Anyone suffer from sugar addiction?
Replies
-
lynn_glenmont wrote: »missteena88 wrote: »Has anyone ever truly suffered from sugar addiction? How did you recover?
I believe you.
OP asked two questions. How do "believe" a question?
You're projecting your own beliefs onto OP.Here are some starter ideas, since you mentioned the carb thing is a problem for you.
Again, you're projecting. OP said no such thing. OP didn't even mention carbs (which is a larger category than sugar). OP made no declarative statements whatsoever.Think of things you can add to your life: a HIIT (high intensity exercise training routine); going to bed by 9:00p with a book, taking a short walk every morning before your shower, touching base with MFP friends and/or Group that will support you in your goals.
I'm curious -- Is it bad to go to bed at 9 p.m. and just go to sleep? Is it bad to sit or lie on another piece of furniture with a book? Is it bad to read on an e-reader or read a magazine instead of a physical book? Can people take their walks after their showers?
Lynn, Most responses the poster received had a combative tone. I aimed to offer support and walking in someone else's moccasins gives the poster more respect for their experiences and empirical evidence. Any thing I offered after a kind word were simply ideas to illuminate that there is a path from where the poster is today to where the poster wants to go.
Again, what works for one will not work for another. Gradual can work for one. Cold-turkey can work for another. Going to bed early can be a strategy for late-night eating for one. Third-shift workers develop strategies to a different clock.
Your response, like many others in general MFP posts, seem to be looking for a fight, rather than lending a hand.
Thank goodness there are closed groups for those of us who thrive best in gentler company.3 -
I believe anything can be addicting including sugar. For example most people are addicted to their smart phones. But these aren't addicting in the same way as meth or cocaine or alcohol. Willpower is how you overcome it. Deciding what is more important. In my opinion, claiming that sugar is this addiction that you have to "recover" from is a way of giving away your personal responsibility and ability to make better choices. I think your attitude has to change. Good luck
If sugar and smartphones aren't addictive in the way that an addictive substance is addictive, I'm not sure what you mean by the word. It just seems like it's a more dramatic way of saying "attached to" or "enjoys."4 -
Carlos_421 wrote: »Are you not eating any vegetables? They have sugar.
I said that checking sunflower seeds for sugar content is how off sugar I am. Avoiding veg because they contain sugar would be beyond that, I think. So, no, I eat vegetables.Carlos_421 wrote: »And the carbs in sunflower seeds break down into sugar.
Your body can even convert protein into carbs.
I'm doing the upper carb limit of keto which is about 40g/day net carbs. That's actaully a lot of carbs for a keto diet but it still qualifies. A lot of people like to get under 20 total carbs.
I honestly don't understand what you are getting at in these questions. I feel like you are working from an assumption that I don't agree with.0 -
PeachyPlum wrote: »some scientific evidence that gut bacteria is capable of manipulating your eating behavior. So, if you eat a bunch of refined sugar the bacteria that thrive on processed sugar will emit neurotransmitters that drive you to consume more sugar.
Although scientifically accurate statement, a person will experience is a sugar addictiion.
1 -
GottaBurnEmAll wrote: »I, at one time, believed I was addicted to sugar.
I handled that belief as an addict would and completely gave up added sugar. At the time, I also gave up starchy and refined carbs because I believed I was also addicted to those.
I lived and ate that way for ten years.
The beginning was hard, but I gradually got used to just eating meat, eggs, some dairy, and vegetables. I found it easiest to simply not buy things that would tempt me.
What eventually did me in was not the desire to once again have something sweet, it was finding out that they'd introduced gluten free oats to the market (I have celiac disease).
When I ate the oatmeal and found out that I didn't feel any different than I had felt from before by consuming starch, I had a long hard think about what I had previously experienced, my own perceptions, and my tendency towards gullibility and had to admit that I had been making excuses for bad behavior in the past and had experienced "symptoms" around that behavior because what I read about sugar/carb addiction (the straw I was grasping) told me I would.
I reintroduced sugar and carbs back into my diet, but still kept the love and appreciation for vegetables that I had found as a low-carber in my life.
While I appreciate the desire to want to limit one's consumption of added sugars (mine is still quite low because I'd rather spend my calories elsewhere), I don't find it helpful in the long-run for most people to frame their experiences as those of addicts.
While the issue people can have with particular foods is often problematic, writing it off as addictive can shift the blame to the food rather than the underlying behaviors and habits that need to be acknowledged and addressed in order for a healthy ongoing relationship with food to be formed.
I do think that in the initial phase of dealing with a problem with certain foods, it's often necessary to eliminate them completely, but I think the ultimate goal should always be to address the underlying issues and to keep an eye on a long-term goal of having a sustainable way of eating in mind.
Best of luck to you, OP.
@GottaBurnEmAll I wish I could "Insightful", "Inspiring", "Like", and "Awesome" this post. Well said!4 -
janejellyroll wrote: »I believe anything can be addicting including sugar. For example most people are addicted to their smart phones. But these aren't addicting in the same way as meth or cocaine or alcohol. Willpower is how you overcome it. Deciding what is more important. In my opinion, claiming that sugar is this addiction that you have to "recover" from is a way of giving away your personal responsibility and ability to make better choices. I think your attitude has to change. Good luck
If sugar and smartphones aren't addictive in the way that an addictive substance is addictive, I'm not sure what you mean by the word. It just seems like it's a more dramatic way of saying "attached to" or "enjoys."
Yeah. I guess that sounds right to me. I guess I meant something that someone enjoys doing /consuming despite it being detrimental to their life in one way or another, but does it anyway. But I guess that's most things.
2 -
While a biochemical "addiction" to sugar in the same manner as nicotine, other drugs, may not in fact exist, I think many people are emotionally attached to sugar--it is not just the taste of it but also what it represents. For me, as a child and teen, sugar was the single greatest source of self-comfort in difficult and lonely situations. So, for me, breaking the sugar habit (not addiction, but habit) involved finding new sources of self-care and being able to face difficulty and challenge in new ways, not using food.2
-
janejellyroll wrote: »If sugar and smartphones aren't addictive in the way that an addictive substance is addictive, I'm not sure what you mean by the word. It just seems like it's a more dramatic way of saying "attached to" or "enjoys."
An addiction is often defined as a substance or activity that you can't stop even though you want to and you notice it has deleterious effects on your life. I think that's a workable definition, but I'm interested in thoughts that disagree.
There are people who lose everything because they gamble compulsively. They lose all their money and their families to gambling. I think it would be an understatement to say those people just enjoy gambling and feel attached to it.
For those people, gambling has hijacked the reward mechanism in their brain. Anything that has the potential to hijack the reward mechanism in your brain has the potential to become addictive.
We don't have to call it addiction, though I don't know why process addictions have to be off the table. Drugs manipulate or mimic your innate neurotransmitters. Even drugs are only changing how your brain already behaves which is what process addictions do. They are not completely foreign bodies. So, if you take heroin and that mimics dopamine making your brain feel full of dopamine, how is that completely different from eating a candy bar that causes your brain to release extra dopamine? Isn't the difference just a dosage one?0 -
I quit cold turkey for 30 days and am now able to fit in some sweets every now and again without lapsing into a binge/purge cycle. I had to be in the right mindset and had to want to change my choices before I was finally able to take control. I have done the cold turkey thing before and have always ended up bingeing in the end. This time, I have been successful but only because I truly wanted to change this time.0
-
There we go, it's a "habit" not addiction4
-
missteena88 wrote: »Has anyone ever truly suffered from sugar addiction? How did you recover?
Nope. I feed my "addiction" every night. No suffering here.3 -
nokanjaijo wrote: »janejellyroll wrote: »If sugar and smartphones aren't addictive in the way that an addictive substance is addictive, I'm not sure what you mean by the word. It just seems like it's a more dramatic way of saying "attached to" or "enjoys."
An addiction is often defined as a substance or activity that you can't stop even though you want to and you notice it has deleterious effects on your life. I think that's a workable definition, but I'm interested in thoughts that disagree.
There are people who lose everything because they gamble compulsively. They lose all their money and their families to gambling. I think it would be an understatement to say those people just enjoy gambling and feel attached to it.
For those people, gambling has hijacked the reward mechanism in their brain. Anything that has the potential to hijack the reward mechanism in your brain has the potential to become addictive.
We don't have to call it addiction, though I don't know why process addictions have to be off the table. Drugs manipulate or mimic your innate neurotransmitters. Even drugs are only changing how your brain already behaves which is what process addictions do. They are not completely foreign bodies. So, if you take heroin and that mimics dopamine making your brain feel full of dopamine, how is that completely different from eating a candy bar that causes your brain to release extra dopamine? Isn't the difference just a dosage one?
I think I would consider excessive gambling to be a compulsion (like hoarding or dangerous sexual behaviors) rather than an addiction. Of course, this is an outsider saying that -- I don't have experience with any of the three.
Might there be similarities in how the brain deals with compulsions and addictions? I think it's possible, there's a lot we don't yet know about the brain.1 -
I am a recovering sugar addict. Right now I am taking a product made by TruVision Health which completely curbs my cravings and for the first time in YEARS I am no longer a slave to my sugar cravings.0
-
nokanjaijo wrote: »janejellyroll wrote: »If sugar and smartphones aren't addictive in the way that an addictive substance is addictive, I'm not sure what you mean by the word. It just seems like it's a more dramatic way of saying "attached to" or "enjoys."
An addiction is often defined as a substance or activity that you can't stop even though you want to and you notice it has deleterious effects on your life. I think that's a workable definition, but I'm interested in thoughts that disagree.
There are people who lose everything because they gamble compulsively. They lose all their money and their families to gambling. I think it would be an understatement to say those people just enjoy gambling and feel attached to it.
For those people, gambling has hijacked the reward mechanism in their brain. Anything that has the potential to hijack the reward mechanism in your brain has the potential to become addictive.
We don't have to call it addiction, though I don't know why process addictions have to be off the table. Drugs manipulate or mimic your innate neurotransmitters. Even drugs are only changing how your brain already behaves which is what process addictions do. They are not completely foreign bodies. So, if you take heroin and that mimics dopamine making your brain feel full of dopamine, how is that completely different from eating a candy bar that causes your brain to release extra dopamine? Isn't the difference just a dosage one?
I'm on your team, and I think part of the mainstream researchers' reticence to take that (very small) theoretical leap between what they are observing and applying a definition of "sugar addiction" to the behavior is that then it would become a treatable disease that insurers - and by extension the government - would have to pay to treat. That's what has happened with alcohol dependence being labeled as a disease: now it costs the taxpayers. It can no longer be defined as a moral weakness or a choice. Follow the money when it comes to public health and policy.
I have issues with sugar, I have since I was a small child and ate way too much of it unsupervised on a regular basis. Did it change my brain? Dunno. Once I start, it is exceedingly difficult to quit while there is a cookie in sight. Or Hot Tamales. Or Bing cherries.
I have argued this point way too many times and I'm not willing to do so again, but the $$$ angle is another one to consider.
2 -
janejellyroll wrote: »nokanjaijo wrote: »janejellyroll wrote: »If sugar and smartphones aren't addictive in the way that an addictive substance is addictive, I'm not sure what you mean by the word. It just seems like it's a more dramatic way of saying "attached to" or "enjoys."
An addiction is often defined as a substance or activity that you can't stop even though you want to and you notice it has deleterious effects on your life. I think that's a workable definition, but I'm interested in thoughts that disagree.
There are people who lose everything because they gamble compulsively. They lose all their money and their families to gambling. I think it would be an understatement to say those people just enjoy gambling and feel attached to it.
For those people, gambling has hijacked the reward mechanism in their brain. Anything that has the potential to hijack the reward mechanism in your brain has the potential to become addictive.
We don't have to call it addiction, though I don't know why process addictions have to be off the table. Drugs manipulate or mimic your innate neurotransmitters. Even drugs are only changing how your brain already behaves which is what process addictions do. They are not completely foreign bodies. So, if you take heroin and that mimics dopamine making your brain feel full of dopamine, how is that completely different from eating a candy bar that causes your brain to release extra dopamine? Isn't the difference just a dosage one?
I think I would consider excessive gambling to be a compulsion (like hoarding or dangerous sexual behaviors) rather than an addiction. Of course, this is an outsider saying that -- I don't have experience with any of the three.
Might there be similarities in how the brain deals with compulsions and addictions? I think it's possible, there's a lot we don't yet know about the brain.
Im of like mindset here.
I think for some who care to break down the differences between chemical/substance addiction vs habit/compulsion this makes sense.
Then, there are variable degrees of addiction.
Furthermore, there are those who have personal connections to some addiction or another who feel very strongly in their convictions.
My takeaway from having read too many debates on this...for many it just becomes an argument of semantics that no one really wins.
Edited for pronoun correction.1 -
janejellyroll wrote: »I think I would consider excessive gambling to be a compulsion (like hoarding or dangerous sexual behaviors) rather than an addiction. Of course, this is an outsider saying that -- I don't have experience with any of the three.
Might there be similarities in how the brain deals with compulsions and addictions? I think it's possible, there's a lot we don't yet know about the brain.
I would as well. In fact, I used the word "compulsively" in the post you replied to. Where we part is that I think saying something is a compulsion and not an addiction is kind of a distinction without a difference. I would call hourly cocaine use a compulsion.
0 -
nokanjaijo wrote: »janejellyroll wrote: »I think I would consider excessive gambling to be a compulsion (like hoarding or dangerous sexual behaviors) rather than an addiction. Of course, this is an outsider saying that -- I don't have experience with any of the three.
Might there be similarities in how the brain deals with compulsions and addictions? I think it's possible, there's a lot we don't yet know about the brain.
I would as well. In fact, I used the word "compulsively" in the post you replied to. Where we part is that I think saying something is a compulsion and not an addiction is kind of a distinction without a difference. I would call daily cocaine use a compulsion.
I can see what you mean by "distinction without a difference," but the difference (to my mind) between something like cocaine use and gambling is the actual physical withdrawal symptoms that will take place when a regular user of cocaine tries to stop. So one might also feel compelled to use cocaine, but the physical addiction with be another reinforcement to that compulsion.1 -
MommyMeggo wrote: »janejellyroll wrote: »nokanjaijo wrote: »janejellyroll wrote: »If sugar and smartphones aren't addictive in the way that an addictive substance is addictive, I'm not sure what you mean by the word. It just seems like it's a more dramatic way of saying "attached to" or "enjoys."
An addiction is often defined as a substance or activity that you can't stop even though you want to and you notice it has deleterious effects on your life. I think that's a workable definition, but I'm interested in thoughts that disagree.
There are people who lose everything because they gamble compulsively. They lose all their money and their families to gambling. I think it would be an understatement to say those people just enjoy gambling and feel attached to it.
For those people, gambling has hijacked the reward mechanism in their brain. Anything that has the potential to hijack the reward mechanism in your brain has the potential to become addictive.
We don't have to call it addiction, though I don't know why process addictions have to be off the table. Drugs manipulate or mimic your innate neurotransmitters. Even drugs are only changing how your brain already behaves which is what process addictions do. They are not completely foreign bodies. So, if you take heroin and that mimics dopamine making your brain feel full of dopamine, how is that completely different from eating a candy bar that causes your brain to release extra dopamine? Isn't the difference just a dosage one?
I think I would consider excessive gambling to be a compulsion (like hoarding or dangerous sexual behaviors) rather than an addiction. Of course, this is an outsider saying that -- I don't have experience with any of the three.
Might there be similarities in how the brain deals with compulsions and addictions? I think it's possible, there's a lot we don't yet know about the brain.
Im of like mindset here.
I think for some who care to break down the differences between chemical/substance addiction vs habit/compulsion this makes sense.
Then, there are variable degrees of addiction.
Furthermore, there are those who have personal connections to some addiction or another who feel very strongly in their convictions.
My takeaway from having read too many debates on this...for many it just becomes an argument of semantics that no one really wins.
Edited for pronoun correction.
I agree that it does tend to become a discussion of what words actually mean.
I think it also becomes, sometimes, a debate on how people "should" respond to the compulsion (let's say) to eat sugar. Some people think that calling it an addiction may make it harder for people who have trouble moderating their sugar consumption, that it makes people feel powerless or leads them to eliminate foods they don't need to eliminate. Other people, including some who have successfully learned to moderate their consumption of sugar, find it to be a useful framework for the discussion.
2 -
Hearts_2015 wrote: »lynn_glenmont wrote: »missteena88 wrote: »Has anyone ever truly suffered from sugar addiction? How did you recover?
I believe you.
OP asked two questions. How do "believe" a question?
You're projecting your own beliefs onto OP.Here are some starter ideas, since you mentioned the carb thing is a problem for you.
Again, you're projecting. OP said no such thing. OP didn't even mention carbs (which is a larger category than sugar). OP made no declarative statements whatsoever.Think of things you can add to your life: a HIIT (high intensity exercise training routine); going to bed by 9:00p with a book, taking a short walk every morning before your shower, touching base with MFP friends and/or Group that will support you in your goals.
I'm curious -- Is it bad to go to bed at 9 p.m. and just go to sleep? Is it bad to sit or lie on another piece of furniture with a book? Is it bad to read on an e-reader or read a magazine instead of a physical book? Can people take their walks after their showers?
I think you may have missed some information the OP shared about herself in her other threads, that might be why you're confused.
This is a non-starter, and I find it curiously smug and condescending. Nobody "missed" information provided in other threads, they're responding to what the OP asked in this thread. Are you suggesting that people stalk the OP to to make sure they have "all" the information before commenting?6 -
I love me some sugar but I don't believe in sugar "addiction". I think it is just an excuse but everyone has their own experiences/beliefs I guess.0
-
janejellyroll wrote: »I can see what you mean by "distinction without a difference," but the difference (to my mind) between something like cocaine use and gambling is the actual physical withdrawal symptoms that will take place when a regular user of cocaine tries to stop. So one might also feel compelled to use cocaine, but the physical addiction with be another reinforcement to that compulsion.
I see what you are saying. Consider this, though. Once you have detoxed a person from cocaine, they are no longer physically addicted to the cocaine. That doesn't seem to have any effect on the risk of them going out to get more cocaine once you've let them out of your site. You have to continue treating them as a cocaine addict because they will continue to behave like one.
I had to be told when I was no longer physically addicted to nicotine. I had no sense of it, internally. Nothing changed from my point of view in terms of how hard it was to not smoke.janejellyroll wrote: »I agree that it does tend to become a discussion of what words actually mean.
I think it also becomes, sometimes, a debate on how people "should" respond to the compulsion (let's say) to eat sugar. Some people think that calling it an addiction may make it harder for people who have trouble moderating their sugar consumption, that it makes people feel powerless or leads them to eliminate foods they don't need to eliminate. Other people, including some who have successfully learned to moderate their consumption of sugar, find it to be a useful framework for the discussion.
RIGHT. Roight roight roight.
I think we should talk about this like as, there are some similarities in how people act with sugar and the desire to consume sugar can behave like an addiction, whether or not that's what it is. So, try treating it like one and see if that helps.
What is all comes down to is, if you're doing cocaine every hour or finding it impossible to turn down the donuts your coworker brings, is that you have got to step up and own your life. You have got to step up and say what you will allow and what you will not tolerate from yourself. You have got to look at yourself honestly and without judgment to see what you need to do to achieve your goals.
That may mean no more sugar. If that's the case, you have to put your foot down and decree no more sugar. If no more sugar isn't necessary, you'll probably figure it out. You're going to probably fail and eat a cupcake at some point on your first attempt to cut it out. If that leads to supermarket cakes and 2 liter cokes and circling the drain, there you go. Now you know.0 -
YES! I did, and it is most definitely real. I'm not lying when I say that I would put away a 12-pack box of drumsticks, for example, over a 1 1/2-2 day period. I was ALWAYS craving something, especially sweets, and I couldn't get enough.
In my situation, I found a vegan site called "Oh She Glows." For the record, I'm not vegan, but I've always loved veggie sandwiches and that sort of thing. I was randomly searching for a recipe one day, when I came across her website. I made one recipe, which led to another and then another. She uses products like pure maple syrup and fruit for sweetening her foods, but after a period of time, it helped me break away from the need for the sugars found in the typical sweets. About 8 months after starting, I realized I hadn't had one sugar (or any other) craving. Considering how much crap I had been putting away for YEARS, that was an amazing transformation.
I don't cook or bake much anymore, but I haven't returned back to most sweets (or other "junk" food.) One bite or two is always more than enough to peg my sweet meter. In fact, I traded out my sugar column for fiber on this site because I tend to stay away from the stuff now. Occasionally, I'll check the report to make sure I'm keeping it in line, which I always am, but that's about it.
I'm not saying this will work for everyone, but it changed my life...and I wasn't even expecting it. It was purely an accidental find.0 -
noexcuses0626 wrote: »I am a recovering sugar addict. Right now I am taking a product made by TruVision Health which completely curbs my cravings and for the first time in YEARS I am no longer a slave to my sugar cravings.
it may curb your appetite but most of the ingredients were proven non effective for anything.There have been no clinical studies done on those products and theres this https://www.fda.gov/ICECI/EnforcementActions/WarningLetters/2015/ucm464091.htm2 -
Jriggs46615 wrote: »YES! I did, and it is most definitely real. I'm not lying when I say that I would put away a 12-pack box of drumsticks, for example, over a 1 1/2-2 day period. I was ALWAYS craving something, especially sweets, and I couldn't get enough.
In my situation, I found a vegan site called "Oh She Glows." For the record, I'm not vegan, but I've always loved veggie sandwiches and that sort of thing. I was randomly searching for a recipe one day, when I came across her website. I made one recipe, which led to another and then another. She uses products like pure maple syrup and fruit for sweetening her foods, but after a period of time, it helped me break away from the need for the sugars found in the typical sweets. About 8 months after starting, I realized I hadn't had one sugar (or any other) craving. Considering how much crap I had been putting away for YEARS, that was an amazing transformation.
I don't cook or bake much anymore, but I haven't returned back to most sweets (or other "junk" food.) One bite or two is always more than enough to peg my sweet meter. In fact, I traded out my sugar column for fiber on this site because I tend to stay away from the stuff now. Occasionally, I'll check the report to make sure I'm keeping it in line, which I always am, but that's about it.
I'm not saying this will work for everyone, but it changed my life...and I wasn't even expecting it. It was purely an accidental find.
So you went from eating sugary snacks to eating snacks with fruit and maple syrup.
How is that getting away from sweets?4 -
quiksylver296 wrote: »missteena88 wrote: »Has anyone ever truly suffered from sugar addiction? How did you recover?
Nope. I feed my "addiction" every night. No suffering here.
Ditto.
I used to believe I was "addicted" to sugar, years ago. What I have learned during this whole health/weight battle is that it is less of an addiction and more of a habit/emotional attachment (Celebrating? Cake!!
Bored? Bake Cookies! Happy? Ice Cream! Sad? Pie! etc, etc, etc.)
Once I accepted that I enjoy sugar and can't eliminate it (after MUCH trial and error), I just found ways to fit it into my goals.
Win-Win.4 -
nokanjaijo wrote: »janejellyroll wrote: »If sugar and smartphones aren't addictive in the way that an addictive substance is addictive, I'm not sure what you mean by the word. It just seems like it's a more dramatic way of saying "attached to" or "enjoys."
An addiction is often defined as a substance or activity that you can't stop even though you want to and you notice it has deleterious effects on your life. I think that's a workable definition, but I'm interested in thoughts that disagree.
There are people who lose everything because they gamble compulsively. They lose all their money and their families to gambling. I think it would be an understatement to say those people just enjoy gambling and feel attached to it.
For those people, gambling has hijacked the reward mechanism in their brain. Anything that has the potential to hijack the reward mechanism in your brain has the potential to become addictive.
We don't have to call it addiction, though I don't know why process addictions have to be off the table. Drugs manipulate or mimic your innate neurotransmitters. Even drugs are only changing how your brain already behaves which is what process addictions do. They are not completely foreign bodies. So, if you take heroin and that mimics dopamine making your brain feel full of dopamine, how is that completely different from eating a candy bar that causes your brain to release extra dopamine? Isn't the difference just a dosage one?
For one - there is physical addiction. Heroin withdrawal may be something people are hospitalized for. Heroin users may step down to methadone, there are methadone clinics. Users may go from a drug clinic to a half way house.
Physical alcohol addiction takes many years. Yes, I know people do have drinking problems, yet aren't physically addicted. It takes more & more alcohol to achieve the same effect. Alcoholics undergo personality changes. This is why they undergo a 12 step program. There are years of "I don't have a problem" "I'm not responsible" "I can handle it" kind of thing.
If we are never responsible.....how do we initiate change?
I love sugar too.....but it's a habit for me. I have a relative who is an addict (alcohol).0 -
Yes, I have a total sugar addiction. I started by quitting pepsi/coke. I was up to 3-6 glasses a day. I even hid it in a coffee mug at work! So gross. When I first tried quitting I would literally go to drive thru's and just order my soda fix. Eventually I decided to go thru the withdrawals (which were real for me). I had headaches and felt like my body was aching for it! I did keep eating other sweets but kicking soda was my first step. First 2 weeks were toughest and I felt "back to normal" after a month. My energy and mood improved. I am on week 1 of my diet. I am eating fruit now which can be hard when I want crap sugar. Occasionally I've had chocolate but now that I am eating whole foods and I make sure I eat good food before I have any treat so I don't just binge on it and feel empty. I don't feel bad about it now because I am committed to my health. Staying away from processed sugar is my goal. If I stay away from fruit completely I would probably lose my mind.1
-
stanmann571 wrote: »
So you went from eating sugary snacks to eating snacks with fruit and maple syrup.
How is that getting away from sweets?
Actually, no. I'm not a scientist or nutritionist, and I wasn't claiming to be an expert in my answer. I simply noted what helped me. It may not be the answer for everyone.
These recipes did use items like maple syrup and bananas, but they were in limited amounts, a tbsp vs cups like most sweet treats. Perhaps it slowly backed my intake down over a period of time. Again, I'm not an expert. I just know that I went from constant, intense cravings for sugar and other junk to not having any at all. It's been 2 1/2 years.
At this point, I have cut most sugar from my life. I may eat a bite here or there, but I no longer HAVE to have it. I'm no longer climbing the walls like a caged animal, if I don't have junk at my disposal. For me, I know it all goes back to when I started using those recipes.
I went from eating BOXES of drumsticks and pints of ice cream, bags of chips, etc to never buying the stuff, and having no desire to do so.
Doubt or judge, if you want, but it worked for ME. That's all I'm saying.
1 -
Jriggs46615 wrote: »stanmann571 wrote: »
So you went from eating sugary snacks to eating snacks with fruit and maple syrup.
How is that getting away from sweets?
Actually, no. I'm not a scientist or nutritionist, and I wasn't claiming to be an expert in my answer. I simply noted what helped me. It may not be the answer for everyone.
These recipes did use items like maple syrup and bananas, but they were in limited amounts, a tbsp vs cups like most sweet treats. Perhaps it slowly backed my intake down over a period of time. Again, I'm not an expert. I just know that I went from constant, intense cravings for sugar and other junk to not having any at all. It's been 2 1/2 years.
At this point, I have cut most sugar from my life. I may eat a bite here or there, but I no longer HAVE to have it. I'm no longer climbing the walls like a caged animal, if I don't have junk at my disposal. For me, I know it all goes back to when I started using those recipes.
I went from eating BOXES of drumsticks and pints of ice cream, bags of chips, etc to never buying the stuff, and having no desire to do so.
Doubt or judge, if you want, but it worked for ME. That's all I'm saying.
You had issues with over eating - many of us have been there. Bags of chips....not about sugar. Pints of ice cream....that creamy goodness is sugar, fat and protein (it's a recipe). This isn't sugar "addiction." But you have learned to change your behavior, you are creating healthier recipes....good job.1 -
nokanjaijo wrote: »janejellyroll wrote: »If sugar and smartphones aren't addictive in the way that an addictive substance is addictive, I'm not sure what you mean by the word. It just seems like it's a more dramatic way of saying "attached to" or "enjoys."
An addiction is often defined as a substance or activity that you can't stop even though you want to and you notice it has deleterious effects on your life. I think that's a workable definition, but I'm interested in thoughts that disagree.
There are people who lose everything because they gamble compulsively. They lose all their money and their families to gambling. I think it would be an understatement to say those people just enjoy gambling and feel attached to it.
For those people, gambling has hijacked the reward mechanism in their brain. Anything that has the potential to hijack the reward mechanism in your brain has the potential to become addictive.
We don't have to call it addiction, though I don't know why process addictions have to be off the table. Drugs manipulate or mimic your innate neurotransmitters. Even drugs are only changing how your brain already behaves which is what process addictions do. They are not completely foreign bodies. So, if you take heroin and that mimics dopamine making your brain feel full of dopamine, how is that completely different from eating a candy bar that causes your brain to release extra dopamine? Isn't the difference just a dosage one?
For one - there is physical addiction. Heroin withdrawal may be something people are hospitalized for. Heroin users may step down to methadone, there are methadone clinics. Users may go from a drug clinic to a half way house.
Physical alcohol addiction takes many years. Yes, I know people do have drinking problems, yet aren't physically addicted. It takes more & more alcohol to achieve the same effect. Alcoholics undergo personality changes. This is why they undergo a 12 step program. There are years of "I don't have a problem" "I'm not responsible" "I can handle it" kind of thing.
If we are never responsible.....how do we initiate change?
I love sugar too.....but it's a habit for me. I have a relative who is an addict (alcohol).
You can say all of these things about gamblers, though.
I addressed the topic of the physical aspect in a previous post if you're interested.
I'm not sure what you mean about responsibility. I think we're all responsible. All of us. A heroin addict is completely responsible for changing their own life. No one else can do it for you.1
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 426 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions