Sugars: do "natural" sugars count the same as processed?
TOHRT
Posts: 1 Member
My one cup of raw blueberries has almost 15 g of sugars. I eat very little processed foods, no juice, no sugared drinks, yet my nutrition profile often is over the 24g daily sugar goal. Should fruit and veg natural sugars be counted the same? The Glycemic Load of these foods is quite low.
1
Replies
-
If you don't have a medical reason to worry about sugar, don't. Sugar is a carb. You are already tracking carbs on here. I changed my sugar tracker to fiber.9
-
My one cup of raw blueberries has almost 15 g of sugars. I eat very little processed foods, no juice, no sugared drinks, yet my nutrition profile often is over the 24g daily sugar goal. Should fruit and veg natural sugars be counted the same? The Glycemic Load of these foods is quite low.
The molecules in the sugar in fruit are the same as those in table sugar...sugar is sugar. The main difference nutritionally speaking is that things like fruit and whatnot also come with fiber, antioxidants, and other micro-nutrients.7 -
Out of curiosity, where'd you get your 24g sugar goal? MFP defaults to 15% of total calories, which is 45 grams for a 1200-calorie diet. If you're setting custom goals, then you might want to check with wherever you're getting them from to see whether they consider natural sugars an issue.
As others have said, if you're diabetic or trying to do keto or such, then all sugars will probably need to be watched for you. If not, then it's entirely up to you how you want to set your rules.5 -
cwolfman13 wrote: »The molecules in the sugar in fruit are the same as those in table sugar...sugar is sugar. The main difference nutritionally speaking is that things like fruit and whatnot also come with fiber, antioxidants, and other micro-nutrients.
^^this. So the lesson is: completely avoid processed sugar and eat fruit sparingly. You can get the same nutrients from vegetables without all the sugar. Fruits should be a garnish or a treat.18 -
SilentDan82 wrote: »cwolfman13 wrote: »The molecules in the sugar in fruit are the same as those in table sugar...sugar is sugar. The main difference nutritionally speaking is that things like fruit and whatnot also come with fiber, antioxidants, and other micro-nutrients.
^^this. So the lesson is: completely avoid processed sugar and eat fruit sparingly. You can get the same nutrients from vegetables without all the sugar. Fruits should be a garnish or a treat.
I'm pretty confident that's not the lesson @cwolfman13 is trying to convey.16 -
SilentDan82 wrote: »cwolfman13 wrote: »The molecules in the sugar in fruit are the same as those in table sugar...sugar is sugar. The main difference nutritionally speaking is that things like fruit and whatnot also come with fiber, antioxidants, and other micro-nutrients.
^^this. So the lesson is: completely avoid processed sugar and eat fruit sparingly. You can get the same nutrients from vegetables without all the sugar. Fruits should be a garnish or a treat.
No, the lesson is balance. Completely avoiding processed foods that contain sugar is unnecessary if you are getting adequate protein, fat, fiber, and micro-nutrients. She could eat as much fruit as she pleases. Sugar is not evil. Sugar does not make you fat.14 -
SilentDan82 wrote: »cwolfman13 wrote: »The molecules in the sugar in fruit are the same as those in table sugar...sugar is sugar. The main difference nutritionally speaking is that things like fruit and whatnot also come with fiber, antioxidants, and other micro-nutrients.
^^this. So the lesson is: completely avoid processed sugar and eat fruit sparingly. You can get the same nutrients from vegetables without all the sugar. Fruits should be a garnish or a treat.
Why? Can you cite any science to back up your assertion?6 -
I'm pretty confident that's not the lesson @cwolfman13 is trying to convey.
Well, that's the lesson I'm trying to convey.9 -
SilentDan82 wrote: »cwolfman13 wrote: »The molecules in the sugar in fruit are the same as those in table sugar...sugar is sugar. The main difference nutritionally speaking is that things like fruit and whatnot also come with fiber, antioxidants, and other micro-nutrients.
^^this. So the lesson is: completely avoid processed sugar and eat fruit sparingly. You can get the same nutrients from vegetables without all the sugar. Fruits should be a garnish or a treat.
No . . . no, that is not the lesson.4 -
SilentDan82 wrote: »I'm pretty confident that's not the lesson @cwolfman13 is trying to convey.
Well, that's the lesson I'm trying to convey.
Why? There's no reason to completely avoid sugar and fruit as long as it fits your day.9 -
SilentDan82 wrote: »I'm pretty confident that's not the lesson @cwolfman13 is trying to convey.
Well, that's the lesson I'm trying to convey.
But why? Why would a person with no medical concerns need to limit fruit or sugar if they are getting adequate amounts of everything else their body needs? You don't get extra credit for exceeding your vitamin and mineral needs.10 -
How does one change their sugar tracker to fiber on here? Do you have to be a Premium member to do so?0
-
AquabearGO wrote: »How does one change their sugar tracker to fiber on here? Do you have to be a Premium member to do so?
http://www.myfitnesspal.com/account/diary_settings1 -
AquabearGO wrote: »How does one change their sugar tracker to fiber on here? Do you have to be a Premium member to do so?
From your home page, click on Settings, then click on Diary Settings. Then you'll see this...
1 -
Wow, I did not expect this much backlash... No, I don't have scientific papers to cite, I only speak from experience.... I can eat a lot of fruit and ingest a lot of calories that way and still feel hungry which leads me go way over my calorie target, that's why. I'll leave it to the OP to take from this what she needs....6
-
SilentDan82 wrote: »Wow, I did not expect this much backlash... No, I don't have scientific papers to cite, I only speak from experience.... I can eat a lot of fruit and ingest a lot of calories that way and still feel hungry which leads me go way over my calorie target, that's why. I'll leave it to the OP to take from this what she needs....
Define a 'lot' of fruit. Because I eat quite a bit of it (400+ grams a day on average), and have no problem fitting it into my calorie goals. In total I average 1,000+ grams of veg and fruit a day and it's the base that I build my meals on. Today for example I'm having a large banana, strawberries, blueberries and then a very generous portion of honey rock.2 -
OliveGirl128 wrote: »SilentDan82 wrote: »Wow, I did not expect this much backlash... No, I don't have scientific papers to cite, I only speak from experience.... I can eat a lot of fruit and ingest a lot of calories that way and still feel hungry which leads me go way over my calorie target, that's why. I'll leave it to the OP to take from this what she needs....
Define a 'lot' of fruit. Because I eat quite a bit of it (400+ grams a day on average), and have no problem fitting it into my calorie goals. In total I average 1,000+ grams of veg and fruit a day and it's the base that I build my meals on. Today for example I'm having a large banana, strawberries, blueberries and then a very generous portion of honey rock.
I can literally keep eating fruit non-stop for hours. What you just described I would still categorize as sparingly.0 -
SilentDan82 wrote: »Wow, I did not expect this much backlash... No, I don't have scientific papers to cite, I only speak from experience.... I can eat a lot of fruit and ingest a lot of calories that way and still feel hungry which leads me go way over my calorie target, that's why. I'll leave it to the OP to take from this what she needs....
Filling up on fruit isn't a great strategy for a lot of people, but that doesn't mean one has to limit fruit to just a garnish or a treat. You can have fruit as part of a meal or snack with other foods that you find more satiating. That works for many people (including me).3 -
SilentDan82 wrote: »OliveGirl128 wrote: »SilentDan82 wrote: »Wow, I did not expect this much backlash... No, I don't have scientific papers to cite, I only speak from experience.... I can eat a lot of fruit and ingest a lot of calories that way and still feel hungry which leads me go way over my calorie target, that's why. I'll leave it to the OP to take from this what she needs....
Define a 'lot' of fruit. Because I eat quite a bit of it (400+ grams a day on average), and have no problem fitting it into my calorie goals. In total I average 1,000+ grams of veg and fruit a day and it's the base that I build my meals on. Today for example I'm having a large banana, strawberries, blueberries and then a very generous portion of honey rock.
I can literally keep eating fruit non-stop for hours. What you just described I would still categorize as sparingly.
So then the issue for you has nothing to do with fruit or sugar and everything to do with portion control. That's why you are getting pushback. Your individual experience doesn't apply to people who don't have the same portion control issue.11 -
SilentDan82 wrote: »OliveGirl128 wrote: »SilentDan82 wrote: »Wow, I did not expect this much backlash... No, I don't have scientific papers to cite, I only speak from experience.... I can eat a lot of fruit and ingest a lot of calories that way and still feel hungry which leads me go way over my calorie target, that's why. I'll leave it to the OP to take from this what she needs....
Define a 'lot' of fruit. Because I eat quite a bit of it (400+ grams a day on average), and have no problem fitting it into my calorie goals. In total I average 1,000+ grams of veg and fruit a day and it's the base that I build my meals on. Today for example I'm having a large banana, strawberries, blueberries and then a very generous portion of honey rock.
I can literally keep eating fruit non-stop for hours. What you just described I would still categorize as sparingly.
What's the most fruit you have eaten in a day?0 -
janejellyroll wrote: »SilentDan82 wrote: »Wow, I did not expect this much backlash... No, I don't have scientific papers to cite, I only speak from experience.... I can eat a lot of fruit and ingest a lot of calories that way and still feel hungry which leads me go way over my calorie target, that's why. I'll leave it to the OP to take from this what she needs....
Filling up on fruit isn't a great strategy for a lot of people, but that doesn't mean one has to limit fruit to just a garnish or a treat. You can have fruit as part of a meal or snack with other foods that you find more satiating. That works for many people (including me).
Ok, so I'm seeing a pattern here in the replies. I should've been more specific about what I consider "a lot", "sparingly" or a "treat". What you just described is still in line with what I am saying. I usually have a piece of fruit for breakfast and some berries in my salads and maybe a bit as a snack. Some people, when first trying to eat healthy, go nuts with the fruits because they taste better than vegetables and they require no prep. I've done that and I know others who have done that and it's always been a disaster. My point was to avoid this and not make fruits the majority of your meals.0 -
SilentDan82 wrote: »janejellyroll wrote: »SilentDan82 wrote: »Wow, I did not expect this much backlash... No, I don't have scientific papers to cite, I only speak from experience.... I can eat a lot of fruit and ingest a lot of calories that way and still feel hungry which leads me go way over my calorie target, that's why. I'll leave it to the OP to take from this what she needs....
Filling up on fruit isn't a great strategy for a lot of people, but that doesn't mean one has to limit fruit to just a garnish or a treat. You can have fruit as part of a meal or snack with other foods that you find more satiating. That works for many people (including me).
Ok, so I'm seeing a pattern here in the replies. I should've been more specific about what I consider "a lot", "sparingly" or a "treat". What you just described is still in line with what I am saying. I usually have a piece of fruit for breakfast and some berries in my salads and maybe a bit as a snack. Some people, when first trying to eat healthy, go nuts with the fruits because they taste better than vegetables and they require no prep. I've done that and I know others who have done that and it's always been a disaster. My point was to avoid this and not make fruits the majority of your meals.
The OP is worried about her cup of blueberries. One cup. Not four bananas for lunch and a pound of apples for dinner.12 -
SilentDan82 wrote: »janejellyroll wrote: »SilentDan82 wrote: »Wow, I did not expect this much backlash... No, I don't have scientific papers to cite, I only speak from experience.... I can eat a lot of fruit and ingest a lot of calories that way and still feel hungry which leads me go way over my calorie target, that's why. I'll leave it to the OP to take from this what she needs....
Filling up on fruit isn't a great strategy for a lot of people, but that doesn't mean one has to limit fruit to just a garnish or a treat. You can have fruit as part of a meal or snack with other foods that you find more satiating. That works for many people (including me).
Ok, so I'm seeing a pattern here in the replies. I should've been more specific about what I consider "a lot", "sparingly" or a "treat". What you just described is still in line with what I am saying. I usually have a piece of fruit for breakfast and some berries in my salads and maybe a bit as a snack. Some people, when first trying to eat healthy, go nuts with the fruits because they taste better than vegetables and they require no prep. I've done that and I know others who have done that and it's always been a disaster. My point was to avoid this and not make fruits the majority of your meals.
I get what you're saying -- disagreements can arise when people are using words in slightly different ways.
Meeting all your nutritional needs would be a challenge if fruit was the majority of your diet, so you won't see many people advocating for something like that here. If you take a look at the OP's original question, she references a cup of blueberries. That's a reasonable serving, one that is unlikely to crowd out anything else she needs. I don't think we have to worry about making sure she doesn't eat fruit in portions will cause her to exceed her calorie goal.
3 -
-
SilentDan82 wrote: »
No, it falls under normal and reasonable serving size.
Your experience is coloring your language usage here and is distorting the meaning.
Most people would assume "sparing" to be in context in regards to the norm, not in regards to eating significantly more than is normal.12 -
Your best bet is to review the glycemic index and glycemic load of the food you are eating. These give you the impact to your body. Cherries for example have a low glycemic index and very low glycemic load. I strive for GI below 55 or 50 and a GL below 10. I recommend looking at those numbers vs. pure sugar numbers.9
-
thomascgentle wrote: »Your best bet is to review the glycemic index and glycemic load of the food you are eating. These give you the impact to your body. Cherries for example have a low glycemic index and very low glycemic load. I strive for GI below 55 or 50 and a GL below 10. I recommend looking at those numbers vs. pure sugar numbers.
If you're going off of GI make sure you pay careful attention to the serving size. Sometimes the low GI foods have very, very tiny serving sizes. Also, when you combine foods it changes the GI of them. Only people with medical conditions would find this way of eating necessary.4 -
My one cup of raw blueberries has almost 15 g of sugars. I eat very little processed foods, no juice, no sugared drinks, yet my nutrition profile often is over the 24g daily sugar goal. Should fruit and veg natural sugars be counted the same? The Glycemic Load of these foods is quite low.
This should not be the MFP goal. The MFP goal is 15% of calories (which still might be low if you eat lots of fruit), and therefore even at 1200 it will be 45 g.
If you are referring to the "no more than 5% of calories, estimated at 25 g" recommendation from the WHO, that's about added sugar and things like honey, syrup, and juice, not all sugar. Just look at your sources of sugar if you want to track that. (Since the point is to avoid excess low nutrient/high cal foods, to have a nutrient dense diet, and, especially, excess calories, I don't worry about it if I know those things are on point.)2 -
SilentDan82 wrote: »OliveGirl128 wrote: »SilentDan82 wrote: »Wow, I did not expect this much backlash... No, I don't have scientific papers to cite, I only speak from experience.... I can eat a lot of fruit and ingest a lot of calories that way and still feel hungry which leads me go way over my calorie target, that's why. I'll leave it to the OP to take from this what she needs....
Define a 'lot' of fruit. Because I eat quite a bit of it (400+ grams a day on average), and have no problem fitting it into my calorie goals. In total I average 1,000+ grams of veg and fruit a day and it's the base that I build my meals on. Today for example I'm having a large banana, strawberries, blueberries and then a very generous portion of honey rock.
I can literally keep eating fruit non-stop for hours. What you just described I would still categorize as sparingly.
I usually have between 0 and 3 servings of fruit (more on average in the summer), but even if I ate fruit without limits I'd not overeat, since I find it quite filling. I understand not everyone does, but it's good to be aware that we are not all the same, so you can't claim that others will go over on their calorie goals from eating lots of fruit. (I don't eat tons, but I see nothing wrong with eating lots more if you get in adequate vegetables, protein, and healthy fats.)0 -
SilentDan82 wrote: »OliveGirl128 wrote: »SilentDan82 wrote: »Wow, I did not expect this much backlash... No, I don't have scientific papers to cite, I only speak from experience.... I can eat a lot of fruit and ingest a lot of calories that way and still feel hungry which leads me go way over my calorie target, that's why. I'll leave it to the OP to take from this what she needs....
Define a 'lot' of fruit. Because I eat quite a bit of it (400+ grams a day on average), and have no problem fitting it into my calorie goals. In total I average 1,000+ grams of veg and fruit a day and it's the base that I build my meals on. Today for example I'm having a large banana, strawberries, blueberries and then a very generous portion of honey rock.
I can literally keep eating fruit non-stop for hours. What you just described I would still categorize as sparingly.
Thanks for the clarification! So, for you fruit leads to binge like eating. Eating too much of any food is not a good thing, even if it's 'healthy' foods. However, you do have to realize that binge eating on fruit is not something most people struggle with, and including several servings a day into ones diet is a great way to get in important nutrients.2
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 176K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.6K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions