Dexa scan!
Replies
-
Even the Dexa scans are not really accurate. https://weightology.net/the-pitfalls-of-body-fat-measurement-part-6-dexa/
Who cares, you look great!5 -
Good job. You look great and very lean - even if the scan was higher than you expected . I prefer the mirror anyhow and you definitely pass that test.
Is that weight listed as "total mass" your scale weight? What are your stats?1 -
jseams1234 wrote: »Good job. You look great and very lean - even if the scan was higher than you expected . I prefer the mirror anyhow and you definitely pass that test.
Is that weight listed as "total mass" your scale weight? What are your stats?
That was the weight from the scan itself. My scale at home read 146 that morning. I’m not sure which one is closer to real.
I’m 5’7”.0 -
mom23mangos wrote: »Daaang! You look amazing already. I can’t wait to see the results post-bulk. Great job on all your hard work!
Thanks so much!
You look great too. I can tell you work those legs! 👍🏼1 -
Massive well done. There's quite a difference even across the duration of this thread. Sub 10% is a great achievement. Looking good man.1
-
Stockholm_Andy wrote: »
It's even more freaky when you see the same pose from behind.
I really wouldn't want my butt to look like that
Also anyone else think it's a bit odd seeing him standing there in his posing pouch with the kid in the background on her ipad. Just another day in the office for a bodybuilder dad
Wth .. 😖1 -
slimgirljo15 wrote: »Stockholm_Andy wrote: »
It's even more freaky when you see the same pose from behind.
I really wouldn't want my butt to look like that
Also anyone else think it's a bit odd seeing him standing there in his posing pouch with the kid in the background on her ipad. Just another day in the office for a bodybuilder dad
Wth .. 😖
Jo, it's called a "walnut ***" & "Christmas Tree"2 -
Keto_Vampire wrote: »slimgirljo15 wrote: »Stockholm_Andy wrote: »
It's even more freaky when you see the same pose from behind.
I really wouldn't want my butt to look like that
Also anyone else think it's a bit odd seeing him standing there in his posing pouch with the kid in the background on her ipad. Just another day in the office for a bodybuilder dad
Wth .. 😖
Jo, it's called a "walnut ***" & "Christmas Tree"
Uh huh.. Well if I ever need walnuts cracked I guess one like that could come in handy 😂3 -
Re: Burto
Background IPad User —- pretty sure that’s an Adult Female and not a kid.
Riff1970 - Really great look and %
1 -
-
slimgirljo15 wrote: »Stockholm_Andy wrote: »
It's even more freaky when you see the same pose from behind.
I really wouldn't want my butt to look like that
Also anyone else think it's a bit odd seeing him standing there in his posing pouch with the kid in the background on her ipad. Just another day in the office for a bodybuilder dad
Wth .. 😖
Hahaha. A little too much for ya?1 -
Re: Burto
Background IPad User —- pretty sure that’s an Adult Female and not a kid.
Riff1970 - Really great look and %
Could well be I can't really tell. My point wasn't that it was a kid or an adult more that there was just someone randomly in the back ground going about their business while an extremely large guy in a posing pouch was getting his photos done.0 -
Wouldn’t personally class 160 lb
Extremely large tbh, amazing conditioning
Definitely2 -
slimgirljo15 wrote: »Stockholm_Andy wrote: »
It's even more freaky when you see the same pose from behind.
I really wouldn't want my butt to look like that
Also anyone else think it's a bit odd seeing him standing there in his posing pouch with the kid in the background on her ipad. Just another day in the office for a bodybuilder dad
Wth .. 😖
Hahaha. A little too much for ya?
Just a tad lol.. I can appreciate the hard work though1 -
I’ve been pigging out for 4 days at Cruisin’ the Coast car show in Biloxi, Mississippi. My home scale shows I gained 6 pounds. 😲
0 -
Yes, this is what I wanted to see but your reading only shows mass -- not volume. It should include both.
My last DEXA VAT reading was very similar to yours: Mass 0.00# (which doesn't mean it's zero; just not significantly measurable) and Volume 0.12 cubic inches, My A/G ratio was also similar to yours at 0.52.
However, DEXA measured my overall BF% at 13.8% which made absolutely NO sense to me considering the extremely low VAT measurements and because it was entirely inconsistent w/the hydro measurement of 7.7% BF taken the same day.
This is why I am suspicious of the DEXA readings that I have obtained and reply mainly on hydro.1 -
Update! 160 lbs. 13% BF according to the handheld. Gained about 15 lbs since October eating about 3000 calories a day.
Starting cut today at 1900 calories a day. My only goal is to beat my first Dexa scan. First scan came back 9.1% BF. I want to be less than 9% by the end of August.
4
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 424 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions