Protein amounts

Options
KateCassie
KateCassie Posts: 6 Member
edited December 2024 in Health and Weight Loss
I feeling very confused! How on earth do people eat a balanced diet without exceeding their protein daily amounts? Everything now-a-days seems to be protein enriched, but I eat quite low calories and only have eggs/chicken as protein sources and my protein count is way higher than what is recommended (.8/kg).... But people still drink protein shakes etc? Does protein increase with activity level, because everything I’m reading suggests that the average adult should only be consuming around 50-70g of protein daily.

Do you include protein from everything you consume? Or just from meat etc?
«1

Replies

  • lynn_glenmont
    lynn_glenmont Posts: 10,190 Member
    .8 g/kg is a minimum, and there are many circumstances (including being in a calorie deficit) that can make it desirable to go higher. There's certainly no harm, barring some specific medical condition such as existing kidney problems, in going higher.
  • Strudders67
    Strudders67 Posts: 991 Member
    I've also been looking at the subject of protein and macros. Yesterday, I found a useful MedicalNewsToday report, which I read a bit more of today. Further down the article it says that eating more than 2g per kg, for a long time, can cause health problems (and lists a set of potential issues), but it does say that up to 2g doesn't cause any side effects.

    1g-2g, per kg of body weight seems sensible.
  • lukejoycePT
    lukejoycePT Posts: 182 Member
    Don't panic about protein. There is a lot of nonsense out there about how much we should consume etc.

    If you exercise then it's a good idea to eat around 0.5-1 gram of protein per lbs of body weight a day.

    For example i currently weigh around 149 lbs, my daily protein goal is set to 150 grams but i normally go over by about 20 grams.

    If you don't exercise then 70g daily is enough, but try to stay above this as protein is important.
    If you go over it's totally fine, will do you no harm.




    KateCassie wrote: »
    I feeling very confused! How on earth do people eat a balanced diet without exceeding their protein daily amounts? Everything now-a-days seems to be protein enriched, but I eat quite low calories and only have eggs/chicken as protein sources and my protein count is way higher than what is recommended (.8/kg).... But people still drink protein shakes etc? Does protein increase with activity level, because everything I’m reading suggests that the average adult should only be consuming around 50-70g of protein daily.

    Do you include protein from everything you consume? Or just from meat etc?

  • sardelsa
    sardelsa Posts: 9,795 Member
    As others mentioned it sounds like the recommended minimum for someone who isn't very active. Unless you have a medical condition and it is not causing you to neglect other areas of nutrition, going higher in protein is typically fine. I haven't read any concrete studies that would deter me from eating high protein. I usually aim for 135-160g a day.
  • sgt1372
    sgt1372 Posts: 3,997 Member
    edited July 2019
    Eating "excess" protein is not "harmful" unless you are eating extreme amounts and have a potential kidney sensitity.

    A ,high protein diet at 0.8-1.2g/# BW will provide the nutients/ amino acids necessary to promote mUscular development, especially if consumed while engaged in heavy lifting activity .

    Otherwise, it's nothing to really worry about provided you are eating an orherwise "balanced" diet.
  • LyndaBSS
    LyndaBSS Posts: 6,964 Member
    edited July 2019
    I don't want to argue. I never said that consuming only plants would meet your protein goals. I don't eat tofu and hate soy.

    I eat a plant based diet with seafood, eggs and cheese. I asked what foods were protein enriched because I'm interested in learning.
  • chamberstracy614
    chamberstracy614 Posts: 5 Member
    My doctor put me on a special diet. I am to eat 80 grams or more of protein and 80 grams or less of carbs. Plus drink 12-14 cups of water a day
  • lemurcat2
    lemurcat2 Posts: 7,887 Member
    Theoldguy1 wrote: »
    The USDA guidelines say 10-35% of daily cañories from protein.

    I've never found percentage-based macro allocations to be rational. If I reduce my calories so that I'm in an energy deficit because I need to lose weight, my body's need for protein intake (actual intake, in grams) does not decrease. If anything, I should increase my protein if I want to have the best shot at preserving muscle. But using a percentage-based approach for my protein goal would automatically cut my protein intake (x% of y - z, where y is original calories and z is amount I'm reducing my calorie intake, is always less than x% of y).

    Exactly this.
  • ExistingFish
    ExistingFish Posts: 1,259 Member
    Theoldguy1 wrote: »
    The USDA guidelines say 10-35% of daily cañories from protein.

    I've never found percentage-based macro allocations to be rational. If I reduce my calories so that I'm in an energy deficit because I need to lose weight, my body's need for protein intake (actual intake, in grams) does not decrease. If anything, I should increase my protein if I want to have the best shot at preserving muscle. But using a percentage-based approach for my protein goal would automatically cut my protein intake (x% of y - z, where y is original calories and z is amount I'm reducing my calorie intake, is always less than x% of y).

    You just adjust your percentage when you adjust your calorie goal. 10-35% is a big range.

    Depending on my calorie range, protein has always been between 20 and 30% of my calories, both fully within that range. Almost always 25%, which is ~1g per lb of body weight.
  • ExistingFish
    ExistingFish Posts: 1,259 Member
    If you adjust the percentages to achieve certain raw numbers of grams, what's the point in relying on the percentages? Just get straight to the point and look at the grams.

    In the context of MFP, because I don't pay for premium?

    Percentages help me keep everything in the context of the other macros and my calories as a whole. Yes, I have a straight protein goal based on my body weight, but I also look at it in a percentage so I can make sure it is both reasonable for my calorie goals and reasonably proportional to my other macros. If I was trying to eat 1200 calories, and I had a protein goal what I do now around 115g, it would be around 38%, which is both outside the range set by the USDA (barely, though) and outside of what I'd consider "normal" as it skews the overall macros.
  • Kalex1975
    Kalex1975 Posts: 427 Member
    Examine.com has a very detailed article about protein here: How much protein do you need per day?

    They also have a calculator which is helpful!
  • Carlos_421
    Carlos_421 Posts: 5,133 Member
    KateCassie wrote: »
    I feeling very confused! How on earth do people eat a balanced diet without exceeding their protein daily amounts? Everything now-a-days seems to be protein enriched, but I eat quite low calories and only have eggs/chicken as protein sources and my protein count is way higher than what is recommended (.8/kg).... But people still drink protein shakes etc? Does protein increase with activity level, because everything I’m reading suggests that the average adult should only be consuming around 50-70g of protein daily.

    Do you include protein from everything you consume? Or just from meat etc?

    That protein amount is the bare minimum, not a maximum limit.
    The best idea is to shoot for more than this.
  • lemurcat2
    lemurcat2 Posts: 7,887 Member
    Theoldguy1 wrote: »
    If you adjust the percentages to achieve certain raw numbers of grams, what's the point in relying on the percentages? Just get straight to the point and look at the grams.

    The OP was questioning the appropriate amount of protein to consume for health reasons. The percent range provides that amount for the vast majority of individuals.

    And a range based on grams would provide that for pretty much everyone. I see no reason to prefer percentages when you can look at grams.
  • lemurcat2
    lemurcat2 Posts: 7,887 Member
    If you adjust the percentages to achieve certain raw numbers of grams, what's the point in relying on the percentages? Just get straight to the point and look at the grams.

    In the context of MFP, because I don't pay for premium?

    Percentages help me keep everything in the context of the other macros and my calories as a whole. Yes, I have a straight protein goal based on my body weight, but I also look at it in a percentage so I can make sure it is both reasonable for my calorie goals and reasonably proportional to my other macros. If I was trying to eat 1200 calories, and I had a protein goal what I do now around 115g, it would be around 38%, which is both outside the range set by the USDA (barely, though) and outside of what I'd consider "normal" as it skews the overall macros.

    If it works for you, no reason not to do it, but I always looked at just grams in the context of regular MFP. My preferred protein goal was 90+ (it's a bit lower now since I'm not at a deficit). I knew there was no harm to my health if I went over, but using grams also meant that if I had a big exercise day and added it in (when I was eating back cals), I did not have to hit 120 or whatever.

    10-35% is so broad it does fit basically everyone, but you have to know more to know what works for you. Kenyan marathoners who eat lots and lots of cals because of their training typically eat around 10% protein. Someone on 1200 cals of course should not (and personally I'd consider 20% of that too low given the person is at a deficit and depending on their size), so the percentage range just seems pretty useless to me.
  • ExistingFish
    ExistingFish Posts: 1,259 Member
    lemurcat2 wrote: »
    If you adjust the percentages to achieve certain raw numbers of grams, what's the point in relying on the percentages? Just get straight to the point and look at the grams.

    In the context of MFP, because I don't pay for premium?

    Percentages help me keep everything in the context of the other macros and my calories as a whole. Yes, I have a straight protein goal based on my body weight, but I also look at it in a percentage so I can make sure it is both reasonable for my calorie goals and reasonably proportional to my other macros. If I was trying to eat 1200 calories, and I had a protein goal what I do now around 115g, it would be around 38%, which is both outside the range set by the USDA (barely, though) and outside of what I'd consider "normal" as it skews the overall macros.

    If it works for you, no reason not to do it, but I always looked at just grams in the context of regular MFP. My preferred protein goal was 90+ (it's a bit lower now since I'm not at a deficit). I knew there was no harm to my health if I went over, but using grams also meant that if I had a big exercise day and added it in (when I was eating back cals), I did not have to hit 120 or whatever.

    10-35% is so broad it does fit basically everyone, but you have to know more to know what works for you. Kenyan marathoners who eat lots and lots of cals because of their training typically eat around 10% protein. Someone on 1200 cals of course should not (and personally I'd consider 20% of that too low given the person is at a deficit and depending on their size), so the percentage range just seems pretty useless to me.

    Well if percentages don't work for you, then don't use them. Use grams. I think percentages are more applicable to the population at large, but that is just my opinion.
This discussion has been closed.