Hunting

Options
1235»

Replies

  • midlomel1971
    midlomel1971 Posts: 1,283 Member
    edited March 2020
    Options
    This past Sunday morning at the local Walmart, got up early to hunt paper towels. Spotted a 6 pack of "make your own size' and took her right down. Tied her to the back seat and took her home. Skinned off the plastic wrap and now I have 6 fat rolls of paper towel in my pantry.
  • manderson27
    manderson27 Posts: 3,510 Member
    Options
    I have some very ambivilant feelings regarding hunting. I live in the UK and of an age to have been brought up with Fox hunting and Deer hunting being not only the norm but tradition. Seeing the horses and hounds out on boxing day was something that used to stir my British blood. I also used to work at a hunters stable as a young girl tending and riding the horses which I loved even though I never rode to the hunt.

    Of course all that kind of tradition is being subsumed and changed now with the rise of anti hunt demonstrations and the law being brought in that hunts have to have apply for permits or they can only do drag hunting etc. I do understand the sentiments of the anti hunt lobby I care about animals as well but on the other hand I am a country girl and brought up with the understanding that animal populations can get out of control and farmers have livestock and crops to protect.

    A friend of mine lives on Exmoor and that has a very high deer population. He was explaining to my husband how if they did not control the population by eliminating the old, sick, weak animals it reduces the over all health of the herd. Once a stag has reached a certain age he has fathered so many offspring to that particular herd that if a new stag is not able to take over the gene pool becomes very small so sometimes they have to take out the old stag to give a younger one from a different herd the chance to come in and enlarge and strengthen the gene pool. This is not how most people see stag/deer hunting they just see a magnificent animal being killed for fun but that is not the case.

    My ambivilance comes because I (like so many others) despised big game hunters who kill exotics for trophies.

    Then I saw a programme with Stacey Dooley who went to a game farm in Africa and I realised that I was having a knee jerk reaction and had no idea of what actually went on there. Although I still personally don't see the point in killing a lion, I can also now see that those game reserves actually preserve and add to the animal population in that area, they control it, keep it healthy and also use the meat in the hotel and donate meat to schools and various institutions in the area that are not be able to afford to buy meat. Not to mention bringing in money to the area and employing local people in the hotel complex/spa and out on the reserve.

    Hunting is a very polarising subject and I guess it always will be. But sometimes there is more to the picture than initially meets the eye.
  • manderson27
    manderson27 Posts: 3,510 Member
    Options
    I hunted this thread down and took it out like a boss.

    2uk6aps5dc8v.png
  • Djproulx
    Djproulx Posts: 3,084 Member
    Options
    I have some very ambivilant feelings regarding hunting. I live in the UK and of an age to have been brought up with Fox hunting and Deer hunting being not only the norm but tradition. Seeing the horses and hounds out on boxing day was something that used to stir my British blood. I also used to work at a hunters stable as a young girl tending and riding the horses which I loved even though I never rode to the hunt.

    Of course all that kind of tradition is being subsumed and changed now with the rise of anti hunt demonstrations and the law being brought in that hunts have to have apply for permits or they can only do drag hunting etc. I do understand the sentiments of the anti hunt lobby I care about animals as well but on the other hand I am a country girl and brought up with the understanding that animal populations can get out of control and farmers have livestock and crops to protect.

    A friend of mine lives on Exmoor and that has a very high deer population. He was explaining to my husband how if they did not control the population by eliminating the old, sick, weak animals it reduces the over all health of the herd. Once a stag has reached a certain age he has fathered so many offspring to that particular herd that if a new stag is not able to take over the gene pool becomes very small so sometimes they have to take out the old stag to give a younger one from a different herd the chance to come in and enlarge and strengthen the gene pool. This is not how most people see stag/deer hunting they just see a magnificent animal being killed for fun but that is not the case.

    My ambivilance comes because I (like so many others) despised big game hunters who kill exotics for trophies.

    Then I saw a programme with Stacey Dooley who went to a game farm in Africa and I realised that I was having a knee jerk reaction and had no idea of what actually went on there. Although I still personally don't see the point in killing a lion, I can also now see that those game reserves actually preserve and add to the animal population in that area, they control it, keep it healthy and also use the meat in the hotel and donate meat to schools and various institutions in the area that are not be able to afford to buy meat. Not to mention bringing in money to the area and employing local people in the hotel complex/spa and out on the reserve.

    Hunting is a very polarising subject and I guess it always will be. But sometimes there is more to the picture than initially meets the eye.

    Would be interested in your take on the Dave Carrie shooting videos on youtube that highlight driven bird shooting on various UK estates. Understanding that the cost of these shooting days is a factor for many, one of the major points made in his video is that this lifestyle is what allows the estates to continue habitat management while supplying a highly nutritious food source to both local and distant restaurants, etc.
  • santiagotaylor312
    santiagotaylor312 Posts: 2 Member
    Options
    Saw this old thread and now I want to speak out. About hunting: I have a lot of concerns for this topic. My dad was a hunter and he passed away not too long ago. I used to hunt with him, but I didn't really like it. For me it was more an obligation or something like that. The point is - now I own my old man's rifle and I don't know what to do with it. Should I start to hunt too or should I sell this rifle? Right now it needs some repair. For example, it needs a new scope. I have read a few rifle scope review and I will buy one of it. But after that... I don't know. My dad was a hunter, his dad was a hunter. It's like hunter dynasty. And I don't know if I'm the one who need to break a circle. Maybe yes, maybe no.
    If you feel that it's the wrong thing - you shouldn't do it. Keep you mind and soul clean, don't let the bad habits of your father to ruin your life. Do that and you'll have my respect! :)
  • brittanystebbins95
    brittanystebbins95 Posts: 567 Member
    Options
    I went out deer hunting this last fall. I went kinda late though and I was only able to go out a couple times, so I didn't see anything unfortunately. Thankfully the rest of my family all filled their tags, and since I helped skin and process (we do it all ourselves) they hooked me up with quite a bit of venison.
  • YellowD0gs
    YellowD0gs Posts: 693 Member
    Options
    Turkey season opened today. May have plans to go chase a couple this weekend.
  • manderson27
    manderson27 Posts: 3,510 Member
    Options
    Djproulx wrote: »
    I have some very ambivilant feelings regarding hunting. I live in the UK and of an age to have been brought up with Fox hunting and Deer hunting being not only the norm but tradition. Seeing the horses and hounds out on boxing day was something that used to stir my British blood. I also used to work at a hunters stable as a young girl tending and riding the horses which I loved even though I never rode to the hunt.

    Of course all that kind of tradition is being subsumed and changed now with the rise of anti hunt demonstrations and the law being brought in that hunts have to have apply for permits or they can only do drag hunting etc. I do understand the sentiments of the anti hunt lobby I care about animals as well but on the other hand I am a country girl and brought up with the understanding that animal populations can get out of control and farmers have livestock and crops to protect.

    A friend of mine lives on Exmoor and that has a very high deer population. He was explaining to my husband how if they did not control the population by eliminating the old, sick, weak animals it reduces the over all health of the herd. Once a stag has reached a certain age he has fathered so many offspring to that particular herd that if a new stag is not able to take over the gene pool becomes very small so sometimes they have to take out the old stag to give a younger one from a different herd the chance to come in and enlarge and strengthen the gene pool. This is not how most people see stag/deer hunting they just see a magnificent animal being killed for fun but that is not the case.

    My ambivilance comes because I (like so many others) despised big game hunters who kill exotics for trophies.

    Then I saw a programme with Stacey Dooley who went to a game farm in Africa and I realised that I was having a knee jerk reaction and had no idea of what actually went on there. Although I still personally don't see the point in killing a lion, I can also now see that those game reserves actually preserve and add to the animal population in that area, they control it, keep it healthy and also use the meat in the hotel and donate meat to schools and various institutions in the area that are not be able to afford to buy meat. Not to mention bringing in money to the area and employing local people in the hotel complex/spa and out on the reserve.

    Hunting is a very polarising subject and I guess it always will be. But sometimes there is more to the picture than initially meets the eye.

    Would be interested in your take on the Dave Carrie shooting videos on youtube that highlight driven bird shooting on various UK estates. Understanding that the cost of these shooting days is a factor for many, one of the major points made in his video is that this lifestyle is what allows the estates to continue habitat management while supplying a highly nutritious food source to both local and distant restaurants, etc.

    I don't know much about hunting but I am sure Game keepers everywhere will confirm that without the raising of these birds for the shoot specific kinds of habitats would probably not be maintained in the same way.

    The large estates always need something to help bring money in to maintain them. Longleat for example went down the Safari Park route many years ago. Other estates are run by institutions like the National Trust or British Heritage who maintain them by charging visitors and donations. The moors such as Exmoor and Dartmoor are also similarly supported by the big institutions but also by the farmers and estate owners, no doubt subsidised by the hunting shooting and fishing fraternity. Any surplus meat is certainly bought by local butchers and restaraunts in the area.

    There are several areas near where I live that are maintained for Pheasants and smaller game birds. We often hear the sound of shotguns during the season. Lovely large woodlands edged with meadows.

    On the whole I think the UK has a reasonable balance when it comes to it's wildlife and maintaining habitat. People sometimes really don't understand how the countryside works. Everything needs to be kept in balance and sometimes this means culling deer/fox/rabbits etc. Raising birds specifically to kill them may seem harsh but we do the same with chickens/turkey/ducks. The game birds live a wild, free range life so better off than a lot of domestic bred fowl.

    There is of course a huge wave of controversy surrounding hunting over here. People have a lot of "feels" for animals and they are gaining ground. Game keepers and masters of the hunt know to keep quiet about how they actually maintain the animals on the estate or risk the wrath of the animal rights activists in one form or another. There have even been death threats, physical attacks and vandalism to property by animal rights activisits on people who are just trying to make a living.
  • Djproulx
    Djproulx Posts: 3,084 Member
    Options
    Djproulx wrote: »
    I have some very ambivilant feelings regarding hunting. I live in the UK and of an age to have been brought up with Fox hunting and Deer hunting being not only the norm but tradition. Seeing the horses and hounds out on boxing day was something that used to stir my British blood. I also used to work at a hunters stable as a young girl tending and riding the horses which I loved even though I never rode to the hunt.

    Of course all that kind of tradition is being subsumed and changed now with the rise of anti hunt demonstrations and the law being brought in that hunts have to have apply for permits or they can only do drag hunting etc. I do understand the sentiments of the anti hunt lobby I care about animals as well but on the other hand I am a country girl and brought up with the understanding that animal populations can get out of control and farmers have livestock and crops to protect.

    A friend of mine lives on Exmoor and that has a very high deer population. He was explaining to my husband how if they did not control the population by eliminating the old, sick, weak animals it reduces the over all health of the herd. Once a stag has reached a certain age he has fathered so many offspring to that particular herd that if a new stag is not able to take over the gene pool becomes very small so sometimes they have to take out the old stag to give a younger one from a different herd the chance to come in and enlarge and strengthen the gene pool. This is not how most people see stag/deer hunting they just see a magnificent animal being killed for fun but that is not the case.

    My ambivilance comes because I (like so many others) despised big game hunters who kill exotics for trophies.

    Then I saw a programme with Stacey Dooley who went to a game farm in Africa and I realised that I was having a knee jerk reaction and had no idea of what actually went on there. Although I still personally don't see the point in killing a lion, I can also now see that those game reserves actually preserve and add to the animal population in that area, they control it, keep it healthy and also use the meat in the hotel and donate meat to schools and various institutions in the area that are not be able to afford to buy meat. Not to mention bringing in money to the area and employing local people in the hotel complex/spa and out on the reserve.

    Hunting is a very polarising subject and I guess it always will be. But sometimes there is more to the picture than initially meets the eye.

    Would be interested in your take on the Dave Carrie shooting videos on youtube that highlight driven bird shooting on various UK estates. Understanding that the cost of these shooting days is a factor for many, one of the major points made in his video is that this lifestyle is what allows the estates to continue habitat management while supplying a highly nutritious food source to both local and distant restaurants, etc.

    I don't know much about hunting but I am sure Game keepers everywhere will confirm that without the raising of these birds for the shoot specific kinds of habitats would probably not be maintained in the same way.

    The large estates always need something to help bring money in to maintain them. Longleat for example went down the Safari Park route many years ago. Other estates are run by institutions like the National Trust or British Heritage who maintain them by charging visitors and donations. The moors such as Exmoor and Dartmoor are also similarly supported by the big institutions but also by the farmers and estate owners, no doubt subsidised by the hunting shooting and fishing fraternity. Any surplus meat is certainly bought by local butchers and restaraunts in the area.

    There are several areas near where I live that are maintained for Pheasants and smaller game birds. We often hear the sound of shotguns during the season. Lovely large woodlands edged with meadows.

    On the whole I think the UK has a reasonable balance when it comes to it's wildlife and maintaining habitat. People sometimes really don't understand how the countryside works. Everything needs to be kept in balance and sometimes this means culling deer/fox/rabbits etc. Raising birds specifically to kill them may seem harsh but we do the same with chickens/turkey/ducks. The game birds live a wild, free range life so better off than a lot of domestic bred fowl.

    There is of course a huge wave of controversy surrounding hunting over here. People have a lot of "feels" for animals and they are gaining ground. Game keepers and masters of the hunt know to keep quiet about how they actually maintain the animals on the estate or risk the wrath of the animal rights activists in one form or another. There have even been death threats, physical attacks and vandalism to property by animal rights activisits on people who are just trying to make a living.

    Thanks for the explanation. That seems to be in line with what I've heard from friends here in the US who've traveled to the UK to shoot driven pheasants. To me, the other issue is that without the large estates and gamekeepers managing habitat and wildlife supplemented by the sporting revenue, that the ecosystem would degrade and many species, both game and nongame, would suffer. I could be mistaken, but I don't believe the anti hunting activists have a plan to help the ecosystem in the absence of scientific management by gamekeepers and estate owners.
  • manderson27
    manderson27 Posts: 3,510 Member
    Options
    Djproulx wrote: »
    Djproulx wrote: »
    I have some very ambivilant feelings regarding hunting. I live in the UK and of an age to have been brought up with Fox hunting and Deer hunting being not only the norm but tradition. Seeing the horses and hounds out on boxing day was something that used to stir my British blood. I also used to work at a hunters stable as a young girl tending and riding the horses which I loved even though I never rode to the hunt.

    Of course all that kind of tradition is being subsumed and changed now with the rise of anti hunt demonstrations and the law being brought in that hunts have to have apply for permits or they can only do drag hunting etc. I do understand the sentiments of the anti hunt lobby I care about animals as well but on the other hand I am a country girl and brought up with the understanding that animal populations can get out of control and farmers have livestock and crops to protect.

    A friend of mine lives on Exmoor and that has a very high deer population. He was explaining to my husband how if they did not control the population by eliminating the old, sick, weak animals it reduces the over all health of the herd. Once a stag has reached a certain age he has fathered so many offspring to that particular herd that if a new stag is not able to take over the gene pool becomes very small so sometimes they have to take out the old stag to give a younger one from a different herd the chance to come in and enlarge and strengthen the gene pool. This is not how most people see stag/deer hunting they just see a magnificent animal being killed for fun but that is not the case.

    My ambivilance comes because I (like so many others) despised big game hunters who kill exotics for trophies.

    Then I saw a programme with Stacey Dooley who went to a game farm in Africa and I realised that I was having a knee jerk reaction and had no idea of what actually went on there. Although I still personally don't see the point in killing a lion, I can also now see that those game reserves actually preserve and add to the animal population in that area, they control it, keep it healthy and also use the meat in the hotel and donate meat to schools and various institutions in the area that are not be able to afford to buy meat. Not to mention bringing in money to the area and employing local people in the hotel complex/spa and out on the reserve.

    Hunting is a very polarising subject and I guess it always will be. But sometimes there is more to the picture than initially meets the eye.

    Would be interested in your take on the Dave Carrie shooting videos on youtube that highlight driven bird shooting on various UK estates. Understanding that the cost of these shooting days is a factor for many, one of the major points made in his video is that this lifestyle is what allows the estates to continue habitat management while supplying a highly nutritious food source to both local and distant restaurants, etc.

    I don't know much about hunting but I am sure Game keepers everywhere will confirm that without the raising of these birds for the shoot specific kinds of habitats would probably not be maintained in the same way.

    The large estates always need something to help bring money in to maintain them. Longleat for example went down the Safari Park route many years ago. Other estates are run by institutions like the National Trust or British Heritage who maintain them by charging visitors and donations. The moors such as Exmoor and Dartmoor are also similarly supported by the big institutions but also by the farmers and estate owners, no doubt subsidised by the hunting shooting and fishing fraternity. Any surplus meat is certainly bought by local butchers and restaraunts in the area.

    There are several areas near where I live that are maintained for Pheasants and smaller game birds. We often hear the sound of shotguns during the season. Lovely large woodlands edged with meadows.

    On the whole I think the UK has a reasonable balance when it comes to it's wildlife and maintaining habitat. People sometimes really don't understand how the countryside works. Everything needs to be kept in balance and sometimes this means culling deer/fox/rabbits etc. Raising birds specifically to kill them may seem harsh but we do the same with chickens/turkey/ducks. The game birds live a wild, free range life so better off than a lot of domestic bred fowl.

    There is of course a huge wave of controversy surrounding hunting over here. People have a lot of "feels" for animals and they are gaining ground. Game keepers and masters of the hunt know to keep quiet about how they actually maintain the animals on the estate or risk the wrath of the animal rights activists in one form or another. There have even been death threats, physical attacks and vandalism to property by animal rights activisits on people who are just trying to make a living.

    Thanks for the explanation. That seems to be in line with what I've heard from friends here in the US who've traveled to the UK to shoot driven pheasants. To me, the other issue is that without the large estates and gamekeepers managing habitat and wildlife supplemented by the sporting revenue, that the ecosystem would degrade and many species, both game and nongame, would suffer. I could be mistaken, but I don't believe the anti hunting activists have a plan to help the ecosystem in the absence of scientific management by gamekeepers and estate owners.

    The eco system would certainly change. People forget that these large tracts of land, moors, wetlands, woodlands and waterways have all been "managed" for centuries. So if they stopped being "managed" and were just allowed to do their own thing, then all kinds of plants and animals could invade and completely take over and drive the native wildlife out. Grey Squirrels are a prime example, ousting the UK's red squirrels from all but the remotest parts of the country.

    We already have rivers full of weed that it is costing a fortune and hundreds of volunteers to remove it to keep the trout streams flowing.

    Buildings are being damaged by uncontrolled Japanese Knotweed, you can't sell a house if it has this in the garden, it has to br professionally killed and removed.

    We are busy planting old style meadows to try and bring back the native insect pollinators. Resuming dredging in our wetlands to help prevent flooding. Cleaning up waterways to bring back native species of fish. We are in fact having to revert to old style managing of habitats to ensure a future for our native wildlife and this will include culling some species to keep the balance.

    Understanding how the environment works is key to keeping it flourishing. So uncontrolled nature is not necassarily the best thing for the environment if you want to keep your native species of flora and fauna.

    Besides if we didn't have this kind of management the developers would just move in and buy everything up and build all over it.
  • Djproulx
    Djproulx Posts: 3,084 Member
    Options
    @manderson27 - couldn't agree more. The stewardship aspect is vital and the gamekeepers and shooting sports enthusiasts give back with both expertise and funding to maintain these beautiful places. In the US, funding is provided through the Pittmen Robertson act (excise tax on firearm/ammo sales) coupled with the management expertise provided by groups like Delta Waterfowl, Ducks Unlimited, Pheasants Forever, and local conservation organizations. Without their money, management expertise and member's labor, both game and non game species would lose.
  • manderson27
    manderson27 Posts: 3,510 Member
    Options
    This where I live. The Chew Valley with it's man made lake not only supplies water for the surrounding area but is a bird watchers and wildlife paradise. Walking and picnics, two cafes and the best fish n chips in the area. Trout fishing/breeding and a yacht club. It is a spectacular area. Cheddar Gorge not far away with local strawberries and the original Cheddar cheese. Wookey Hole caves and Weston Super Mare just down the road. The sprawling Mendip hills and forestry for hiking.

    None of this would be here if it wasn't managed in some way or another.

    But now we can't go out. Sad times.

    8b1ig76nvje2.png
    chjzd8zby9kc.png
    nir52j0j8ixz.png


  • PAV8888
    PAV8888 Posts: 13,619 Member
    Options
    Chew Valley

    Never thought that I would get the urge to visit England... for nature and country-side!
  • Djproulx
    Djproulx Posts: 3,084 Member
    Options
    Beautiful pictures. It looks and sounds spectacular. I'll show my wife these pictures as I try to talk her into making a trip with me. I'd love to spend a weekend at one of the shooting estates.

  • manderson27
    manderson27 Posts: 3,510 Member
    Options
    @PAV8888 I guess when most people think of the UK they think of the cities like London or Edinburgh etc in the same way as we think of the US we think of NY or Vegas.

    We have a spare room now our son has moved out, will rent it for a crate of Appletons Rum and a hamper of Belgian Chocolates.

    @Djproulx Scotland is the place for you then check this out. https://www.dalhousieestates.co.uk/activities/field-sports/grouse-shooting/