Welcome to Debate Club! Please be aware that this is a space for respectful debate, and that your ideas will be challenged here. Please remember to critique the argument, not the author.
Food Stamps Restriction
Replies
-
lemurcat12 wrote: »Here's an analysis of what is bought with SNAP: https://www.fns.usda.gov/sites/default/files/ops/SNAPFoodsTypicallyPurchased.pdf
How do gov't provided food subsidies (or more general welfare programs for the poor if it's encompassed within) work in Australia, Christine? (or others)
@Lemurcat12 They have foodbarns here where our grocery stores donate near expired fruit/veg, meat, bread/packet food, pretty much anything/everything you'd find at a regular store where people can get food for free. They can't go every week though, maybe 2-3 times a month.
We also have welfare agencies where they write a cheque to be used at your local grocery store, and in big bold writing on the front of the cheque there is a list of foods you are not allowed to buy.4 -
lemurcat12 wrote: »Chef_Barbell wrote: »lemurcat12 wrote: »Here's an analysis of what is bought with SNAP: https://www.fns.usda.gov/sites/default/files/ops/SNAPFoodsTypicallyPurchased.pdf
How do gov't provided food subsidies (or more general welfare programs for the poor if it's encompassed within) work in Australia, Christine? (or others)
That link doesn't seem to work for me. What's the main idea?
It's a detailed report/analysis, so hard to summarize, but basically SNAP and non SNAP households have similar buying patterns.
This is what I thought... But let's restrict people already going through so much.14 -
lemurcat12 wrote: »Here's an analysis of what is bought with SNAP: https://www.fns.usda.gov/sites/default/files/ops/SNAPFoodsTypicallyPurchased.pdf
How do gov't provided food subsidies (or more general welfare programs for the poor if it's encompassed within) work in Australia, Christine? (or others)
Our government doesn't provide food subsidies, the only places that will give food or vouchers for it are independent (usually religious) charities.
Government welfare is a cash based system - jobseekers get $535.60 a fortnight, and can also be eligible for rent assistance and other assistance. They also get a healthcare card, meaning most doctors visits are free, including a range of specialists, and prescriptions are $4 or so.
There is currently a trial of a cashless welfare card happening in certain areas, where 80% of the fortnightly payment is given by way of a keycard which cannot be used to be alcohol, cigarettes, gambling products (lotto and scratch tickets) etc and cannot be used to withdraw cash. Other than that thought, it can be used for anything - not just food. You can use it anywhere you can pay by EFTPOS.
It's receiving mixed reviews on its effectiveness.8 -
Chef_Barbell wrote: »lemurcat12 wrote: »Chef_Barbell wrote: »lemurcat12 wrote: »Here's an analysis of what is bought with SNAP: https://www.fns.usda.gov/sites/default/files/ops/SNAPFoodsTypicallyPurchased.pdf
How do gov't provided food subsidies (or more general welfare programs for the poor if it's encompassed within) work in Australia, Christine? (or others)
That link doesn't seem to work for me. What's the main idea?
It's a detailed report/analysis, so hard to summarize, but basically SNAP and non SNAP households have similar buying patterns.
This is what I thought... But let's restrict people already going through so much.
I dont think telling people they can't use food stamps on soda et al is going to cause anyone hardship. Hopefully they would spend the money they save on soda on something with a little more nutritional substance.9 -
Christine_72 wrote: »Chef_Barbell wrote: »lemurcat12 wrote: »Chef_Barbell wrote: »lemurcat12 wrote: »Here's an analysis of what is bought with SNAP: https://www.fns.usda.gov/sites/default/files/ops/SNAPFoodsTypicallyPurchased.pdf
How do gov't provided food subsidies (or more general welfare programs for the poor if it's encompassed within) work in Australia, Christine? (or others)
That link doesn't seem to work for me. What's the main idea?
It's a detailed report/analysis, so hard to summarize, but basically SNAP and non SNAP households have similar buying patterns.
This is what I thought... But let's restrict people already going through so much.
I dont think telling people they can't use food stamps on soda et al is going to cause anyone hardship. Hopefully they would spend the money they save on soda on something with a little more nutritional substance.
I asked upthread where does it end then?6 -
Christine_72 wrote: »lemurcat12 wrote: »Christine_72 wrote: »where we live people will use there food card to buy 50 liters of pop, 12 packs, etc, they then sell the pop to small country stores for money,ive seen them pulling 3 wallmart carts full of pop before, so that means the children go without food, im sure the goverment knows what they buy with there food cards they should put a limit on how much pop they can get, they wipe out the pop shelves every month so apparently they dont need food.the kids are the ones who suffer.
That is just disgustingly shameful
Yes, why would the small country store do that? It doesn't seem to make a lot of economic sense, and thus I'd be ashamed to call myself a merchant!
Both the store and the people doing this should be penalised IMO.
If it happened, of course they should. It's illegal. Also seems illogical, however.3 -
Chef_Barbell wrote: »Christine_72 wrote: »Chef_Barbell wrote: »lemurcat12 wrote: »Chef_Barbell wrote: »lemurcat12 wrote: »Here's an analysis of what is bought with SNAP: https://www.fns.usda.gov/sites/default/files/ops/SNAPFoodsTypicallyPurchased.pdf
How do gov't provided food subsidies (or more general welfare programs for the poor if it's encompassed within) work in Australia, Christine? (or others)
That link doesn't seem to work for me. What's the main idea?
It's a detailed report/analysis, so hard to summarize, but basically SNAP and non SNAP households have similar buying patterns.
This is what I thought... But let's restrict people already going through so much.
I dont think telling people they can't use food stamps on soda et al is going to cause anyone hardship. Hopefully they would spend the money they save on soda on something with a little more nutritional substance.
I asked upthread where does it end then?
Here it is stated:
NO:
Chips
Chocolate
Soda
Biscuits (cookies)
Cigarettes
There's probably a few more I've forgotten about. It's a simple and clear instruction.1 -
Alatariel75 wrote: »lemurcat12 wrote: »Here's an analysis of what is bought with SNAP: https://www.fns.usda.gov/sites/default/files/ops/SNAPFoodsTypicallyPurchased.pdf
How do gov't provided food subsidies (or more general welfare programs for the poor if it's encompassed within) work in Australia, Christine? (or others)
Our government doesn't provide food subsidies, the only places that will give food or vouchers for it are independent (usually religious) charities.
Government welfare is a cash based system - jobseekers get $535.60 a fortnight, and can also be eligible for rent assistance and other assistance. They also get a healthcare card, meaning most doctors visits are free, including a range of specialists, and prescriptions are $4 or so.
There is currently a trial of a cashless welfare card happening in certain areas, where 80% of the fortnightly payment is given by way of a keycard which cannot be used to be alcohol, cigarettes, gambling products (lotto and scratch tickets) etc and cannot be used to withdraw cash. Other than that thought, it can be used for anything - not just food. You can use it anywhere you can pay by EFTPOS.
It's receiving mixed reviews on its effectiveness.
So the cash system would/could be used to supplement all expenses, including food?
That's a less restrictive system. How available is it, and is there a time limit?0 -
Christine_72 wrote: »Chef_Barbell wrote: »Christine_72 wrote: »Chef_Barbell wrote: »lemurcat12 wrote: »Chef_Barbell wrote: »lemurcat12 wrote: »Here's an analysis of what is bought with SNAP: https://www.fns.usda.gov/sites/default/files/ops/SNAPFoodsTypicallyPurchased.pdf
How do gov't provided food subsidies (or more general welfare programs for the poor if it's encompassed within) work in Australia, Christine? (or others)
That link doesn't seem to work for me. What's the main idea?
It's a detailed report/analysis, so hard to summarize, but basically SNAP and non SNAP households have similar buying patterns.
This is what I thought... But let's restrict people already going through so much.
I dont think telling people they can't use food stamps on soda et al is going to cause anyone hardship. Hopefully they would spend the money they save on soda on something with a little more nutritional substance.
I asked upthread where does it end then?
Here it is stated:
NO:
Chips
Chocolate
Soda
Biscuits (cookies)
Cigarettes
There's probably a few more I've forgotten about. It's a simple and clear instruction.
You really think that if they implemented that, it would stop there?7 -
Alatariel75 wrote: »lemurcat12 wrote: »Here's an analysis of what is bought with SNAP: https://www.fns.usda.gov/sites/default/files/ops/SNAPFoodsTypicallyPurchased.pdf
How do gov't provided food subsidies (or more general welfare programs for the poor if it's encompassed within) work in Australia, Christine? (or others)
Our government doesn't provide food subsidies, the only places that will give food or vouchers for it are independent (usually religious) charities.
Government welfare is a cash based system - jobseekers get $535.60 a fortnight, and can also be eligible for rent assistance and other assistance. They also get a healthcare card, meaning most doctors visits are free, including a range of specialists, and prescriptions are $4 or so.
There is currently a trial of a cashless welfare card happening in certain areas, where 80% of the fortnightly payment is given by way of a keycard which cannot be used to be alcohol, cigarettes, gambling products (lotto and scratch tickets) etc and cannot be used to withdraw cash. Other than that thought, it can be used for anything - not just food. You can use it anywhere you can pay by EFTPOS.
It's receiving mixed reviews on its effectiveness.
The welfare system is pretty good here.
The elderly pension and disability pension (including rent assistance which is i think $90 fn) is around $930 per fortnight.1 -
Chef_Barbell wrote: »Christine_72 wrote: »Chef_Barbell wrote: »Christine_72 wrote: »Chef_Barbell wrote: »lemurcat12 wrote: »Chef_Barbell wrote: »lemurcat12 wrote: »Here's an analysis of what is bought with SNAP: https://www.fns.usda.gov/sites/default/files/ops/SNAPFoodsTypicallyPurchased.pdf
How do gov't provided food subsidies (or more general welfare programs for the poor if it's encompassed within) work in Australia, Christine? (or others)
That link doesn't seem to work for me. What's the main idea?
It's a detailed report/analysis, so hard to summarize, but basically SNAP and non SNAP households have similar buying patterns.
This is what I thought... But let's restrict people already going through so much.
I dont think telling people they can't use food stamps on soda et al is going to cause anyone hardship. Hopefully they would spend the money they save on soda on something with a little more nutritional substance.
I asked upthread where does it end then?
Here it is stated:
NO:
Chips
Chocolate
Soda
Biscuits (cookies)
Cigarettes
There's probably a few more I've forgotten about. It's a simple and clear instruction.
You really think that if they implemented that, it would stop there?
No idea, but it's a decent start. I can't think of anything that should be added to the list.8 -
lemurcat12 wrote: »Alatariel75 wrote: »lemurcat12 wrote: »Here's an analysis of what is bought with SNAP: https://www.fns.usda.gov/sites/default/files/ops/SNAPFoodsTypicallyPurchased.pdf
How do gov't provided food subsidies (or more general welfare programs for the poor if it's encompassed within) work in Australia, Christine? (or others)
Our government doesn't provide food subsidies, the only places that will give food or vouchers for it are independent (usually religious) charities.
Government welfare is a cash based system - jobseekers get $535.60 a fortnight, and can also be eligible for rent assistance and other assistance. They also get a healthcare card, meaning most doctors visits are free, including a range of specialists, and prescriptions are $4 or so.
There is currently a trial of a cashless welfare card happening in certain areas, where 80% of the fortnightly payment is given by way of a keycard which cannot be used to be alcohol, cigarettes, gambling products (lotto and scratch tickets) etc and cannot be used to withdraw cash. Other than that thought, it can be used for anything - not just food. You can use it anywhere you can pay by EFTPOS.
It's receiving mixed reviews on its effectiveness.
So the cash system would/could be used to supplement all expenses, including food?
That's a less restrictive system. How available is it, and is there a time limit?
Yup, it's all living expenses. It's pretty available, if you've quit your job there is a 12 week wait, but if you're fired its instant. They look at your assets first - you can't get it if you have a nest egg, for example, you have to need it.
No time limit, so long as you comply with conditions, including proving that you have been applying for jobs, showing up to meetings/appointments, and in some cases completing compulsory training or work placements.
They also have similar systems for students, who get $437.50 a fortnight while they are studying, and then there are sickness benefits ($535.60 a fortnight) for when you can't work but can consistently prove you're too ill to look for work (you can only collect this for a maximum of 2 years before you have to move onto a disability support pension)1 -
Christine_72 wrote: »Chef_Barbell wrote: »Christine_72 wrote: »Chef_Barbell wrote: »Christine_72 wrote: »Chef_Barbell wrote: »lemurcat12 wrote: »Chef_Barbell wrote: »lemurcat12 wrote: »Here's an analysis of what is bought with SNAP: https://www.fns.usda.gov/sites/default/files/ops/SNAPFoodsTypicallyPurchased.pdf
How do gov't provided food subsidies (or more general welfare programs for the poor if it's encompassed within) work in Australia, Christine? (or others)
That link doesn't seem to work for me. What's the main idea?
It's a detailed report/analysis, so hard to summarize, but basically SNAP and non SNAP households have similar buying patterns.
This is what I thought... But let's restrict people already going through so much.
I dont think telling people they can't use food stamps on soda et al is going to cause anyone hardship. Hopefully they would spend the money they save on soda on something with a little more nutritional substance.
I asked upthread where does it end then?
Here it is stated:
NO:
Chips
Chocolate
Soda
Biscuits (cookies)
Cigarettes
There's probably a few more I've forgotten about. It's a simple and clear instruction.
You really think that if they implemented that, it would stop there?
No idea, but it's a decent start. I can't think of anything that should be added to the list.
The government will. So should this arbitrary list of food include things to make sweets and treats? What about diet soda or seltzer?9 -
This is enlightening re. the amounts people get. It's repeated loudly and often that our welfare system is too generous. Jobseekers (unemployed) get £73 ($93 USD) per week, under 21 less. There's a stop gap statutory sick pay if you don't get it from your job for up to 6 months and that's £89 ($113 USD) per week. Disability/long term welfare is £73 assessment phase and if you are placed in the less severe group (they think you will be capable of returning to work at some point), support group (assessed as probably not returning to work ever or any time soon) is £102 pw ($130 USD). Disability benefits are reviewed at various intervals as dictated by the hand of god (Department for Work and Pensions). The £73 per week lowest disability benefit was recently reduced by £30 per week to "incentivise" people back to work sooner. Because there's nothing like abject poverty and inability to even get to an interview to help people into work.......
The there's rent assistance but that also has caps that are too complicated to explain. And for more disabled people there are other benefits to cover the costs of having that disability and they range from £20 - £130 pw or there abouts.
But to live on if you are out of work or assessed as being fit for something even if it's 5 years down the road it's £73 per week. And that's for everything outside of rent and some/all of council tax (again varies). So food, water bill, internet, phone, gas, electric, travel expenses, food etc etc etc.4 -
Christine_72 wrote: »Chef_Barbell wrote: »Christine_72 wrote: »Chef_Barbell wrote: »lemurcat12 wrote: »Chef_Barbell wrote: »lemurcat12 wrote: »Here's an analysis of what is bought with SNAP: https://www.fns.usda.gov/sites/default/files/ops/SNAPFoodsTypicallyPurchased.pdf
How do gov't provided food subsidies (or more general welfare programs for the poor if it's encompassed within) work in Australia, Christine? (or others)
That link doesn't seem to work for me. What's the main idea?
It's a detailed report/analysis, so hard to summarize, but basically SNAP and non SNAP households have similar buying patterns.
This is what I thought... But let's restrict people already going through so much.
I dont think telling people they can't use food stamps on soda et al is going to cause anyone hardship. Hopefully they would spend the money they save on soda on something with a little more nutritional substance.
I asked upthread where does it end then?
Here it is stated:
NO:
Chips
Chocolate
Soda
Biscuits (cookies)
Cigarettes
There's probably a few more I've forgotten about. It's a simple and clear instruction.
So basically any small semblance of joy you could get whilst miserable? I mean, really, a bar of chocolate or a packet of biscuits and you're suddenly misusing welfare?33 -
Christine_72 wrote: »Chef_Barbell wrote: »Christine_72 wrote: »Chef_Barbell wrote: »lemurcat12 wrote: »Chef_Barbell wrote: »lemurcat12 wrote: »Here's an analysis of what is bought with SNAP: https://www.fns.usda.gov/sites/default/files/ops/SNAPFoodsTypicallyPurchased.pdf
How do gov't provided food subsidies (or more general welfare programs for the poor if it's encompassed within) work in Australia, Christine? (or others)
That link doesn't seem to work for me. What's the main idea?
It's a detailed report/analysis, so hard to summarize, but basically SNAP and non SNAP households have similar buying patterns.
This is what I thought... But let's restrict people already going through so much.
I dont think telling people they can't use food stamps on soda et al is going to cause anyone hardship. Hopefully they would spend the money they save on soda on something with a little more nutritional substance.
I asked upthread where does it end then?
Here it is stated:
NO:
Chips
Chocolate
Soda
Biscuits (cookies)
Cigarettes
There's probably a few more I've forgotten about. It's a simple and clear instruction.
Is this what you are talking about? https://www.dss.gov.au/families-and-children/programmes-services/welfare-conditionality/cashless-debit-card-overview
Or something else? I'm trying to understand how it works, and don't see those restrictions (just some others).0 -
lemurcat12 wrote: »Christine_72 wrote: »Chef_Barbell wrote: »Christine_72 wrote: »Chef_Barbell wrote: »lemurcat12 wrote: »Chef_Barbell wrote: »lemurcat12 wrote: »Here's an analysis of what is bought with SNAP: https://www.fns.usda.gov/sites/default/files/ops/SNAPFoodsTypicallyPurchased.pdf
How do gov't provided food subsidies (or more general welfare programs for the poor if it's encompassed within) work in Australia, Christine? (or others)
That link doesn't seem to work for me. What's the main idea?
It's a detailed report/analysis, so hard to summarize, but basically SNAP and non SNAP households have similar buying patterns.
This is what I thought... But let's restrict people already going through so much.
I dont think telling people they can't use food stamps on soda et al is going to cause anyone hardship. Hopefully they would spend the money they save on soda on something with a little more nutritional substance.
I asked upthread where does it end then?
Here it is stated:
NO:
Chips
Chocolate
Soda
Biscuits (cookies)
Cigarettes
There's probably a few more I've forgotten about. It's a simple and clear instruction.
Is this what you are talking about? https://www.dss.gov.au/families-and-children/programmes-services/welfare-conditionality/cashless-debit-card-overview
Or something else? I'm trying to understand how it works, and don't see those restrictions (just some others).
What Christine is talking about is the independent, charity based groups who will give people a leg up if they need, and provide a voucher/cheque for a local store and impose restrictions on what it can be used to buy. It's emergency assistance, not regular, so I can understand the restrictions, and its nature as emergency assistance makes it completely different to what's being discussed here. You can't go back week after week for it.
It's also nothing to do with the government assistance available. It's church groups, by and large.
I remember having to go to one once when I was 17 and broke and a friend asked me to babysit her 1 year old for the afternoon and didn't come back for 4 days. Didn't have any money for nappies or baby food.10 -
The main issue I have with eliminating whole categories of food is that it becomes a nightmare for the retailers. They just do not have the time to go in their computer systems and say "yes SNAP can be used on this, no, it can't be used in this". Right now, the distinction is that already prepared foods cannot be purchased with SNAP but foods that are prepared at home can. There are a few weird things like you can buy a Papa Murphy's take and bake pizza with SNAP, but you cannot buy a whole rotisserie chicken from a grocery store with it.
Who decides which snack foods are and are not healthy? Graham crackers are considered healthy, but potato chips are not? How do the merchants separate them?
One thing that has been proposed that I can see as a way around this for the retailers is "if it is subject to sales tax, it cannot be purchased with SNAP". In my state, candy, soda, and some snacks are taxable. Most food and ingredients are not. Still would not allow that chicken to get purchased, though.8 -
We have food banks here, same thing, largely run by church groups and charities. Again you can't go every week and you have to be referred by another agency like a social worker etc. Even they try to throw in a "treat" like a packet of biscuits or some chocolate.6
-
VintageFeline wrote: »We have food banks here, same thing, largely run by church groups and charities. Again you can't go every week and you have to be referred by another agency like a social worker etc. Even they try to throw in a "treat" like a packet of biscuits or some chocolate.
Same here.
A good majority on SNAP are elderly, disabled and children. Not these extreme cases that people seem to pull out their *kitten* whenever this debate comes up. They don't deserve treats or snacks?16 -
The main issue I have with eliminating whole categories of food is that it becomes a nightmare for the retailers. They just do not have the time to go in their computer systems and say "yes SNAP can be used on this, no, it can't be used in this". Right now, the distinction is that already prepared foods cannot be purchased with SNAP but foods that are prepared at home can. There are a few weird things like you can buy a Papa Murphy's take and bake pizza with SNAP, but you cannot buy a whole rotisserie chicken from a grocery store with it.
Who decides which snack foods are and are not healthy? Graham crackers are considered healthy, but potato chips are not? How do the merchants separate them?
One thing that has been proposed that I can see as a way around this for the retailers is "if it is subject to sales tax, it cannot be purchased with SNAP". In my state, candy, soda, and some snacks are taxable. Most food and ingredients are not. Still would not allow that chicken to get purchased, though.
I also immediately think of the poor, minimum wage workers on the tills who are going to cop bile and vitriol any time they try and tell someone that they can't have their soda with their stamps.13 -
Chef_Barbell wrote: »VintageFeline wrote: »We have food banks here, same thing, largely run by church groups and charities. Again you can't go every week and you have to be referred by another agency like a social worker etc. Even they try to throw in a "treat" like a packet of biscuits or some chocolate.
Same here.
A good majority on SNAP are elderly, disabled and children. Not these extreme cases that people seem to pull out their *kitten* whenever this debate comes up. They don't deserve treats or snacks?
They deserve and need their resources to be used for nutrient dense foods.19 -
This content has been removed.
-
Packerjohn wrote: »Chef_Barbell wrote: »VintageFeline wrote: »We have food banks here, same thing, largely run by church groups and charities. Again you can't go every week and you have to be referred by another agency like a social worker etc. Even they try to throw in a "treat" like a packet of biscuits or some chocolate.
Same here.
A good majority on SNAP are elderly, disabled and children. Not these extreme cases that people seem to pull out their *kitten* whenever this debate comes up. They don't deserve treats or snacks?
They deserve and need their resources to be used for nutrient dense foods.
Only?5 -
Chef_Barbell wrote: »Packerjohn wrote: »Chef_Barbell wrote: »VintageFeline wrote: »We have food banks here, same thing, largely run by church groups and charities. Again you can't go every week and you have to be referred by another agency like a social worker etc. Even they try to throw in a "treat" like a packet of biscuits or some chocolate.
Same here.
A good majority on SNAP are elderly, disabled and children. Not these extreme cases that people seem to pull out their *kitten* whenever this debate comes up. They don't deserve treats or snacks?
They deserve and need their resources to be used for nutrient dense foods.
Only?
Need to prioritize. The government should provide assistance to ensure good nutrition so yes.7 -
Packerjohn wrote: »Chef_Barbell wrote: »Packerjohn wrote: »Chef_Barbell wrote: »VintageFeline wrote: »We have food banks here, same thing, largely run by church groups and charities. Again you can't go every week and you have to be referred by another agency like a social worker etc. Even they try to throw in a "treat" like a packet of biscuits or some chocolate.
Same here.
A good majority on SNAP are elderly, disabled and children. Not these extreme cases that people seem to pull out their *kitten* whenever this debate comes up. They don't deserve treats or snacks?
They deserve and need their resources to be used for nutrient dense foods.
Only?
Need to prioritize. The government should provide assistance to ensure good nutrition so yes.
And if they already are providing good nutrition and have left over?5 -
Chef_Barbell wrote: »Packerjohn wrote: »Chef_Barbell wrote: »Packerjohn wrote: »Chef_Barbell wrote: »VintageFeline wrote: »We have food banks here, same thing, largely run by church groups and charities. Again you can't go every week and you have to be referred by another agency like a social worker etc. Even they try to throw in a "treat" like a packet of biscuits or some chocolate.
Same here.
A good majority on SNAP are elderly, disabled and children. Not these extreme cases that people seem to pull out their *kitten* whenever this debate comes up. They don't deserve treats or snacks?
They deserve and need their resources to be used for nutrient dense foods.
Only?
Need to prioritize. The government should provide assistance to ensure good nutrition so yes.
And if they already are providing good nutrition and have left over?
Then they are probably getting too much assistance.23 -
Packerjohn wrote: »Chef_Barbell wrote: »Packerjohn wrote: »Chef_Barbell wrote: »VintageFeline wrote: »We have food banks here, same thing, largely run by church groups and charities. Again you can't go every week and you have to be referred by another agency like a social worker etc. Even they try to throw in a "treat" like a packet of biscuits or some chocolate.
Same here.
A good majority on SNAP are elderly, disabled and children. Not these extreme cases that people seem to pull out their *kitten* whenever this debate comes up. They don't deserve treats or snacks?
They deserve and need their resources to be used for nutrient dense foods.
Only?
Need to prioritize. The government should provide assistance to ensure good nutrition so yes.
You can get a packet of biscuits (cookies) here for 20p, I'm sure there's similar all round the world. Are we really saying that every single aspect of their life should be controlled and bring even more misery for the sake of 20p?14 -
And it's also mind blowing to me that the poor are considered so "other" that all of them are consistently making terrible choices with their spending. That they haven't found ways to make everything they have stretch as far as is humanly possible.
There will always be exceptions but these are human beings, just like you and I they want to live a decent life. How can you begrudge someone a dollar or two spent on some candy?28 -
Packerjohn wrote: »Chef_Barbell wrote: »Packerjohn wrote: »Chef_Barbell wrote: »Packerjohn wrote: »Chef_Barbell wrote: »VintageFeline wrote: »We have food banks here, same thing, largely run by church groups and charities. Again you can't go every week and you have to be referred by another agency like a social worker etc. Even they try to throw in a "treat" like a packet of biscuits or some chocolate.
Same here.
A good majority on SNAP are elderly, disabled and children. Not these extreme cases that people seem to pull out their *kitten* whenever this debate comes up. They don't deserve treats or snacks?
They deserve and need their resources to be used for nutrient dense foods.
Only?
Need to prioritize. The government should provide assistance to ensure good nutrition so yes.
And if they already are providing good nutrition and have left over?
Then they are probably getting too much assistance.
Or they budget their assistance well.18
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.6K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions