Advice on Fat (Over)Consumption and Calorie Deficits
britcoleman1
Posts: 7 Member
I have tried to log my food intake for several days. I thought I was choosing healthy fats like avocado, olive oil, olives, eggs. But for several days my caloric intake has been under 1,000 and my fat intake has made up more than 50% of my diet. How will this affect my weight loss over time? On the one hand, caloric deficits are good for weight loss, but on the other hand the over-consumption of fats might be harmful.
Also, myfitnesspal will not allow me to submit food journals with a calorie intake under 1,000. I'm sure I'm not starving myself because I usually eat until I'm full. If I weren't trying to lose weight I would probably be eating more unhealthy snacks throughout the day, like chips, cookies, and cakes.
The other thing is that whenever I cook I tend to use olive oil to sautee things like onions and peppers. But one tablespoon of olive oil allegedly contains 1/4 of my recommended fat intake.
I need help and advice for future healthy eating and weight loss.
Also, myfitnesspal will not allow me to submit food journals with a calorie intake under 1,000. I'm sure I'm not starving myself because I usually eat until I'm full. If I weren't trying to lose weight I would probably be eating more unhealthy snacks throughout the day, like chips, cookies, and cakes.
The other thing is that whenever I cook I tend to use olive oil to sautee things like onions and peppers. But one tablespoon of olive oil allegedly contains 1/4 of my recommended fat intake.
I need help and advice for future healthy eating and weight loss.
2
Replies
-
The minimum you should be eating is 1200 calories a day.
Eating so little is dangerous and unhealthy.8 -
Calories are what determine weight loss, especially in the short run.
(In the longer run, truly awful nutrition may result in fatigue, so less movement; or suboptimal eating vs. personal needs may result in poor compliance with calorie goal. In that sense, food choice can indirectly affect weight loss. Any direct, short-term effects tend to be arithmetically trivial).
So, eating "too much" fat, but within calorie goal, shouldn't be a problem. However, if eating that much fat means you're seriously undercutting your protein goal, that underconsumption of protein can be a problem. One possible result is losing more than the minimum of muscle tissue while losing fat. So, try to at least hit your MFP protein goal, maybe even exceed it.
Also, you need a certain amount of micronutrients (vitamins, minerals, phytochemicals) and fiber, for adequate nutrition, thus best odds of continuing good health. It won't affect weight loss noticeably if you don't get those, but most of us want to be healthy, not just thinner, right? The best source for micronutrients is plenty of varied, colorful fruits and veggies, and those will bring good fiber, usually, too. Just taking vitamins/supplements is not a substitute for nutrients from foods: At best, it's an insurance policy backup.
No matter how full a person feels, undereating is a health risk. I don't know whether you're undereating, but 1000 calories is a very dangerous sign. I ate 1200 calories plus all exercise calories at the start, and it turned out to be too few (MFP underestimated my calorie needs, I didn't do it on purpose). I felt full and great, until suddenly, I didn't. I was weak and fatigued, and it took several weeks to recover normal strength and energy. No one wants that!
I was lucky. Consider the experience reported by the young, healthy woman in this thread:
https://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/discussion/10761904/under-1200-for-weight-loss/p1
Fast weight loss may feel rewarding at first, but can potentially lead to noncompliance in the longer run . . . and can be a health risk. Unless you're very petite and inactive, I'd strongly suggest you set up MFP to lose no more than 1% of your current body weight per week (less than that if within 50 pounds of goal), and eat at least that number of calories.
Best wishes for much success at weight loss and good health!12 -
The minimum you should be eating is 1200 calories a day.
Eating so little is dangerous and unhealthy.
Yes, I'm coming to understand that. But actually I don't feel hungry beyond what I've been eating. I tend to eat lots of rich things like avocado, olives, tuna, eggs, etc. But I also eat vegetables like spinach, celery, tomato, and cucumber. Honestly I don't feel hungry. I would hate to just start eating more for the hell of it.2 -
britcoleman1 wrote: »The minimum you should be eating is 1200 calories a day.
Eating so little is dangerous and unhealthy.
Yes, I'm coming to understand that. But actually I don't feel hungry beyond what I've been eating. I tend to eat lots of rich things like avocado, olives, tuna, eggs, etc. But I also eat vegetables like spinach, celery, tomato, and cucumber. Honestly I don't feel hungry. I would hate to just start eating more for the hell of it.
Your heart is a muscle eating so little is damaging your body. I developed an eating disorder, by eating so little. It lead to my suffering from blackouts, and my periods stopped. I blacked out in a target, and once in my shower. I fell out, and hit my head on the bathroom floor. You know what's not fun being found naked and unconscious.11 -
How long have you been doing this?
What is your current height/weight/approximate age? Are you at home, or moving around? How many hours a day are you non sedentary at a guess?
Your (actual) total calories absorbed vs total calories expended will determine your long term weight trend trajectory.
In the shorter term, non fat weight fluctuations (also known as water weight fluctuations) are more likely to sharply influence your scale readings.
The above is true regardless of whether 1% or 100% of your diet consists of drinking olive oil or eating potato chips. Obviously either of these two extremes would probably result in other longer term health problems that would have little to do with your actual weight.
There are national food guides that can describe what is considered a healthy mix of food to intake. You don't have to be 100% on point in order to, overall, maintain a healthy diet.
50% of calories from fats is a little bit high, but not necessarily egregiously so if your fats are considered healthy and if you are also eating sufficient protein and a variety of vegetables and fruits. Otherwise the higher fat intake may be crowding out other nutrients.
People on keto type diets do eat a higher percentage of their calories from fats, often even more than 50%. That said, I've personally not chosen to eat a keto type diet and have found that the regular amount of fats I regularly intake through daily eating generally come up to more to any minimums that I would have considered. Long term I've consistently eaten close to 30% of my calories from fat, and this has been with me making efforts to decrease my fat intake-- not making efforts to increase it! I averaged about 32% when losing faster, and about 27-28% during slower losses and at maintenance.
Very few people need to only eat 1000 Cal a day to lose weight. Eating only this much and creating a larger than necessary deficit will, sooner or later, impact your energy levels and general health. You may feel satiated with a certain way of eating... ask yourself what other types of eating you could be exploring and whether the totality of your diet right now is optimally healthy and satisfying -- i.e. also plan for the occasional indulgence within your reasonable caloric budgets unless you are seriously proposing that you're going to spend, literally, the rest of your life never again ever having any of these indulgences. The time to learn to incorporate them in reasonable amounts (or decide to consciously and truly and permanently avoid and eliminate them)... is while losing. Not by re-introducing them in a free for all when you declare maintenance.
Also please note that a scale is, generally speaking, more consistent in measuring than your eyeball and measuring cups or spoons. A tablespoon of oil (the 120Cal stuff) ranges in weight from about 13 to 14g). I generally consider 13.5g to be one tbsp (varies by temperature, but most homes are probably close enough to ~20C)
A tablespoon of ice cream or whipped cream is even less than 13g as they contain both fat and are whipped. So these items (oil, whipped items, ice cream) are instances where 1ml does not equal 1g -- something that remains close enough to true for most other items one weighs.7 -
britcoleman1 wrote: »The minimum you should be eating is 1200 calories a day.
Eating so little is dangerous and unhealthy.
Yes, I'm coming to understand that. But actually I don't feel hungry beyond what I've been eating. I tend to eat lots of rich things like avocado, olives, tuna, eggs, etc. But I also eat vegetables like spinach, celery, tomato, and cucumber. Honestly I don't feel hungry. I would hate to just start eating more for the hell of it.
You shouldn't do it for the hell of it.
You should do it for the health of it.
Too few calories - i.e., too fast weight loss - is a health risk.17 -
Calories are what determine weight loss, especially in the short run.
(In the longer run, truly awful nutrition may result in fatigue, so less movement; or suboptimal eating vs. personal needs may result in poor compliance with calorie goal. In that sense, food choice can indirectly affect weight loss. Any direct, short-term effects tend to be arithmetically trivial).
So, eating "too much" fat, but within calorie goal, shouldn't be a problem. However, if eating that much fat means you're seriously undercutting your protein goal, that underconsumption of protein can be a problem. One possible result is losing more than the minimum of muscle tissue while losing fat. So, try to at least hit your MFP protein goal, maybe even exceed it.
Also, you need a certain amount of micronutrients (vitamins, minerals, phytochemicals) and fiber, for adequate nutrition, thus best odds of continuing good health. It won't affect weight loss noticeably if you don't get those, but most of us want to be healthy, not just thinner, right? The best source for micronutrients is plenty of varied, colorful fruits and veggies, and those will bring good fiber, usually, too. Just taking vitamins/supplements is not a substitute for nutrients from foods: At best, it's an insurance policy backup.
No matter how full a person feels, undereating is a health risk. I don't know whether you're undereating, but 1000 calories is a very dangerous sign. I ate 1200 calories plus all exercise calories at the start, and it turned out to be too few (MFP underestimated my calorie needs, I didn't do it on purpose). I felt full and great, until suddenly, I didn't. I was weak and fatigued, and it took several weeks to recover normal strength and energy. No one wants that!
I was lucky. Consider the experience reported by the young, healthy woman in this thread:
https://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/discussion/10761904/under-1200-for-weight-loss/p1
Fast weight loss may feel rewarding at first, but can potentially lead to noncompliance in the longer run . . . and can be a health risk. Unless you're very petite and inactive, I'd strongly suggest you set up MFP to lose no more than 1% of your current body weight per week (less than that if within 50 pounds of goal), and eat at least that number of calories.
Best wishes for much success at weight loss and good health!
Thanks for the input. I will try to do more research and figure out what's going on. But I already eat fruits and vegetables, so I think I should be good there. The main problem is that my carb and protein intake are too low. So maybe I will need to learn some new recipes.3 -
britcoleman1 wrote: »The minimum you should be eating is 1200 calories a day.
Eating so little is dangerous and unhealthy.
Yes, I'm coming to understand that. But actually I don't feel hungry beyond what I've been eating. I tend to eat lots of rich things like avocado, olives, tuna, eggs, etc. But I also eat vegetables like spinach, celery, tomato, and cucumber. Honestly I don't feel hungry. I would hate to just start eating more for the hell of it.
Your heart is a muscle eating so little is damaging your body. I developed an eating disorder, by eating so little. It lead to my suffering from blackouts, and my periods stopped. I blacked out in a target, and once in my shower. I fell out, and hit my head on the bathroom floor. You know what's not fun being found naked and unconscious.
Ok. Thanks for your advice. And so sorry that happened to you. It's been a little over a week of me making a sincere effort to lose weight. And that under calorie thing happened three times. So I will start looking for new recipes to raise my protein and carb levels. And then hopefully lower my fat intake and meet the recommended caloric intake. Whew!2 -
Many people who find themselves set to 1200 Cal a day are attempting to lose weight at a rate of 2lbs a week. For many of them, this makes sense. But for many more, depending on their current weight and activity level, 2lbs a week is NOT an optimal deficit.
You are concerned about fat--a macronutrient. Macronutrients are important, but the widest part of the nutritional pyramid, and its base, is the appropriate caloric balance. Which an over-aggressive deficit would not be.
When looking at your caloric goals a weekly, instead of daily, view (assuming you avoid engaging in counter-productively large inter-day variations) may prove to be more helpful to you.
6 -
How long have you been doing this?
What is your current height/weight/approximate age? Are you at home, or moving around? How many hours a day are you non sedentary at a guess?
Your (actual) total calories absorbed vs total calories expended will determine your long term weight trend trajectory.
In the shorter term, non fat weight fluctuations (also known as water weight fluctuations) are more likely to sharply influence your scale readings.
The above is true regardless of whether 1% or 100% of your diet consists of drinking olive oil or eating potato chips. Obviously either of these two extremes would probably result in other longer term health problems that would have little to do with your actual weight.
There are national food guides that can describe what is considered a healthy mix of food to intake. You don't have to be 100% on point in order to, overall, maintain a healthy diet.
50% of calories from fats is a little bit high, but not necessarily egregiously so if your fats are considered healthy and if you are also eating sufficient protein and a variety of vegetables and fruits. Otherwise the higher fat intake may be crowding out other nutrients.
People on keto type diets do eat a higher percentage of their calories from fats, often even more than 50%. That said, I've personally not chosen to eat a keto type diet and have found that the regular amount of fats I regularly intake through daily eating generally come up to more to any minimums that I would have considered. Long term I've consistently eaten close to 30% of my calories from fat, and this has been with me making efforts to decrease my fat intake-- not making efforts to increase it! I averaged about 32% when losing faster, and about 27-28% during slower losses and at maintenance.
Very few people need to only eat 1000 Cal a day to lose weight. Eating only this much and creating a larger than necessary deficit will, sooner or later, impact your energy levels and general health. You may feel satiated with a certain way of eating... ask yourself what other types of eating you could be exploring and whether the totality of your diet right now is optimally healthy and satisfying -- i.e. also plan for the occasional indulgence within your reasonable caloric budgets unless you are seriously proposing that you're going to spend, literally, the rest of your life never again ever having any of these indulgences. The time to learn to incorporate them in reasonable amounts (or decide to consciously and truly and permanently avoid and eliminate them)... is while losing. Not by re-introducing them in a free for all when you declare maintenance.
Also please note that a scale is, generally speaking, more consistent in measuring than your eyeball and measuring cups or spoons. A tablespoon of oil (the 120Cal stuff) ranges in weight from about 13 to 14g). I generally consider 13.5g to be one tbsp (varies by temperature, but most homes are probably close enough to ~20C)
A tablespoon of ice cream or whipped cream is even less than 13g as they contain both fat and are whipped. So these items (oil, whipped items, ice cream) are instances where 1ml does not equal 1g -- something that remains close enough to true for most other items one weighs.
I only just started to make a sincere effort at losing weight a little over a week ago. Before I was not one to track my eating or even weigh myself. I've known for at least a year now that I have put on weight, since I've had to buy bigger clothes. I must have gained 30 pounds (14kgs) over the past three years, due to some life stressors. And I moved back to America almost a year ago. I mention that last bit only because I've lived in several different countries and have always put on weight whenever I move back to America. So I'm inclined to believe the preservatives and other things in the food are sabotaging. And we have a lot of cultural practices centered around food and overeating. It's hard to say how long my caloric intake has been this low, since I wasn't tracking it before. But then again, this is me trying to eat healthy. I must have had higher calories before when I was eating more chips and sweets with reckless abandon.
I have a desk job, but walk a lot and take public transit. I will usually walk ~2 miles a day for transportation purposes. And I also work in a large park, so I take 30 minute walks on my lunch break. Of course these days I'm working from home. So I'm not as active. But I do home workouts for like 25 minutes a day--usually cardio circuits, belly dancing, toning, etc. I am about 5'6'' (168cm). I currently weigh 181 lbs (82 kgs) according to my scale... And I'm in my late 20's.
I'm making an effort to stay hydrated, drinking 8-10 cups a day. Hoping that my body will let go of any excess water retention it's been doing.
Thanks for the tip about using a food scale. It's not something I'm considering now, but maybe in the future.!
1 -
It's common early on, especially if you change your diet a lot, to be surprisingly not hungry on few calories, and planning to eat more feels weird, but it is important to get at least 1200, and if you don't you may find yourself burning out or binging or feeling bad in a few weeks.
There's no issue with eating 50+% fat if you feel good doing it (personally I would find it tough to do on under 1000 cals, as I don't find fat itself all that filling, but people vary). You definitely should make sure to hit your protein goal for 1200 cals (and usually at 1200 cals aiming for more like 30% protein can be beneficial), and you can plan ways to add a few more cals at each meal for otherwise increasing. More fruit, whole food or minimally processed carbs like potatoes, sweet potatoes, oats, barley, other whole grains, beans -- all options that you could try. Or if you feel like you aren't hungry, there are less filling options.
When I first started logging at MFP, I was shocked to see that I'd been eating around 1000, because I was not hungry. Luckily I realized that was too low and looked at my diet. I was doing the opposite of you -- going too low on fat, as well as cutting out lower nutrient foods, and eating quite small servings of starches (I was eating plenty of protein and tons of veg). I realized it was fine to use some olive oil (in dressings or for cooking) and even to add in some cheese for taste, to eat larger servings of the starches when I had room, etc. I think doing that made my diet more sustainable and overall healthier (more calorie appropriate).
The one thing I'd caution is that fats are high cal so sometimes it can be easy to undercount them, depending on how they are being measured and remembering to count all cooking fats.7 -
britcoleman1 wrote: »Thanks for the tip about using a food scale. It's not something I'm considering now, but maybe in the future.!
The reason I mentioned it is because fats are easy to add up. So there does exist a chance that you may actually be eating more than you think at times... hence the scale comment.
I would be more worried about low protein than anything as sufficient protein (think 0.8g to 1g per lb of bodyweight at the top of the normal weight range, standing in as proxy for about 0.6g to 0.8g per lb of lean mass at the top of the normal weight range) would be protective of lean mass especially while you're in a caloric deficit. (and so would strength training)
You may want to start using a weight trend web site or application (happy scale, libra, trendweight, weightgrapher) -- you can use them all without special scales, though a free account with them or a third party may be necessary for some).
Weigh trend apps highlight your weigh trend over time and reduce the changes you see due to a one or two day water retention event. they are still affected by menstrual cycle or strength training, but do help you see past sort term day to day fluctuations.
Drinking water to manage water weight... is a bit of a diminishing returns game. our bodies are quite good at regulating water retention depending on our needs, and if healthy a day of excess sodium or two will move along without much help!
2 -
Reading through this thread I am reminded of when I started weight loss. I had a lot more than you to lose.
I set my goal to "Lose 2 pounds per week." Totally reasonable, BTW, since I had 80 pounds to lose. Since you have 30 pounds to lose, set the goals at "Lose 1 pound per week." Then buy a food scale. To me, it sounds as if you are likely eating more than you think, but you've only been doing it for a week, so if you ARE under eating, the physical side effects just haven't kicked in yet. They will. For me it was severe hair loss, dry skin, weak nails. I shudder to think at what I was doing to the inside of my body, the part I couldn't see. I broke bones for the first time in my life. It's nothing to mess with, eating too little.
So, set to "lose 1 pound." Set your Activity level to Lightly Active. Almost no one really falls into the "sedentary" category if they work or take care of kids or go to school.
Buy a digital food scale so you actually know. They're about $10 on Amazon.
Fat doesn't make you fat. When I was in weight-loss mode I had my fats set at 45%, it was how I felt the best.7 -
britcoleman1 wrote: »The minimum you should be eating is 1200 calories a day.
Eating so little is dangerous and unhealthy.
Yes, I'm coming to understand that. But actually I don't feel hungry beyond what I've been eating. I tend to eat lots of rich things like avocado, olives, tuna, eggs, etc. But I also eat vegetables like spinach, celery, tomato, and cucumber. Honestly I don't feel hungry. I would hate to just start eating more for the hell of it.
But you wouldn't be eating more "just for the hell of it." You'd be eating more to avoid the health risks that are clearly associated with consistently undereating.
If your high fat diet is killing your appetite to the point that you can't eat the minimum amount of calories your body needs, you'll have to experiment with eating less fat until you reach the level where you can consume enough.
The other issue could be the accuracy of how you're tracking your intake. High fat foods are very calorie-dense. If you're estimating your portions of these foods or using methods like measuring cups, it's possible you're eating more than you think you are.12 -
-
britcoleman1 wrote: »The minimum you should be eating is 1200 calories a day.
Eating so little is dangerous and unhealthy.
Yes, I'm coming to understand that. But actually I don't feel hungry beyond what I've been eating. I tend to eat lots of rich things like avocado, olives, tuna, eggs, etc. But I also eat vegetables like spinach, celery, tomato, and cucumber. Honestly I don't feel hungry. I would hate to just start eating more for the hell of it.
Part of healthy eating is providing your body with appropriate calories (energy). You wouldn't be eating more just for the hell of it...you would be eating more because what you're currently doing isn't healthy. 1200 is the rock bottom minimum for a sedentary female not under medical supervision. My guess would also be that your protein is inadequate from the foods you describe as well. Protein deficiency is a thing as well.3 -
Thanks all for the input. Right now the consensus seems to be:
1) taking my rudimentary food measuring with a grain of salt,
2) increasing my protein, carb, and overall calorie intake, and
3) possible reducing my fat intake.
I will try to find some different recipes with more protein. I'm not a big meat eater, but will occasionally make chicken or salmon. Then I eat lots of chopped nuts like almonds and cashews, but I worry these are just as high in fat
More research to follow!2 -
britcoleman1 wrote: »Thanks all for the input. Right now the consensus seems to be:
1) taking my rudimentary food measuring with a grain of salt,
2) increasing my protein, carb, and overall calorie intake, and
3) possible reducing my fat intake.
I will try to find some different recipes with more protein. I'm not a big meat eater, but will occasionally make chicken or salmon. Then I eat lots of chopped nuts like almonds and cashews, but I worry these are just as high in fat
More research to follow!
You can increase protein by eating or drinking yogurt, milk and similar. Nuts ARE high in fats and calories. Not sure again how you measure them... but weighing them would not be a terrible idea--as with most high cal items.
BTW beans, lentils, and rice or cracked wheat or bread or.... would also form complete proteins and may or may not better fit your eating style.
In spite of the emphasis on weighing your food for accuracy, doing so is not necessary, many people get by fine with approximate measurements. I enjoyed doing it because it allowed me to eat the maximum amount of goodies while still meeting my (reasonably defined and appropriate) weight loss goals. And I still do it... because hey, I like knowing and not wondering, and it takes me less long than trying to guess my cups
So #1 for sure.
#2 increasing protein for sure. Carbs are really your own preference in terms of satiation and energy levels--there exist no universal minimum or maximums. Overall caloric intake increase? That does depend on a lot more. How close is #1 to reality? How fast are you losing? How fast SHOULD you be losing? If you're obese anything above a 25% caloric deficit when compared to your TDEE is probably quite aggressive. If you're overweight/normal weight going above 20% is definitely being very aggressive. Your weight trend over several weeks shows you your "real" numbers (1lb weight change = approximately 3500 Cal)
#3 is again, a preference
4 -
Are you weighing/measuring things? Avocado and olive oil, in addition to being fatty they are also calorie dense (but nutritious and yummy!!). I eat both daily, nearly impossible to eat them and fill full after they use such a large proportion of your low daily allowance IMO.3
-
Are you weighing/measuring things? Avocado and olive oil, in addition to being fatty they are also calorie dense (but nutritious and yummy!!). I eat both daily, nearly impossible to eat them and fill full after they use such a large proportion of your low daily allowance IMO.
Someone else mentioned I should start weighing things too. Since it's just my first week of trying, I will focus on low fat, high protein recipes for next week instead. In the future, if I become seriously committed I will consider making that kind of purchase0 -
Pretty much everything useful that could be said has been said, but I just wanted to add (or support) two points:
It is very common at the beginning of a diet to not feel hungry on very few calories, in fact even to feel full on what amounts to a near-starvation diet. There've been plenty of people on these boards who've complained, in the first month or so of dieting, that they felt stuffed on 1000 calories and couldn't imagine how they could possibly fit one more morsel of food into their mouths. The thing is, this changes. Big time. It happened to me. My "I'm not hungry at all" phase lasted a good 8 or 10 weeks, during which losing weight seemed incredibly easy and almost every morning brought a joyous experience of getting on the scale to collect my rewards. Then one day, all of a sudden, out of the blue, I was hungry again. I mean really, really hungry. And I've been hungry ever since. That was 6 or 7 months ago. I'm still losing weight, but it's slowed and it's hard work now. I wish I could go back to the "not the least bit hungry or interested in food" phase, but it appears to be gone with the wind.
There are lotsa theories out there as to why this phenomenon occurs. I think perhaps it has something to do with the initial excitement and adrenaline surge of taking on a big new project, namely, dieting, in which adrenaline and motivation and enthusiasm can blunt appetite for a while. Others have said it's related to the fact that changing your diet plays games with grehlin and other hormones that signal hunger and saiety, but that kind of science-y stuff is way beyond my pay grade. Whatever the explanation, here's what you need to know. One of these days, you are not just going to be hungry, you are going to be HUNGRY. The best thing you can do to ward off the damage when that happens (i.e. binging and regaining the weight) is to develop good habits NOW. And the best habit you can develop right now is to set up a proper calorie target and learn to hit it day after day, rain or shine, happy or sad, hungry or full. TDEEcalculator.net says your maintenance (break-even) calorie level for your weight/height/gender is around 1900 calories per day. A 1 lb per week goal would entail eating 1400 cals per day and if it were me, that would be the minimum I would even consider. Then just eat those 1400 calories every day, never less. That will be a huge favor you'd be doing yourself for down the road, when one day you wake up famished. It's gonna happen and at that point you will want to be well-adjusted to your calorie target and in the habit of structuring your day and meals to hit it without having to excessively think about and plan for it. Train yourself now for life at 1400 calories (or whatever number you pick) and make it such a consistent, normal part of your routine that it outlasts hitting the hunger phase.
Secondly, there is nothing wrong with olive oil. Olive oil is healthy. There is no reason to minimize usage of olive oil if it fits into your calories and you are getting the other stuff you need, namely, the right amount of protein and micronutrients. The only reason fat has made up 50 % of your calories is because you're not eating enough other stuff. If you're eating 1000 cals and fat makes up 50 % of it, that means you're getting 500 calories from fat. Nothing wrong with that. What's missing is the other 500 or thereabouts calories of proteins or carbs to round things out on top of the 500 you're currently getting, and then your fat intake would be 33 %, which would be entirely normal and unremarkable. So enjoy your olive oil and healthy fats, just be sure to supplement them with enough other stuff so you're eating a balanced diet.6
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions