Weight Loss Tips From 1951

«1

Replies

  • Torxa
    Torxa Posts: 61 Member
    That isn't how I thought it would go. Imagine, we have had the formula for weight loss for this long!
  • RunsWithBees
    RunsWithBees Posts: 1,508 Member
    Torxa wrote: »
    That isn't how I thought it would go. Imagine, we have had the formula for weight loss for this long!

    Yup! They knew all about calorie deficits and using a food scale and everything!
  • nutmegoreo
    nutmegoreo Posts: 15,532 Member
    I like it!
  • jasondjulian
    jasondjulian Posts: 182 Member
    Narrator mispronounced "protein" as "pro-tee-in".

    Just think, these girls had it relatively easy... McDonald's and fast food and quick meals as we know it didn't exist for another few years yet.

    The themes are the same, weigh/measure your food, track it, and don't eat too much!

    Fuzzy black and white video... so hard to see what the actual food is, it's all grey!

    Overall, that is a good video that rings true on a lot of levels.

  • madwells1
    madwells1 Posts: 510 Member
    I would have loved it more if the girls were lifting weights or doing HIIT instead of touching their shoulders!!

    Wonder what they would have thought about our modern day workouts!!

    Also, that 'figure chart' was spectacular!!
  • workinonit1956
    workinonit1956 Posts: 1,043 Member
    pinuplove wrote: »
    I'd take the calories from all that milk and spend them elsewhere :lol: But the basic message is there.
    I thought the same thing!
  • pinuplove
    pinuplove Posts: 12,871 Member
    It must be that it’s so normal to see much larger people everywhere nowadays because the girls barely look overweight to me!

    I watched without sound (at work, you see). What were they using to judge overweight? Top of BMI? BF% (although judging by their exercise I doubt this)?
  • L1zardQueen
    L1zardQueen Posts: 8,753 Member
    pinuplove wrote: »
    It must be that it’s so normal to see much larger people everywhere nowadays because the girls barely look overweight to me!

    I watched without sound (at work, you see). What were they using to judge overweight? Top of BMI? BF% (although judging by their exercise I doubt this)?

    It was not mentioned on how they determined weight loss goals.
  • mph323
    mph323 Posts: 3,565 Member
    pinuplove wrote: »
    pinuplove wrote: »
    It must be that it’s so normal to see much larger people everywhere nowadays because the girls barely look overweight to me!

    I watched without sound (at work, you see). What were they using to judge overweight? Top of BMI? BF% (although judging by their exercise I doubt this)?

    It was not mentioned on how they determined weight loss goals.

    Hmm. 'You're fat because I said so.' OK!

    (Despite my love of their style, I'm SO glad it's not the 50's any more)

    I'm assuming there's a research paper associated with the study somewhere. It might be interesting to track it down and see how the experiment parameters were determined such as ideal body weight vs current weight for each participant and number of calories required (seems like a blanket 1400 was applied overall). The subtext of the mini-documentary was "milk can help you lose weight!" so a lot of the actual experiment structure wouldn't be applicable or deemed interesting to the general public.
  • RunsWithBees
    RunsWithBees Posts: 1,508 Member
    pinuplove wrote: »
    It must be that it’s so normal to see much larger people everywhere nowadays because the girls barely look overweight to me!

    I watched without sound (at work, you see). What were they using to judge overweight? Top of BMI? BF% (although judging by their exercise I doubt this)?

    They did not say. Perhaps they used waist circumference? A lot of the dresses back then focused on a cinched waist style.
  • AnnPT77
    AnnPT77 Posts: 34,222 Member
    If history of eating/weight loss interests you, you might also find this fun - it's excerpts from a 1960 home economics textbook:

    https://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/discussion/10625791/mainstream-eating-guidance-1960
  • CSARdiver
    CSARdiver Posts: 6,252 Member
    mph323 wrote: »
    CSARdiver wrote: »
    If you study enough history you find that we human evolution is constantly hindered by our ignorance of history. We just relearn what past generations already knew.

    Love that the individual is weighing her glass of milk on a food scale.

    Good way to sneak in that subliminal "milk is an integral part of a weight loss plan!" :)

    1950s sneaking was pretty obvious. This was marketing's "slap consumer in the face" tactic.
  • Running_and_Coffee
    Running_and_Coffee Posts: 811 Member
    This video just made me understand why my husband's grandmother thought I needed to lose weight--my butt is like the lady who apparently needs to lose 15 lbs.
  • RunsWithBees
    RunsWithBees Posts: 1,508 Member
    CSARdiver wrote: »
    If you study enough history you find that we human evolution is constantly hindered by our ignorance of history. We just relearn what past generations already knew.

    Love that the individual is weighing her glass of milk on a food scale.

    Yep! There’s nothing new under the sun! I wonder at what point in history people just figured they would rather try gimmicky fad diets than lose weight the right way. I guess “count calories & weigh your food” just doesn’t sound “sexy & novel” enough to be an attractive option. Too bad because it’s the ONLY thing that ACTUALLY works!
  • RunsWithBees
    RunsWithBees Posts: 1,508 Member
    This video just made me understand why my husband's grandmother thought I needed to lose weight--my butt is like the lady who apparently needs to lose 15 lbs.

    Explain to her that big behinds are in-style nowadays! ;)
  • CSARdiver
    CSARdiver Posts: 6,252 Member
    CSARdiver wrote: »
    If you study enough history you find that we human evolution is constantly hindered by our ignorance of history. We just relearn what past generations already knew.

    Love that the individual is weighing her glass of milk on a food scale.

    Yep! There’s nothing new under the sun! I wonder at what point in history people just figured they would rather try gimmicky fad diets than lose weight the right way. I guess “count calories & weigh your food” just doesn’t sound “sexy & novel” enough to be an attractive option. Too bad because it’s the ONLY thing that ACTUALLY works!

    I'm continually amazed to learn all of what previous civilizations already knew.

    Calorie counting isn't new. It simply was relaunched onto a new platform and popular as the advent of smartphones makes the process incredibly easy. One poster on here cited a calorie book from the 1950/60s which estimated calories for common food items.
  • nutmegoreo
    nutmegoreo Posts: 15,532 Member
    madwells1 wrote: »
    I would have loved it more if the girls were lifting weights or doing HIIT instead of touching their shoulders!!

    Wonder what they would have thought about our modern day workouts!!

    Also, that 'figure chart' was spectacular!!

    This suggests that weightlifting wasn't a thing for women at the time:

    https://breakingmuscle.com/fitness/women-in-weight-sports-part-1-how-it-all-started
    The first females started entering our contests in the 1970s.