Sugar and keto
Replies
-
Commander_Keen wrote: »mirandafinch wrote: »Thanks all for your replies! I’ve been following the blood sugar diet and it’s an 8 week plan at 800 cals a daymirandafinch wrote: »I’ve lost 11 pounds in 2 weeks so it’s working
If one loses weight/fat at a deficit -- which she is, why does it matter if she is eating 800 calories, or at 1500? A deficit is a deficit, so why does 400, or 700 calories make a difference?
Calories are the fuel your body uses to do the important stuff it does that literally keep you alive, and it can only burn so much body fat at any given time. So if you undereat, your body will try to burn muscle to make up the difference, and if it can't get enough energy from even burning some muscle, it will simply not do some of the things you need it to do to stay healthy. It's why anorexics will eventually die.
Losing weight quickly also puts a lot of stress on your body in general, and can mess with your hormone balance.
https://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/discussion/10569458/why-eating-too-little-calories-is-a-bad-idea/p1
Losing weight in a healthy manner is about finding the middle ground where you are giving your body enough calories to be healthy, but still staying in a deficit so it has to get a little extra energy by burning body fat.6 -
Commander_Keen wrote: »mirandafinch wrote: »Thanks all for your replies! I’ve been following the blood sugar diet and it’s an 8 week plan at 800 cals a daymirandafinch wrote: »I’ve lost 11 pounds in 2 weeks so it’s working
If one loses weight/fat at a deficit -- which she is, why does it matter if she is eating 800 calories, or at 1500? A deficit is a deficit, so why does 400, or 700 calories make a difference?
Calories are the fuel your body uses to do the important stuff it does that literally keep you alive, and it can only burn so much body fat at any given time. So if you undereat, your body will try to burn muscle to make up the difference, and if it can't get enough energy from even burning some muscle, it will simply not do some of the things you need it to do to stay healthy. It's why anorexics will eventually die.
https://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/discussion/10569458/why-eating-too-little-calories-is-a-bad-idea/p1
Losing weight in a healthy manner us about finding the middle ground where you are giving your body enough calories to be healthy, but still staying in a deficit so it has to get a little extra energy by burning body fat.
I am not entirely sure that is correct.
Calories is just food, but its the carbs that fuel your body, and if you don't eat the carbs, then the storage carbs/fat is used to fuel the body. Right. So I believe this because there are people who are 600 lbs, and lose weight at 12000 calories, they are able to lose a 1 lbs a day.
Why is there a difference between some one who is 400 lbs over weight vs some who is 50lbs over weight.
Now also, just because there are discussions -- The question is what is the medical background of everybody one the website... Just because on here doesn't make it true.18 -
Commander_Keen wrote: »Commander_Keen wrote: »mirandafinch wrote: »Thanks all for your replies! I’ve been following the blood sugar diet and it’s an 8 week plan at 800 cals a daymirandafinch wrote: »I’ve lost 11 pounds in 2 weeks so it’s working
If one loses weight/fat at a deficit -- which she is, why does it matter if she is eating 800 calories, or at 1500? A deficit is a deficit, so why does 400, or 700 calories make a difference?
Calories are the fuel your body uses to do the important stuff it does that literally keep you alive, and it can only burn so much body fat at any given time. So if you undereat, your body will try to burn muscle to make up the difference, and if it can't get enough energy from even burning some muscle, it will simply not do some of the things you need it to do to stay healthy. It's why anorexics will eventually die.
https://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/discussion/10569458/why-eating-too-little-calories-is-a-bad-idea/p1
Losing weight in a healthy manner us about finding the middle ground where you are giving your body enough calories to be healthy, but still staying in a deficit so it has to get a little extra energy by burning body fat.
I am not entirely sure that is correct.
Calories is just food, but its the carbs that fuel your body, and if you don't eat the carbs, then the storage carbs/fat is used to fuel the body. Right. So I believe this because there are people who are 600 lbs, and lose weight at 12000 calories, they are able to lose a 1 lbs a day.
Why is there a difference between some one who is 400 lbs over weight vs some who is 50lbs over weight.
Now also, just because there are discussions -- The question is what is the medical background of everybody one the website... Just because on here doesn't make it true.
You don't have to have a medical background to know how the body works.
People who are 600 lbs can lose weight at an otherwise dangerous rate because the danger of weighing 600 lbs is worse than the danger of losing weight quickly. They should be monitored by a doctor to make sure the fast weight loss isn't causing any serious issues.
I'm fine with the advice I'm giving some one being corrected if I'm wrong. If you have sources that suggest what I've posted is incorrect, I'd love to learn more.7 -
Commander_Keen wrote: »Commander_Keen wrote: »mirandafinch wrote: »Thanks all for your replies! I’ve been following the blood sugar diet and it’s an 8 week plan at 800 cals a daymirandafinch wrote: »I’ve lost 11 pounds in 2 weeks so it’s working
If one loses weight/fat at a deficit -- which she is, why does it matter if she is eating 800 calories, or at 1500? A deficit is a deficit, so why does 400, or 700 calories make a difference?
Calories are the fuel your body uses to do the important stuff it does that literally keep you alive, and it can only burn so much body fat at any given time. So if you undereat, your body will try to burn muscle to make up the difference, and if it can't get enough energy from even burning some muscle, it will simply not do some of the things you need it to do to stay healthy. It's why anorexics will eventually die.
https://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/discussion/10569458/why-eating-too-little-calories-is-a-bad-idea/p1
Losing weight in a healthy manner us about finding the middle ground where you are giving your body enough calories to be healthy, but still staying in a deficit so it has to get a little extra energy by burning body fat.
I am not entirely sure that is correct.
Calories is just food, but its the carbs that fuel your body, and if you don't eat the carbs, then the storage carbs/fat is used to fuel the body. Right. So I believe this because there are people who are 600 lbs, and lose weight at 12000 calories, they are able to lose a 1 lbs a day.
Why is there a difference between some one who is 400 lbs over weight vs some who is 50lbs over weight.
Now also, just because there are discussions -- The question is what is the medical background of everybody one the website... Just because on here doesn't make it true.
You don't have to have a medical background to know how the body works.
People who are 600 lbs can lose weight at an otherwise dangerous rate because the danger of weighing 600 lbs is worse than the danger of losing weight quickly. They should be monitored by a doctor to make sure the fast weight loss isn't causing any serious issues.
I'm fine with the advice I'm giving some one being corrected if I'm wrong. If you have sources that suggest what I've posted is incorrect, I'd love to learn more.
This.
Morbidly obese people who are in a life and death situation will sometimes be given the ok to lose weight rapidly-under the close supervision of a doctor. For someone like the OP, who isn't even that overweight, eating a VLCD is doing way more harm than any good.
2 -
Commander_Keen wrote: »mirandafinch wrote: »Thanks all for your replies! I’ve been following the blood sugar diet and it’s an 8 week plan at 800 cals a daymirandafinch wrote: »I’ve lost 11 pounds in 2 weeks so it’s working
If one loses weight/fat at a deficit -- which she is, why does it matter if she is eating 800 calories, or at 1500? A deficit is a deficit, so why does 400, or 700 calories make a difference?
It matters when you consider the rate of weight loss...2 -
Commander_Keen wrote: »Commander_Keen wrote: »mirandafinch wrote: »Thanks all for your replies! I’ve been following the blood sugar diet and it’s an 8 week plan at 800 cals a daymirandafinch wrote: »I’ve lost 11 pounds in 2 weeks so it’s working
If one loses weight/fat at a deficit -- which she is, why does it matter if she is eating 800 calories, or at 1500? A deficit is a deficit, so why does 400, or 700 calories make a difference?
Calories are the fuel your body uses to do the important stuff it does that literally keep you alive, and it can only burn so much body fat at any given time. So if you undereat, your body will try to burn muscle to make up the difference, and if it can't get enough energy from even burning some muscle, it will simply not do some of the things you need it to do to stay healthy. It's why anorexics will eventually die.
https://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/discussion/10569458/why-eating-too-little-calories-is-a-bad-idea/p1
Losing weight in a healthy manner us about finding the middle ground where you are giving your body enough calories to be healthy, but still staying in a deficit so it has to get a little extra energy by burning body fat.
I am not entirely sure that is correct.
Calories is just food, but its the carbs that fuel your body, and if you don't eat the carbs, then the storage carbs/fat is used to fuel the body. Right. So I believe this because there are people who are 600 lbs, and lose weight at 12000 calories, they are able to lose a 1 lbs a day.
Why is there a difference between some one who is 400 lbs over weight vs some who is 50lbs over weight.
Now also, just because there are discussions -- The question is what is the medical background of everybody one the website... Just because on here doesn't make it true.
It's the calories that fuel your body, regardless of which macros they come from. Carbs aren't that special. Excess fat or protein will be stored, too, in a calorie surplus, and mostly stored as fat.
If you materially overeat calories, even with minimal carb intake, you'll gain weight. If this were not true, people doing keto would all eventually starve to death.
On the flip side, in a calorie deficit, your body will burn mostly fat to make up the shortfall, no matter the macro composition of your intake.
The difference between someone losing a pound a day at 400 pounds overweight, and someone doing it at 50 over, is that the former has more fat available to mobilize. (Rate is believed to be limited by the size of the stockpile.)
I don't need a medical degree to know this. It's basic physiology.
And I'm guessing I have at least as many medical degrees as you do. Just a guess, though.13 -
Hey all, just thought I’d update you. I’ve doubled my calorie intake and upped the exercise, still following a keto diet but feels much healthier and sustainable. Really appreciate all your input and advice xx10
-
mirandafinch wrote: »Hi, yeah I do exercise, spin twice a week and a couple of resistance workouts. I’ve tried sugar substitutes before but can’t stand the taste. I can spot fake sugar a mile off 😃
Hiya OP - I also struggle with AS however I am getting on with the Tate and Lyle half brown sugar half stevia - might be worth a go !
Also, I did the 800cal blood diet this year for 12 weeks (high starting weight) monitoring my BP and BG as I went as I was just about hitting T2 critieria.
I tweaked it and did 800 cals NET (so I ate my exercise calories, Med style diet) - I found it easier to split this over 2 meals and found for the first time ever I think that I dont need to eat all the time after all. It has definitely reset my thinking about how often I have to eat and what I can manage perfectly well on portion-wise. MFP has taught me the importance of using a scale !
I also think when the overall calorie intake is very low, you dont have to remove sugar or reduce it to the point where it makes it all a bit hard and difficult - I say be damned and have the coffee ! I couldnt cut my tea back at all and still lost a truck load of weight.
My health markers are now normal (not even pre diabetic !) apart from still being fat so I've upped my calories and am keeping to the same woe to lose weight at a slower rate.
VLCD's do seem to be unpopular on MFP however the NHS are trialling this as a first line of treatment for T2 - reference info for the woo-ers is here: https://www.ncl.ac.uk/magres/research/diabetes/reversal/#overview
OP I dont know if you have any issues with blood sugar or it was just that this diet appealled - but if you want to add me as a friend to compare notes, please feel free !
Good luck !0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.6K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions