Thoughts on eating all organic

1235

Replies

  • janejellyroll
    janejellyroll Posts: 25,763 Member

    This may be a little off subject but suggest to your friend that they put a light in their coop on a timer. Chickens lay less in winter because of the shorter daylight hours. By simply extending the hours with light most chickens will lay daily all year.

    We chose not to light ours because it shortens the natural life cycle of the chicken. This is true of beef given rBst to force an Increase in milk production as well. A chicken left to lay on its natural cycle will lay a good 7-8yrs (our oldest layer is going on 9). When they are in light all winter to lay they will usually die around year 4-5 depending on the breed.

    Cows will usually live and give milk for about 7-8yrs. When they're forced to produce more with hormones they usually die around year 3-4. And surviving to 4 is rare according to my dairy farming friend (she won't even drink their milk because she said it is so full of puss and junk). Blech! I live in ag country so a lot of people drink raw milk here.

    The natural lifespan of a cow is 18-22 years, I thought. Why are these cows dying natural deaths at age 7-8?

    You are correct. Sorry about that. I was typing while booking it on the treadmill and not thinking as I went. I should have proofread what I typed before posting. Not sure what I was thinking about as I typed it though (except that I had 7 minutes left on the treadmill when I wrote that answer. LOL. I must have been anxious to get done). :s Alas, I am done working out so wanted to confirm you are correct about a cow's natural life span.

    I admire your multi-tasking ability!
  • Orphia
    Orphia Posts: 7,097 Member
    It makes me chuckle when I see people say organic tastes better.

    I've seen at least three videos where lots of people have been tested tasting two different fruits, one organic one regular, and the probability they get it right is no better than chance.
  • ccsernica
    ccsernica Posts: 1,040 Member
    Orphia wrote: »
    It makes me chuckle when I see people say organic tastes better.

    I've seen at least three videos where lots of people have been tested tasting two different fruits, one organic one regular, and the probability they get it right is no better than chance.

    Shouldn't make any difference at all if it's just the same cultivar grown conventional vs. organic.

    But sometimes organic growers will focus on "heritage" or less common cultivars, and that can make a significant difference. Which has nothing to do with "organic" per se, of course, but it may be what people have in mind.
  • GottaBurnEmAll
    GottaBurnEmAll Posts: 7,722 Member
    Orphia wrote: »
    It makes me chuckle when I see people say organic tastes better.

    I've seen at least three videos where lots of people have been tested tasting two different fruits, one organic one regular, and the probability they get it right is no better than chance.

    On the most part, I agree with you. However, and this might just be where they're farmed, I truly can taste a difference between organic raw carrots and conventional carrots a good deal of the time. Conventional carrots can be bitter, whereas the organics are sweeter.

    Again, this might be down to where they're farmed, and since I'm limited to where my local stores source their produce and I'm not really paying that much more (carrots are cheap, yo), for just this one veggie, I'll suck it up and buy organic.
  • dfwesq
    dfwesq Posts: 592 Member
    edited April 2017
    ccsernica wrote: »
    Orphia wrote: »
    It makes me chuckle when I see people say organic tastes better.

    I've seen at least three videos where lots of people have been tested tasting two different fruits, one organic one regular, and the probability they get it right is no better than chance.

    Shouldn't make any difference at all if it's just the same cultivar grown conventional vs. organic.

    But sometimes organic growers will focus on "heritage" or less common cultivars, and that can make a significant difference. Which has nothing to do with "organic" per se, of course, but it may be what people have in mind.
    They might also be growing cultivars with better flavor but lower yield, knowing they can charge more for them. That might be why I like the taste of some organic fruits and vegetables better. For most I don't notice a difference.

    I'm not sure the technique makes no difference at all. I suppose it might in some cases. Or different processing/handling methods might make some difference (for example, the type of wax applied to apples or bell peppers.)

    Fwiw, some organic produce also looks different from conventional produce, at least in the stores where I shop. For example, organic broccoli has longer stems than conventional. I have no idea why.
  • savithny
    savithny Posts: 1,200 Member
    I remember reading a post from someone who was complaining that the "organic" apples she'd bought didn't taste better, in fact, they were disappointing. Well, she'd bought Gingergold or some other apple that doesn't store well, and was eating it far out of season...
    Some organic farmers also work to grow interesting, flavorful cultivars, which can make a flavor difference. And if you're buying at a local market you may be buying fresher vegetables than you're used to be eating, which can also make a flavor difference. But those factors aren't actually about being grown organically, they're about other decisions made by the farmer that often go along with organic practices, but are separate issues.
  • ConquerAndBloom
    ConquerAndBloom Posts: 94 Member
    Organic in my opinion is a waste of money and a scam. Shrugs.
  • dfwesq
    dfwesq Posts: 592 Member
    edited April 2017
    savithny wrote: »
    I remember reading a post from someone who was complaining that the "organic" apples she'd bought didn't taste better, in fact, they were disappointing. Well, she'd bought Gingergold or some other apple that doesn't store well, and was eating it far out of season...
    Some organic farmers also work to grow interesting, flavorful cultivars, which can make a flavor difference. And if you're buying at a local market you may be buying fresher vegetables than you're used to be eating, which can also make a flavor difference. But those factors aren't actually about being grown organically, they're about other decisions made by the farmer that often go along with organic practices, but are separate issues.

    Agreed. It could be those factors that account for taste differences. I think more important than buying organic is buying what you like - at least, for nutritional reasons. Buying produce you like to eat means you're more likely to eat more of it, and that's good for health and weight loss. There may be social or environmental reasons to buy organic, but it was health reasons I was thinking of.
  • tomteboda
    tomteboda Posts: 2,171 Member
    Orphia wrote: »
    It makes me chuckle when I see people say organic tastes better.

    I've seen at least three videos where lots of people have been tested tasting two different fruits, one organic one regular, and the probability they get it right is no better than chance.

    In general you're right, but there actually is one food that has been demonstrated (scientifically) to have lost most of its flavor in modern agricultural practices due to the needs of mass production and stability for long-range transport: the tomato.

    Yes, the delicious, beautiful tomato of 2017 does not taste anything like the delicious, beautiful tomato of 1957, or even 1987. At the moment the only real recourse is to grow your own or purchase organic heirloom tomatoes from a very honest farmer.

    However, grocery store tomatoes should soon taste a lot better.
    Better-Tasting Grocery Store Tomatoes Could Soon Be on Their Way (2015 American Chemical Society symposium talk)

    Flavor Facelift for Supermarket Tomatoes (2017 news brief, American Chemical Society)

    A Chemical Genetic Roadmap to Improved Tomato Flavor (2017 Science )
  • Alatariel75
    Alatariel75 Posts: 18,349 Member
    tomteboda wrote: »
    Orphia wrote: »
    It makes me chuckle when I see people say organic tastes better.

    I've seen at least three videos where lots of people have been tested tasting two different fruits, one organic one regular, and the probability they get it right is no better than chance.

    In general you're right, but there actually is one food that has been demonstrated (scientifically) to have lost most of its flavor in modern agricultural practices due to the needs of mass production and stability for long-range transport: the tomato.

    Yes, the delicious, beautiful tomato of 2017 does not taste anything like the delicious, beautiful tomato of 1957, or even 1987. At the moment the only real recourse is to grow your own or purchase organic heirloom tomatoes from a very honest farmer.

    However, grocery store tomatoes should soon taste a lot better.
    Better-Tasting Grocery Store Tomatoes Could Soon Be on Their Way (2015 American Chemical Society symposium talk)

    Flavor Facelift for Supermarket Tomatoes (2017 news brief, American Chemical Society)

    A Chemical Genetic Roadmap to Improved Tomato Flavor (2017 Science )

    I was thinking about this, I read an article/watched a doco about how the reason people in their 50s and 60s today complain that a particular favourite meal doesn't taste the way it did when their mum made it, is because the ingredients have been bred to taste very different. The example they used was chicken and noodles, and they talked about how breeding chickens for size has completely changed the way they taste. I wish I could remember more, but it's just a random brain-snippet bobbing around.
  • lemurcat12
    lemurcat12 Posts: 30,886 Member
    edited April 2017
    savithny wrote: »
    Some organic farmers also work to grow interesting, flavorful cultivars, which can make a flavor difference. And if you're buying at a local market you may be buying fresher vegetables than you're used to be eating, which can also make a flavor difference. But those factors aren't actually about being grown organically, they're about other decisions made by the farmer that often go along with organic practices, but are separate issues.

    Yeah, exactly this.

    The tomato, as mentioned above, is a great and one of the most extreme examples.

    Many of the same farmers who find a niche selling to people who want to buy organic (and will pay more for it) are also able to justify the price by selling unusual and interesting/delicious varieties of veg and fruit. That's a huge part of why I garden and why I buy at local farms and the green market during the season. But to attribute this is "organic" is incorrect.
  • Ironandwine69
    Ironandwine69 Posts: 2,432 Member
    Not worth breaking the bank, in my opinion
  • ccsernica
    ccsernica Posts: 1,040 Member
    edited April 2017
    tomteboda wrote: »
    Orphia wrote: »
    It makes me chuckle when I see people say organic tastes better.

    I've seen at least three videos where lots of people have been tested tasting two different fruits, one organic one regular, and the probability they get it right is no better than chance.

    In general you're right, but there actually is one food that has been demonstrated (scientifically) to have lost most of its flavor in modern agricultural practices due to the needs of mass production and stability for long-range transport: the tomato.

    Yes, the delicious, beautiful tomato of 2017 does not taste anything like the delicious, beautiful tomato of 1957, or even 1987. At the moment the only real recourse is to grow your own or purchase organic heirloom tomatoes from a very honest farmer.

    However, grocery store tomatoes should soon taste a lot better.
    Better-Tasting Grocery Store Tomatoes Could Soon Be on Their Way (2015 American Chemical Society symposium talk)

    Flavor Facelift for Supermarket Tomatoes (2017 news brief, American Chemical Society)

    A Chemical Genetic Roadmap to Improved Tomato Flavor (2017 Science )

    I was thinking about this, I read an article/watched a doco about how the reason people in their 50s and 60s today complain that a particular favourite meal doesn't taste the way it did when their mum made it, is because the ingredients have been bred to taste very different. The example they used was chicken and noodles, and they talked about how breeding chickens for size has completely changed the way they taste. I wish I could remember more, but it's just a random brain-snippet bobbing around.
    On the face of it, I have to say this doesn't sound terribly plausible. People's tastes change as they age. I eat and enjoy many foods now that I would have hated as a child. And then there are the rose-colored glasses of nostalgia affecting our recall.

    For example, back around 1990 or so I knew a San Francisco native in his mid-50s who insisted that sourdough bread had gotten notably less sour since he was young. This was demonstrably false. There's only so sour you can make sourdough, as the taste comes from waste products of yeast and after a certain point the yeast just stops growing. There was no convincing him of that, though.
  • heiliskrimsli
    heiliskrimsli Posts: 735 Member
    I find that other than salt, inorganic compounds are not edible and therefore I don't consume them. :)
  • stealthq
    stealthq Posts: 4,298 Member
    tomteboda wrote: »
    Orphia wrote: »
    It makes me chuckle when I see people say organic tastes better.

    I've seen at least three videos where lots of people have been tested tasting two different fruits, one organic one regular, and the probability they get it right is no better than chance.

    In general you're right, but there actually is one food that has been demonstrated (scientifically) to have lost most of its flavor in modern agricultural practices due to the needs of mass production and stability for long-range transport: the tomato.

    Yes, the delicious, beautiful tomato of 2017 does not taste anything like the delicious, beautiful tomato of 1957, or even 1987. At the moment the only real recourse is to grow your own or purchase organic heirloom tomatoes from a very honest farmer.

    However, grocery store tomatoes should soon taste a lot better.
    Better-Tasting Grocery Store Tomatoes Could Soon Be on Their Way (2015 American Chemical Society symposium talk)

    Flavor Facelift for Supermarket Tomatoes (2017 news brief, American Chemical Society)

    A Chemical Genetic Roadmap to Improved Tomato Flavor (2017 Science )

    No kidding. I'm a tomato aficionado and even the heirlooms I can get at the farmer's market are 'meh'. They grow the sweeter, milder varieties and I like a lot of bold tomato flavor and a good kick of acidity.

    This year I'm growing a couple of varieties myself, just to see if I can get better flavor.
  • tomteboda
    tomteboda Posts: 2,171 Member
    stealthq wrote: »
    tomteboda wrote: »
    Orphia wrote: »
    It makes me chuckle when I see people say organic tastes better.

    I've seen at least three videos where lots of people have been tested tasting two different fruits, one organic one regular, and the probability they get it right is no better than chance.

    In general you're right, but there actually is one food that has been demonstrated (scientifically) to have lost most of its flavor in modern agricultural practices due to the needs of mass production and stability for long-range transport: the tomato.

    Yes, the delicious, beautiful tomato of 2017 does not taste anything like the delicious, beautiful tomato of 1957, or even 1987. At the moment the only real recourse is to grow your own or purchase organic heirloom tomatoes from a very honest farmer.

    However, grocery store tomatoes should soon taste a lot better.
    Better-Tasting Grocery Store Tomatoes Could Soon Be on Their Way (2015 American Chemical Society symposium talk)

    Flavor Facelift for Supermarket Tomatoes (2017 news brief, American Chemical Society)

    A Chemical Genetic Roadmap to Improved Tomato Flavor (2017 Science )

    No kidding. I'm a tomato aficionado and even the heirlooms I can get at the farmer's market are 'meh'. They grow the sweeter, milder varieties and I like a lot of bold tomato flavor and a good kick of acidity.

    This year I'm growing a couple of varieties myself, just to see if I can get better flavor.

    I grow my own tomatoes, too. Not all varieties you can grow at home are very good. The popular "Big Boy" and "Early Girl" are flavorless in the extreme, for example.

    Tomatoes like to be babied. They are more work than my roses. I understand completely why they've been cultivated for hardiness and transport stability.
  • cmtigger
    cmtigger Posts: 1,450 Member
    Maaike84 wrote: »
    I seek out organic for animal products, but mostly because they will go hand in hand with having higher welfare standards and I do care about the way the animal is treated. I don't mind the extra expense - try to limit my meat intake in general because I do feel that that's a bit better for the planet.

    Also like to support local - but I don't really pay attention to organic otherwise. Will try it out for certain things - for example, my supermarket did these organic blueberries, that were only a little bit more expensive but tasted much better. Have a feeling however that the better taste was due to the type of blueberry chosen, not the fact that it was organic.

    Some of the "organic" farms are pretty much the same as the other farms. Buying from small local farmers is a better bet for animal welfare.

    Sometimes organic farms can even delay getting vet care for a sick animal because they can't keep it in their herd if it's been given certain medications.
  • stealthq
    stealthq Posts: 4,298 Member
    ccsernica wrote: »
    tomteboda wrote: »
    Orphia wrote: »
    It makes me chuckle when I see people say organic tastes better.

    I've seen at least three videos where lots of people have been tested tasting two different fruits, one organic one regular, and the probability they get it right is no better than chance.

    In general you're right, but there actually is one food that has been demonstrated (scientifically) to have lost most of its flavor in modern agricultural practices due to the needs of mass production and stability for long-range transport: the tomato.

    Yes, the delicious, beautiful tomato of 2017 does not taste anything like the delicious, beautiful tomato of 1957, or even 1987. At the moment the only real recourse is to grow your own or purchase organic heirloom tomatoes from a very honest farmer.

    However, grocery store tomatoes should soon taste a lot better.
    Better-Tasting Grocery Store Tomatoes Could Soon Be on Their Way (2015 American Chemical Society symposium talk)

    Flavor Facelift for Supermarket Tomatoes (2017 news brief, American Chemical Society)

    A Chemical Genetic Roadmap to Improved Tomato Flavor (2017 Science )

    I was thinking about this, I read an article/watched a doco about how the reason people in their 50s and 60s today complain that a particular favourite meal doesn't taste the way it did when their mum made it, is because the ingredients have been bred to taste very different. The example they used was chicken and noodles, and they talked about how breeding chickens for size has completely changed the way they taste. I wish I could remember more, but it's just a random brain-snippet bobbing around.
    On the face of it, I have to say this doesn't sound terribly plausible. People's tastes change as they age. I eat and enjoy many foods now that I would have hated as a child. And then there are the rose-colored glasses of nostalgia affecting our recall.

    For example, back around 1990 or so I knew a San Francisco native in his mid-50s who insisted that sourdough bread had gotten notably less sour since he was young. This was demonstrably false. There's only so sour you can make sourdough, as the taste comes from waste products of yeast and after a certain point the yeast just stops growing. There was no convincing him of that, though.

    I think there's some truth, some nostalgia, depends on the specifics. My parents, for example, grew up eating older truly free-range chickens they had raised. The chickens ate mostly what they could forage and some feed supplement. Only ones that quit producing were ever eaten. Age of the bird and of course amount of exercise and the bird's diet definitely changes the taste so that makes sense in their case.

    The sourdough thing definitely seems like nostalgia. And boy, do I wish I could get my hands on some of that 'substandard' sourdough. The stuff that passes for sourdough here barely tastes different than sandwich bread.
  • cmtigger
    cmtigger Posts: 1,450 Member

    So maybe I'm wasting my money but it does seem like my organic food spoils much faster than non organic. And I think there is a placebo effect in that I feel like its better for me:)

    ETA - I always make spelling and typo's.

    Actually there are two different brands of organic milk I occasionally buy. One is not homogenized and is only pasteurized enough to keep it safe. It has an awesome flavor. The other i buy when I know I'm not going to be able to get back to the store for a while. It's ultra pasteurized and shelf stable and lasts for a long time.

    The stuff I usually buy because of price is someplace between the two for how long I can keep it before it sours and becomes chicken food.

    It's not organic/non organic, but the individual products.
  • cmtigger
    cmtigger Posts: 1,450 Member
    crazyravr wrote: »
    I could never afford to eat all organic food. The closest i get is free range eggs (i refuse to buy cage eggs) and chicken.

    I make sure my eggs and chicken are organic / cage free. The beef is grass fed. The fish are wild and NEVER farmed. Veggies, whatever is cheaper. The difference is in the protein. I could afford to buy all organic always, but why limit myself to whats available?

    I've been working on incorporating fish 4-5 times a week into my diet and the EWG recommends farmed fish for several species. What types of fish do you eat? I'm very new to the whole fish thing so still learning :)
    Someone already posted this, but the EWG is a bit of a scare organization. This is a much better guide.

    http://www.seafoodwatch.org

    I raise and sell eggs myself. They go for $5 a dozen here, but eggs in stores are more expensive here due to state regulations.
  • stevencloser
    stevencloser Posts: 8,911 Member
    edited April 2017
    I grew my own tomatoes once and I didn't notice a big difference to storebought, apart from the fact that eating a body temperature tomato straight from the plant felt weird.
    tomteboda wrote: »
    stealthq wrote: »
    tomteboda wrote: »
    Orphia wrote: »
    It makes me chuckle when I see people say organic tastes better.

    I've seen at least three videos where lots of people have been tested tasting two different fruits, one organic one regular, and the probability they get it right is no better than chance.

    In general you're right, but there actually is one food that has been demonstrated (scientifically) to have lost most of its flavor in modern agricultural practices due to the needs of mass production and stability for long-range transport: the tomato.

    Yes, the delicious, beautiful tomato of 2017 does not taste anything like the delicious, beautiful tomato of 1957, or even 1987. At the moment the only real recourse is to grow your own or purchase organic heirloom tomatoes from a very honest farmer.

    However, grocery store tomatoes should soon taste a lot better.
    Better-Tasting Grocery Store Tomatoes Could Soon Be on Their Way (2015 American Chemical Society symposium talk)

    Flavor Facelift for Supermarket Tomatoes (2017 news brief, American Chemical Society)

    A Chemical Genetic Roadmap to Improved Tomato Flavor (2017 Science )

    No kidding. I'm a tomato aficionado and even the heirlooms I can get at the farmer's market are 'meh'. They grow the sweeter, milder varieties and I like a lot of bold tomato flavor and a good kick of acidity.

    This year I'm growing a couple of varieties myself, just to see if I can get better flavor.

    I grow my own tomatoes, too. Not all varieties you can grow at home are very good. The popular "Big Boy" and "Early Girl" are flavorless in the extreme, for example.

    Tomatoes like to be babied. They are more work than my roses. I understand completely why they've been cultivated for hardiness and transport stability.

    Ironically, of all the vegetable growing endeavors I did so far, my tomatoes were the only ones successful. But since I've got a garden now, I can expand the scope. Potatoes, peas, spinach and strawberries this year.
  • cbelc2
    cbelc2 Posts: 762 Member
    I try not to eat processed foods. Just because something has a label that says organic doesn't mean it is healthy. I make it a point to buy certain things organic like citrus if I use the peel and celery. I make it a habit to buy whole as much as possible and limit extra unwanted ingredients like preservatives and flavoring and coloring agents. My garden is 'organic' and I control fire ants with red pepper flakes, cinnamon, mint, and citrus peel.
  • JessicaMcB
    JessicaMcB Posts: 1,503 Member
    We eat largely organic but only because no one in this town will pay full price for it and I stalk the section until they reduce price on everything. Then it's cheaper than non-organic ;)
  • stealthq
    stealthq Posts: 4,298 Member
    edited April 2017
    tomteboda wrote: »
    stealthq wrote: »
    tomteboda wrote: »
    Orphia wrote: »
    It makes me chuckle when I see people say organic tastes better.

    I've seen at least three videos where lots of people have been tested tasting two different fruits, one organic one regular, and the probability they get it right is no better than chance.

    In general you're right, but there actually is one food that has been demonstrated (scientifically) to have lost most of its flavor in modern agricultural practices due to the needs of mass production and stability for long-range transport: the tomato.

    Yes, the delicious, beautiful tomato of 2017 does not taste anything like the delicious, beautiful tomato of 1957, or even 1987. At the moment the only real recourse is to grow your own or purchase organic heirloom tomatoes from a very honest farmer.

    However, grocery store tomatoes should soon taste a lot better.
    Better-Tasting Grocery Store Tomatoes Could Soon Be on Their Way (2015 American Chemical Society symposium talk)

    Flavor Facelift for Supermarket Tomatoes (2017 news brief, American Chemical Society)

    A Chemical Genetic Roadmap to Improved Tomato Flavor (2017 Science )

    No kidding. I'm a tomato aficionado and even the heirlooms I can get at the farmer's market are 'meh'. They grow the sweeter, milder varieties and I like a lot of bold tomato flavor and a good kick of acidity.

    This year I'm growing a couple of varieties myself, just to see if I can get better flavor.

    I grow my own tomatoes, too. Not all varieties you can grow at home are very good. The popular "Big Boy" and "Early Girl" are flavorless in the extreme, for example.

    Tomatoes like to be babied. They are more work than my roses. I understand completely why they've been cultivated for hardiness and transport stability.

    Don't I know it. Those two and "Celebrity" are sold here a lot because they're some of the few that'll set fruit before it gets too hot.

    I'm being dumb and stubborn and trying one of the "Brandywine" varieties. Historically, a terrible producer in Dallas. I'll be lucky to get a couple of tomatoes off of it. Got one set so far, and a handful of flowers that have an opportunity while it's not 80+ all day and night. We'll see if I can get any to ripe without losing them to bugs, birds, or my poor gardening practices.

    I'm also being a bit smarter and growing a cherry variety that should produce well - "Frosted Green Doctor's".

    I have seeds for probably 15 other varieties (gifts), but don't have the prepped sunny space for more than two tomato plants plus the eggplants I really wanted to try this year :smiley:
  • lemurcat12
    lemurcat12 Posts: 30,886 Member
    cbelc2 wrote: »
    I try not to eat processed foods. Just because something has a label that says organic doesn't mean it is healthy. I make it a point to buy certain things organic like citrus if I use the peel and celery. I make it a habit to buy whole as much as possible and limit extra unwanted ingredients like preservatives and flavoring and coloring agents. My garden is 'organic' and I control fire ants with red pepper flakes, cinnamon, mint, and citrus peel.

    If it has ingredients, isn't it processed?
  • ccsernica
    ccsernica Posts: 1,040 Member
    stealthq wrote: »
    ccsernica wrote: »
    tomteboda wrote: »
    Orphia wrote: »
    It makes me chuckle when I see people say organic tastes better.

    I've seen at least three videos where lots of people have been tested tasting two different fruits, one organic one regular, and the probability they get it right is no better than chance.

    In general you're right, but there actually is one food that has been demonstrated (scientifically) to have lost most of its flavor in modern agricultural practices due to the needs of mass production and stability for long-range transport: the tomato.

    Yes, the delicious, beautiful tomato of 2017 does not taste anything like the delicious, beautiful tomato of 1957, or even 1987. At the moment the only real recourse is to grow your own or purchase organic heirloom tomatoes from a very honest farmer.

    However, grocery store tomatoes should soon taste a lot better.
    Better-Tasting Grocery Store Tomatoes Could Soon Be on Their Way (2015 American Chemical Society symposium talk)

    Flavor Facelift for Supermarket Tomatoes (2017 news brief, American Chemical Society)

    A Chemical Genetic Roadmap to Improved Tomato Flavor (2017 Science )

    I was thinking about this, I read an article/watched a doco about how the reason people in their 50s and 60s today complain that a particular favourite meal doesn't taste the way it did when their mum made it, is because the ingredients have been bred to taste very different. The example they used was chicken and noodles, and they talked about how breeding chickens for size has completely changed the way they taste. I wish I could remember more, but it's just a random brain-snippet bobbing around.
    On the face of it, I have to say this doesn't sound terribly plausible. People's tastes change as they age. I eat and enjoy many foods now that I would have hated as a child. And then there are the rose-colored glasses of nostalgia affecting our recall.

    For example, back around 1990 or so I knew a San Francisco native in his mid-50s who insisted that sourdough bread had gotten notably less sour since he was young. This was demonstrably false. There's only so sour you can make sourdough, as the taste comes from waste products of yeast and after a certain point the yeast just stops growing. There was no convincing him of that, though.

    I think there's some truth, some nostalgia, depends on the specifics. My parents, for example, grew up eating older truly free-range chickens they had raised. The chickens ate mostly what they could forage and some feed supplement. Only ones that quit producing were ever eaten. Age of the bird and of course amount of exercise and the bird's diet definitely changes the taste so that makes sense in their case.

    The sourdough thing definitely seems like nostalgia. And boy, do I wish I could get my hands on some of that 'substandard' sourdough. The stuff that passes for sourdough here barely tastes different than sandwich bread.

    It's possible to fake sourdough with vinegar, as I understand it. No respectable baker does that. There's one bakery in my town that doesn't even use starter. Their sourdough is made with naturally occurring wild yeast. (This is Santa Cruz, not San Francisco, but folks feel pretty much the same way down here on such matters.)
  • cmtigger
    cmtigger Posts: 1,450 Member
    ccsernica wrote: »
    stealthq wrote: »
    ccsernica wrote: »
    tomteboda wrote: »
    Orphia wrote: »
    It makes me chuckle when I see people say organic tastes better.

    I've seen at least three videos where lots of people have been tested tasting two different fruits, one organic one regular, and the probability they get it right is no better than chance.

    In general you're right, but there actually is one food that has been demonstrated (scientifically) to have lost most of its flavor in modern agricultural practices due to the needs of mass production and stability for long-range transport: the tomato.

    Yes, the delicious, beautiful tomato of 2017 does not taste anything like the delicious, beautiful tomato of 1957, or even 1987. At the moment the only real recourse is to grow your own or purchase organic heirloom tomatoes from a very honest farmer.

    However, grocery store tomatoes should soon taste a lot better.
    Better-Tasting Grocery Store Tomatoes Could Soon Be on Their Way (2015 American Chemical Society symposium talk)

    Flavor Facelift for Supermarket Tomatoes (2017 news brief, American Chemical Society)

    A Chemical Genetic Roadmap to Improved Tomato Flavor (2017 Science )

    I was thinking about this, I read an article/watched a doco about how the reason people in their 50s and 60s today complain that a particular favourite meal doesn't taste the way it did when their mum made it, is because the ingredients have been bred to taste very different. The example they used was chicken and noodles, and they talked about how breeding chickens for size has completely changed the way they taste. I wish I could remember more, but it's just a random brain-snippet bobbing around.
    On the face of it, I have to say this doesn't sound terribly plausible. People's tastes change as they age. I eat and enjoy many foods now that I would have hated as a child. And then there are the rose-colored glasses of nostalgia affecting our recall.

    For example, back around 1990 or so I knew a San Francisco native in his mid-50s who insisted that sourdough bread had gotten notably less sour since he was young. This was demonstrably false. There's only so sour you can make sourdough, as the taste comes from waste products of yeast and after a certain point the yeast just stops growing. There was no convincing him of that, though.

    I think there's some truth, some nostalgia, depends on the specifics. My parents, for example, grew up eating older truly free-range chickens they had raised. The chickens ate mostly what they could forage and some feed supplement. Only ones that quit producing were ever eaten. Age of the bird and of course amount of exercise and the bird's diet definitely changes the taste so that makes sense in their case.

    The sourdough thing definitely seems like nostalgia. And boy, do I wish I could get my hands on some of that 'substandard' sourdough. The stuff that passes for sourdough here barely tastes different than sandwich bread.

    It's possible to fake sourdough with vinegar, as I understand it. No respectable baker does that. There's one bakery in my town that doesn't even use starter. Their sourdough is made with naturally occurring wild yeast. (This is Santa Cruz, not San Francisco, but folks feel pretty much the same way down here on such matters.)

    After moving from northern CA to Kansas 20 years ago I saw what passes as sourdough in other parts of the country. It may have changed now, but real sourdough was one of the foods I missed. (I also missed California cheese and the freshness of our produce.)
  • Alatariel75
    Alatariel75 Posts: 18,349 Member
    ccsernica wrote: »
    tomteboda wrote: »
    Orphia wrote: »
    It makes me chuckle when I see people say organic tastes better.

    I've seen at least three videos where lots of people have been tested tasting two different fruits, one organic one regular, and the probability they get it right is no better than chance.

    In general you're right, but there actually is one food that has been demonstrated (scientifically) to have lost most of its flavor in modern agricultural practices due to the needs of mass production and stability for long-range transport: the tomato.

    Yes, the delicious, beautiful tomato of 2017 does not taste anything like the delicious, beautiful tomato of 1957, or even 1987. At the moment the only real recourse is to grow your own or purchase organic heirloom tomatoes from a very honest farmer.

    However, grocery store tomatoes should soon taste a lot better.
    Better-Tasting Grocery Store Tomatoes Could Soon Be on Their Way (2015 American Chemical Society symposium talk)

    Flavor Facelift for Supermarket Tomatoes (2017 news brief, American Chemical Society)

    A Chemical Genetic Roadmap to Improved Tomato Flavor (2017 Science )

    I was thinking about this, I read an article/watched a doco about how the reason people in their 50s and 60s today complain that a particular favourite meal doesn't taste the way it did when their mum made it, is because the ingredients have been bred to taste very different. The example they used was chicken and noodles, and they talked about how breeding chickens for size has completely changed the way they taste. I wish I could remember more, but it's just a random brain-snippet bobbing around.
    On the face of it, I have to say this doesn't sound terribly plausible. People's tastes change as they age. I eat and enjoy many foods now that I would have hated as a child. And then there are the rose-colored glasses of nostalgia affecting our recall.

    For example, back around 1990 or so I knew a San Francisco native in his mid-50s who insisted that sourdough bread had gotten notably less sour since he was young. This was demonstrably false. There's only so sour you can make sourdough, as the taste comes from waste products of yeast and after a certain point the yeast just stops growing. There was no convincing him of that, though.

    I found the article I was thinking of, with some creative Googling. Not saying I believe it, but it's an interesting theory:

    http://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/food/eat/why-everything-now-tastes-like-chicken-except-chicken/news-story/4c7421d81e15a91e5bdd65211ae4f069
This discussion has been closed.