Do you care about your BMI?

Options
124

Replies

  • Machka9
    Machka9 Posts: 24,849 Member
    Options
    Do you care about your BMI?

    Yes.

    For me, it seems to be quite accurate ... it matches how I feel about myself.

    And personally, I like being in the lower half of my normal BMI range. Right now, I'm right in the middle of that range, and I know I need to lose a little bit.
  • Machka9
    Machka9 Posts: 24,849 Member
    Options
    GottaBurnEmAll wrote: »
    kshama2001 wrote: »
    @gabbyo23 What’s your frame size? http://www.myfooddiary.com/Resources/frame_size_calculator.asp

    I have a large frame and the only time I've had a BMI as low as 24 was after 6 weeks of undereating and overexercising during boot camp. I have wide shoulders, big hands, big feet, and a big head and had to get my boots and hat from the men's side of the uniform room.

    My goal is to get back into my skinny jeans from when I was a full time yoga teacher, which will have me at a Low Overweight BMI, and I'm ok with that.

    That calculator drives me batty, because I have differing elbow breadth and wrist findings. If you look at me, it's all a puzzle. My hips are narrow (34"), but my shoulders are broad. I have no earthly idea what my frame size is. I have small hands and feet, and a narrow rib cage (I wear a 30" bra band). I'm going to go with small-ish frame size. I think.

    Yes, my measurements confuse that calculator. :lol:

    I have teensy-tiny wrists (and ankles) ... child-sized. But long limbs.

  • Francl27
    Francl27 Posts: 26,372 Member
    Options
    I care about it so my doctor leaves me alone. But yeah, if I get closer to the overweight BMI I'm too chubby for my taste.
  • Machka9
    Machka9 Posts: 24,849 Member
    Options
    According to the Asian BMI calculator:
    https://aadi.joslin.org/en/am-i-at-risk/asian-bmi-calculator

    Your weight is within healthy range. Continue exercising and eating healthfully. :)

    I wonder if there's one for people of Eastern European descent.
  • GottaBurnEmAll
    GottaBurnEmAll Posts: 7,722 Member
    Options
    Machka9 wrote: »
    GottaBurnEmAll wrote: »
    kshama2001 wrote: »
    @gabbyo23 What’s your frame size? http://www.myfooddiary.com/Resources/frame_size_calculator.asp

    I have a large frame and the only time I've had a BMI as low as 24 was after 6 weeks of undereating and overexercising during boot camp. I have wide shoulders, big hands, big feet, and a big head and had to get my boots and hat from the men's side of the uniform room.

    My goal is to get back into my skinny jeans from when I was a full time yoga teacher, which will have me at a Low Overweight BMI, and I'm ok with that.

    That calculator drives me batty, because I have differing elbow breadth and wrist findings. If you look at me, it's all a puzzle. My hips are narrow (34"), but my shoulders are broad. I have no earthly idea what my frame size is. I have small hands and feet, and a narrow rib cage (I wear a 30" bra band). I'm going to go with small-ish frame size. I think.

    Yes, my measurements confuse that calculator. :lol:

    I have teensy-tiny wrists (and ankles) ... child-sized. But long limbs.

    Hmmm... now you have me thinking. I know my legs are long relative to my frame (even though they look dumpy because my quads are pretty muscled for no reason I know of). I'm not sure about my arms. I think they're average length.

    I'm still going with small framed based on hands, feet, wrists, ankles, rib cage, and hips. That's a good amount of real estate.

    And the only reason this really matters is in deciding a goal weight range.
  • Mouse_Potato
    Mouse_Potato Posts: 1,495 Member
    Options
    ShammersPink wrote: »
    Mouse_Potato wrote: »

    I hate the Waist:Hip ratio. It shows me as "at risk" no matter how small I get because my hips shrink along with the rest of me. :disappointed:

    Sadly, this ratio is largely genetically determined. It is a good descriptor for apple vs pear fat deposition, which does affect your risk, as it indicates visceral fat, but beyond a certain point, you may not be able to alter it. If you tend to have a high waist:hip ratio, it may be more important to make sure the other measures, such as BMI, are okay.

    I'm pretty sure that if I went up into the obese range, I'd start putting enough on my belly for the waist:hip ratio to go the wrong way, but I'm hour-glassy by genetic disposition, and I could be overweight by BMI, borderline by waist:height ratio, and almost certainly overfat by BF%, and my waist:hip ratio would remain healthy.

    So I think it's a ratio to use in conjunction with other measures, not by itself.

    This is why I hate it. For me, that is. My BMI is 21.2. My body fat is somewhere between 20 and 22 percent. I have visible abs. But I have narrow hips and a short waist, so even when I weighed less than 100 pounds (at 5'4"), I still had a 27" waist. Squats and deadlifts have helped give me a booty, but my WHR is still .82.
  • kshama2001
    kshama2001 Posts: 27,897 Member
    Options
    zyxst wrote: »
    lemmie177 wrote: »
    If I go by Asian BMI classifications, I'm overweight. :)

    All it tells me is I'm too fat to travel in Asia. XD

    I was at my goal weight when I lived in Okinawa and I was too big to shop for women's clothes or shoes there.

    (Shoes was no surprise as I have trouble in the US at regular shoe departments...unless I'm looking for sneakers in Men's. Zappos FTW!)
  • robininfl
    robininfl Posts: 1,137 Member
    Options
    Mouse_Potato wrote: »
    ShammersPink wrote: »
    Mouse_Potato wrote: »

    I hate the Waist:Hip ratio. It shows me as "at risk" no matter how small I get because my hips shrink along with the rest of me. :disappointed:

    Sadly, this ratio is largely genetically determined. It is a good descriptor for apple vs pear fat deposition, which does affect your risk, as it indicates visceral fat, but beyond a certain point, you may not be able to alter it. If you tend to have a high waist:hip ratio, it may be more important to make sure the other measures, such as BMI, are okay.

    I'm pretty sure that if I went up into the obese range, I'd start putting enough on my belly for the waist:hip ratio to go the wrong way, but I'm hour-glassy by genetic disposition, and I could be overweight by BMI, borderline by waist:height ratio, and almost certainly overfat by BF%, and my waist:hip ratio would remain healthy.

    So I think it's a ratio to use in conjunction with other measures, not by itself.

    This is why I hate it. For me, that is. My BMI is 21.2. My body fat is somewhere between 20 and 22 percent. I have visible abs. But I have narrow hips and a short waist, so even when I weighed less than 100 pounds (at 5'4"), I still had a 27" waist. Squats and deadlifts have helped give me a booty, but my WHR is still .82.

    I'm like this too, just built like a ruler, straight up and down. I think part of the WHR idea is that if you put fat on in your abdomen, it's more dangerous, if you keep it in your butt and legs, it isn't. So yeah you can't fix it as a risk factor, it probably simply IS more risky for us to have excess fat than some other body types. Like it is for men... But if you don't have the excess fat, you have effectively managed the risk.

    Mine gets better when I lift weights, as an absolute measure, because my butt and thighs grow more than the rest of me. That isn't changing my genetic body type, though.
  • AutumnDancer26
    AutumnDancer26 Posts: 23 Member
    Options
    I make a point of never paying attention to my BMI, since it told me I was overweight. It's not a denial thing, but I happen to be very tall and have a good deal of muscle on me with a fairly low body fat percentage. I might weigh more than other people my height, but in no way am I unhealthy.
  • patchie27
    patchie27 Posts: 4 Member
    Options
    Yes, I do.
  • pesigrandi
    pesigrandi Posts: 74 Member
    Options
    I don't so much care about the BMI number because it's not particularly accurate in a lot of cases. I have a book that has some other numbers (though partially based on BMI) that calculates your weight from fat and your belly fat. To me that is more important based on what I've read over the last few years.
  • neldabg
    neldabg Posts: 1,452 Member
    Options
    Yes. I do pay attention to other markers such as how I feel and the fat surrounding my waist, but BMI is one factor.
  • Therealobi1
    Therealobi1 Posts: 3,261 Member
    Options
    I did before. Didn't like the obese label. Overweight by 2 whole pounds doesn't bother me at all
  • hazcad
    hazcad Posts: 41 Member
    Options
    I take no notice of BMI. Theirs more to life than reaching a generic number that has been created that says "you" have to be. If I'm fit, healthy and eating right that's all that matters. I have a target to reach of course but that's somewhere i feel I'd be happy with nothing to do with a BMI chart. As others have said it doesn't take into account bone,muscle or water. I monitor my weight, food, fitness and body fat % and that's all.
  • __TMac__
    __TMac__ Posts: 1,665 Member
    Options
    I've used it to help set my initial goal. Once I get there, I plan to get a body fat test to determine a more accurate stopping point. I'm seeking to be in the middle of the healthy range, and since I've been overweight most of my adult life, I don't know where that is. The BMI scale is useful to me for that sort of benchmarking.
  • kamouflaged
    kamouflaged Posts: 4 Member
    Options
    Depends on your goals. If you are fine at that weight, nothing wrong with going into maintenance mode.

    I do consider BMI amongst other things like waist/hips ratio and fat %. Being small now, I have to make sure I don't fall into the underweight category (which wouldn't be good since I have an athletic build, not just skin and bones). BMI gives me an indicator of where I am and what I need to maintain or adjust, but I think measurements are more accurate. I also wouldn't mind being in the overweight class if I was more muscular. They are numbers, they can help in getting a big pictures, but when it comes to overall health, there is so much to look for (cardiovascular fitness for example).
  • DebSozo
    DebSozo Posts: 2,578 Member
    edited January 2017
    Options
    BMI tells me I am in the high/normal range. But I feel "thick" because I used to be in the low/middle range. I still have that picture of my trimmer and fitter self in my head and want to get back to it.

    I had creeped into "overweight" 25 BMI range briefly. That wake up call did help to kick me to lose the weight to get into the "normal" BMI. But the "normal BMI" range is HUGE! And 10 pounds increases my clothes one size so I can't fit into my wardrobe.

    So I basically use my wardrobe to keep me in check. When I can't button my slacks comfortably it's time to get back on a deficit and start cutting calories.

    I gained some weight over the holidays and feel pudgy. But no one can notice under the winter clothes. Now I'm going to work to get those pounds off before warm weather hits.

    My summer wardrobe is smaller than my winter wardrobe. I've noticed that larger sizes give a lot more leeway than the lower clothes sizes. When you get down to a lower size it seems even 5 pounds gained will make clothes not fit correctly.
  • applemiki
    applemiki Posts: 13 Member
    Options
    to be honest the BMI charts are usually for people who have average frame structures. i have learned never to gauge from that because i have a large bone structure. what is overweight for the average person is pretty much ideal for me. i want to look healthy, not malnourished.

Categories