Forget BMI
mtb000mtb
Posts: 69 Member
The Body Volume Index BVI has been developed as an alternative to BMI that better measures obesity and predict health outcomes regardless of body composition.
a-simple-and-more-accurate-way-to-determine-whether-your-weight-is-healthy
body volume
a-simple-and-more-accurate-way-to-determine-whether-your-weight-is-healthy
body volume
2
Replies
-
No android version?2
-
The measurement is essentially a ratio comparing your total body volume to the volume of your abdomen, a measurement that can be taken manually or using an app.
this is it in a nutshell...just another number to tell us we are fat or we aren't fat...Yah.6 -
Other than the 10% or so people who are in the overweight/obese range that are truly muscular, I'm pretty sure this new measure and BMI will give directionally similar results.16
-
Just look in the mirror and take an honest look at yourself.11
-
BMI is a pretty damn good indicator.... and it doesn't need an apple only app.10
-
BMI tells me I'm fat.2
-
BMI works for me!
I've been within my normal BMI range almost my entire life ... just stepped out of it very briefly 3 times.3 -
trigden1991 wrote: »Just look in the mirror and take an honest look at yourself.
Is that app available on Android though?6 -
Packerjohn wrote: »Other than the 10% or so people who are in the overweight/obese range that are truly muscular, I'm pretty sure this new measure and BMI will give directionally similar results.
You don't have to be all that muscular to be obese/overweight as an average height male and have a 39.9 or lower waist.
2 years ago at 255 lbs I had a 39 inch abdominal circumference. I'm 71 inches tall.2 -
stanmann571 wrote: »Packerjohn wrote: »Other than the 10% or so people who are in the overweight/obese range that are truly muscular, I'm pretty sure this new measure and BMI will give directionally similar results.
You don't have to be all that muscular to be obese/overweight as an average height male and have a 39.9 or lower waist.
2 years ago at 255 lbs I had a 39 inch abdominal circumference. I'm 71 inches tall.
If that's you in the avatar and it isn't Photoshop, I would say that equals pretty strong/muscular.1 -
Ironandwine69 wrote: »BMI tells me I'm fat.
no BMI does not tell you that...
it tells you one of a couple thing
underweight
normal weight
overweight
obese
morbidly obese
if it tells you that you are overweight and you don't think so one of two things is going on.
You are an outlier or you need to reevaluate what you are seeing.11 -
Packerjohn wrote: »stanmann571 wrote: »Packerjohn wrote: »Other than the 10% or so people who are in the overweight/obese range that are truly muscular, I'm pretty sure this new measure and BMI will give directionally similar results.
You don't have to be all that muscular to be obese/overweight as an average height male and have a 39.9 or lower waist.
2 years ago at 255 lbs I had a 39 inch abdominal circumference. I'm 71 inches tall.
If that's you in the avatar and it isn't Photoshop, I would say that equals pretty strong/muscular.
Yes, it's me, no there's no photographic trickery(well almost none... It was more of a sweep to touch my navel and then recovery to 2 hands vs an extended static hold) IF you look closely you can see a little bit of blur on my hand in motion
But that's a party trick, and involves mostly balance... vs strength, although there is certainly a core strength component.
0 -
trigden1991 wrote: »Just look in the mirror and take an honest look at yourself.
Is that app available on Android though?
Yes.
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=mmapps.mirror.free&hl=en4 -
That is interesting; thanks for posting. My husband is one for whom BMI is off. He's been losing weight and does still have a bit more to lose but nothing like BMI would indicate. I also just looked at the measurements we last took for him (he's lost a bit more since then) and waist was 39.75" even though he's now right on the border between "obese" and "overweight" per BMI.
I don't have time to research this more right now, but anyone know for this if waist measurement they're going by is the narrowest point between rib cage and hips, or belly button level? My belly button definitely migrated lower thanks to pregnancy so now that measurement is pretty close to my hip measurement. BMI is 20.1 now, true waist is 28.5" but belly button level "waist" measurement is right around 35".1 -
macchiatto wrote: »That is interesting; thanks for posting. My husband is one for whom BMI is off. He's been losing weight and does still have a bit more to lose but nothing like BMI would indicate. I also just looked at the measurements we last took for him (he's lost a bit more since then) and waist was 39.75" even though he's now right on the border between "obese" and "overweight" per BMI.
I don't have time to research this more right now, but anyone know for this if waist measurement they're going by is the narrowest point between rib cage and hips, or belly button level? My belly button definitely migrated lower thanks to pregnancy so now that measurement is pretty close to my hip measurement. BMI is 20.1 now, true waist is 28.5" but belly button level "waist" measurement is right around 35".
The standard we use in the military is 2 fingers above the crest of the hip bone. A couple important components are standing upright. and using someone else to measure.. A stepstool is helpful so that the observer can ensure the tape is level. Also, for consistency... the measurement should be at the end of a "normal" exhalation... not an exaggerated one... and we normally take 3 measurements...
I'm not sure if the medical community uses a different location1 -
0
-
Ironandwine69 wrote: »BMI tells me I'm fat.
no BMI does not tell you that...
it tells you one of a couple thing
underweight
normal weight
overweight
obese
morbidly obese
if it tells you that you are overweight and you don't think so one of two things is going on.
You are an outlier or you need to reevaluate what you are seeing.
BMI doesn't take in to account body fat vs muscle mass, so the number is utterly meaningless without understanding body composition.5 -
rianneonamission wrote: »Ironandwine69 wrote: »BMI tells me I'm fat.
no BMI does not tell you that...
it tells you one of a couple thing
underweight
normal weight
overweight
obese
morbidly obese
if it tells you that you are overweight and you don't think so one of two things is going on.
You are an outlier or you need to reevaluate what you are seeing.
BMI doesn't take in to account body fat vs muscle mass, so the number is utterly meaningless without understanding body composition.
And what percent of the population is so muscular that the large ranges in the categories of BMI don't resonantly categorize most people.11 -
Packerjohn wrote: »rianneonamission wrote: »Ironandwine69 wrote: »BMI tells me I'm fat.
no BMI does not tell you that...
it tells you one of a couple thing
underweight
normal weight
overweight
obese
morbidly obese
if it tells you that you are overweight and you don't think so one of two things is going on.
You are an outlier or you need to reevaluate what you are seeing.
BMI doesn't take in to account body fat vs muscle mass, so the number is utterly meaningless without understanding body composition.
And what percent of the population is so muscular that the large ranges in the categories of BMI don't resonantly categorize most people.
The correct answer is we really have no idea.6 -
It may categorise most, but it doesn't categorise everyone. So to say to a stranger that, because BMI tells them they are overweight when they are not, they are lying to themselves or have a skewed self image is ridiculous.
5 -
Ironandwine69 wrote: »BMI tells me I'm fat.
no BMI does not tell you that...
it tells you one of a couple thing
underweight
normal weight
overweight
obese
morbidly obese
if it tells you that you are overweight and you don't think so one of two things is going on.
You are an outlier or you need to reevaluate what you are seeing.
BMI tells me I am obese2 -
gym4life64 wrote: »Ironandwine69 wrote: »BMI tells me I'm fat.
no BMI does not tell you that...
it tells you one of a couple thing
underweight
normal weight
overweight
obese
morbidly obese
if it tells you that you are overweight and you don't think so one of two things is going on.
You are an outlier or you need to reevaluate what you are seeing.
BMI tells me I am obese
Me too.. I am overfat... when I get to my goal weight I'll still be obese, but I don't think I'll be overfat
Edited because I wrote overweight when I meant overfat1 -
stanmann571 wrote: »Packerjohn wrote: »rianneonamission wrote: »Ironandwine69 wrote: »BMI tells me I'm fat.
no BMI does not tell you that...
it tells you one of a couple thing
underweight
normal weight
overweight
obese
morbidly obese
if it tells you that you are overweight and you don't think so one of two things is going on.
You are an outlier or you need to reevaluate what you are seeing.
BMI doesn't take in to account body fat vs muscle mass, so the number is utterly meaningless without understanding body composition.
And what percent of the population is so muscular that the large ranges in the categories of BMI don't resonantly categorize most people.
The correct answer is we really have no idea.
Well according to the CDC only 29% of the US population (self reported) does resistance training 2X a week or more. Since most of the population has sedentary jobs that aren't going to build muscle mass and some of the people doing resistance training are most likely not doing enough to build significant muscle, the % of the population that would be overweight or obese on the BMI scale due to being muscular would be pretty small.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/cdc-80-percent-of-american-adults-dont-get-recommended-exercise/8 -
I'm one of those people that when I'm down around my ideal weight BMI says that I'm overweight even though my body may be really tight and muscular. I just stopped caring what it said. And I mean, does it really matter? I know when I'm fat and when I'm not. Right now I'm fat.3
-
I may, eventually, get close to "normal" BMI range, but I don't believe I will ever be in it. I'm 6'0.5", which means that my maximum weight should be 182.5lbs.
To get myself into "fit" shape, my body fat percentage should be between 14% and 17%, which means my non-fat mass should be between 151.5lbs and 157lbs.
When I had a bodpod scan done back in December, my non-fat mass 183.2lbs, and an overall weight of 233lbs. This means that I would have to lose 50.5lbs, and (of that), 26-32lbs of it would have to be non-fat mass.
Now, add in that I have always led a sedentary lifestyle before I started losing weight. I'm a computer programmer, we're not exactly known for our willingness to get up and move around. So, my non-fat mass isn't likely to change that much.
I might get myself down into the high 190 range, but really, that's as far as I expect it will ever go. Losing more than that will probably put me in a danger zone of too little body fat or too much non-fat mass having been removed.
Physically, I've always been completely ordinary. Nothing special about me. And yet, here I am stating that I am unlikely to *ever* have a "normal" or "healthy" BMI, even if I get myself down to 10% body fat (which is a level that many athletes have a hard time getting to).
BMI is broken. You might be one of the lucky ones for whom it works, but BMI is fundamentally broken for measuring an individual. Don't use it, don't rely on it. Get actual body fat scans done, or just settle for looking in a mirror honestly, and deciding if what you see is fat or not.
But don't push BMI. It's not a good tool.1 -
rianneonamission wrote: »Ironandwine69 wrote: »BMI tells me I'm fat.
no BMI does not tell you that...
it tells you one of a couple thing
underweight
normal weight
overweight
obese
morbidly obese
if it tells you that you are overweight and you don't think so one of two things is going on.
You are an outlier or you need to reevaluate what you are seeing.
BMI doesn't take in to account body fat vs muscle mass, so the number is utterly meaningless without understanding body composition.
not so much...you have to understand the history of BMI and what is was used for and why it is still used before you can make blanket statements like that..rianneonamission wrote: »It may categorise most, but it doesn't categorise everyone. So to say to a stranger that, because BMI tells them they are overweight when they are not, they are lying to themselves or have a skewed self image is ridiculous.
and I didn't just say skewed self image I believe I said "outlier" first.
and I would like to see the BF% of those who are claiming outlier status...
I am not disputing that there are outliers there sure are but I also know that BMI is a good measurement for most...and when coupled with weight and other indicators such as BP etc it gives a good read on health and weight....and yes of course there are limitations.
PS I used to argue that BMI wasn't a good measure due to personal bias...8 -
macchiatto wrote: »That is interesting; thanks for posting. My husband is one for whom BMI is off. He's been losing weight and does still have a bit more to lose but nothing like BMI would indicate. I also just looked at the measurements we last took for him (he's lost a bit more since then) and waist was 39.75" even though he's now right on the border between "obese" and "overweight" per BMI.
I don't have time to research this more right now, but anyone know for this if waist measurement they're going by is the narrowest point between rib cage and hips, or belly button level? My belly button definitely migrated lower thanks to pregnancy so now that measurement is pretty close to my hip measurement. BMI is 20.1 now, true waist is 28.5" but belly button level "waist" measurement is right around 35".
For women it's the narrowest point.1 -
Oh, jeez, I just realized that I was calculating my *maximum* weight according to BMI. That 182.5lbs is a BMI of 25 for me. If I go for the low end, a BMI of 19? My weight should be 138.7lbs. That's laughably implausible for me.1
-
I've always gone by the old fashioned pinch an inch.0
-
Recall that the BMI formula is just: (Weight in kilograms)/(Height in meters)^2
Given the incredible simplicity of the metric, I'm always wondering: what do people expect? Of course people who are muscular will appear to have a high BMI. Even when you BMI is 25 or greater, the statistics don't say much about your health.
Here is a good blurb on BMI:
https://www.cdc.gov/healthyweight/assessing/bmi/adult_bmi/
If you really want to see how BMI compares with DXA (which is the gold standard for measuring percentage body fat) you can look at this paper:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16044176
The conclusion of the above paper is that BMI predictions of body fat percentage correlate well with DXA, but looking at the data, I see that the DXA measurement could be different from the BMI prediction by as much as +/-10%. In other words, your BMI might predict a body fat of 20%, but yours is really 10% or 30%, which is highly significant. (See below for data from Steinberger 2005).
1
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 176K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.6K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.4K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions