Any ditched the fitness trackers? Any regrets?
dave_in_ni
Posts: 533 Member
I've been through the majority of them over the past 5-6 years, everything from Fitbit to Garmin to Apple. Made the decision last week that I really don't need to track everything and I don't need notifications for everything. Went back to my G-Shock and it feels so freeing to be honest.
Accuracy of them is somewhat questionable anyway
Accuracy of them is somewhat questionable anyway
2
Replies
-
I like the data. I like that the device collects my heart rate during a run automatically, without me needing to remember to press the button. I have all notifications turned off, but the device is my handy silent alarm clock. I guess I don't *need* to track anything, but it's habit, now. I feel naked without it. The accuracy seems consistent, anyway - I can adjust the calorie estimates to get reasonable weight management results.
But that's me, and you see things your own way. The world would be a boring place if everyone was exactly the same.6 -
I lost my FitBit one some years back and didn't bother to replace it. I use a "dumb" pedometer when I go on walks.
I can eat back 75-100% of the calories from the MFP database and lose as expected. Right now it's 100% because I've created some custom entries for light and moderate gardening - I only use the regular gardening entry when I'm doing heavy gardening.4 -
I love my garmin. I've been using it for 4 years almost constantly. I love being able to see how much more active I've become, see how far and where I walked, and I enjoy the challenges for badges just as a bit of fun. I don't have any notifications turned on on it (or on the phone app) though.0
-
I could never because I wear my Apple Watch constantly unless it’s charging. I turn off all annoying notifications though, what ones do you get? I don’t get any on my watch.
I like to see my heart rate date during runs/biking. I like seeing my steps for the day.2 -
I kind of love my garmin. Mainly because I'm a number and data girl. It doesn't drive me crazy though.1
-
I wore a Fitbit for a couple days and it made me feel claustrophobic - I have issues lol. So that was that.2
-
I never had a fitness tracker; I don't care for gadgets and I don't want to get hooked to one. The only thing that I use when I go for a walk is the MapmyWalk app in my cell phone, just to know how many miles I walked, duration, and speed.
Burned calories are not important either because I don't log them or eat them back. I have a set range of calories that I eat, regardless of my workouts (not very impressive or consistent right now), and my method is good enough to keep me at the right weight. In maintenance for 11 years.
I have seen many people attached to their watches or trackers keeping track of whatever they do, and I decided that it is not for me. I do like data but I also know that I would be hooked to the trackers and probably develop a compulsion. I don't need that.
3 -
Would I be "able" to live without my Fitbit? I certainly didn't die during the week I was waiting for a replacement, or during the four days I was waiting for a strap from a slow moving amazon order. There has also been the time I couldn't find my charger and had to wait for the one I ordered to arrive since I was NOT going to pay the inflated in-stock store price.
But, through the beginning of my "weight management" phase just about 90 months ago
I've tried to "layer" my actions and defences against reverting to my pre weight management state of obesity and inactivity.
Why would I give up one of my more interesting and effective tools?3 -
I go back and forth, but for me it’s a bit of accountability. I don’t set daily step goals, but it does help me see how active (or not) I have been during the day. I am a homeschool mom with fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue, some days I get to supper and notice I didn’t do squat in the form of movement all day. So I will take that realization with me on a lap around the neighborhood 😂
It’s also interesting for me because I can tell the days I don’t feel well based on step count...
I bought my instinct a year and a half ago because I was triathlon training and it would work for all 3 sports. It also has a breadcrumb option for hiking in case I ever get lost
hubby likes the GPS tracking so he can keep an eye on me while I am out alone, eases his mind a little. And he also sends me cheerleading texts sometimes (which pop up on my watch) so that’s a bonus! The other reason I keep it is for the heart rate monitoring... I am prone to some occasional hiccups and speed ups so if I am feeling a bit funky one glance will tell me if my heart is racing (which I double check with a manual pulse count) because I can’t always discern if that is the issue at that moment in time.
I do contemplate getting something more basic, I definitely would still need a watch for the time! And maybe some day I will. I am not attached I don’t think... I forgot it one night before bed and my main frustration was not knowing what time it was in the middle of the night! Ha!1 -
In a way, the question doesn’t even compute, for me. I’ve long used a HRM, GPS tracker, and sometimes specialized devices to collect performance-related metrics. That was before mass-market multi-function fitness trackers were available at all.
Now that I have a Garmin that integrates all of those, plus automates some estimates I used to do more laboriously (like resting heart rate), plus gives me estimates I didn’t have before at all, I love my Garmin. That’s true even though its all-day calorie estimate is *wildly* inaccurate for me (I don’t synch it to MFP because of that).
I used to use a Polar HRM, and correlate it with pace/distance/time data from my Concept 2 rowing machine, tracking hoped-for things like lowered HR at the same pace, for example. I also had a Garmin (Forerunner) that would do pace/distance tracking for on-water rowing. I would use that data in junction with the Polar HR data, as well as for evaluating different technical changes or strategies. (Example: If we do 500m max-effort rowing pieces, is our double faster at 25 spm or 30 spm? (If you’re thinking 30 is always faster . . . it isn’t, because technique can degrade at higher spm.)) It took a 3rd device to get the SPM, and there were not apps to integrate all those pieces at the time, so it was ballpark-ish, or spreadsheet analysis with aggregated data streams.
Now, Garmin gives me reasonable estimates of all that stuff – pace, SPM, HR, distance, duration – time-integrated. That’s pretty useful, and a time-saver. On top of that, it replaces the wristwatch I’ve worn most of my life (for a while in the 1970s, I carried a pocket watch, because my job was destructive to wristwatches of the era). Though I'm not competing any more, performance improvement is still part of the fun, for me.
I do use Garmin’s calorie estimates for some exercises, where I don’t have an estimating source I consider more likely to be accurate. That’s a handy side-benefit, but not the key reason I appreciate having such a device.
I understand that we’re all different people with different priorities, but the seeming common idea on MFP that the main point of these devices is calorie estimates and step counts . . . that’s really alien to me.
1 -
Never owned a tracker in my life and I never plan to. I'm a runner, thousands of miles on these feet but I know my route's mileage and I have a notebook and pen. People survived before trackers, a huge waste of money and space. Less is more, I promise.
Adding: I run alot of miles. In less than two weeks I'm running a Marathon. But even when I'm not training for something, I still run a significant amount of miles and I walk quite a bit, too. I'll never buy a gadget, no thanks.
Husband owns a Garmin, quite a little novelty but they're all garbage if you ask me.4 -
I'm also a runner. I started out without a watch and would blow up in races because I had no idea what my pace was. I always started way too fast and would die about 3/4 through. Same happened on my long runs. I didn't like having to wait until I was finished to know whether I was on target or not. I got the most basic Garmin initially (FR10) and it was fine until I started doing marathons. Having it die at mile 24 was not happiness. I still stay basic with the FR 25. I like looking at my HR and sleep and calories, but I don't focus on them. I mostly just focus on pace and distance, what I need to know to make sure I'm going fast enough when I'm doing speedwork and not too fast when I'm doing long or easy runs. I could live without the information, but since I do enjoy racing, I find it useful.3
-
I've had at least 3 different brands of fit watches and they make me neurotic so I gave them up, I couldn't and didn't believe the majority of the data just seemed to off for me and I no longer like watch wearing so no need.
I just document the exercise I do and the length of time and I'm over it.
I like the ideal of them, just not for me2 -
spiriteagle99 wrote: »I'm also a runner. I started out without a watch and would blow up in races because I had no idea what my pace was. I always started way too fast and would die about 3/4 through. Same happened on my long runs. I didn't like having to wait until I was finished to know whether I was on target or not. I got the most basic Garmin initially (FR10) and it was fine until I started doing marathons. Having it die at mile 24 was not happiness. I still stay basic with the FR 25. I like looking at my HR and sleep and calories, but I don't focus on them. I mostly just focus on pace and distance, what I need to know to make sure I'm going fast enough when I'm doing speedwork and not too fast when I'm doing long or easy runs. I could live without the information, but since I do enjoy racing, I find it useful.
Yes, I find the steps and mileage helpful, but pace is most important to me because I will totally burn out early if I don't focus on it.2 -
In a way, the question doesn’t even compute, for me. I’ve long used a HRM, GPS tracker, and sometimes specialized devices to collect performance-related metrics. That was before mass-market multi-function fitness trackers were available at all.
Now that I have a Garmin that integrates all of those, plus automates some estimates I used to do more laboriously (like resting heart rate), plus gives me estimates I didn’t have before at all, I love my Garmin. That’s true even though its all-day calorie estimate is *wildly* inaccurate for me (I don’t synch it to MFP because of that).
I used to use a Polar HRM, and correlate it with pace/distance/time data from my Concept 2 rowing machine, tracking hoped-for things like lowered HR at the same pace, for example. I also had a Garmin (Forerunner) that would do pace/distance tracking for on-water rowing. I would use that data in junction with the Polar HR data, as well as for evaluating different technical changes or strategies. (Example: If we do 500m max-effort rowing pieces, is our double faster at 25 spm or 30 spm? (If you’re thinking 30 is always faster . . . it isn’t, because technique can degrade at higher spm.)) It took a 3rd device to get the SPM, and there were not apps to integrate all those pieces at the time, so it was ballpark-ish, or spreadsheet analysis with aggregated data streams.
Now, Garmin gives me reasonable estimates of all that stuff – pace, SPM, HR, distance, duration – time-integrated. That’s pretty useful, and a time-saver. On top of that, it replaces the wristwatch I’ve worn most of my life (for a while in the 1970s, I carried a pocket watch, because my job was destructive to wristwatches of the era). Though I'm not competing any more, performance improvement is still part of the fun, for me.
I do use Garmin’s calorie estimates for some exercises, where I don’t have an estimating source I consider more likely to be accurate. That’s a handy side-benefit, but not the key reason I appreciate having such a device.
I understand that we’re all different people with different priorities, but the seeming common idea on MFP that the main point of these devices is calorie estimates and step counts . . . that’s really alien to me.
I was speaking about myself really. I was never into running, just weights and walking, It was steps I was after and calorie total. Trackers are useless for weights and as you say the calorie total was not accurate and neither were the steps really, so for me it was kind of a pointless device. I was after it more for health I guess that fitness, we'll not even talk about sleep tracking which ended up giving me insomnia.2 -
I’ve never had one. I’m not a data geek at all. I’ve gained lost and maintained weight without one. I also don’t use mfp as intended though so i don’t eat back my exercise calories.
I think I would find trackers annoying. Each to their own.2 -
I currently use my Fitbit purely as a wristwatch, but intend to return to some of the tracking features post-pregnancy. I don’t have any other wristwatch and really like the way my Fitbit looks, so I’m happily ”stuck” with it even now.
The only downside why I’d maybe prefer a similar-looking wristwatch is that there doesn’t seem to be any way of telling the app I’m pregnant, and pregnancy is messing up every statistic: my resting HR is through the roof (normal for pregnancy), my sleeping patterns are messed up because of nightly bathroom breaks, my ability to do intense exercise is reduced to almost 0 and so on.1 -
dave_in_ni wrote: »In a way, the question doesn’t even compute, for me. I’ve long used a HRM, GPS tracker, and sometimes specialized devices to collect performance-related metrics. That was before mass-market multi-function fitness trackers were available at all.
Now that I have a Garmin that integrates all of those, plus automates some estimates I used to do more laboriously (like resting heart rate), plus gives me estimates I didn’t have before at all, I love my Garmin. That’s true even though its all-day calorie estimate is *wildly* inaccurate for me (I don’t synch it to MFP because of that).
I used to use a Polar HRM, and correlate it with pace/distance/time data from my Concept 2 rowing machine, tracking hoped-for things like lowered HR at the same pace, for example. I also had a Garmin (Forerunner) that would do pace/distance tracking for on-water rowing. I would use that data in junction with the Polar HR data, as well as for evaluating different technical changes or strategies. (Example: If we do 500m max-effort rowing pieces, is our double faster at 25 spm or 30 spm? (If you’re thinking 30 is always faster . . . it isn’t, because technique can degrade at higher spm.)) It took a 3rd device to get the SPM, and there were not apps to integrate all those pieces at the time, so it was ballpark-ish, or spreadsheet analysis with aggregated data streams.
Now, Garmin gives me reasonable estimates of all that stuff – pace, SPM, HR, distance, duration – time-integrated. That’s pretty useful, and a time-saver. On top of that, it replaces the wristwatch I’ve worn most of my life (for a while in the 1970s, I carried a pocket watch, because my job was destructive to wristwatches of the era). Though I'm not competing any more, performance improvement is still part of the fun, for me.
I do use Garmin’s calorie estimates for some exercises, where I don’t have an estimating source I consider more likely to be accurate. That’s a handy side-benefit, but not the key reason I appreciate having such a device.
I understand that we’re all different people with different priorities, but the seeming common idea on MFP that the main point of these devices is calorie estimates and step counts . . . that’s really alien to me.
I was speaking about myself really. I was never into running, just weights and walking, It was steps I was after and calorie total. Trackers are useless for weights and as you say the calorie total was not accurate and neither were the steps really, so for me it was kind of a pointless device. I was after it more for health I guess that fitness, we'll not even talk about sleep tracking which ended up giving me insomnia.
I love my Garmin in general, but also I find it pretty useful lifting weights in the gym. It knows whether I'm doing benches, squats, or whatever, and it counts reps for me. There's an up and a down button so when I did 12 and it only saw 11, it's quick and easy to fix. I like having a log of what I did. The web site gives me a graph of reps and weight for every lift, over time, to show me if I'm making progress and if I'm covering all my bases.
This time of year my main exercise is cycling. I have the Garmin tail light on my bike, the one with radar, so when I'm riding, my watch starts beeping and vibrating to let me know wherever there's a car behind me. Don't even have to look at it, if it's freaking out it's because there's a car approaching; if the car is going too fast the watch screen goes red, and the light starts flashing to get the driver's attention. I love my Garmin.4 -
I don't use it for steps or calories though.1
-
I had the Fitbit charge hr 6 years ago and replaced it with the Fitbit inspire in the last year. I wear mine all the time and only take it off to shower or charge. Although it may not always be precisely accurate I enjoy keeping track of my steps and sleep. It has became a must have for me kind of like my phone.1
-
I sometimes think about it. I laugh at myself when I get to the trailhead and am mad that my garmin battery is low and won't be able to capture my whole workout. Then I remind myself that my body will get the workout whether my Garmin keeps record of it or not!! We used to guessitmate our calorie burn from workouts from anecdotal averages and we did just fine. I haven't seen waistlines, including mine, shrink because I have more data.0
-
I could track my calories with pen and paper but I use MFP because it is faster and easier. The watch is the same way. It helps me in an area in which I have historically struggled so the easier it is the more sustainable it is. If the day comes I find it easier to live without it, then I will ditch it. The same is true of MFP. If I could walk everywhere easier than I could drive there I would ditch the vehicle too.1
-
I started with a basic FitBit. I liked the simplicity of the device. The first one died several times on warranty, and was replaced, but eventually died out of warranty (at about 1.5y), so I bought one with HR. It was very good for the basic health monitoring, but not so much for activities (the phone was better for that). Again, I went through a couple on warranty, then it died out of warranty (again at about 1.5y), at which point, I had had enough of these flakey devices. I went back to the phone plus a HRM strap for a long time for running, cycling, etc., which actually works very well.
Eventually, I bought a lower-end Garmin (VA3) because it offered swim monitoring as well as run and ride. It's been very good, although it died after 2 years, so I bought a re-firb of the same unit to replace it (shows how much I like it). I've also added a Garmin bicycle computer to my kit, mostly for safety (it has incident detection and pairs to a rear-view radar).
I still want a Garmin HRM for swimming! I think Garmin has me figured out pretty well!2 -
My apple watch has definitely helped my running. It's very liberating to not carry a phone and listen to my music. I have definitely gotten faster and more fit because I have instantaneous access to my HR (from a chest strap bluetooth) pace distance splits etc.
When I was a kid, I can remember just starting to jog and carrying a stop watch in order to see how long I was running for.
These are tools. I agree that we have to be careful we don't let them control us (apple watch definitely tries!) If you feel claustraphobic from the tools then it's a good reason for you to let them go. Personally since I have gotten my vaccines and the chip I feel so much more in tune to all my devices...
5 -
“I could track my calories with pen and paper”
You just reminded me of the days in the early 90’s when I had a huge book that gave the calorie info for thousands of different foods. Each day I would track my calories by looking it up and writing it down in a notebook.4 -
“I could track my calories with pen and paper”
You just reminded me of the days in the early 90’s when I had a huge book that gave the calorie info for thousands of different foods. Each day I would track my calories by looking it up and writing it down in a notebook.
That reminds me of this mini book I had when I first started counting calories over 15 years ago. I used to bring it with me everywhere in my purse.
0 -
Sound like a fair summary so far?
* People who use their trackers for calories are split on liking and not liking them.
* People who use them for steps and general movement level are split between "this motivates me off the couch" and "this thing is too controlling."
* People who use them for info to help in some way with their sport or exercise of choice love them.6 -
I did. Haven’t looked back. Well, I did briefly and same issues made me put it in the drawer. My issues with all the ones I’ve tried:
—calorie counts way off. I ate what MFP synced w what tracker said and I maintained or gained slowly. Went back to manual input and I started losing again. (This partly bc my main activity was lifting and it couldn’t track that as well I think)
—trackers favor steady state cardio. I lift. That’s what actually makes me look how I want to look (because muscles). But bc I’m competitive and hate that bc my heart rate doesn’t go up enough for long enough to register as a “real “ workout, the tracker makes me look like a couch potato. So I would add more cardio than I needed. And would often obsess over why it wouldn’t count my steps while holding a shopping cart or stroller, etc. sometimes the extra push for more steps/cardio led to some minor overuse injuries and mostly far too much time spent exercising. I was prioritizing what pleased the tracker and not what would directly help my goals. Did the tracker cause this? No, obviously it was my own issue, but I prioritize better without it.
—I was spending too much time analyzing metrics and results, looking at trends in sleep, exercise minutes, steps, etc. and that got me nowhere, at the end of the day. So now I input into MFP, and get back to life. And get results.2 -
Switching to a TDEE approach (vs. the default MFP method) has been a huge boon to my success. Still wear my apple watch for alerts and things but do not use it for tracking exercise, steps, or calories. If there's anything I would like to measure better it's sleep. The battery makes it such that sleep tracking via apple watch isn't very feasible but I'd like to quantify and work to improve my sleep quantity and quality and I think a tracker may help in that endeavor.0
-
I ditched my FitBit, but I like my Garmin. I use it primarily for GPS tracking and I like my exercise and activities to be uploaded to one site. It also provides far more in depth training data than the FitBit did. I also like the breadcrumb trails and compass for hiking and mountain biking. I can check the current weather and temps and days forecast just touching a button (like I just did a moment ago to see if I'd be swimming later this afternoon). I also keep a close eye on my HR, particularly resting and how quickly my HR comes down after exercise as another data point for where my fitness is...
Steps and stuff are just kind of gravy...I don't have any particular step goals since I walk my dog most mornings and I'm typically somewhere between 10K-15K steps per day...but I like seeing the data. I glance at the calories from time to time and for the most part they seem reasonable relative to years of data I had previous to owning one of these things...but it's not something I pay a lot of attention to. The sleep tracking was pretty interesting when I quit drinking the copious amounts of booze I was drinking throughout the pandemic...sleep was very noticeably improved IRL and as indicated on my watch...so that was kinda cool, but not something I look at a ton.
I've never had my Garmin or my FitBit synched to MFP...but I don't log, so it wouldn't really be of any particular benefit.2
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.6K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions