Cardio in the am or pm?

dave8644
dave8644 Posts: 5 Member
edited November 16 in Fitness and Exercise
Hi guys, I just wanted to know of your experiences on doing cardio on an empty stomach first thing waking up into morning or doing cardio in the evening. I have heard both pros and cons and just wandering what do you guys think. Any suggestions? Thanks dave

Replies

  • zorrocat
    zorrocat Posts: 153 Member
    Personally, cardio is best for me first thing in the morning on either an empty stomach or a cup of coffee. When I run later in the day, it usually makes me feel a little nauseous, even if it's been a few hours since my last meal.
  • _Bro
    _Bro Posts: 437 Member
    I don't think it makes that big of a difference... I might do cardio once a week or so unless I am training for something like a spartan race
  • CafeRacer808
    CafeRacer808 Posts: 2,396 Member
    edited March 2017
    As an insomniac, I prefer to do cardio either in the morning or during my lunch hour. Working out at night, be it cardio or lifting, tends to interfere with my sleep.

    ETA: If it's a morning session, I don't eat beforehand. If it's a midday/afternoon session, it's usually 1.5-2 hours after I've eaten.
  • rybo
    rybo Posts: 5,424 Member
    I prefer at least 2, preferably 4 hours from when I last eat until I do cardio. Otherwise its like a bowling ball in my belly. I've never had issues running fasted in the mornings and rather enjoy that setup. Try whichever works for you. Everyone is different.
  • Kollane
    Kollane Posts: 45 Member
    If I haven't eaten at least an hour before, my heart rate will be sky high and I'll feel extremely weak. Oh yeah, my hands also start shaking. And I might feel like I need to throw up.
    My cardio tends to be quite intense (Bodycombat), but for me to attend 8.30 class, I'll have to have a banana and skyr (dairy product) before 7.30 at latest.
  • kcjchang
    kcjchang Posts: 709 Member
    Weekdays, I perfer afternoon. When I did ride in the morning, I perfer to be fasted. Stop during it because I can't stay warm even in summer (start time between 6:30-7:00). Rides average 90 minutes.

    On weekends, I perfer morning and eat before. I normal up before 6:00 but don't start riding until 8:00. Weekend ride are normally 3+ hours on Saturdays and 2 on Sundays.
  • jennybearlv
    jennybearlv Posts: 1,519 Member
    I think it depends on if you are a morning person or a night owl. I prefer not to know what a sunrise looks like, so I do late workouts. I'm also one of those odd sorts that likes a big meal before I workout. Being hungry has never gotten me through the last mile or one more set.
  • stephannie6699
    stephannie6699 Posts: 50 Member
    in the morning :)
  • pondee629
    pondee629 Posts: 2,469 Member
    ninerbuff wrote: »
    If we're talking impact on weight loss........................it doesn't matter. If we're talking on what works best for an individual, then only the individual will know.

    I split my cardio up with a jog/walk in the morning and then either a walk or bike ride later in the afternoon.

    A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition

    9285851.png

    It's personal. Try at several times and see what/when YOU like. Then go with that. Kinda like asking which is the best way to cook a steak. I like mine rare, others medium rare, others medium etc.
  • MeanderingMammal
    MeanderingMammal Posts: 7,866 Member
    dave8644 wrote: »
    Hi guys, I just wanted to know of your experiences on doing cardio on an empty stomach first thing waking up into morning or doing cardio in the evening. I have heard both pros and cons and just wandering what do you guys think. Any suggestions? Thanks dave

    There is no One True Way(TM) on this.

    Personally my midweek runs tend to be in the evening, generally 6-10 miles, sometimes up to 15. I'll snack at about 1600-1700 before that.

    At weekends I'll do my longer runs, generally back to backs from 13 miles upwards, so I'll generally eat an hour or so before heading out. That gets me beyond the 90-110 minute point, where I find a bit of fuelling can be helpful.
  • Rax1974
    Rax1974 Posts: 408 Member
    In the morning your Glycogen is supposedly less so you get more bang for your buck. I do Steady State right when I get up. Takes about 10 minutes to kick in then I feel great!
  • cwolfman13
    cwolfman13 Posts: 41,865 Member
    dave8644 wrote: »
    Hi guys, I just wanted to know of your experiences on doing cardio on an empty stomach first thing waking up into morning or doing cardio in the evening. I have heard both pros and cons and just wandering what do you guys think. Any suggestions? Thanks dave

    It's personal preference...there are some benefits in regards to endurance and performance when you train fasted at times. I do some of my training fasted and other times not.

    In regards to losing weight (fat), it makes no difference.
  • ItsAllMental819
    ItsAllMental819 Posts: 68 Member
    If your doing low intensity cardio you preserve glycogen stores and burn primarily from fat stores in the mornings. This type of cardio is considered to be the "best" type to perform in a fasted state (in the early morning) or depleted state (post workout). In my experience, even with moderate or high intensity cardio, early morning fasted state cardio works best for me but really it's a question of preference & everyone has their own opinion. Just do what you feel works the best for you...
  • AnvilHead
    AnvilHead Posts: 18,343 Member
    If your doing low intensity cardio you preserve glycogen stores and burn primarily from fat stores in the mornings. This type of cardio is considered to be the "best" type to perform in a fasted state (in the early morning) or depleted state (post workout). In my experience, even with moderate or high intensity cardio, early morning fasted state cardio works best for me but really it's a question of preference & everyone has their own opinion. Just do what you feel works the best for you...

    Not so much:
    http://weightology.net/fat-loss/fasted-cardio-an-undeserved-good-reputation.html/


    In regards to the OP, the best time to do cardio (or any workout, for that matter) is whenever you'll do it most consistently. Workouts you do at a time that fits into your schedule are better than missed workouts from trying to squeeze them in at a supposed "optimal" time. Personal preference is the most important consideration.
  • ItsAllMental819
    ItsAllMental819 Posts: 68 Member
    AnvilHead wrote: »
    If your doing low intensity cardio you preserve glycogen stores and burn primarily from fat stores in the mornings. This type of cardio is considered to be the "best" type to perform in a fasted state (in the early morning) or depleted state (post workout). In my experience, even with moderate or high intensity cardio, early morning fasted state cardio works best for me but really it's a question of preference & everyone has their own opinion. Just do what you feel works the best for you...

    Not so much:
    http://weightology.net/fat-loss/fasted-cardio-an-undeserved-good-reputation.html/


    In regards to the OP, the best time to do cardio (or any workout, for that matter) is whenever you'll do it most consistently. Workouts you do at a time that fits into your schedule are better than missed workouts from trying to squeeze them in at a supposed "optimal" time. Personal preference is the most important consideration.

    The site you referred me to was only a blog - or basically one man's opinion... Although well written and had some good information he says only that there is no evidence that it does work and he has zero factual evidence that it doesn't. I disagree with his hypothesis but respect it. There are several studies that show fasted state and depleted state cardio burns more calories. I never stated that it burns fat as no cardiovascular exercises actually burn fat - only raises metabolism and allows you to be in a caloric deficit state so you lose weight. There are many other factors that go into fat loss...
    I just let the OP know what worked best for me as he asked & you parroted my main advice that personal preference is the most important consideration.
  • usmcmp
    usmcmp Posts: 21,219 Member
    AnvilHead wrote: »
    If your doing low intensity cardio you preserve glycogen stores and burn primarily from fat stores in the mornings. This type of cardio is considered to be the "best" type to perform in a fasted state (in the early morning) or depleted state (post workout). In my experience, even with moderate or high intensity cardio, early morning fasted state cardio works best for me but really it's a question of preference & everyone has their own opinion. Just do what you feel works the best for you...

    Not so much:
    http://weightology.net/fat-loss/fasted-cardio-an-undeserved-good-reputation.html/


    In regards to the OP, the best time to do cardio (or any workout, for that matter) is whenever you'll do it most consistently. Workouts you do at a time that fits into your schedule are better than missed workouts from trying to squeeze them in at a supposed "optimal" time. Personal preference is the most important consideration.

    The site you referred me to was only a blog - or basically one man's opinion... Although well written and had some good information he says only that there is no evidence that it does work and he has zero factual evidence that it doesn't. I disagree with his hypothesis but respect it. There are several studies that show fasted state and depleted state cardio burns more calories. I never stated that it burns fat as no cardiovascular exercises actually burn fat - only raises metabolism and allows you to be in a caloric deficit state so you lose weight. There are many other factors that go into fat loss...
    I just let the OP know what worked best for me as he asked & you parroted my main advice that personal preference is the most important consideration.

    I think you missed all the links to studies supporting that opinion.
  • AnvilHead
    AnvilHead Posts: 18,343 Member
    edited March 2017
    The site you referred me to was only a blog - or basically one man's opinion... Although well written and had some good information he says only that there is no evidence that it does work and he has zero factual evidence that it doesn't.

    Read through it again. See all the words in blue letters? Those are links. Links to studies. Studies are sometimes considered evidence.

    Krieger isn't just some hack "blogger" spouting half-cocked, unsupported layman opinions like so much of the dreck on the internet. From the "About James" section of his page:
    James Krieger is the founder of Weightology. He has a Master's degree in Nutrition from the University of Florida and a second Master's degree in Exercise Science from Washington State University. He is the former research director for a corporate weight management program that treated over 400 people per year, with an average weight loss of 40 pounds in 3 months. His former clients include the founder of Sylvan Learning Centers and The Little Gym, the vice president of Costco, and a former vice president of MSN.

    James is a published scientist, author, and speaker in the field of exercise and nutrition. He has published research in prestigious scientific journals, including the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition and the Journal of Applied Physiology. In his previous lay publication, Weightology Weekly, he wrote over 70 articles per year covering the latest science in a manner that was friendly and easy to understand. James is also the former science editor for Pure Power Magazine, and the former editor for Journal of Pure Power, both publications that delivered scientific, but lay-friendly, information on training and nutrition to athletes and coaches. In addition, James has given over 75 lectures on fitness-related topics to physicians, dietitians, and other professionals, and has been a speaker at major events such as the AFPT Conference and NSCA Personal Training Conference. In fact, James has been involved in the health, nutrition, and fitness field for over 20 years, and has written over 500 articles. He is a strong believer in an evidence-based, scientific approach to body transformation and health.

    For more information on James's background and experience, view his curriculum vita.
  • ItsAllMental819
    ItsAllMental819 Posts: 68 Member
    edited March 2017
    usmcmp wrote: »
    AnvilHead wrote: »
    If your doing low intensity cardio you preserve glycogen stores and burn primarily from fat stores in the mornings. This type of cardio is considered to be the "best" type to perform in a fasted state (in the early morning) or depleted state (post workout). In my experience, even with moderate or high intensity cardio, early morning fasted state cardio works best for me but really it's a question of preference & everyone has their own opinion. Just do what you feel works the best for you...

    Not so much:
    http://weightology.net/fat-loss/fasted-cardio-an-undeserved-good-reputation.html/


    In regards to the OP, the best time to do cardio (or any workout, for that matter) is whenever you'll do it most consistently. Workouts you do at a time that fits into your schedule are better than missed workouts from trying to squeeze them in at a supposed "optimal" time. Personal preference is the most important consideration.

    The site you referred me to was only a blog - or basically one man's opinion... Although well written and had some good information he says only that there is no evidence that it does work and he has zero factual evidence that it doesn't. I disagree with his hypothesis but respect it. There are several studies that show fasted state and depleted state cardio burns more calories. I never stated that it burns fat as no cardiovascular exercises actually burn fat - only raises metabolism and allows you to be in a caloric deficit state so you lose weight. There are many other factors that go into fat loss...
    I just let the OP know what worked best for me as he asked & you parroted my main advice that personal preference is the most important consideration.

    I think you missed all the links to studies supporting that opinion.

    No I caught them all... Again all the studies he referenced stated "We found no significant differences in fat loss between the groups."(Fasted state vs Interval)
    AnvilHead wrote: »
    The site you referred me to was only a blog - or basically one man's opinion... Although well written and had some good information he says only that there is no evidence that it does work and he has zero factual evidence that it doesn't.

    Read through it again. See all the words in blue letters? Those are links. Links to studies. Studies are sometimes considered evidence.

    Krieger isn't just some hack "blogger" spouting half-cocked, unsupported layman opinions like so much of the dreck on the internet. From the "About James" section of his page:
    James Krieger is the founder of Weightology. He has a Master's degree in Nutrition from the University of Florida and a second Master's degree in Exercise Science from Washington State University. He is the former research director for a corporate weight management program that treated over 400 people per year, with an average weight loss of 40 pounds in 3 months. His former clients include the founder of Sylvan Learning Centers and The Little Gym, the vice president of Costco, and a former vice president of MSN.

    James is a published scientist, author, and speaker in the field of exercise and nutrition. He has published research in prestigious scientific journals, including the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition and the Journal of Applied Physiology. In his previous lay publication, Weightology Weekly, he wrote over 70 articles per year covering the latest science in a manner that was friendly and easy to understand. James is also the former science editor for Pure Power Magazine, and the former editor for Journal of Pure Power, both publications that delivered scientific, but lay-friendly, information on training and nutrition to athletes and coaches. In addition, James has given over 75 lectures on fitness-related topics to physicians, dietitians, and other professionals, and has been a speaker at major events such as the AFPT Conference and NSCA Personal Training Conference. In fact, James has been involved in the health, nutrition, and fitness field for over 20 years, and has written over 500 articles. He is a strong believer in an evidence-based, scientific approach to body transformation and health.

    For more information on James's background and experience, view his curriculum vita.

    Really? What's a study???

    NONE of those studies showed fasted steady state cardio DOESN'T work which is what I said. Only that interval training cardio or HIIT works the same. Really, wow some common sense! So again - he says only that there is no evidence that it does work and he has zero factual evidence that it doesn't. Another point he made is the notion that with fasted steady state cardio you start breaking down or burning proteins halfway through training - this is highly possible but if your getting at least 1g protein per lbs of bodyweight and not doing 2 hours of cardio it won't effect you to the point you're breaking muscle down over fat.

    Also, I never said he was some hack "blogger" but it is a blog and is his opinion right? I'm glad you can copy and paste but I read his bio prior to posting my comment.

    Again, steady state fasted cardio in the morning has worked best for me. I see the advantages of HIIT and use it at times but just because James Kreiger says fasted cardio working best is a myth it does not make it so. Once more it's a matter of preference & what may work best for one person won't for another...
  • AnvilHead
    AnvilHead Posts: 18,343 Member
    edited March 2017
    usmcmp wrote: »
    AnvilHead wrote: »
    If your doing low intensity cardio you preserve glycogen stores and burn primarily from fat stores in the mornings. This type of cardio is considered to be the "best" type to perform in a fasted state (in the early morning) or depleted state (post workout). In my experience, even with moderate or high intensity cardio, early morning fasted state cardio works best for me but really it's a question of preference & everyone has their own opinion. Just do what you feel works the best for you...

    Not so much:
    http://weightology.net/fat-loss/fasted-cardio-an-undeserved-good-reputation.html/


    In regards to the OP, the best time to do cardio (or any workout, for that matter) is whenever you'll do it most consistently. Workouts you do at a time that fits into your schedule are better than missed workouts from trying to squeeze them in at a supposed "optimal" time. Personal preference is the most important consideration.

    The site you referred me to was only a blog - or basically one man's opinion... Although well written and had some good information he says only that there is no evidence that it does work and he has zero factual evidence that it doesn't. I disagree with his hypothesis but respect it. There are several studies that show fasted state and depleted state cardio burns more calories. I never stated that it burns fat as no cardiovascular exercises actually burn fat - only raises metabolism and allows you to be in a caloric deficit state so you lose weight. There are many other factors that go into fat loss...
    I just let the OP know what worked best for me as he asked & you parroted my main advice that personal preference is the most important consideration.

    I think you missed all the links to studies supporting that opinion.

    No I caught them all... Again all the studies he referenced stated "We found no significant differences in fat loss between the groups."(Fasted state vs Interval)
    AnvilHead wrote: »
    The site you referred me to was only a blog - or basically one man's opinion... Although well written and had some good information he says only that there is no evidence that it does work and he has zero factual evidence that it doesn't.

    Read through it again. See all the words in blue letters? Those are links. Links to studies. Studies are sometimes considered evidence.

    Krieger isn't just some hack "blogger" spouting half-cocked, unsupported layman opinions like so much of the dreck on the internet. From the "About James" section of his page:
    James Krieger is the founder of Weightology. He has a Master's degree in Nutrition from the University of Florida and a second Master's degree in Exercise Science from Washington State University. He is the former research director for a corporate weight management program that treated over 400 people per year, with an average weight loss of 40 pounds in 3 months. His former clients include the founder of Sylvan Learning Centers and The Little Gym, the vice president of Costco, and a former vice president of MSN.

    James is a published scientist, author, and speaker in the field of exercise and nutrition. He has published research in prestigious scientific journals, including the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition and the Journal of Applied Physiology. In his previous lay publication, Weightology Weekly, he wrote over 70 articles per year covering the latest science in a manner that was friendly and easy to understand. James is also the former science editor for Pure Power Magazine, and the former editor for Journal of Pure Power, both publications that delivered scientific, but lay-friendly, information on training and nutrition to athletes and coaches. In addition, James has given over 75 lectures on fitness-related topics to physicians, dietitians, and other professionals, and has been a speaker at major events such as the AFPT Conference and NSCA Personal Training Conference. In fact, James has been involved in the health, nutrition, and fitness field for over 20 years, and has written over 500 articles. He is a strong believer in an evidence-based, scientific approach to body transformation and health.

    For more information on James's background and experience, view his curriculum vita.

    Really? What's a study???

    NONE of those studies showed fasted steady state cardio DOESN'T work which is what I said. Only that interval training cardio or HIIT works the same. Really, wow some common sense! So again - he says only that there is no evidence that it does work and he has zero factual evidence that it doesn't. Another point he made is the notion that with fasted steady state cardio you start breaking down or burning proteins halfway through training - this is highly possible but if your getting at least 1g protein per lbs of bodyweight and not doing 2 hours of cardio it won't effect you to the point you're breaking muscle down over fat.

    Also, I never said he was some hack "blogger" but it is a blog and is his opinion right? I'm glad you can copy and paste but I read his bio prior to posting my comment.

    Again, steady state fasted cardio in the morning has worked best for me. I see the advantages of HIIT and use it at times but just because James Kreiger says fasted cardio working best is a myth it does not make it so. Once more it's a matter of preference & what may work best for one person won't for another...

    Just to clarify, are you stating that as a fact, or as your opinion?


    For the record, my opinion is that there's nothing wrong with fasted cardio if that's what one wants to do. There are a lot of variables which are best determined by personal preference and "best" is a relative term. "Best" in what context? In that one feels the "best" training fasted? Great. In that fasted cardio in the morning is the "best" time because it fits in their schedule and they'll be most consistent working out at that time? Awesome. In that there's something magical about fasted cardio that makes it the "best" workout one can possibly do? No. That it's the "best" in terms of creating greater weight/fat loss? Nope.
  • ItsAllMental819
    ItsAllMental819 Posts: 68 Member
    All my comments are only my opinion unless I either state otherwise or include a reference or link. If you re-read my original post I had best in quotation marks to set it off & show it was my opinion and that others may disagree. I never said or even thought that fasted steady state cardio is "magical". Do I think its best for me & does it work? Yes I do... Do I think it's the best type of cardio overall? No, but I know it works and that it's NOT a myth & don't think it's right for others to say it is. Now, I could list the reasons why and when I think fasted steady state cardio is the best (for myself) but I don't think that's what you were asking & it's beside the point I was making.
  • CBD92
    CBD92 Posts: 72 Member
    I cannot stand training on an empty stomach. I spent a couple months in Thailand living at a Muay Thai (Thai kickboxing) gym and they train first thing in the morning before they serve breakfast. It was so brutal and I didn't get the results I had hoped for. Once I got back to Canada and continued to train I started to eat first and am seeing much better results. There has been extensive research done showing that it's actually more beneficial to train after you've eaten, but some people Just can't bring themselves to do it. If you can, eat something though. My absolute favourite Thing for first thing in the am before training is hemp seeds. They are so small but have so much energy and protein. I usually blend 1/4 cup in water to make a hemp "milk" and then I make a smoothie with that milk but you could just chug back the milk and call it a day (it doesn't taste good, just a heads up). But if you can get something in your body, that will help you tremendously with energy output. Just think of your body like a vehicle. It won't go if you don't put fuel in the tank! :)
  • no44s4me
    no44s4me Posts: 73 Member
    AM definitely, clears my head and starts the day off right. But it's real early, I'm either on the treadmill/road or recumbent bike by 5 so there's not much time to eat before. I do drink a cup a coffee though. On the mornings I lift, I always eat prior. I think it really comes down to what works for you. I rarely blow off lifting so having to reschedule to the PM will work sometimes, but if it's cardio that needs to moved to the PM, there's a higher probability of it being blown off.
This discussion has been closed.