Not into weight lifting. Is it really necessary at all?
Mslmesq
Posts: 1,000 Member
I used to lift (lightly) in my 20's. I went around with a man who was really into it, and he taught me how. But I don't think I ever really liked it that much.
As I get older, I've heard it's very important for a woman to do it to maintain muscle. But frankly, I like it even less now. I prefer pilates, yoga, or whatever.
But here is my question that I keep coming back to for those that think it's necessary and the best form of exercise for maintaining muscle. And that it has to be weights, as opposed to using your own body for the exercise, like you do for the most part in pilates (non reformer) and yoga. How do you explain people that don't lift, but are very muscular?
The first example that immediately comes to mind is a ballerina and her legs. They don't lift weights, other than using their body's weight to carry them. My understanding is they do cross train with pilates, yoga, etc., but no weight training. Yet, they are as muscular as can be in their legs.
So, is it really necessary?
As I get older, I've heard it's very important for a woman to do it to maintain muscle. But frankly, I like it even less now. I prefer pilates, yoga, or whatever.
But here is my question that I keep coming back to for those that think it's necessary and the best form of exercise for maintaining muscle. And that it has to be weights, as opposed to using your own body for the exercise, like you do for the most part in pilates (non reformer) and yoga. How do you explain people that don't lift, but are very muscular?
The first example that immediately comes to mind is a ballerina and her legs. They don't lift weights, other than using their body's weight to carry them. My understanding is they do cross train with pilates, yoga, etc., but no weight training. Yet, they are as muscular as can be in their legs.
So, is it really necessary?
0
Replies
-
First, there is a difference between being really really lean (like the ballerina), and being muscular.
Second, the health benefits of lifting go far beyond just muscles. Strength for daily life, bone density, etc...
Third, strength training is a fairly broad term. Yes, in most cases weights are the most effective form, but there are a lot of good body weight exercises that can be done. I've done some yoga in my day, but I'm certainly no expert. IME, yoga is great for targeting supporting/stabilizing muscles, but doesn't do much to really strengthen the major muscle groups.0 -
Few things are truly necessary.
Is strength training beneficial, yes of course. Do you have to lift weights in order to strength train, no, not at all. I haven't been in a gym in over 7 years. Most would consider me fairly muscular. I train hard using body weight exercises. Did I enjoy lifting weights back in the day, yes I loved it. But now I enjoy this body weight thing and seeing how far it can take me. There are things I can do now that I couldn't when I was "stronger" and lifted weights.
If you like yoga and pilates, stick with those. I'd also suggest incorporating other body weight strength training as that will only enhance your yoga & pilates practice.0 -
First, there is a difference between being really really lean (like the ballerina), and being muscular.
Second, the health benefits of lifting go far beyond just muscles. Strength for daily life, bone density, etc...
Third, strength training is a fairly broad term. Yes, in most cases weights are the most effective form, but there are a lot of good body weight exercises that can be done. I've done some yoga in my day, but I'm certainly no expert. IME, yoga is great for targeting supporting/stabilizing muscles, but doesn't do much to really strengthen the major muscle groups.
I disagree that ballerinas (professional) are really lean, as opposed to really muscular. They are both in my opinion. Their legs are very muscular.
As far as the benefits, yes I agree. I'm just trying to decide if these benefits need to be obtained from traditional weight lifting, or can be obtained from other exercise...which will also build muscle.
Other examples I think of are ice skaters, swimmers, gymnasts.0 -
Few things are truly necessary.
Is strength training beneficial, yes of course. Do you have to lift weights in order to strength train, no, not at all. I haven't been in a gym in over 7 years. Most would consider me fairly muscular. I train hard using body weight exercises. Did I enjoy lifting weights back in the day, yes I loved it. But now I enjoy this body weight thing and seeing how far it can take me. There are things I can do now that I couldn't when I was "stronger" and lifted weights.
If you like yoga and pilates, stick with those. I'd also suggest incorporating other body weight strength training as that will only enhance your yoga & pilates practice.
Thanks. You do look great by the way. Thumbs up. :-)0 -
Other examples I think of are ice skaters, swimmers, gymnasts.
You don't think they lift? I know for a fact swimmers do, and I bet dollars to donuts the others do as well.0 -
I know lots of people who do pilates and yoga and look very fit and lean. But the other day one of them tried to give her 5 year old (who maybe weighed about 40lbs) a piggy back ride and she struggled to get up off the ground. Mind you she was about 5'9 in height so I don't think it should have been hard.
It's gonna be a matter of preference to each individual. Some can be body strong, but if they don't weigh much, then doing things like lifting a suit case, full laundry basket or even groceries may be challenging. I'd like to think that if I had to move a couch by myself, I could do it.
So again not necessary, but it does have it's advantages in the real world.
A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
IDEA Fitness member
Kickboxing Certified Instructor
Been in fitness industry for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition0 -
Yes its necessary for over all body composition
You will have a higher LEAN BODY MASS therefore you will need MORE calories daily
Besides you will look better . A bit of muscle on any frame looks good0 -
It's probably going to be a heck of lot easier to just lift some weights than, say, train for the hours and hours a day it takes a ballerine to develop those legs through dance alone.
Unless that's your thing and then go for it.0 -
I know lots of people who do pilates and yoga and look very fit and lean. But the other day one of them tried to give her 5 year old (who maybe weighed about 40lbs) a piggy back ride and she struggled to get up off the ground. Mind you she was about 5'9 in height so I don't think it should have been hard.
It's gonna be a matter of preference to each individual. Some can be body strong, but if they don't weigh much, then doing things like lifting a suit case, full laundry basket or even groceries may be challenging. I'd like to think that if I had to move a couch by myself, I could do it.
So again not necessary, but it does have it's advantages in the real world.
A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
IDEA Fitness member
Kickboxing Certified Instructor
Been in fitness industry for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition
I think a good business idea would be a female only moving company where the girl move your stuff dressed in bikinis. Also their truck is pink. They could move your couch for you.0 -
Other examples I think of are ice skaters, swimmers, gymnasts.
You don't think they lift? I know for a fact swimmers do, and I bet dollars to donuts the others do as well.
Swimmers, I don't know. Probably depends. I used to ice skate. Back then, no they didn't. Ballet was encouraged to supplement. No one ever used to weight lift. Now, I don't know. But they had the same muscles back then.
Also, my husband doesn't lift but has really muscular legs from years of playing soccer. That is muscle memory cause he does nothing now. But they are still rock hard. Go figure. :-/0 -
Other examples I think of are ice skaters, swimmers, gymnasts.
You don't think they lift? I know for a fact swimmers do, and I bet dollars to donuts the others do as well.
Swimmers, I don't know. Probably depends. I used to ice skate. Back then, no they didn't. Ballet was encouraged to supplement. No one ever used to weight lift. Now, I don't know. But they had the same muscles back then.
Also, my husband doesn't lift but has really muscular legs from years of playing soccer. That is muscle memory cause he does nothing now. But they are still rock hard. Go figure. :-/
I know for a fact, skaters do now....at least if they're serious about it, same thing with soccer players.....0 -
For me it is necessary ! at 48 I feel stronger than ever before in life! I feel lean and comfortable in my skin, I eat a ton of food since weights allow my body to burn faster with muscle.(love food) Yup for me it is a must;-) I love how I feel from lifting!
You gotta do what works for you.;-)
edited to add, using your own bodyweights is effective too.0 -
It's definitely not necessary. But it is helpful, and good for you. Here's the thing: If feeling like having to lift weights is going to deter you from working out because you dread it that much, don't do it. But if it's a minor annoyance to spend a little time on it every week, you might just want to do it since it's great for lean muscle mass and looking good.
And on a personal note, I'm not really into lifting either, but since I started doing even minor lifting a few months ago, I noticed a huuuuge difference. It seems worth an extra hour a week to me. I do it while I watch tv because I use free weights at home. =D0 -
Yes its necessary for over all body composition
You will have a higher LEAN BODY MASS therefore you will need MORE calories daily
Besides you will look better . A bit of muscle on any frame looks good
I agree with this. I guess the question is how to get it.
I also do believe there is some muscle memory cause I've experienced it too.0 -
Other examples I think of are ice skaters, swimmers, gymnasts.
You don't think they lift? I know for a fact swimmers do, and I bet dollars to donuts the others do as well.
Swimmers, I don't know. Probably depends. I used to ice skate. Back then, no they didn't. Ballet was encouraged to supplement. No one ever used to weight lift. Now, I don't know. But they had the same muscles back then.
Also, my husband doesn't lift but has really muscular legs from years of playing soccer. That is muscle memory cause he does nothing now. But they are still rock hard. Go figure. :-/
I'm thinking that your definition of muscular and others here may be quite different. E. G. Every soccer player I've seen has chicken legs0 -
What is really necessary? I love lifting, but finding something you love that you will do consistently is much more important in the long run.0
-
I want lean muscle mass and to be strong and healthy. So for me, yes.0
-
Back in the day distance runners didn't lift or do abs either.........strength training in general and weight lifting in particular offers so many benefits that all you really need to decide is whether or not the benefits outweigh your disinterest in weight lifting. You don't need to spend hours at it to derive a significant benefit and, like some vegetables, you may surprise yourself by growing to enjoy it (or at least the results)
I'm not sure what the rate of muscle loss is for women but for men over 40 it's alarming (about 1% per year and the rate accelerates after 60) and there is a growing body of solid evidence that many of the problems associated with aging can be mitigated through exercise (both cardio and strength)0 -
Other examples I think of are ice skaters, swimmers, gymnasts.
You don't think they lift? I know for a fact swimmers do, and I bet dollars to donuts the others do as well.
Swimmers, I don't know. Probably depends. I used to ice skate. Back then, no they didn't. Ballet was encouraged to supplement. No one ever used to weight lift. Now, I don't know. But they had the same muscles back then.
Also, my husband doesn't lift but has really muscular legs from years of playing soccer. That is muscle memory cause he does nothing now. But they are still rock hard. Go figure. :-/
I'm thinking that your definition of muscular and others here may be quite different. E. G. Every soccer player I've seen has chicken legs
Well he's not a body builder, but they are definitely muscular. Probably not too different in my opinion then others. I dated someone who was a body builder and very big, so I understand the difference. He's still got muscular legs and a bike rider's but. But if he didn't get it from soccer, then idk.
Tennis, same thing though, imo. Look at the forearms.0 -
Depends on your goals.
Do you want to be lose fat and muscle and be weak?
Do you want to lose fat and maintain muscle?
Do you want to lose fat and then build muscle?
I want to lose fat and maintain muscle, so lifting is for me.0 -
Tennis players are lean but definitely not muscular.0
-
Tennis players are lean but definitely not muscular.
Agreed.
OP - is this more about appearance, fitness/ability, or health for you?0 -
Back in the day distance runners didn't lift or do abs either.........strength training in general and weight lifting in particular offers so many benefits that all you really need to decide is whether or not the benefits outweigh your disinterest in weight lifting. You don't need to spend hours at it to derive a significant benefit and, like some vegetables, you may surprise yourself by growing to enjoy it (or at least the results)
I'm not sure what the rate of muscle loss is for women but for men over 40 it's alarming (about 1% per year and the rate accelerates after 60) and there is a growing body of solid evidence that many of the problems associated with aging can be mitigated through exercise (both cardio and strength)
Well running is not one of the athletes I associate in my mind with building muscle, so...
And I agree with everyone saying it's important to maintain muscle, especially as we age. What I'm trying to figure out is if traditional weight training is necessary to do it.0 -
Tennis players are lean but definitely not muscular.
Agreed.
OP - is this more about appearance, fitness/ability, or health for you?
Only health. Not the other two.
And with tennis, only, only referring to the forearm. Nothing else on the body.0 -
Back in the day distance runners didn't lift or do abs either.........strength training in general and weight lifting in particular offers so many benefits that all you really need to decide is whether or not the benefits outweigh your disinterest in weight lifting. You don't need to spend hours at it to derive a significant benefit and, like some vegetables, you may surprise yourself by growing to enjoy it (or at least the results)
I'm not sure what the rate of muscle loss is for women but for men over 40 it's alarming (about 1% per year and the rate accelerates after 60) and there is a growing body of solid evidence that many of the problems associated with aging can be mitigated through exercise (both cardio and strength)
Well running is not one of the athletes I associate in my mind with building muscle, so...
And I agree with everyone saying it's important to maintain muscle, especially as we age. What I'm trying to figure out is if traditional weight training is necessary to do it.
No, it's not... not in the sense of barbells, plates, etc.0 -
I don't think it's "necessary," but it's a darn good idea.0
-
I don't like doing planks, but I do them anyway. I don't like going to the dentist, but I do. I don't like spinach, but I eat it. Life is full of these decisions. Sounds like you don't want to strength train, and you won't. So, don't. Like everyone else, you decide what your goals are and how you'd like to get there.0
-
For me, yes, because I'd rather a round hard booty then a jiggly cellulite ridden booty (those are my 2 options), I like to look good naked and I think mucles look awesome naked.
For women in general, I think it is because women who perform strength training exercises are less likely to have osteoporosis.0 -
First, there is a difference between being really really lean (like the ballerina), and being muscular.
Second, the health benefits of lifting go far beyond just muscles. Strength for daily life, bone density, etc...
Third, strength training is a fairly broad term. Yes, in most cases weights are the most effective form, but there are a lot of good body weight exercises that can be done. I've done some yoga in my day, but I'm certainly no expert. IME, yoga is great for targeting supporting/stabilizing muscles, but doesn't do much to really strengthen the major muscle groups.
I disagree that ballerinas (professional) are really lean, as opposed to really muscular. They are both in my opinion. Their legs are very muscular.
As far as the benefits, yes I agree. I'm just trying to decide if these benefits need to be obtained from traditional weight lifting, or can be obtained from other exercise...which will also build muscle.
Other examples I think of are ice skaters, swimmers, gymnasts.
I was a gymnast in High School. (Mind you I was not very good and it was High School, so don't equate me with professional/ olympic Gymnasts) I did not "lift" weights (other than my body) and I had extremely muscular legs. I believe body weight training is fine for maintaining muscle while losing weight, or maintaining muscle over the years. We did squats, lunges, various jumps (occasionally with ankle weight- so I dont know if that counts as "lifting"). I do mostly body weight training now and still have pretty awesome muscles in my legs. All that being said, I am planning on starting to lift soon because I want to be better, stronger etc.. Depending on your goals, I have read that body weight training will probably do what you are looking for. Do some research, check with Drs or trainers, possibly nutritionists?0 -
I don't like doing planks, but I do them anyway. I don't like going to the dentist, but I do. I don't like spinach, but I eat it. Life is full of these decisions. Sounds like you don't want to strength train, and you won't. So, don't. Like everyone else, you decide what your goals are and how you'd like to get there.
Lol. I actually love doing planks. I can hold one in good form forever. I hate sideovers though.
Yup, I've been struggling with whether or not to reincorporate weight lifting. Part of it is intimidation cause I don't know how anymore. And part of it is worry about spending too much time doing it, cause I used to be really into the whole 4 days a week or more and a split routine. And it's time consuming. Then, last, I think or wonder, is it really necessary when I already like other things I can maintain muscle mass with...or at least I think I can.
I am worried about losing muscle mass as I age though, thus my thinking about all of this.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 394.1K Introduce Yourself
- 43.9K Getting Started
- 260.4K Health and Weight Loss
- 176K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.6K Fitness and Exercise
- 435 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153.1K Motivation and Support
- 8.1K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.4K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.9K MyFitnessPal Information
- 15 News and Announcements
- 1.2K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.7K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions