Starch
Stroudmo
Posts: 1 Member
I need to figure out how much starch I am having for breakfast. I'm at a loss as to how to calculate the starch. Thanks for your help
0
Replies
-
You'll need to find a database/food tracking app that lists starch values. You won't be able to find them on MFP.3
-
Starch is a type of carb but not something that is tracked or distinguished on food labels. Why do you need to specifically know how much starch you are consuming? I would suggest finding a list of foods high in starch and tally how many of those you eat.
https://www.diabetes.org/nutrition/understanding-carbs/get-to-know-carbs4 -
I need to figure out how much starch I am having for breakfast. I'm at a loss as to how to calculate the starch. Thanks for your help
MFP won't list that specifically, but you can look at a food label and take the total carbohydrates - sugar - fiber = starch. The three components of carbohydrates are sugar/fiber/starch4 -
Isn’t “starch” the old way of referring to carbs?0
-
-
lynn_glenmont wrote: »
I read it as an alternative to “carbs” - it feels like a dieting term from about the 70s or earlier- maybe from weight watchers or something.
I’m old too!
0 -
No judgment, just curious...why are you wanting to track starch?0
-
Starch is a carb. It is more complex than the simplest carbs in white bread, and takes longer to raise your blood insulin response for an equal-calorie intake.
Other than that, some starches, such as rice and pasta, can be cooked then refrigerated for 12 hours to convert their starch content to a form of starch called "resistant" starch. Resistant starches are not digested in the stomach or small intestine, but only in the large intestine where the energy released is consumed by the microbes of your biome. Even so, I've never been inspired to cook a pot of spaghetti and then wait a day to eat it just to see if that will actually help me maintain a calorie deficit.1 -
-
lynn_glenmont wrote: »
I read it as an alternative to “carbs” - it feels like a dieting term from about the 70s or earlier- maybe from weight watchers or something.
I’m old too!
Thanks - that’s what I meant and I’m old too!1 -
lynn_glenmont wrote: »
I read it as an alternative to “carbs” - it feels like a dieting term from about the 70s or earlier- maybe from weight watchers or something.
I’m old too!
When I was growing up (so '70s and '80s), I recall learning (not formally, just as common knowledge) that a dinner was made up of a protein (probably "meat or fish"), a starch, and a vegetable. A "starch" wasn't simply a carb -- it certainly did not include fruit or candy or jello (which was a "dessert," LOL), and as noted veg were a separate component -- but specifically a starchy carb. So bread, rice, corn, potatoes, sweet potatoes, beans, peas (usually canned), spaghetti, some other grain, etc. This had nothing to do with dieting, and is basically the old "meat and potatoes" way of eating I grew up with (which IME always included a non-starchy veg or salad too).
That's what I'd assume if someone mentioned "a starch" now too.
Starch itself can be measured, as can sugar, but I'm not sure why one would need to.1 -
JeromeBarry1 wrote: »Starch is a carb. It is more complex than the simplest carbs in white bread, and takes longer to raise your blood insulin response for an equal-calorie intake.
Basic carb breakdown (excluding fiber, which is different) are starch and sugar. White bread can easily be made of flour, water, and yeast, and even if it includes a bit of sugar or honey the predominant source of cals (and of carbs) is, of course, starch. So I don't get the contrast here.
Starch is very easy for your body to break down, although depending on the form it will take longer than sugar (which is why most fuels for athletic performance are sugars, although not all). Usually fiber tends to slow it down (whether sugar or starch), although it can be more complicated, of course.2 -
JeromeBarry1 wrote: »Starch is a carb. It is more complex than the simplest carbs in white bread, and takes longer to raise your blood insulin response for an equal-calorie intake.
Other than that, some starches, such as rice and pasta, can be cooked then refrigerated for 12 hours to convert their starch content to a form of starch called "resistant" starch. Resistant starches are not digested in the stomach or small intestine, but only in the large intestine where the energy released is consumed by the microbes of your biome. Even so, I've never been inspired to cook a pot of spaghetti and then wait a day to eat it just to see if that will actually help me maintain a calorie deficit.
Well, I'll save you the experiment - this type of year my breakfast is rice and lentils that I cook ahead of time and eat during the week. Unfortunately, there is no magical diminishment of the rice calories after they transform into a resistant starch3
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.6K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions