionals to estimate calories, which is why many weight management professionals discard calorie counting for the average person doing this on their own. You also have to incorporate the 20% margin of error in calorie estimation, hence the 1000 calorie day you just logged per the label is somewhere between 800 and 1200 calories. You can use MFP successfully by checking your logs to see where the error may have occurred if you are not hitting your goals.
Model your behavior to those who have succeeded and lost 100+ lbs and maintained this over years. In all of these situations the successful share distinct common behaviors:
1. They implemented small changes - rarely anything drastic.
2. They continually set small goals, met the goals, and set new loftier goals.
3. Weight loss was a smaller goal to a larger vision (long life, improved life, kids, athletic performance, etc.)
Here's a link to the National Weight Control Registry - one of the most informative sites on long term success:
http://nwcr.ws/
Though I disagree with some of what was said, I find much of it informative. Thank you for participating. I will check out the site. I think people may be misunderstanding my intent here. Many seem to think that I am blaming a system or excusing bad behavior. My mother believes strongly in the starvation mode. She accuses her weight and her lack of losing weight on it. She truly believes she destroyed her metabolism and no matter what I say to her or how I try to convince her that this is all hog wash, she is stuck in her beliefs that she can never lose the weight and has accepted her lot in life. I dont believe in "starvation mode" the same way she does. Ive tried to tell her that her lack of success in weight loss, is due to her lack of getting off her duff. I KNOW I can lose weight. I am CONFIDENT I will. I am not *kitten* footing around making excuses to the contrary. I dont know where everyone is getting that I have given up from my story. Quite the opposite, I now realize my idiocy and can make smart changes for once in my life.
I find this to be one of the most straight forward memes.
3 -
Hmm. Does the coding for this site "kitten" out offensive memes as well?0
-
starvation mode = when you don't eat anything for a pro longed period of time and your body turns on itself for energy. Takes a long time to happen...
Like say, 20 years? Agreed. Im sure I lost more muscle than I did actual fat when starving. Still think its a misnomer though. Perhaps a new name will clear up the confusion associated behind it. It probably already has one, and everyone completely agrees with the idea behind it, without even realizing its the same bloody thing. Like common core.. Almost everyone hates "common core" math. Change the name but give them the same lessons and they would never clue in to its origins. Its like leading sheep to the slaughter.
no, I am talking about eating little, or nothing, for a period of six months. Think starving kids in Africa...
Ahh, longest I went was only 4 months of no calorie intake and heavy pilates work out. Lots of water though. Almost landed me in the hospital and I had one pissed off doctor berating me about my stupidity. That was pretty stupid of me. But I was 18 and stupid and had recently gotten married.0 -
starvation mode = when you don't eat anything for a pro longed period of time and your body turns on itself for energy. Takes a long time to happen...
Like say, 20 years? Agreed. Im sure I lost more muscle than I did actual fat when starving. Still think its a misnomer though. Perhaps a new name will clear up the confusion associated behind it. It probably already has one, and everyone completely agrees with the idea behind it, without even realizing its the same bloody thing. Like common core.. Almost everyone hates "common core" math. Change the name but give them the same lessons and they would never clue in to its origins. Its like leading sheep to the slaughter.
no, I am talking about eating little, or nothing, for a period of six months. Think starving kids in Africa...
Ahh, longest I went was only 4 months of no calorie intake and heavy pilates work out. Lots of water though. Almost landed me in the hospital and I had one pissed off doctor berating me about my stupidity. That was pretty stupid of me. But I was 18 and stupid and had recently gotten married.
You had zero calorie intake for four months?3 -
your friend was on the Twinkie diet1
-
trigden1991 wrote: »Starvation mode is a myth.
This. 100%.
OP, what you are describing is your experience and emotional processes that have brought you to the place you are today.
It takes a whole lot more than what you're describing for metabolic adaptation (which, it seems to me, you might mean by starvation mode) to come into play.2 -
In my opinion starvation mode is the body slowing metabolism to conserve whats left. I don't see how weight gain could be the result unless calories increase over the long term.
That is the basics of what I believe. Weight gain isnt the result of slowing the metabolism, its the result of falling of the wagon. Here is the basic break up of what I have seen and experienced.
Stage 1: 150lbs, consume 2000 calories a day, walk 2 miles a day.
Stage 2: Consume 800 calories a day,Starve myself to 130, Walk 5 miles a day.
Stage 3: 3 day binge just cause.. Start recounting calories after but this time..eh, I feel like I was over doing it, so consume 1500 calories a day and redrop my walking to 2 miles a day. Gain to 180 lbs.
Stage 4: hover at 180 for 2 years. Redrop calories to 800 a day, walk 2 miles every day. Lose to 140. Also lose my gall bladder.. Surgeon said it was because of the yo-yo dieting.
Stage 5: Fall off again.. eat 2000 calories a day, walk 3 miles 3 times a week, gain to 215 and hold steady.
None of this makes sense until this stage
Stage 6: F it. No walking, no exercise, PTSD, consume who knows what at 3pm every night cause eating breakfast and lunch just isnt your thing, gain to 300. (THAT makes sense. I deserved that.)
What doesnt make sense is the holding steady at the other ridiculous levels when everyone else around you does less and eats more but retains their weight they originally started with because they didnt feel the need to starve off the excess fluff. Every hear a skinny girl brag about how much she eats and how much she eats? Ever witness it...
I understand each persons metabolism is unique unto themselves. Two 5' 1 girls can jog 2 miles a day, weight train 30 minutes every other day, and consume 1800 calories each.. And one could be consuming those 1800 calories in nothing but twinkies and ho-ho's while the other is more self-conscious and never touches packaged foods at all. And the Twinkie lover can be 10-15 lbs lighter than her more anxious counter part. I understand this, but I still dont "get' it. And like I pointed out before. I was the active one in my family with no health issues and was the over weight one. My sister was the one who couldnt walk half a mile without sitting down to take a break while I danced in place impatiently wanting to get moving again. This wasnt my need to work out, this was my energy level. I had an entire world to explore and she was holding me up. She had bad asthma so she had her excuse.
Surely, you're not saying that you got to 300 pound because you were in starvation mode.
Setting aside any medical issues that needed immediate attention, you got to 300 pounds by eating too much--just like everyone else has/does.
3 -
albertabeefy wrote: »
That's the attitude that'll make the difference. A full-on lifestyle change - not a temporary diet - is the key to losing and then maintaining healthy weight.Reaverie wrote:But this time, you arent aiming to lose it all in a few months. Heck, you wont even lose it in a few years! But the changes you make from this day hence, will be life changing, not some stupid quick fad that obliterates your metabolism and self-esteem.
Really? You must at-least agree the body reduces RMR and T3 in the presence of a hypocaloric diet... Which certainly makes it more difficult to lose weight than if it didn't ...trigden1991 wrote: »Starvation mode is a myth.
I most certainly do agree with that but I don't believe in starvation mode.1 -
Ambivalent kitty sees you...
Hey guys - this discussion has been cleaned up to remove some posts. Please be aware that this discussion has been posted in the debate section. HOWEVER, personal attacks are still against the guidelines and if they are reported to us we do take note and action for them. Please keep the debate to a poster's ideas and NOT their frame of mind or reading comprehension. If you see a post that you believe violates our community guidelines please REPORT it so that the mod team can take a look and then move on without responding to it.
I hope you're having an awesome Friday.
Cheers,
Em4 -
I don't recall seeing anything that required "cleaning up".. but then I'm not the type that needs a "safe space"...1
-
I don't recall seeing anything that required "cleaning up".. but then I'm not the type that needs a "safe space"...
The clean-up wasn't to make this a 'safe space' but to remove content that violated community guidelines. Which are located here: http://www.myfitnesspal.com/welcome/guidelines so that folks can take a look and not fall afoul of them again.
Since this discussion is about 'Understanding the Starvation Mode myth', getting back on topic (so as to not violate the above linked community guidelines):
OP - your original post made me chuckle, because I can relate with how you ended up yo-yoing. I think we've all been there (well, maybe not all but a whole heck of a lot of us). Starvation Mode as it's been popularized is (IMO) a cop-out. I love that you've taken responsibility for what got you here and I wish that more people understood more about fitness and nutrition and what restrict/binge cycles do not only physically but emotionally and mentally.6 -
JustSomeEm wrote: »I don't recall seeing anything that required "cleaning up".. but then I'm not the type that needs a "safe space"...
The clean-up wasn't to make this a 'safe space' but to remove content that violated community guidelines. Which are located here: http://www.myfitnesspal.com/welcome/guidelines so that folks can take a look and not fall afoul of them again.
Since this discussion is about 'Understanding the Starvation Mode myth', getting back on topic (so as to not violate the above linked community guidelines):
OP - your original post made me chuckle, because I can relate with how you ended up yo-yoing. I think we've all been there (well, maybe not all but a whole heck of a lot of us). Starvation Mode as it's been popularized is (IMO) a cop-out. I love that you've taken responsibility for what got you here and I wish that more people understood more about fitness and nutrition and what restrict/binge cycles do not only physically but emotionally and mentally.
You read what I wrote and understood what I was saying.3 -
Well I just loved your story. I laughed out loud at the part where you readjust your feet and move the scale to another part of the floor!!! I have done that!! You are funny and I think you could be a serious writer2
-
JustSomeEm wrote: »I don't recall seeing anything that required "cleaning up".. but then I'm not the type that needs a "safe space"...
The clean-up wasn't to make this a 'safe space' but to remove content that violated community guidelines. Which are located here: http://www.myfitnesspal.com/welcome/guidelines so that folks can take a look and not fall afoul of them again.
Since this discussion is about 'Understanding the Starvation Mode myth', getting back on topic (so as to not violate the above linked community guidelines):
OP - your original post made me chuckle, because I can relate with how you ended up yo-yoing. I think we've all been there (well, maybe not all but a whole heck of a lot of us). Starvation Mode as it's been popularized is (IMO) a cop-out. I love that you've taken responsibility for what got you here and I wish that more people understood more about fitness and nutrition and what restrict/binge cycles do not only physically but emotionally and mentally.
You read what I wrote and understood what I was saying.
I apologize in advance if this comes off any way other than what's intended, which is support, but I didn't see much to "Not understand". Sometimes there are benefits to not being the smartest cookie in the room, I tend to look for the simplest explanations and common denominators.
Your first post ended with this:You are beautiful just the way you are and you dont need others to validate your existence. If they have issues with the way you look, the issue is with themselves, not with you.
That went ALL through me, because of the struggles my youngest has had with the yoyo dieting and self image issues you're talking about. I firmly believe the only reason she didn't spiral further down is that she chose to trust her mother and I, and tell us everything she was feeling. We responded with every variation of that above line that we could give her to think about and consider. She's now 26, comfortable in her own skin, and quite beautiful just as she is.
I won't apologize if I missed your intent, because your post hammered home just the same to me. Thanks
2 -
donnamoore58 wrote: »Well I just loved your story. I laughed out loud at the part where you readjust your feet and move the scale to another part of the floor!!! I have done that!! You are funny and I think you could be a serious writer
I like writing lessons in story form to lighten the mood and make reading it more bearable. Thank you for your kind words. I had intended the post to be light hearted and entertaining.
1 -
JustSomeEm wrote: »I don't recall seeing anything that required "cleaning up".. but then I'm not the type that needs a "safe space"...
The clean-up wasn't to make this a 'safe space' but to remove content that violated community guidelines. Which are located here: http://www.myfitnesspal.com/welcome/guidelines so that folks can take a look and not fall afoul of them again.
Since this discussion is about 'Understanding the Starvation Mode myth', getting back on topic (so as to not violate the above linked community guidelines):
OP - your original post made me chuckle, because I can relate with how you ended up yo-yoing. I think we've all been there (well, maybe not all but a whole heck of a lot of us). Starvation Mode as it's been popularized is (IMO) a cop-out. I love that you've taken responsibility for what got you here and I wish that more people understood more about fitness and nutrition and what restrict/binge cycles do not only physically but emotionally and mentally.
You read what I wrote and understood what I was saying.
I apologize in advance if this comes off any way other than what's intended, which is support, but I didn't see much to "Not understand". Sometimes there are benefits to not being the smartest cookie in the room, I tend to look for the simplest explanations and common denominators.
Your first post ended with this:You are beautiful just the way you are and you dont need others to validate your existence. If they have issues with the way you look, the issue is with themselves, not with you.
That went ALL through me, because of the struggles my youngest has had with the yoyo dieting and self image issues you're talking about. I firmly believe the only reason she didn't spiral further down is that she chose to trust her mother and I, and tell us everything she was feeling. We responded with every variation of that above line that we could give her to think about and consider. She's now 26, comfortable in her own skin, and quite beautiful just as she is.
I won't apologize if I missed your intent, because your post hammered home just the same to me. Thanks
That is the hardest lesson of all, loving your self. I'm so happy your daughter found peace with who she is.1 -
O.P.
Welcome to mfp and good wishes on your weight loss journey. See you around the forums!2 -
-
In my opinion starvation mode is the body slowing metabolism to conserve whats left. I don't see how weight gain could be the result unless calories increase over the long term.
That is the basics of what I believe. Weight gain isnt the result of slowing the metabolism, its the result of falling of the wagon. Here is the basic break up of what I have seen and experienced.
Stage 1: 150lbs, consume 2000 calories a day, walk 2 miles a day.
Stage 2: Consume 800 calories a day,Starve myself to 130, Walk 5 miles a day.
Stage 3: 3 day binge just cause.. Start recounting calories after but this time..eh, I feel like I was over doing it, so consume 1500 calories a day and redrop my walking to 2 miles a day. Gain to 180 lbs.
Stage 4: hover at 180 for 2 years. Redrop calories to 800 a day, walk 2 miles every day. Lose to 140. Also lose my gall bladder.. Surgeon said it was because of the yo-yo dieting.
Stage 5: Fall off again.. eat 2000 calories a day, walk 3 miles 3 times a week, gain to 215 and hold steady.
None of this makes sense until this stage
Stage 6: F it. No walking, no exercise, PTSD, consume who knows what at 3pm every night cause eating breakfast and lunch just isnt your thing, gain to 300. (THAT makes sense. I deserved that.)
What doesnt make sense is the holding steady at the other ridiculous levels when everyone else around you does less and eats more but retains their weight they originally started with because they didnt feel the need to starve off the excess fluff. Every hear a skinny girl brag about how much she eats and how much she eats? Ever witness it...
I understand each persons metabolism is unique unto themselves. Two 5' 1 girls can jog 2 miles a day, weight train 30 minutes every other day, and consume 1800 calories each.. And one could be consuming those 1800 calories in nothing but twinkies and ho-ho's while the other is more self-conscious and never touches packaged foods at all. And the Twinkie lover can be 10-15 lbs lighter than her more anxious counter part. I understand this, but I still dont "get' it. And like I pointed out before. I was the active one in my family with no health issues and was the over weight one. My sister was the one who couldnt walk half a mile without sitting down to take a break while I danced in place impatiently wanting to get moving again. This wasnt my need to work out, this was my energy level. I had an entire world to explore and she was holding me up. She had bad asthma so she had her excuse.
To properly diagnose this you have to take yourself out of the equation. Metabolism is not that terribly different from person to person. The predominant physiological factor is lean muscle mass. Still the dominating factor in weight management is caloric intake. You can either accept this and be successful, or continue to construct excuses.
It is very difficult for trained professionals to estimate calories, which is why many weight management professionals discard calorie counting for the average person doing this on their own. You also have to incorporate the 20% margin of error in calorie estimation, hence the 1000 calorie day you just logged per the label is somewhere between 800 and 1200 calories. You can use MFP successfully by checking your logs to see where the error may have occurred if you are not hitting your goals.
Model your behavior to those who have succeeded and lost 100+ lbs and maintained this over years. In all of these situations the successful share distinct common behaviors:
1. They implemented small changes - rarely anything drastic.
2. They continually set small goals, met the goals, and set new loftier goals.
3. Weight loss was a smaller goal to a larger vision (long life, improved life, kids, athletic performance, etc.)
Here's a link to the National Weight Control Registry - one of the most informative sites on long term success:
http://nwcr.ws/
Though I disagree with some of what was said, I find much of it informative. Thank you for participating. I will check out the site. I think people may be misunderstanding my intent here. Many seem to think that I am blaming a system or excusing bad behavior. My mother believes strongly in the starvation mode. She accuses her weight and her lack of losing weight on it. She truly believes she destroyed her metabolism and no matter what I say to her or how I try to convince her that this is all hog wash, she is stuck in her beliefs that she can never lose the weight and has accepted her lot in life. I dont believe in "starvation mode" the same way she does. Ive tried to tell her that her lack of success in weight loss, is due to her lack of getting off her duff. I KNOW I can lose weight. I am CONFIDENT I will. I am not *kitten* footing around making excuses to the contrary. I dont know where everyone is getting that I have given up from my story. Quite the opposite, I now realize my idiocy and can make smart changes for once in my life. I find this to be one of the most straight forward memes.
What parts do you disagree with?
I recognize your tongue in cheek humor and very much appreciate it. I simply want you to succeed and don't want you to set unrealistic goals.
0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 426 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions