Beyond Frustrated

13

Replies

  • Lesscookies1
    Lesscookies1 Posts: 250 Member
    Change your goal on MyFitnessPal to lear at maintenance, and eat the calories MyFitnessPal suggests ensure you're using a food scale to get accurate measurements. Start a progressive strength training program to tone up if you're not doing so already. Good luck!

    If you're completely obsessed with the idea of losing weight change your goal on MyFitnessPal to lose 0.5 pounds a week, but use more accurate tracking a food scale will help . You're not losing weight because you're eating more then you're currently burning and this you're eating at maintenance reason you haven't gained weight or lost it.
  • Lesscookies1
    Lesscookies1 Posts: 250 Member
    edited November 2017
    Op refuses to answer the question about if she's using a food scale or not to track her intake, so anything in the diary I'm taking with a grain of salt thus the reason she hasn't even lost 0.5 pounds even. I think my advice was pretty sound.
  • PAV8888
    PAV8888 Posts: 14,343 Member
    edited November 2017
    Op refuses to answer the question about if she's using a food scale or not to track her intake, so anything in the diary I'm taking with a grain of salt thus the reason she hasn't even lost 0.5 pounds even. I think my advice was pretty sound.

    Your advice above (eat at maintenance using a scale and increase muscle mass) is actually great for the OP!

    You won't hear me disagreeing with it (and in fact I have included the same advice in my "woo" post) :wink:
  • Ready2Rock206
    Ready2Rock206 Posts: 9,487 Member
    Op refuses to answer the question about if she's using a food scale or not to track her intake, so anything in the diary I'm taking with a grain of salt thus the reason she hasn't even lost 0.5 pounds even. I think my advice was pretty sound.

    She said she isn't using a food scale, but refuses to accept the fact her logging is inaccurate.
  • Lesscookies1
    Lesscookies1 Posts: 250 Member
    Op refuses to answer the question about if she's using a food scale or not to track her intake, so anything in the diary I'm taking with a grain of salt thus the reason she hasn't even lost 0.5 pounds even. I think my advice was pretty sound.

    She said she isn't using a food scale, but refuses to accept the fact her logging is inaccurate.

    Thanks didn't see this information explains everything.
  • ladyhusker39
    ladyhusker39 Posts: 1,406 Member
    Another idea that just occurred to me is to increase your calories to maintenance and eat at that level for 4-6 weeks (to smooth out any fluctuations from your TOM, etc). Track your CICO just like you are now. Weigh yourself at the beginning and again at the end, but not in the middle.

    If your weight doesn't change during that time then your logging is accurate and you can rule it out as the problem. Then you can run a calorie deficit from there to drop the weight.

    Let us know how it goes for you. We really are trying to help, but we only have what you tell us to go on. We don't have any ulterior motives except to lend help where we can.

    Good luck.
  • WhereIsPJSoles
    WhereIsPJSoles Posts: 622 Member
    Are you hungry all the time?
  • lucerorojo
    lucerorojo Posts: 790 Member
    The OP is small, but the food in the diary still doesn't seem to be substantial enough (or enough nutrients) for someone who is also exercising. She may be eating more than is in the diary due to inaccurate food logging but I think she should eat back some of her exercise calories. Not that she would lose weight by eating more, but she might still be in the maintenance range and it would be healthier. The sodium overall isn't that high, but I noticed a couple of days when it was and perhaps that causes some water retention that is masking some fat loss?

    I also noticed that some foods she logged just had the calories and didn't include any macros. For example, she logs the calories in the coffee but not the g in the sugar column. She may only be thinking about calories, but it also makes me wonder about some of those entries--without all the nutrients what is she reading to get the calorie counts? The box/can labels have them all and so do the "verified" entries on MFP.
  • tiptoethruthetulips
    tiptoethruthetulips Posts: 3,372 Member
    MFP has set your allowance at 1700? How tall are you and what is your age?
  • LeahV93
    LeahV93 Posts: 17 Member
    ginababin wrote: »
    Are you hungry all the time?
    Not at all... sometimes I eat only beacaue I have to stay as close to my target number not because I’m hungry.
  • LeahV93
    LeahV93 Posts: 17 Member
    edited November 2017
    Okay assuming you’re right about me logging in wrong, although that burger had nothing on it except burger and bun otherwise i would have logged it, and that my measurements are wrong, how many calories am I off? at the end of the day the deficit is still large that it if there are errors as such I should still be seeing some weight loss.
    And i do log everything i eat, so no nothing is left out.
    I also tend to air on the conservative side for those items that are not too specific. Say there are two options for the same item i pick the one with the highest calorie.
    For my exercise, my trainer says i burn between 500-600 a workout. I log 500.
    My coffee doesn’t rake two spoons of sugar it’s really between 1.5 and 2 i log 2.
    Those are just some examples to give you an idea or my habits.
  • LeahV93
    LeahV93 Posts: 17 Member
    MFP has set your allowance at 1700? How tall are you and what is your age?

    1200, early 40s and 5’2
  • cs2thecox
    cs2thecox Posts: 533 Member
    edited November 2017
    Just a few points from your diary that I've found to be wildly off in my own experience...

    Six Star Whey Protein + - Whey Protein +, 1 scoop 180
    Weigh that scoop! Is it a flat scoop, a heaped scoop, a scoop where the whey is packed tight etc. This could easily be close to 100 calories out from where you think it is.

    Lebanese - Pea Stew With Meat and Carrots , 14 ounce 282
    Did you create this recipe entry yourself, or is it a vague approximation based on someone else's database entry? Use those with care, since I've found they can be WAY off. It's better to build your own, or at least eyeball a portion and go, ok, that looks like 40g of peas, 50g of carrots, 50g of chicken, 10g tomato paste, 1 stock cube, and a tablespoon of oil, and add it all individually. It's a bit of a faff initially, but gets easier with time.

    Coffee
    Accurately measure what you have one time. Weigh the milk and log it. Weigh the sugar and log it. If it really does add up to 40 cals then fine, keep using a generic entry, but do at least check it out to make sure it's accurate for you. I use a generic entry for tea with milk, but since it's about 8 calories a cup, I'm ok with knowing it might be inaccurate.

    So yeah. Try switching to grammes, weigh EVERYTHING, and log honestly. I think almost all of us have given ourselves that horrible surprise of just WHAT we were eating before we started logging accurately.

    My logging isn't perfect (my diary is public - have at it), I eyeball low cal veg (after a long time of weighing), and I use a lot of packet entries without further weighing, BUT I'm achieving what I want so I acknowledge that my logging is a bit slack and know that I could tighten it up if I wanted or needed to.

    Also, remember that by inaccurate logging, the only person you're actually cheating is yourself... :/
  • WhereIsPJSoles
    WhereIsPJSoles Posts: 622 Member
    Have you only been tracking since October 16?
  • Psychgrrl
    Psychgrrl Posts: 3,177 Member

    LeahV93 wrote: »
    Yesterday I had 450 calories remaining from the 1200 goal that mfp set for me - although I try to stay at about 1000. The day before that I had 521 calories remaining of the 1200. The day before that I had 362 remaining. Of course on days I don't exercise the deficit is closer to 100-200 calories. Even if I am not 100% accurate with my measurements I am still creating a huge deficit not to see any weight loss.

    A 500 calorie burn per workout is not a conservative estimate it's a generous one, unless you're working out for a couple of hours. Many people under-estimate intake and over-estimate calorie burn--I sure did. What kind of workouts are you doing and for how long? What's your daily activity level like outside of exercise--how did you set it in MFP?

    There are some miscalculations in there for you. If you were creating the deficit you think, you'd be losing weight.
  • Psychgrrl
    Psychgrrl Posts: 3,177 Member
    LeahV93 wrote: »

    You think you cut calories. You didn't.

    Thank you for your reply but I actually know I did. I was eating a lot more and more food with higher calories until I stopped doing that and I started counting what I ate. [/quote]

    You're not as accurate as you need to be if you're using measuring cups and spoons for solid foods.
  • LeahV93
    LeahV93 Posts: 17 Member
    mitch16 wrote: »
    Because you're petite and at a healthy weight already, you're probably not burning 500 calories during an hour-long kickboxing session. I would suggest sticking at the conservative end of the calorie estimate for calories burned--closer to 400 in an hour.

    Looking at your diary, you have tracked dinners at 1 oz of cheese, or 0.13 cup of rice. 1 oz of cheese is the size of 2 dice. 0.13 of a cup of rice is 2 (measuring) tablespoons, or the size of a ping pong ball. Are you really eating that little?

    Yes that’s right about 2 dice size for the cheese and rice is definitely that little. I don’t eat much.
  • LeahV93
    LeahV93 Posts: 17 Member
    ginababin wrote: »
    Have you only been tracking since October 16?

    I pretty much eat the same food. In october i started putting it in mfp. But it’s pretty much the same before that.
  • WhereIsPJSoles
    WhereIsPJSoles Posts: 622 Member
    For your calorie burn during exercise maybe invest in a heart rate monitor instead of relying on your trainer. The bigger you are the more calories you burn doing the same activity, so your trainer could’ve pulled that number from an estimate of someone twice your size.
This discussion has been closed.