Is the Greek god body the most attractive male body known to mankind?

135

Replies

  • JoRocka
    JoRocka Posts: 17,525 Member
    JoRocka wrote: »
    What about greek god female bodies?
    5nahxy5kl3fo.jpg
    92dwfoa967a8.jpg

    Considering these are both extremely modern depiction- meh.

    They look nice and were adequate for the roll- But- eh- I would have preferred someone a little bit bigger.

    What do you mean by bigger? Just muscle-wise?

    yeah- Neither of them are particularly well muscled- and they could have used more size IMHO at their body weight. Body fat is fine- just- a little bigger (for my preference of what I would want to see in an Amazonian warrior)
    pbryd wrote: »
    JoRocka wrote: »
    MassarDv wrote: »

    Ew. I find this grotesque..not my preference nada.

    I think it's BS to say that- just because it's not your preference doesn't mean it's gross- just not your flavor.

    It's not BS. Someone is expressing a preference.

    "ew" and "grotesque" is not a preference- those are judgments.
  • JoRocka
    JoRocka Posts: 17,525 Member
    MassarDv wrote: »
    xpiml61katw5.jpg
    This is how a Greek god body looks like

    quoting again- because- apparently it bothers people- and I'm in a mood.
  • Gallowmere1984
    Gallowmere1984 Posts: 6,626 Member
    JoRocka wrote: »
    MassarDv wrote: »
    xpiml61katw5.jpg
    This is how a Greek god body looks like

    quoting again- because- apparently it bothers people- and I'm in a mood.

    I'm not a fan of the Ahnahld boobage, but that could be my bias showing. I have the chest of a ten year old girl, despite my shoulders benefitting massively from my bench/ohp work. xD
  • not_a_runner
    not_a_runner Posts: 1,343 Member
    JoRocka wrote: »
    MassarDv wrote: »
    xpiml61katw5.jpg
    This is how a Greek god body looks like

    quoting again- because- apparently it bothers people- and I'm in a mood.

    Lawl-ing
    He's not even that big.
  • JoRocka
    JoRocka Posts: 17,525 Member
    JoRocka wrote: »
    MassarDv wrote: »
    xpiml61katw5.jpg
    This is how a Greek god body looks like

    quoting again- because- apparently it bothers people- and I'm in a mood.

    Lawl-ing
    He's not even that big.

    No- not really- which is what cracks me up- I think he's not bad at all- but you know ;);) I've seen bigger. ;)
  • not_a_runner
    not_a_runner Posts: 1,343 Member
    JoRocka wrote: »
    JoRocka wrote: »
    MassarDv wrote: »
    xpiml61katw5.jpg
    This is how a Greek god body looks like

    quoting again- because- apparently it bothers people- and I'm in a mood.

    Lawl-ing
    He's not even that big.

    No- not really- which is what cracks me up- I think he's not bad at all- but you know ;);) I've seen bigger. ;)

    Those lat insertions though...
    If only they were a few inches lower. :D Makes him look a little out of proportion.
    Gimme some wings so I can fly away!
  • pbryd
    pbryd Posts: 364 Member
    edited June 2017
    JoRocka wrote: »

    No. Expressing a preference is saying 'it's not my preference.' Saying something is grotesque is unnecessary.

    "I find this..." Is not a blanket statement, it is a personal preference.

  • JoRocka
    JoRocka Posts: 17,525 Member
    pbryd wrote: »
    JoRocka wrote: »

    No. Expressing a preference is saying 'it's not my preference.' Saying something is grotesque is unnecessary.

    "I find this..." Is not a blanket statement, it is a personal preference.

    point is- the comment could have been left w/o the grotesque part.

    The point would have been made WITHOUT saying that.

    Things they teach you in writing classes and HR and work environments- tell the facts that are RELEVANT- and get the point across.

    nothing more.

    "I don't care of this"
    "not my preference"

    both acceptable.
    "ew and grotesque" not required to get that point across.
  • AnvilHead
    AnvilHead Posts: 18,343 Member
    edited June 2017

    Stated in the most inoffensive manner possible within the context of the conversation within this thread:
    I personally find her hawt AF. YMMV.
  • not_a_runner
    not_a_runner Posts: 1,343 Member
    AnvilHead wrote: »

    Stated in the most inoffensive manner possible within the context of the conversation within this thread:
    I personally find her hawt AF. YMMV.

    And that was that last year!! I can't wait to see what she brings to the Olympia after a full year of off season! *swoon*
  • Gallowmere1984
    Gallowmere1984 Posts: 6,626 Member
    AnvilHead wrote: »

    Stated in the most inoffensive manner possible within the context of the conversation within this thread:
    I personally find her hawt AF. YMMV.

    Quoted for truth. All I can say is holy damn.
  • JoRocka
    JoRocka Posts: 17,525 Member

    mmhmmm- dem lats girl. dem lats.
  • FreyasRebirth
    FreyasRebirth Posts: 514 Member
    The Greeks were obsessed with dudes. They not only 'own' the roots of the word misogyny, one of their basic creation myths insisted all of the evil in the world was brought about from Pandora's "box" (also translated jar, and possibly referring to her genitals/womb). Possibly supporting evidence is that no female Greek statues give really *any* genital detail. There's a hint of a crease, at most. Dudes in general were the Greek ideal.
This discussion has been closed.