What counts as clean eating?
Replies
-
janejellyroll wrote: »When/if you get to know her better, you'll see that longer posts are more typical for her. She strikes me as a thoughtful person who likes to "think" things out in text form, stating things more completely in an attempt to come to a better understanding with the person she's conversing with. I wouldn't take the length of her post as a sign that she is "worked up."
Instead of thinking of this as a place where you are being accused of transgressions or that this is somehow contentious, what if you approached this as a chance for the two of you to learn more about what the other thinks? I honestly think that is what lemurcat12 is trying to do here, get a better idea of what you think and sharing her thoughts in return.
I am sure you are right. These things kind of work themselves out in the wash given time. You can't rely on first impressions on a message board which is why I am waiting for some other interaction on some other subject. I have been on various message boards for a very long time and in my experience people that tear apart your posts into sections and then type and type tend to take themselves too seriously. I find that makes it hard for me to take them seriously. That was my first impression but I am completely open to being wrong. Thanks for your input.5 -
janejellyroll wrote: »When/if you get to know her better, you'll see that longer posts are more typical for her. She strikes me as a thoughtful person who likes to "think" things out in text form, stating things more completely in an attempt to come to a better understanding with the person she's conversing with. I wouldn't take the length of her post as a sign that she is "worked up."
Instead of thinking of this as a place where you are being accused of transgressions or that this is somehow contentious, what if you approached this as a chance for the two of you to learn more about what the other thinks? I honestly think that is what lemurcat12 is trying to do here, get a better idea of what you think and sharing her thoughts in return.
I am sure you are right. These things kind of work themselves out in the wash given time. You can't rely on first impressions on a message board which is why I am waiting for some other interaction on some other subject. I have been on various message boards for a very long time and in my experience people that tear apart your posts into sections and then type and type tend to take themselves too seriously. I find that makes it hard for me to take them seriously. That was my first impression but I am completely open to being wrong. Thanks for your input.
I don't think I've said "welcome" yet, but welcome to the forums and I hope you stick around!1 -
janejellyroll wrote: »When/if you get to know her better, you'll see that longer posts are more typical for her. She strikes me as a thoughtful person who likes to "think" things out in text form, stating things more completely in an attempt to come to a better understanding with the person she's conversing with. I wouldn't take the length of her post as a sign that she is "worked up."
Instead of thinking of this as a place where you are being accused of transgressions or that this is somehow contentious, what if you approached this as a chance for the two of you to learn more about what the other thinks? I honestly think that is what lemurcat12 is trying to do here, get a better idea of what you think and sharing her thoughts in return.
I am sure you are right. These things kind of work themselves out in the wash given time. You can't rely on first impressions on a message board which is why I am waiting for some other interaction on some other subject. I have been on various message boards for a very long time and in my experience people that tear apart your posts into sections and then type and type tend to take themselves too seriously. I find that makes it hard for me to take them seriously. That was my first impression but I am completely open to being wrong. Thanks for your input.
Or she's smart and types fast.4 -
janejellyroll wrote: »
I don't think I've said "welcome" yet, but welcome to the forums and I hope you stick around!
Thanks for the welcome. I am still getting the lay of the land but I kind of like it here.2 -
Eating food without dirt on it1
-
Jayfeather15 wrote: »There are dozens of definitions of clean eating: no processed foods, no added sugar, paleo, keto, vegan...you name it. Your best bet is to drop the idea of defining clean eating and focus on primarily eating nutrient-dense foods.
Thanks for giving me a sensible answer. I don't why some people on here are so freaking snarky and sarcastic. Here you are using some app to help you lose weight and then got the nerve to be acting stupid to others when they're seeking help...
The sarcasm is because clean eating is honestly a stupid concept with literally no scientific basis.6 -
diannethegeek wrote: »Jayfeather15 wrote: »diannethegeek wrote: »Jayfeather15 wrote: »There are dozens of definitions of clean eating: no processed foods, no added sugar, paleo, keto, vegan...you name it. Your best bet is to drop the idea of defining clean eating and focus on primarily eating nutrient-dense foods.
Thanks for giving me a sensible answer. I don't why some people on here are so freaking snarky and sarcastic. Here you are using some app to help you lose weight and then got the nerve to be acting stupid to others when they're seeking help...
Wow.
I am sorry, but that's just how I feel. I don't mean anything bad but maybe a better word would be....exasperation, that I sense? Like that's how some people seem to come off here. Which is why I left and I am just now returning to this app. Maybe I'm just reading the room wrong, like is this the normal atmosphere here? I just want an answer to my question and there are others like me who just want to make sure they're doing everything right and may genuinely not know.
A lot of us gave you sensible answers and a few people repeated an old joke that reappears in every clean eating thread to try and make you laugh. That you saw one good answer and everyone else here, including myself, as acting "stupid" irks me.
Then be irked because he is correct.10 -
janejellyroll wrote: »lemurcat12 wrote: »
Why?
Improving the nutritional content of your diet is a start. Reducing calories, especially from low nutrient foods, is a start. Eating vegetables, if you don't much, is a start. Why is it meaningful or a step for someone to start worrying about processing rather than learning about nutrition (which is really not that complicated and most likely know what a healthy diet is without all this clean nonsense)? Why is it a step for someone to make a big thing about how their diet is "clean." That's a distraction from understanding how nutrition works, IMO, and usually just a way to claim that your diet is somehow better than others (even though processed foods aren't inherently bad, many are nutritionally dense and make things easier for some).
Not everyone is going to wake up one day and just get it. I certainly didn't. I made many of the classic mistakes. Sure they delayed my progress but I did finally figure it out. This isn't Star Trek and we can't mind meld good eating habits into people. My point was a step away from nothing towards something shows at least someone might be open to change even if that change starts kind of ridiculous. Again, not saying the "Clean Diet" is ridiculous I still know next to nothing about it.
Besides, there is no reason to be mad at what someone else is doing. It has nothing to do with you and your journey, wherever you might be in it. If the "Clean" people annoy you ignore them.
For many long-term posters, I think it is less being "annoyed" than feeling empathy and concern for the people who are spending time and energy adopting habits that aren't really relevant to weight loss/sustainable weight management. To speak just for myself, I'm not annoyed with clean eaters, I just wish I could have back all the time I spent in my 20s doing things like detoxing and clean eating and eliminating certain foods when all I needed was a calorie deficit. If others can save that wasted time and effort, I'd love to play a part in that.
I am annoyed by clean eaters because they have really taken over the whole internet discussion about dieting and nutrition, usually with little to no scientific basis to back any of their claims, and are endlessly preachy and unbearably superior acting towards those of us who just eat normal food without bothering with their bizarro food rules.
I like making them really mad though by pointing out that I have achieved massive weight loss while ignoring everything they say and just counting calories long term. lol7 -
seekingdaintiness wrote: »janejellyroll wrote: »lemurcat12 wrote: »
Why?
Improving the nutritional content of your diet is a start. Reducing calories, especially from low nutrient foods, is a start. Eating vegetables, if you don't much, is a start. Why is it meaningful or a step for someone to start worrying about processing rather than learning about nutrition (which is really not that complicated and most likely know what a healthy diet is without all this clean nonsense)? Why is it a step for someone to make a big thing about how their diet is "clean." That's a distraction from understanding how nutrition works, IMO, and usually just a way to claim that your diet is somehow better than others (even though processed foods aren't inherently bad, many are nutritionally dense and make things easier for some).
Not everyone is going to wake up one day and just get it. I certainly didn't. I made many of the classic mistakes. Sure they delayed my progress but I did finally figure it out. This isn't Star Trek and we can't mind meld good eating habits into people. My point was a step away from nothing towards something shows at least someone might be open to change even if that change starts kind of ridiculous. Again, not saying the "Clean Diet" is ridiculous I still know next to nothing about it.
Besides, there is no reason to be mad at what someone else is doing. It has nothing to do with you and your journey, wherever you might be in it. If the "Clean" people annoy you ignore them.
For many long-term posters, I think it is less being "annoyed" than feeling empathy and concern for the people who are spending time and energy adopting habits that aren't really relevant to weight loss/sustainable weight management. To speak just for myself, I'm not annoyed with clean eaters, I just wish I could have back all the time I spent in my 20s doing things like detoxing and clean eating and eliminating certain foods when all I needed was a calorie deficit. If others can save that wasted time and effort, I'd love to play a part in that.
I am annoyed by clean eaters because they have really taken over the whole internet discussion about dieting and nutrition, usually with little to no scientific basis to back any of their claims, and are endlessly preachy and unbearably superior acting towards those of us who just eat normal food without bothering with their bizarro food rules.
I like making them really mad though by pointing out that I have achieved massive weight loss while ignoring everything they say and just counting calories long term. lol
I like you.1 -
seekingdaintiness wrote: »janejellyroll wrote: »lemurcat12 wrote: »
Why?
Improving the nutritional content of your diet is a start. Reducing calories, especially from low nutrient foods, is a start. Eating vegetables, if you don't much, is a start. Why is it meaningful or a step for someone to start worrying about processing rather than learning about nutrition (which is really not that complicated and most likely know what a healthy diet is without all this clean nonsense)? Why is it a step for someone to make a big thing about how their diet is "clean." That's a distraction from understanding how nutrition works, IMO, and usually just a way to claim that your diet is somehow better than others (even though processed foods aren't inherently bad, many are nutritionally dense and make things easier for some).
Not everyone is going to wake up one day and just get it. I certainly didn't. I made many of the classic mistakes. Sure they delayed my progress but I did finally figure it out. This isn't Star Trek and we can't mind meld good eating habits into people. My point was a step away from nothing towards something shows at least someone might be open to change even if that change starts kind of ridiculous. Again, not saying the "Clean Diet" is ridiculous I still know next to nothing about it.
Besides, there is no reason to be mad at what someone else is doing. It has nothing to do with you and your journey, wherever you might be in it. If the "Clean" people annoy you ignore them.
For many long-term posters, I think it is less being "annoyed" than feeling empathy and concern for the people who are spending time and energy adopting habits that aren't really relevant to weight loss/sustainable weight management. To speak just for myself, I'm not annoyed with clean eaters, I just wish I could have back all the time I spent in my 20s doing things like detoxing and clean eating and eliminating certain foods when all I needed was a calorie deficit. If others can save that wasted time and effort, I'd love to play a part in that.
I am annoyed by clean eaters because they have really taken over the whole internet discussion about dieting and nutrition, usually with little to no scientific basis to back any of their claims, and are endlessly preachy and unbearably superior acting towards those of us who just eat normal food without bothering with their bizarro food rules.
I like making them really mad though by pointing out that I have achieved massive weight loss while ignoring everything they say and just counting calories long term. lol
I have no problem with someone being annoyed by "clean eaters," (be annoyed by whatever genuinely annoys you!) I was just saying I didn't think anyone had seemed that annoyed *at that point in the thread*.2 -
in my experience people that tear apart your posts into sections and then type and type tend to take themselves too seriously. I find that makes it hard for me to take them seriously. That was my first impression but I am completely open to being wrong. Thanks for your input.
I find this a bizarre reaction, and same with the "you are writing too much" thing.
I responded to one post and answered a specific question you asked and then went off about something else and was very clear (said it twice, I think) that that part was NOT directed at you at all, and that I was not assuming we disagreed even. Then, I responded to one sentence (quoted later) in a second post, and broke down the rest of your post to pinpoint the comment I was responding to and to also highlight that I was agreeing with lots of other parts. I do that since I think it makes communication clearer and I am interested in actually communicating often (at other times I'll make a brief and/or humorous comment, but here I was interested in discussion).
I wouldn't think wanting discussion is taking myself to seriously -- trying to be clear is, in my mind, about treating the comments I am responding to with respect. Snide responses that make it seem that the person did not even read the post being responded to are something I try to avoid since I consider them rude. They don't bother me, though, as I think getting bothered by something in a message board discussion (where you can expect all kinds of responses) would be taking it too seriously, although I think it's lovely when people do want to communicate and share ideas and you can increase understanding, as I do from reading and talking with many, many people here.
But people want different things from these kinds of forums, and that's cool.
There are lots of kinds of posts I don't get either. For example, if I didn't want to hear anything but boosterism about something I was doing (which is NOT what this thread was about, IMO), then I wouldn't ask a question about it. I'd just do it. If I ask a question here it's because I sincerely want to know what people think and to have a discussion. Maybe assuming that's what questions on message boards normally are for is naive?
Anyway, cheers!5 -
Me, I like clarity. How else to get to understanding?
I like MFP for the dedicated posters willing to work through to clarity.
Considering all the fluffernutter floating around on the Internet (i.e. clean eating) this forum is a breath of fresh air.6
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 426 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions