Opinions on 2 a Days?
Replies
-
1
-
Spadesheart wrote: »Spadesheart wrote: »1 rep max calculation, which I think is what they're suggesting, putting it into my app I get 694 1RM for 38*155, vs my previous record of 11*255 which comes out to 555.1 1RM. So if this is the accurate way to calculate it
1RM calculators are less accurate the farther we fade away from our 1RM.
Anything over three reps really won't translate for the majority of lifters into their true1RM.
One thing calculators don't take into account is the skill involved of doing 1RM. If you don't practice them on the regular they obviously are underdeveloped.
I'm not saying calculator don't have their place, just not a accurate assessment of 1RM strength by using higher rep schemes.
Valid. Honestly I've never really attempted to try. I feel like I'd hurt myself.
Just not there yet.
I'm not saying try 1RM in fact I suggest you don't ever unless you are competing. It doesn't help your training long term.
I'm just saying because your 38 rep set calculates a certain 1RM, that has nothing to do with your true 1RM. Nothing.
This exactly. Unless you are competing, knowing your 1RM is mostly about ego.
Cool, cool cool cool. Good to know, I never wanted to do it anyways hahaha0 -
Spadesheart wrote: »Spadesheart wrote: »1 rep max calculation, which I think is what they're suggesting, putting it into my app I get 694 1RM for 38*155, vs my previous record of 11*255 which comes out to 555.1 1RM. So if this is the accurate way to calculate it
1RM calculators are less accurate the farther we fade away from our 1RM.
Anything over three reps really won't translate for the majority of lifters into their true1RM.
One thing calculators don't take into account is the skill involved of doing 1RM. If you don't practice them on the regular they obviously are underdeveloped.
I'm not saying calculator don't have their place, just not a accurate assessment of 1RM strength by using higher rep schemes.
Valid. Honestly I've never really attempted to try. I feel like I'd hurt myself.
Just not there yet.
I'm not saying try 1RM in fact I suggest you don't ever unless you are competing. It doesn't help your training long term.
I'm just saying because your 38 rep set calculates a certain 1RM, that has nothing to do with your true 1RM. Nothing.
This exactly. Unless you are competing, knowing your 1RM is mostly about ego.
In all fairness, there is some application to knowing 1RM. But that is largely if your program based off that number. But the majority of people i know don't do that.1 -
Spadesheart wrote: »Spadesheart wrote: »1 rep max calculation, which I think is what they're suggesting, putting it into my app I get 694 1RM for 38*155, vs my previous record of 11*255 which comes out to 555.1 1RM. So if this is the accurate way to calculate it
1RM calculators are less accurate the farther we fade away from our 1RM.
Anything over three reps really won't translate for the majority of lifters into their true1RM.
One thing calculators don't take into account is the skill involved of doing 1RM. If you don't practice them on the regular they obviously are underdeveloped.
I'm not saying calculator don't have their place, just not a accurate assessment of 1RM strength by using higher rep schemes.
Valid. Honestly I've never really attempted to try. I feel like I'd hurt myself.
Just not there yet.
I'm not saying try 1RM in fact I suggest you don't ever unless you are competing. It doesn't help your training long term.
I'm just saying because your 38 rep set calculates a certain 1RM, that has nothing to do with your true 1RM. Nothing.
This exactly. Unless you are competing, knowing your 1RM is mostly about ego.
In all fairness, there is some application to knowing 1RM. But that is largely if your program based off that number. But the majority of people i know don't do that.
In my experience of...pain and growth, it seemed to be a good indicator of volume gain, especially so far as incremental increases. I would routinely add like 10 pounds and hit a lower rep range to beat my previous record by just a couple pounds at least. It definitely worked for the less dangerous lifts and helped fast track strength progression and muscle growth.
Through my app, I have aimed to beat all my 1RMs every session over the last 3 months, and have been largely successful. It's just clear that that is absolutely not possible with compound exercise that can break your spine, as adding weight to that haphazardly will heavily tax weaker muscle groups and add pressure that your frame just can't handle, and low weight light reps to beat it will do the same.
I think progression has to be slowed down there to just let everything to get stronger at a more even pace or else it's just unsustainable.
Logically, i think It's also because technically with poor form, I was still able to complete squats, as I just have a lot of raw leg strength.
Starting the new plan and progression today. Here's hoping I'm ready for squats 5 days from now.0 -
Volume gain? How would a 1rm estimate that be a indicator of more volume?
There really is no dangerous lifts specifically. Dangerous loads yes. Everyone should practice proper load management in their training.
Curious how long you've been lifting?
2 -
Volume gain? How would a 1rm estimate that be a indicator of more volume?
There really is no dangerous lifts specifically. Dangerous loads yes. Everyone should practice proper load management in their training.
Curious how long you've been lifting?
I mean, due to it working. The strength progression was quite clear, and I was just able to get stronger week over week. For "most" exercises it seemed like a good measure of overall possible exertion if I was going to exhaustion, which I have been since I started. I could go down to lighter weights and usually do just about what my calculated 1 rep max was. Who knows, maybe it was psychological. The goal since the start was to just beat that on my prescribed exercises, usually just by a few pounds every week.
Not very long with the lifting. Since February really. January was all cardio. Weight loss started mid December. The strength gain has been quite surprisingly dramatic, it's never quite been like this any other time I've tried the gym thing. Kind of neat.
2 -
Spadesheart wrote: »Volume gain? How would a 1rm estimate that be a indicator of more volume?
There really is no dangerous lifts specifically. Dangerous loads yes. Everyone should practice proper load management in their training.
Curious how long you've been lifting?
I mean, due to it working. The strength progression was quite clear, and I was just able to get stronger week over week. For "most" exercises it seemed like a good measure of overall possible exertion if I was going to exhaustion, which I have been since I started. I could go down to lighter weights and usually do just about what my calculated 1 rep max was. Who knows, maybe it was psychological. The goal since the start was to just beat that on my prescribed exercises, usually just by a few pounds every week.
Not very long with the lifting. Since February really. January was all cardio. Weight loss started mid December. The strength gain has been quite surprisingly dramatic, it's never quite been like this any other time I've tried the gym thing. Kind of neat.
The typical ability to up the weight nearly every session for a beginner or someone who has started after a long hiatus is about 2-5 months.
About 90% of lifters have this ability to add weight every session for the time frame.2 -
Spadesheart wrote: »Volume gain? How would a 1rm estimate that be a indicator of more volume?
There really is no dangerous lifts specifically. Dangerous loads yes. Everyone should practice proper load management in their training.
Curious how long you've been lifting?
I mean, due to it working. The strength progression was quite clear, and I was just able to get stronger week over week. For "most" exercises it seemed like a good measure of overall possible exertion if I was going to exhaustion, which I have been since I started. I could go down to lighter weights and usually do just about what my calculated 1 rep max was. Who knows, maybe it was psychological. The goal since the start was to just beat that on my prescribed exercises, usually just by a few pounds every week.
Not very long with the lifting. Since February really. January was all cardio. Weight loss started mid December. The strength gain has been quite surprisingly dramatic, it's never quite been like this any other time I've tried the gym thing. Kind of neat.
The typical ability to up the weight nearly every session for a beginner or someone who has started after a long hiatus is about 2-5 months.
About 90% of lifters have this ability to add weight every session for the time frame.
Here's hoping I get to good reps of unassisted dips, and pull-ups before that tapers off. Gotta love that functional strength.0 -
Spadesheart wrote: »Spadesheart wrote: »1 rep max calculation, which I think is what they're suggesting, putting it into my app I get 694 1RM for 38*155, vs my previous record of 11*255 which comes out to 555.1 1RM. So if this is the accurate way to calculate it
1RM calculators are less accurate the farther we fade away from our 1RM.
Anything over three reps really won't translate for the majority of lifters into their true1RM.
One thing calculators don't take into account is the skill involved of doing 1RM. If you don't practice them on the regular they obviously are underdeveloped.
I'm not saying calculator don't have their place, just not a accurate assessment of 1RM strength by using higher rep schemes.
Valid. Honestly I've never really attempted to try. I feel like I'd hurt myself.
Just not there yet.
I'm not saying try 1RM in fact I suggest you don't ever unless you are competing. It doesn't help your training long term.
I'm just saying because your 38 rep set calculates a certain 1RM, that has nothing to do with your true 1RM. Nothing.
This exactly. Unless you are competing, knowing your 1RM is mostly about ego.
In all fairness, there is some application to knowing 1RM. But that is largely if your program based off that number. But the majority of people i know don't do that.
Yes, I understand and agree. That is why I said mostly.0 -
Spadesheart wrote: »1 rep max calculation, which I think is what they're suggesting, putting it into my app I get 694 1RM for 38*155, vs my previous record of 11*255 which comes out to 555.1 1RM. So if this is the accurate way to calculate it
1RM calculators are less accurate the farther we fade away from our 1RM.
Anything over three reps really won't translate for the majority of lifters into their true1RM.
One thing calculators don't take into account is the skill involved of doing 1RM. If you don't practice them on the regular they obviously are underdeveloped.
I'm not saying calculator don't have their place, just not a accurate assessment of 1RM strength by using higher rep schemes.
I think it was Brad Schoenfeld in an interview with Jeff Nippard that talked about a study where they took a group of guys (all who could squat at least 1.5x bodyweight), established their 1RM (by having them lift it) and then dropped the weight to 70% of 1RM and told them to squat to failure.
Some only lifted 70% 1RM for 9 or so reps. Others were able to get close to 30 reps.
Illustrates just how inaccurate the 1RM calculators online must be. Endurance with a lower weight doesn't necessarily translate to a higher 1RM.2
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 426 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions