Brad Schoenfeld - Facts and Fallacies of Fat Loss

AnvilHead
AnvilHead Posts: 18,345 Member
Dr. Brad Schoenfeld presented this lecture at the 2016 NSCA Personal Trainers Conference. This presentation addresses many topics which are frequently discussed here on MFP, often with a lot of myths and misinformation propagated in the discussions. I recently came across it one of the fitness-related groups in my Facebook feed and thought it was worth sharing for anybody who's interested in a solid, scientific, evidence-based approach to numerous topics related to weight/fat loss: https://www.nsca.com/education/videos/facts-and-fallacies-of-fat-loss/

For those with short attention spans who don't want to spend the 50 minutes to watch the entire lecture (although you should, it's well worth the time), here's a timetable of where various topics are addressed:

01:03 - Ketogenic Diets
19:38 - CICO (Calories In, Calories Out)
20:12 - Nutrigenomics
23:56 - Meal Frequency
29:05 - Practical Implications for Meal Frequency
30:47 - Fasted Cardio
38:35 - Bottom Line re: Fasted Cardio
40:00 - 3500 calories = 1 lb. of weight loss, true or false?
40:39 - Adaptive Thermogenesis
44:11 - Leptin
45:04 - "The Oprah Effect"
46:21 - Summary re: Adaptive Thermogenesis and 3500 cal = 1 lb. fat loss
47:19 - Practical Applications for Mitigating Adaptive Thermogenesis
«1

Replies

  • animatorswearbras
    animatorswearbras Posts: 1,001 Member
    Really interesting lecture thankyou for posting!
  • ninerbuff
    ninerbuff Posts: 46,816 Member
    Thanks for this bro.

    A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition

    9285851.png
  • ndj1979
    ndj1979 Posts: 29,145 Member
    Tagging
  • inertiastrength
    inertiastrength Posts: 2,344 Member
    love him!
  • TR0berts
    TR0berts Posts: 7,739 Member
    Simply beautiful.
  • psuLemon
    psuLemon Posts: 38,137 MFP Moderator
    Tagging because I love his work.
  • veronikamellon
    veronikamellon Posts: 42 Member
    Thank you, very informative and balanced view
  • annaskiski
    annaskiski Posts: 1,212 Member
    edited May 2017
    Excellent vid!

    This should be pinned actually. It would help a lot of newbies.
  • crazyycatladyy1
    crazyycatladyy1 Posts: 156 Member
    Just watched it and loved it-thanks for posting!
  • fitmom4lifemfp
    fitmom4lifemfp Posts: 1,572 Member
    Excellent presentation. Lots of good information that is not always understood by everyone.
  • sgt1372
    sgt1372 Posts: 3,974 Member
    edited May 2017
    Bookmarked for later viewing.

    Want to find out what the "Oprah Effect" is.

    Is it the constant pattern of weight loss/gain yo-yoing or the increase in Weight Watchers stock price when she reports that she lost weight (again)? LOL!
  • rybo
    rybo Posts: 5,430 Member
    In for the link
  • fitmom4lifemfp
    fitmom4lifemfp Posts: 1,572 Member
    sgt1372 wrote: »
    Bookmarked for later viewing.

    Want to find out what the "Oprah Effect" is.

    Is it the constant pattern of weight loss/gain yo-yoing or the increase in Weight Watchers stock price when she reports that she lost weight (again)? LOL!

    Exactly. :D This is actually the "Oprah Effect". http://www.investopedia.com/terms/o/oprah-effect.asp

    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-05-02/weight-watchers-surges-after-oprah-effect-helps-fuel-earnings
  • GottaBurnEmAll
    GottaBurnEmAll Posts: 7,722 Member
    A well spent 50 minutes. Thanks for posting.
  • avygyaru
    avygyaru Posts: 51 Member
    Thank you so much for sharing this. I'm officially in love with that site in general now.
  • cqbkaju
    cqbkaju Posts: 1,011 Member
    @AnvilHead

    Thank you sir.
  • CTcutie
    CTcutie Posts: 649 Member
    Can't wait to finish this!
  • PAV8888
    PAV8888 Posts: 11,364 Member
    Want to watch! Thanks for the link.
  • inertiastrength
    inertiastrength Posts: 2,344 Member
    edited May 2017
    I don't understand the part about the thermic effect of digesting protein. If that's the case why wouldn't the low carb group lose more than the non low carb group under controlled circumstances... same cals etc? Like I understand they were all capped at 100g protein but if one were to consume MORE protein in relation to the same cals wouldn't they have a deeper deficit over time?