Why is it advised to lose .5lbs a week?

vanityy99
vanityy99 Posts: 2,583 Member
edited December 19 in Health and Weight Loss
I read a lot of you ‘should’ aim to lose .5lb a week if you’re already at a normal weight. What would be the issue if you aim to lose 1lbs a week? Is it considered unhealthy? And why.
«13

Replies

  • LittleL3gsLaura
    LittleL3gsLaura Posts: 27 Member
    Can I ask your stats height weight etc

    I’ve personally put myself on .5 as it’s more realistic for myself with my height and weight
  • vanityy99
    vanityy99 Posts: 2,583 Member
    edited February 2019
    MikePTY wrote: »
    The less fat your body has on it, the less comfortable it feels burning a lot of fat quickly. If you try to lose too much weight too quickly, your body will start to burn muscle instead because it doesn't want to reduce fat. That is why it is advised for only .5 pounds a week when you are close to your goal. It makes it more likely that your loss will be fat and not muscle.

    Gotcha.
    If you’re eating enough protein and lifting light weights, yet still managing to lose 1lb? Still not a great idea ?
  • sardelsa
    sardelsa Posts: 9,812 Member
    vanityy99 wrote: »
    MikePTY wrote: »
    The less fat your body has on it, the less comfortable it feels burning a lot of fat quickly. If you try to lose too much weight too quickly, your body will start to burn muscle instead because it doesn't want to reduce fat. That is why it is advised for only .5 pounds a week when you are close to your goal. It makes it more likely that your loss will be fat and not muscle.

    Gotcha.
    If you’re eating enough protein and doing lifting light weights, yet still managing to lose 1lb? Still not a great idea ?

    It is typically recommended to stay below 1% of your bodyweight loss per week, and I would typically not recommend that upper limit for most close to goal unless the person is very experienced and under optimal circumstances. So you are following proper lifting programming in the gym and getting more than enough protein, consistently.
  • Maxxitt
    Maxxitt Posts: 1,281 Member
    edited February 2019
    vanityy99 wrote: »
    MikePTY wrote: »
    The less fat your body has on it, the less comfortable it feels burning a lot of fat quickly. If you try to lose too much weight too quickly, your body will start to burn muscle instead because it doesn't want to reduce fat. That is why it is advised for only .5 pounds a week when you are close to your goal. It makes it more likely that your loss will be fat and not muscle.

    Gotcha.
    If you’re eating enough protein and lifting light weights, yet still managing to lose 1lb? Still not a great idea ?

    What do you mean by light weights? You need to move beyond leg lifts and curls with 3# weights to maintain muscle in a hard cut from a healthy weight starting point. If your TDEE is relatively high (say 2000 calories a day or more), cutting 500 calories while maintaining .8g of protein/pound of body weight (given starting point of weight within healthy limits) and at least 35 g of fat/day you might be able to maintain the resistance training that will maintain muscle mass. It will suck, though.

  • vanityy99
    vanityy99 Posts: 2,583 Member
    Maxxitt wrote: »
    vanityy99 wrote: »
    MikePTY wrote: »
    The less fat your body has on it, the less comfortable it feels burning a lot of fat quickly. If you try to lose too much weight too quickly, your body will start to burn muscle instead because it doesn't want to reduce fat. That is why it is advised for only .5 pounds a week when you are close to your goal. It makes it more likely that your loss will be fat and not muscle.

    Gotcha.
    If you’re eating enough protein and lifting light weights, yet still managing to lose 1lb? Still not a great idea ?

    What do you mean by light weights? You need to move beyond leg lifts and curls with 3# weights to maintain muscle in a hard cut from a healthy weight starting point. If your TDEE is relatively high (say 2000 calories a day or more), cutting 500 calories while maintaining .8g of protein/pound of body weight (given starting point of weight within healthy limits) and at least 35 g of fat/day you might be able to maintain the resistance training that will maintain muscle mass. It will suck, though.

    I mean 8lb weights and cardio on the elliptical with high resistance to maintain muscle on my legs, I mean like not having to go full weight training mode since all I’m trying to do is maintain what I have.
  • Opalescent_Topaz
    Opalescent_Topaz Posts: 132 Member
    Hanger: the struggle is real.
  • vanityy99
    vanityy99 Posts: 2,583 Member
    sardelsa wrote: »
    vanityy99 wrote: »
    Maxxitt wrote: »
    vanityy99 wrote: »
    MikePTY wrote: »
    The less fat your body has on it, the less comfortable it feels burning a lot of fat quickly. If you try to lose too much weight too quickly, your body will start to burn muscle instead because it doesn't want to reduce fat. That is why it is advised for only .5 pounds a week when you are close to your goal. It makes it more likely that your loss will be fat and not muscle.

    Gotcha.
    If you’re eating enough protein and lifting light weights, yet still managing to lose 1lb? Still not a great idea ?

    What do you mean by light weights? You need to move beyond leg lifts and curls with 3# weights to maintain muscle in a hard cut from a healthy weight starting point. If your TDEE is relatively high (say 2000 calories a day or more), cutting 500 calories while maintaining .8g of protein/pound of body weight (given starting point of weight within healthy limits) and at least 35 g of fat/day you might be able to maintain the resistance training that will maintain muscle mass. It will suck, though.

    I mean 8lb weights and cardio on the elliptical with high resistance to maintain muscle on my legs, I mean like not having to go full weight training mode since all I’m trying to do is maintain what I have.

    Maintaining what you have in a deficit requires lifting heavy for you, progressively over time. Otherwise you are way more likely to lose it, unfortunately.

    Thanks you’re always awesome.
    I joined the mini challenge 10lbs by Easter, had to make sure if it was a wise idea first.
  • jasonpoihegatama
    jasonpoihegatama Posts: 496 Member
    WHEN i was 102kg i would lose 1 kg per week to get too 98kg my muscle didn't get any smaller or bigger and i was still lifting 200kg in dumbbell press however i was taking BCAA's , Whey and eating a lot. If i would have went any lower than 98kg i would have loss muscle. However i would gain back the 1kg in a week or too!!, This time round when i start?? i will be looking at losing 1lbs per week when i get 20kg from my new goal weight then drop to losing .5lbs pw. One reason for me is to build density in the muscle.
  • psuLemon
    psuLemon Posts: 38,431 MFP Moderator
    Its mainly based on compliance and the ability to get adequate nutrients. It becomes a lot more difficult as you get leaner to create that deficit.

    But for me, i am cutting quickly. Slowly doesn't work for me.
  • vanityy99
    vanityy99 Posts: 2,583 Member
    psuLemon wrote: »
    Its mainly based on compliance and the ability to get adequate nutrients. It becomes a lot more difficult as you get leaner to create that deficit.

    But for me, i am cutting quickly. Slowly doesn't work for me.

    Cutting = losing weight?
  • jasonpoihegatama
    jasonpoihegatama Posts: 496 Member
    vanityy99 wrote: »
    brittlb07 wrote: »
    vanityy99 wrote: »
    kshama2001 wrote: »
    vanityy99 wrote: »
    MikePTY wrote: »
    The less fat your body has on it, the less comfortable it feels burning a lot of fat quickly. If you try to lose too much weight too quickly, your body will start to burn muscle instead because it doesn't want to reduce fat. That is why it is advised for only .5 pounds a week when you are close to your goal. It makes it more likely that your loss will be fat and not muscle.

    Gotcha.
    If you’re eating enough protein and lifting light weights, yet still managing to lose 1lb? Still not a great idea ?

    As someone who formerly wasted a lot of time lifting light weights, I suggest switching to lifting heavy (for you) immediately.

    This woman hit her goal weight and was not happy with how she looked (the picture in the middle) and changed her exercise routine to achieve the picture on the right. See how she is fitter looking despite weighing 18 pounds more? That is due to having more muscle to fat.

    fd4glfp6fk0r.jpg

    See, all that work and I don’t see much of a difference, that tan does wonders.

    Hahahaha I was thinking the same thing! Just a tan!
    SCoil123 wrote: »
    brittlb07 wrote: »
    vanityy99 wrote: »
    kshama2001 wrote: »
    vanityy99 wrote: »
    MikePTY wrote: »
    The less fat your body has on it, the less comfortable it feels burning a lot of fat quickly. If you try to lose too much weight too quickly, your body will start to burn muscle instead because it doesn't want to reduce fat. That is why it is advised for only .5 pounds a week when you are close to your goal. It makes it more likely that your loss will be fat and not muscle.

    Gotcha.
    If you’re eating enough protein and lifting light weights, yet still managing to lose 1lb? Still not a great idea ?

    As someone who formerly wasted a lot of time lifting light weights, I suggest switching to lifting heavy (for you) immediately.

    This woman hit her goal weight and was not happy with how she looked (the picture in the middle) and changed her exercise routine to achieve the picture on the right. See how she is fitter looking despite weighing 18 pounds more? That is due to having more muscle to fat.

    fd4glfp6fk0r.jpg

    See, all that work and I don’t see much of a difference, that tan does wonders.

    Hahahaha I was thinking the same thing! Just a tan!

    The definition is the legs and abs shows more with a tan true but if you look at the before there was no real muscle definition before the tan at all. I bet she feels 100xs better too

    I’m talking about the middle picture compared to the last picture with the tan.
    There’s not much of a difference if any at all IMO.

    She is 18lbs more and that bit more toned! Or am i just looking to hard?
This discussion has been closed.