VENT.
active562
Posts: 135 Member
So I am really pissed because I now understand why I gained 5 pounds in 2 weeks. A product implied that 2 slices contained 65 calories. I was quite impressed and loved that product and so I was eating quite a lot of it. Recently they changed their label and wrote that in fact , one slice contains 65 calories not 2. So basically I was eating double the calories . This is just to warn you guys to be aware of labels as they can be deceiving. As for me , I am back to being on a calorie deficit I guess! 
2
Replies
-
This happens quite a bit and the parent company of the product generally does it for marketing purposes. This is why it is so important to check the accuracy of what you're eating, and the easiest way to do this is to go by the gram serving size instead of the "volume" one, if that makes sense. I.e., instead of 2 tablespoons of peanut butter, weigh out the 32 grams of peanut butter and go by that.
Don't stress over it, though - it is a learning process and it takes time to get into the groove of measuring and logging your foods, checking labels, etc. Just take what you've learned and keep on trucking.8 -
^Yup. Bread is prime example. Once I started using a food scale, I was surprised at the variance in weight from one slice to the next. Ditto bacon.5
-
Yep, this happens quite a bit. Especially with bottled drinks or individually packaged foods. The label will say "80 cals/ serving!" But if you don't know what a serving is, you could be consuming much more.
There's a 20oz bottle of lemonade in the break room. The label notes 100cals/serving. But, there are "approximately" 2.5 servings in the bottle. If you're not reading the full label, you might not realize you're consuming 250cals instead of 100. And that doesn't even take into account that the label itself is allowed to be off by 20% and still meet guidelines (probably not that much for a liquid, but still possible.) So that bottle of lemonade could be nearly 300cals.
I've noticed a lot of bigger name brands are now starting to put on the front of the packaging how many total calories are in the package. Not sure if that's new guidelines being followed or consumer complaints though.2 -
So I am really pissed because I now understand why I gained 5 pounds in 2 weeks. A product implied that 2 slices contained 65 calories. I was quite impressed and loved that product and so I was eating quite a lot of it. Recently they changed their label and wrote that in fact , one slice contains 65 calories not 2. So basically I was eating double the calories . This is just to warn you guys to be aware of labels as they can be deceiving. As for me , I am back to being on a calorie deficit I guess!
You ate 17,500 calories of this product? That's a lot of bread...17 -
what product? did you read what the label said, or infer based on what you perceive a normal serving size to be (i.e. most people consider 2 slices of bread normal, but most labels only give calories for 1)
there is a new law that requires food labeling to be not only a serving size, but what an average person would assume a serving size to be3 -
WinoGelato wrote: »So I am really pissed because I now understand why I gained 5 pounds in 2 weeks. A product implied that 2 slices contained 65 calories. I was quite impressed and loved that product and so I was eating quite a lot of it. Recently they changed their label and wrote that in fact , one slice contains 65 calories not 2. So basically I was eating double the calories . This is just to warn you guys to be aware of labels as they can be deceiving. As for me , I am back to being on a calorie deficit I guess!
You ate 17,500 calories of this product? That's a lot of bread...
Doing the math that's 538 slices of bread in 2 weeks. (each slice was 32.5 calories more than you thought, gaining 5 lbs means eating 17,500 calories more than you thought, 17,500/32.5 = 538.46)
That is 38.5 slices of bread a day (roughly 2 full loafs), every day, for 2 weeks. I'm guessing you didn't really eat that much so the weight gain isn't JUST from the mislabeling. If you did eat that much of it you should probably try to eat a little more variety.
I agree that mislabeling is very annoying though.6 -
WinoGelato wrote: »So I am really pissed because I now understand why I gained 5 pounds in 2 weeks. A product implied that 2 slices contained 65 calories. I was quite impressed and loved that product and so I was eating quite a lot of it. Recently they changed their label and wrote that in fact , one slice contains 65 calories not 2. So basically I was eating double the calories . This is just to warn you guys to be aware of labels as they can be deceiving. As for me , I am back to being on a calorie deficit I guess!
You ate 17,500 calories of this product? That's a lot of bread...
That's what I thought. I love bread but oh my2 -
you probably didn't read it closely. most breads do a serving size for 1. if you mut do bread try a lower calorie one. the one i have is 40 cals a slice and its just as good as any main bread0
-
I would fully expect bread to quote per slice, myself. That is the lowest unit in the package.
Also, gross error check - 65 calories is already quite a low calorie count per slice, compared to the average bread.
But I would check before logging, not after.1 -
I can't edit my post to add picture but here's the bread I bought
1 -
WinoGelato wrote: »So I am really pissed because I now understand why I gained 5 pounds in 2 weeks. A product implied that 2 slices contained 65 calories. I was quite impressed and loved that product and so I was eating quite a lot of it. Recently they changed their label and wrote that in fact , one slice contains 65 calories not 2. So basically I was eating double the calories . This is just to warn you guys to be aware of labels as they can be deceiving. As for me , I am back to being on a calorie deficit I guess!
You ate 17,500 calories of this product? That's a lot of bread...
Haha thanks for making me realize that ! It is impossible ! So maybe its a little weight gain and some water retention
but still it made me quite angry! 2 -
humpbackgirl wrote: »you probably didn't read it closely. most breads do a serving size for 1. if you mut do bread try a lower calorie one. the one i have is 40 cals a slice and its just as good as any main bread
Trust me , I read it closely more than once ! I read it again because of the new package and they changed it from 1 to 2 !0 -
ShammersPink wrote: »I would fully expect bread to quote per slice, myself. That is the lowest unit in the package.
Also, gross error check - 65 calories is already quite a low calorie count per slice, compared to the average bread.
But I would check before logging, not after.
Thats why I ate a lot of it ! Cause I was like '' BREAD ? ONLY 65 CALORIES PER 2 SLICE ? '' and obviously I liked the idea !2 -
mburgess458 wrote: »WinoGelato wrote: »So I am really pissed because I now understand why I gained 5 pounds in 2 weeks. A product implied that 2 slices contained 65 calories. I was quite impressed and loved that product and so I was eating quite a lot of it. Recently they changed their label and wrote that in fact , one slice contains 65 calories not 2. So basically I was eating double the calories . This is just to warn you guys to be aware of labels as they can be deceiving. As for me , I am back to being on a calorie deficit I guess!
You ate 17,500 calories of this product? That's a lot of bread...
Doing the math that's 538 slices of bread in 2 weeks. (each slice was 32.5 calories more than you thought, gaining 5 lbs means eating 17,500 calories more than you thought, 17,500/32.5 = 538.46)
That is 38.5 slices of bread a day (roughly 2 full loafs), every day, for 2 weeks. I'm guessing you didn't really eat that much so the weight gain isn't JUST from the mislabeling. If you did eat that much of it you should probably try to eat a little more variety.
I agree that mislabeling is very annoying though.
I've been eating the bread for more than 2 weeks but during these 2 weeks , i ate a lot more of it and also gained weight . But yeah , it does sound impossible , you are right ! But still , my point is thag mislabeling sucks !1 -
mburgess458 wrote: »WinoGelato wrote: »So I am really pissed because I now understand why I gained 5 pounds in 2 weeks. A product implied that 2 slices contained 65 calories. I was quite impressed and loved that product and so I was eating quite a lot of it. Recently they changed their label and wrote that in fact , one slice contains 65 calories not 2. So basically I was eating double the calories . This is just to warn you guys to be aware of labels as they can be deceiving. As for me , I am back to being on a calorie deficit I guess!
You ate 17,500 calories of this product? That's a lot of bread...
Doing the math that's 538 slices of bread in 2 weeks. (each slice was 32.5 calories more than you thought, gaining 5 lbs means eating 17,500 calories more than you thought, 17,500/32.5 = 538.46)
That is 38.5 slices of bread a day (roughly 2 full loafs), every day, for 2 weeks. I'm guessing you didn't really eat that much so the weight gain isn't JUST from the mislabeling. If you did eat that much of it you should probably try to eat a little more variety.
I agree that mislabeling is very annoying though.
I've been eating the bread for more than 2 weeks but during these 2 weeks , i ate a lot more of it and also gained weight . But yeah , it does sound impossible , you are right ! But still , my point is thag mislabeling sucks !
I agree with what the posters above are saying; however, it's most likely that you have been making similar mistakes with other products as well, and realizing this issue with the bread will help you to avoid similar logging errors in the future. So no, you didn't eat 17,500 calories of the bread in those 2 weeks, but you may have been underestimating your intake of other foods as well, so it's good that you realized what was happening.
Most of that 5 lbs is likely to be water weight, though. Our weight fluctuates naturally on a daily basis, so I wouldn't stress too much.5 -
i'll ask again - what product were you eating? I want to see what the label says - both old and new if i can find0
-
Yep...it sucks. This is why I weigh almost everything that I eat.So I am really pissed because I now understand why I gained 5 pounds in 2 weeks. A product implied that 2 slices contained 65 calories. I was quite impressed and loved that product and so I was eating quite a lot of it. Recently they changed their label and wrote that in fact , one slice contains 65 calories not 2. So basically I was eating double the calories . This is just to warn you guys to be aware of labels as they can be deceiving. As for me , I am back to being on a calorie deficit I guess!
And I am pretty sure that we didn't gain 5lbs of fat in 2 weeks.
3 -
deannalfisher wrote: »i'll ask again - what product were you eating? I want to see what the label says - both old and new if i can find
I dont feel comfortable naming the brand , especially since I do not have proof of what the old label said
0 -
but that is where google-fu comes in handy - PM me the brand if you want - i'm curious2
-
Alyssa_Is_LosingIt wrote: »mburgess458 wrote: »WinoGelato wrote: »So I am really pissed because I now understand why I gained 5 pounds in 2 weeks. A product implied that 2 slices contained 65 calories. I was quite impressed and loved that product and so I was eating quite a lot of it. Recently they changed their label and wrote that in fact , one slice contains 65 calories not 2. So basically I was eating double the calories . This is just to warn you guys to be aware of labels as they can be deceiving. As for me , I am back to being on a calorie deficit I guess!
You ate 17,500 calories of this product? That's a lot of bread...
Doing the math that's 538 slices of bread in 2 weeks. (each slice was 32.5 calories more than you thought, gaining 5 lbs means eating 17,500 calories more than you thought, 17,500/32.5 = 538.46)
That is 38.5 slices of bread a day (roughly 2 full loafs), every day, for 2 weeks. I'm guessing you didn't really eat that much so the weight gain isn't JUST from the mislabeling. If you did eat that much of it you should probably try to eat a little more variety.
I agree that mislabeling is very annoying though.
I've been eating the bread for more than 2 weeks but during these 2 weeks , i ate a lot more of it and also gained weight . But yeah , it does sound impossible , you are right ! But still , my point is thag mislabeling sucks !
I agree with what the posters above are saying; however, it's most likely that you have been making similar mistakes with other products as well, and realizing this issue with the bread will help you to avoid similar logging errors in the future. So no, you didn't eat 17,500 calories of the bread in those 2 weeks, but you may have been underestimating your intake of other foods as well, so it's good that you realized what was happening.
Most of that 5 lbs is likely to be water weight, though. Our weight fluctuates naturally on a daily basis, so I wouldn't stress too much.
I doubt it. Im very strict with my calories ! Its not my fault but theirs , because they mislabbeled it. But yes , you are right I wont stress to much either will probably eat in a slight deficit for a week or 2 and thats it 0 -
deannalfisher wrote: »but that is where google-fu comes in handy - PM me the brand if you want - i'm curious
Alright will pm you ! 0 -
Basically, bread varies within quite a small amount per 100g - seedy breads will be a bit higher due to oils in the seeds.
All the low cal breads work by basically giving you a smaller slice - thinner, and/ or a few square cm smaller face size. Also by a lighter fluffier rise.
So my go-to dense seedy loaf when not dieting is about 300cals/100g, and my lowest non-seedy diet bread is 249cals/100g.
But the slices are only a wee bit smaller but a lot thinner, and a bit insubstantial feeling, so are less than half the weight, and not much more than 1/3rds the calories. (51 vs 137)
So it is easy to make a low calorie sandwich with the diet bread, but it is clearly different.1 -
humpbackgirl wrote: »you probably didn't read it closely. most breads do a serving size for 1. if you mut do bread try a lower calorie one. the one i have is 40 cals a slice and its just as good as any main bread
There's nothing wrong with regular breads. I typically eat 2-4 slices per day without problem. It has a lot to do with the other choices one is making throughout the day.
OP, if you enjoy bread, eat it. I like to occasionally look at my whole day and see if I am finding myself feeling full and meeting my goals. If the answer to either of those is no, then it's time to re-evaluate.0 -
Alyssa_Is_LosingIt wrote: »mburgess458 wrote: »WinoGelato wrote: »So I am really pissed because I now understand why I gained 5 pounds in 2 weeks. A product implied that 2 slices contained 65 calories. I was quite impressed and loved that product and so I was eating quite a lot of it. Recently they changed their label and wrote that in fact , one slice contains 65 calories not 2. So basically I was eating double the calories . This is just to warn you guys to be aware of labels as they can be deceiving. As for me , I am back to being on a calorie deficit I guess!
You ate 17,500 calories of this product? That's a lot of bread...
Doing the math that's 538 slices of bread in 2 weeks. (each slice was 32.5 calories more than you thought, gaining 5 lbs means eating 17,500 calories more than you thought, 17,500/32.5 = 538.46)
That is 38.5 slices of bread a day (roughly 2 full loafs), every day, for 2 weeks. I'm guessing you didn't really eat that much so the weight gain isn't JUST from the mislabeling. If you did eat that much of it you should probably try to eat a little more variety.
I agree that mislabeling is very annoying though.
I've been eating the bread for more than 2 weeks but during these 2 weeks , i ate a lot more of it and also gained weight . But yeah , it does sound impossible , you are right ! But still , my point is thag mislabeling sucks !
I agree with what the posters above are saying; however, it's most likely that you have been making similar mistakes with other products as well, and realizing this issue with the bread will help you to avoid similar logging errors in the future. So no, you didn't eat 17,500 calories of the bread in those 2 weeks, but you may have been underestimating your intake of other foods as well, so it's good that you realized what was happening.
Most of that 5 lbs is likely to be water weight, though. Our weight fluctuates naturally on a daily basis, so I wouldn't stress too much.
I doubt it. Im very strict with my calories ! Its not my fault but theirs , because they mislabbeled it. But yes , you are right I wont stress to much either will probably eat in a slight deficit for a week or 2 and thats it
Oh, I wasn't saying "it's your fault," I was more or less saying that logging errors such as the one you made with the bread are common, which is why I'm such a vehement believer in the almighty Food Scale. I made similar errors in the beginning and was amazed at the difference in how much I thought I was eating and how much I was actually eating simply by not weighing/measuring my food properly. So please don't take that as an attack on your intelligence or ability to log - it's just a very common thing that happens and is the root of most "plateaus" and gradual weight gains when trying to log.4 -
nutmegoreo wrote: »humpbackgirl wrote: »you probably didn't read it closely. most breads do a serving size for 1. if you mut do bread try a lower calorie one. the one i have is 40 cals a slice and its just as good as any main bread
There's nothing wrong with regular breads. I typically eat 2-4 slices per day without problem. It has a lot to do with the other choices one is making throughout the day.
OP, if you enjoy bread, eat it. I like to occasionally look at my whole day and see if I am finding myself feeling full and meeting my goals. If the answer to either of those is no, then it's time to re-evaluate.
Yes I have no problem with eating bread but my point is that mislabelling caused me to gain weight0 -
Alyssa_Is_LosingIt wrote: »Alyssa_Is_LosingIt wrote: »mburgess458 wrote: »WinoGelato wrote: »So I am really pissed because I now understand why I gained 5 pounds in 2 weeks. A product implied that 2 slices contained 65 calories. I was quite impressed and loved that product and so I was eating quite a lot of it. Recently they changed their label and wrote that in fact , one slice contains 65 calories not 2. So basically I was eating double the calories . This is just to warn you guys to be aware of labels as they can be deceiving. As for me , I am back to being on a calorie deficit I guess!
You ate 17,500 calories of this product? That's a lot of bread...
Doing the math that's 538 slices of bread in 2 weeks. (each slice was 32.5 calories more than you thought, gaining 5 lbs means eating 17,500 calories more than you thought, 17,500/32.5 = 538.46)
That is 38.5 slices of bread a day (roughly 2 full loafs), every day, for 2 weeks. I'm guessing you didn't really eat that much so the weight gain isn't JUST from the mislabeling. If you did eat that much of it you should probably try to eat a little more variety.
I agree that mislabeling is very annoying though.
I've been eating the bread for more than 2 weeks but during these 2 weeks , i ate a lot more of it and also gained weight . But yeah , it does sound impossible , you are right ! But still , my point is thag mislabeling sucks !
I agree with what the posters above are saying; however, it's most likely that you have been making similar mistakes with other products as well, and realizing this issue with the bread will help you to avoid similar logging errors in the future. So no, you didn't eat 17,500 calories of the bread in those 2 weeks, but you may have been underestimating your intake of other foods as well, so it's good that you realized what was happening.
Most of that 5 lbs is likely to be water weight, though. Our weight fluctuates naturally on a daily basis, so I wouldn't stress too much.
I doubt it. Im very strict with my calories ! Its not my fault but theirs , because they mislabbeled it. But yes , you are right I wont stress to much either will probably eat in a slight deficit for a week or 2 and thats it
Oh, I wasn't saying "it's your fault," I was more or less saying that logging errors such as the one you made with the bread are common, which is why I'm such a vehement believer in the almighty Food Scale. I made similar errors in the beginning and was amazed at the difference in how much I thought I was eating and how much I was actually eating simply by not weighing/measuring my food properly. So please don't take that as an attack on your intelligence or ability to log - it's just a very common thing that happens and is the root of most "plateaus" and gradual weight gains when trying to log.Alyssa_Is_LosingIt wrote: »Alyssa_Is_LosingIt wrote: »mburgess458 wrote: »WinoGelato wrote: »So I am really pissed because I now understand why I gained 5 pounds in 2 weeks. A product implied that 2 slices contained 65 calories. I was quite impressed and loved that product and so I was eating quite a lot of it. Recently they changed their label and wrote that in fact , one slice contains 65 calories not 2. So basically I was eating double the calories . This is just to warn you guys to be aware of labels as they can be deceiving. As for me , I am back to being on a calorie deficit I guess!
You ate 17,500 calories of this product? That's a lot of bread...
Doing the math that's 538 slices of bread in 2 weeks. (each slice was 32.5 calories more than you thought, gaining 5 lbs means eating 17,500 calories more than you thought, 17,500/32.5 = 538.46)
That is 38.5 slices of bread a day (roughly 2 full loafs), every day, for 2 weeks. I'm guessing you didn't really eat that much so the weight gain isn't JUST from the mislabeling. If you did eat that much of it you should probably try to eat a little more variety.
I agree that mislabeling is very annoying though.
I've been eating the bread for more than 2 weeks but during these 2 weeks , i ate a lot more of it and also gained weight . But yeah , it does sound impossible , you are right ! But still , my point is thag mislabeling sucks !
I agree with what the posters above are saying; however, it's most likely that you have been making similar mistakes with other products as well, and realizing this issue with the bread will help you to avoid similar logging errors in the future. So no, you didn't eat 17,500 calories of the bread in those 2 weeks, but you may have been underestimating your intake of other foods as well, so it's good that you realized what was happening.
Most of that 5 lbs is likely to be water weight, though. Our weight fluctuates naturally on a daily basis, so I wouldn't stress too much.
I doubt it. Im very strict with my calories ! Its not my fault but theirs , because they mislabbeled it. But yes , you are right I wont stress to much either will probably eat in a slight deficit for a week or 2 and thats it
Oh, I wasn't saying "it's your fault," I was more or less saying that logging errors such as the one you made with the bread are common, which is why I'm such a vehement believer in the almighty Food Scale. I made similar errors in the beginning and was amazed at the difference in how much I thought I was eating and how much I was actually eating simply by not weighing/measuring my food properly. So please don't take that as an attack on your intelligence or ability to log - it's just a very common thing that happens and is the root of most "plateaus" and gradual weight gains when trying to log.
Oh I did not take it like that dont worry Sorry , if I sounded like I did ! I get what you are saying and I completely agree. But the thing is , I did measure it and the weight did agree with the old labels ! But once the new packages came in , it did not agree with them obviously 0 -
nutmegoreo wrote: »humpbackgirl wrote: »you probably didn't read it closely. most breads do a serving size for 1. if you mut do bread try a lower calorie one. the one i have is 40 cals a slice and its just as good as any main bread
There's nothing wrong with regular breads. I typically eat 2-4 slices per day without problem. It has a lot to do with the other choices one is making throughout the day.
OP, if you enjoy bread, eat it. I like to occasionally look at my whole day and see if I am finding myself feeling full and meeting my goals. If the answer to either of those is no, then it's time to re-evaluate.
Yes I have no problem with eating bread but my point is that mislabelling caused me to gain weight
I felt that had been covered nicely by others (re: the label difference and the weight gain). My point was directed at the poster saying that if you need to eat bread, it should be the low cal stuff. I didn't feel you needed to be told you had to switch the type of bread you were eating to fit someone else's concept of what you should eat. Carry on! Labels can be a tricky thing to get used to.0 -
This content has been removed.
-
thats a whole hell of a lot of bread. even in 2 weeks time
the weight gain has to be attributed to more than just bread0 -
callsitlikeiseeit wrote: »thats a whole hell of a lot of bread. even in 2 weeks time
the weight gain has to be attributed to more than just bread
Exactly. You didn't eat 17,500 extra calories in bread alone probably not even a small percentage of that0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 176K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.6K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions