Welcome to Debate Club! Please be aware that this is a space for respectful debate, and that your ideas will be challenged here. Please remember to critique the argument, not the author.

Want to lose weight faster, not count portions and eat until you feel full?

Options
2

Replies

  • zeejane4
    zeejane4 Posts: 230 Member
    edited May 2019
    Options
    Phirrgus wrote: »
    zeejane4 wrote: »
    Phirrgus wrote: »
    Dilvish wrote: »
    The science/studies prove it. If you read this article in it's entirety you will see that a Keto/low carb high fat diet is the clear winner... perhaps this article alone can help you win the battle against unwanted pounds...

    https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/23-studies-on-low-carb-and-low-fat-diets
    I gave you a woo for multiple reasons. Yes, I did read the entire article.

    1. Multiple assertions that the high carb groups were calorie restricted, but no mentions of how many calories the high fat group was eating. It might well have been fewer calories.
    2. No mention of the several lbs of water weight lots of folks initially lose when beginning keto.
    3. High carb is not synonymous with low fat. I eat plenty of both carbs and fats.


    The exclusion of those bits calls the credibility into question for me.

    Caloric intake does matter.

    Yeah I went lower carb last month (above keto levels), and I lost 7lbs in a couple weeks. I'm already a lower weight though and it's just not physically possible that I lost a significant amount of fat in that time. Most of it had to be water whoosh. If I started eating a higher carb woe again most of it, if not all of it, would come right back.

    Absolutely. I tried low carb a few years ago and had what I now know to be a massive water loss that first couple of weeks. I had no idea about actual fat loss back then, and my guess is that's exactly what 'studies' like this one bank on.

    That said, I loved the menu lol, it just wasn't sustainable for me due to my greater love for carbs. :)

    My carb target is around 100g and I've found that gives me quite a bit of wiggle room. I still eat things like fruit, grains, ice cream and dairy, we eat out a couple times a week etc. I think a very low carb/keto woe would be challenging, over the long term, but once you start getting in the 75g+ range it gives room for a lot of different foods.

    I've only been experimenting with lower carb for about a month, so way to early to tell if I'll stick with it long term, but I've found it surprisingly easy and I'm enjoying it so far :)
  • Phirrgus
    Phirrgus Posts: 1,894 Member
    Options
    zeejane4 wrote: »
    Phirrgus wrote: »
    zeejane4 wrote: »
    Phirrgus wrote: »
    Dilvish wrote: »
    The science/studies prove it. If you read this article in it's entirety you will see that a Keto/low carb high fat diet is the clear winner... perhaps this article alone can help you win the battle against unwanted pounds...

    https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/23-studies-on-low-carb-and-low-fat-diets
    I gave you a woo for multiple reasons. Yes, I did read the entire article.

    1. Multiple assertions that the high carb groups were calorie restricted, but no mentions of how many calories the high fat group was eating. It might well have been fewer calories.
    2. No mention of the several lbs of water weight lots of folks initially lose when beginning keto.
    3. High carb is not synonymous with low fat. I eat plenty of both carbs and fats.


    The exclusion of those bits calls the credibility into question for me.

    Caloric intake does matter.

    Yeah I went lower carb last month (above keto levels), and I lost 7lbs in a couple weeks. I'm already a lower weight though and it's just not physically possible that I lost a significant amount of fat in that time. Most of it had to be water whoosh. If I started eating a higher carb woe again most of it, if not all of it, would come right back.

    Absolutely. I tried low carb a few years ago and had what I now know to be a massive water loss that first couple of weeks. I had no idea about actual fat loss back then, and my guess is that's exactly what 'studies' like this one bank on.

    That said, I loved the menu lol, it just wasn't sustainable for me due to my greater love for carbs. :)

    My carb target is around 100g and I've found that gives me quite a bit of wiggle room. I still eat things like fruit, grains, ice cream and dairy, we eat out a couple times a week etc. I think a very low carb/keto woe would be challenging, over the long term, but once you start getting in the 75g+ range it gives room for a lot of different foods.

    I've only been experimenting with lower carb for about a month, so way to early to tell if I'll stick with it long term, but I've found it surprisingly easy and I'm enjoying it so far :)

    Ah, that's a correction for me lol. I should have said "lower carb". Mine were in the same general ballpark as yours, and yes, it did make a world of difference. :) I don't think I would last long on pure keto.
  • Commander_Keen
    Commander_Keen Posts: 1,181 Member
    Options
    So far for me, Keto seems to be working for me. -- I have tried multiple idea, multiple ways, but the difference for me now verses in the past is the Sugar intake. Now that I have removed 95% of the sugar from my diet, I seem to be losing weight quicker then I have before.

    On a different note,
    I think the reason why people gain the weight back after they hit their goal, is because they didn't learn how to eat. If my TDEE is at 2200 kal and I diet at 1500 kal Aren't I supposed to keep adding 100 calories per week, until I get readjusted to eating normal portion?
This discussion has been closed.