Viewing the message boards in:

The PED questions I get

13»

Replies

  • Posts: 6,771 Member
    BHFF wrote: »

    And I would you know there are multiple studies? I don't have to look at studies, I am the subject. I've done this. Have you?

    n=1 is not a conclusive study.
  • Posts: 11,068 Member
    edited April 2017
    BHFF wrote: »

    Wow, that's low. The fact that you brought up such a deadly disease like that you should be ashamed of yourself. Regardless of whether it was intended for me or not the fact that you would use something like cancer and diseases killed so many people to your benefit. You're a disgusting human being. That's being reported

    It should be pretty clear that it is an analogy. You are directly claiming multiple times in this thread that you have to have experienced steroid use to have any opinion whatsoever on steroids.
  • Posts: 1,650 Member
    BHFF wrote: »

    Wow, that's low. The fact that you brought up such a deadly disease like that you should be ashamed of yourself. Regardless of whether it was intended for me or not the fact that you would use something like cancer and diseases killed so many people to your benefit. You're a disgusting human being. That's being reported

    Just...what?

    He's pointing out that he doesn't have to have used steroids to be knowledgeable about them. Just like oncologists don't have to have cancer to be knowledgeable about it. And gynecologists don't have to have a uterus to be knowledgeable about them.
  • Posts: 6,771 Member
    There seems to be a lot of inappropriate use of the flag feature. But I'm not especially au fait as I'm too lazy to use it other than for pro ana posts and you use the report feature for that.
  • Posts: 421 Member
    edited April 2017
    3bambi3 wrote: »

    Just...what?

    He's pointing out that he doesn't have to have used steroids to be knowledgeable about them. Just like oncologists don't have to have cancer to be knowledgeable about it. And gynecologists don't have to have a uterus to be knowledgeable about them.

    Again your brilliance amazes me, the both of you. The doctors you speak of study and research their particular field for 8+ years. They dedicate day and night to learning about the field they are going into so that when they do speak on it they are quite knowledgeable. Unless the person above has been going to school and studying steroids For the past four years he cannot claim to understand exactly how they work, what they do, studies and research that he happen to find online. You cannot compare the one study he found to people who spend 8+ years and dedicating their lives to help people with cancer.
  • Posts: 7,739 Member
    There seems to be a lot of inappropriate use of the flag feature. But I'm not especially au fait as I'm too lazy to use it other than for pro ana posts and you use the report feature for that.

    I'd say there seems to be a bit/lot of willful ignorance.
  • Posts: 1,650 Member
    BHFF wrote: »

    Again your brilliance amazes me, the both of you. The doctors you speak of study and research their particular field for 8+ years. They dedicate day and night to learning about the field they are going into so that when they do speak on it they are quite knowledgeable. Unless the person above has been going to school and studying steroids For the past four years he cannot claim to understand exactly how they work, what they do, studies and research that he happen to find online. You cannot compare the one study he found to people who spend 8+ years and dedicating their lives to help people with cancer.

    So...have you dedicated years to the study of steroids? Or does using them somehow negate the need for study?
  • Posts: 421 Member
    3bambi3 wrote: »

    So...have you dedicated years to the study of steroids? Or does using them somehow negate the need for study?

    I can guarantee you my research on them it's for more detailed did the research he read for one study. Knowing what I was going to put into my body when I did them was something I took it very seriously. Not to mention the fact that actually doing them feeling the results seeing the results or the Non results, yes Makes me more in tuned to how they work and don't work
  • Posts: 760 Member
    BHFF wrote: »

    Nah no need Sara. I AM the research
    And you're so everyone remembers, science does not equal fact. Science is not fact.
    Shoot, Pluto is a planet up to about four years ago LOL oooppps

    OP, I'm open to learning something, I'm OK with having my assumptions crushed, I really enjoy intelligent argument, but I can't just take your personal feelings as proof. Your "guarantee" means nothing to me. I was really hoping you had something substantive to say.

    I appreciate that you're being as open and honest as you can be, I believe that you believe, but that is not enough for me. I'm not picking on you, I have no bad feelings toward you, I'm not mad at all, but I'm out.
  • Posts: 442 Member
    Oh well - you're no longer taking them and did 3 cycles the last of which was a few years ago, correct?
    If they want to believe you're still taking - so what? Nobody knows your name and your income doesn't depend off being in this industry as a 'natural' so who cares what they think? Don't stress about it. Long as you're healthy and doing OK and your loved ones are OK. You're the first lifter I've come across who is so concerned about what people think of their PEDs who isn't dependent on selling supplements or income based on their lifting. 99% don't care nor generally bring it up. You look decent. What's the problem? All good.
  • Posts: 421 Member
    IVMay wrote: »
    Oh well - you're no longer taking them and did 3 cycles the last of which was a few years ago, correct?
    If they want to believe you're still taking - so what? Nobody knows your name and your income doesn't depend off being in this industry as a 'natural' so who cares what they think? Don't stress about it. Long as you're healthy and doing OK and your loved ones are OK. You're the first lifter I've come across who is so concerned about what people think of their PEDs who isn't dependent on selling supplements or income based on their lifting. 99% don't care nor generally bring it up. You look decent. What's the problem? All good.

    If you only saw the enormous ammt of personal messages sent to me calling me a "fake natty, pics aren't me, meat head, roid rage, small di*k etc etc etc" you'd understand why I wanted to set the record straight
  • Posts: 6,771 Member
    You know you only make the misconceptions worse by drawing attention to yourself in this way in these threads right?
  • Posts: 38,442 MFP Moderator
    In typical fashion, it seems we cannot leave emotion out of a discussion and are starting to belittle each other. Thread has been closed based on the fact it's violating the below policy. If there are concerns, please feel free to let me know.

    1. No Attacks or Insults and No Reciprocation

    a) Do not attack, mock, or otherwise insult others. You can respectfully disagree with the message or topic, but you cannot attack the messenger. This includes attacks against the user’s spelling or command of written English, or belittling a user for posting a duplicate topic.

    b) If you are attacked by another user, and you reciprocate, you will also be subject to the same consequences. Defending yourself or a friend is not an excuse! Do not take matters into your own hands – instead, use the Report Post link to report an attack and we will be happy to handle the situation for you.


    Thank you,

    psuLemon
This discussion has been closed.