1 lb = 1 lb = 1 lb

Options
1princesswarrior
1princesswarrior Posts: 1,242 Member
Ok, I'm a geek so this drives me absolutely bonkers.

Muscle does not weigh more than fat.

Now, let me support my argument with a little chemistry lesson.

Mass is a physical property that typically reflects the quantity of matter within an object.

Volume is the quantity of 3-dimensional space occupied by a solid, liquid, or gas.

Muscle is more dense than fat, so the same mass of muscle takes up less volume than the same mass of fat. So, the only way that muscle weighs more than fat is when you are comparing the same volume of muscle to the same volume of fat (for example, 1 liter fat to 1 liter muscle), not by comparing the same mass of muscle to the same mass of fat.

See the thread below for a picture:
http://www.myfitnesspal.com/topics/show/279938-5-lbs-of-muscle-vs-5-lbs-of-fat-picture

Thank you for your patience with this geek.
«13

Replies

  • diodelcibo
    diodelcibo Posts: 2,564 Member
    Options
    In other news.
    0720_big.gif
  • judyde
    judyde Posts: 401 Member
    Options
    I hear ya, it reminds me of that old riddle "what weighs more, a pound of feathers or a pound of lead" The same, they are both a pound!

    But I think when people say this, they mean that muscle weighs for a given amount of volume, i.e., it weights more per square inch. If you replaced all your fat with muscle you would be SMALLER. I am definitely trying to get smaller!
  • Holly_Roman_Empire
    Holly_Roman_Empire Posts: 4,440 Member
    Options
    I had a conversation about weight with my husband yesterday that went something like this:

    Me: Yeah, 260 on an NFL linebacker is not the same as 260 on the average joe walking the street.
    Husband: That's the way it goes when you have muscles.
    Me: Yep, muscle is MORE DENSE than fat. Venus Williams weighs the same as me, but obviously I don't have her build or strength.
    Husband: Plus, muscle weighs more than fat.
    Me: [Facepalm]

    ETA: I agree with the above poster. I think it's all semantics. If they said muscle weighs more than fat per cubic inch, then yeah, they would be right.
  • Superhero_Leah
    Options
    This has been mentioned many times....many many times, and you're correct, lol muscle just makes you look so much better.
  • crackur
    crackur Posts: 473 Member
    Options
    now this site has gone too far

    its' like someone telling me the sky is not falling......I damn well know it is closer today than it was yesterday.
  • erickirb
    erickirb Posts: 12,293 Member
    Options
    Ok, I'm a geek so this drives me absolutely bonkers.

    Muscle does not weigh more than fat.

    Now, let me support my argument with a little chemistry lesson.

    Mass is a physical property that typically reflects the quantity of matter within an object.

    Volume is the quantity of 3-dimensional space occupied by a solid, liquid, or gas.

    Muscle is more dense than fat, so the same mass of muscle takes up less volume than the same mass of fat. So, the only way that muscle weighs more than fat is when you are comparing the same volume of muscle to the same volume of fat (for example, 1 liter fat to 1 liter muscle), not by comparing the same mass of muscle to the same mass of fat.

    See the thread below for a picture:
    http://www.myfitnesspal.com/topics/show/279938-5-lbs-of-muscle-vs-5-lbs-of-fat-picture

    Thank you for your patience with this geek.
    But, when you are comparing 2 variable you should keep all else constant, that way you can determine what it is you are testing for. So if you take equal volumes of fat and muscle, muscle will weigh more. So when people say muscle weighs more than fat, they mean by volume, since volume is implied it does not have to be stated.

    ETA: No one ever says 1 lb of muscle weighs more than 1 lb of fat, if they did, then you would be right

    Taking your argument then I weigh as much as you because 1 lb of you weighs the same as 1 lb of me.
    Or butter and carrots have the same caloric content, because 1 cal of carrots = 1 cal of butter, pretty poor logic to me.
  • elisa123gal
    elisa123gal Posts: 4,287 Member
    Options
    yeah... i know what people mean when they say.."muscle weighs more than fat." Just like a I know what they mean when they say "starvation mode" I don't take it all so literal.. but the points need to be well taken.
  • raige123
    Options
    It's not that it weighs more ... it's always said wrong. 1 lb of fat takes up a lot more space then 1 lb of muscle, so having more fat lbs is very bad is the point I think ... but yes ... just always said wrong.
  • SailorKnightWing
    SailorKnightWing Posts: 875 Member
    Options
    So, the only way that muscle weighs more than fat is when you are comparing the same volume of muscle to the same volume of fat (for example, 1 liter fat to 1 liter muscle)
    That's exactly what a lot of people who say it mean.
  • JenAndSome
    JenAndSome Posts: 1,908 Member
    Options
    I don't usually take it so hard when I hear someone say it because I know what they are meaning to say. It's the same thing as the loose/lose, your/you're, and to/too/two. You can let it get to you, or you can just interpret the meaning and move on with your life.
  • Beastmode454
    Beastmode454 Posts: 340 Member
    Options
    now this site has gone too far

    its' like someone telling me the sky is not falling......I damn well know it is closer today than it was yesterday.

    Lmao.. this made almost spit out my water :D
  • InForBacon
    InForBacon Posts: 1,508 Member
    Options
    But, when you are comparing 2 variable you should keep all else constant, that way you can determine what it is you are testing for. So if you take equal volumes of fat and muscle, muscle will weigh more. So when people say muscle weighs more than fat, they mean by volume, since volume is implied it does not have to be stated.

    ETA: No one ever says 1 lb of muscle weighs more than 1 lb of fat, if they did, then you would be right

    Taking your argument then I weigh as much as you because 1 lb of you weighs the same as 1 lb of me.
    Or butter and carrots have the same caloric content, because 1 cal of carrots = 1 cal of butter, pretty poor logic to me.
    What is this Science you speak of?
  • bigphatcat
    bigphatcat Posts: 7,843 Member
    Options
    Did you stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night?
  • UsedToBeHusky
    UsedToBeHusky Posts: 15,229 Member
    Options
    Muscle is denser by volume. Therefore, 1 lb of muscle is smaller than 1 lb of fat. That is what is meant by muscle weighs more than fat. Muscle, in an equivalent-sized mass, is heavier than fat.
  • SerenaFisher
    SerenaFisher Posts: 2,170 Member
    Options
    When someone says "i drank so much water it is coming out of my ears" or some impossible exageration do you also get anal with them? FYI do not take anal seriously.
  • ldrosophila
    ldrosophila Posts: 7,512 Member
    Options
    tell that to the moon
  • spade117
    spade117 Posts: 2,466 Member
    Options
    I had a conversation about weight with my husband yesterday that went something like this:

    Me: Yeah, 260 on an NFL linebacker is not the same as 260 on the average joe walking the street.
    Husband: That's the way it goes when you have muscles.
    Me: Yep, muscle is MORE DENSE than fat. Venus Williams weighs the same as me, but obviously I don't have her build or strength.
    Husband: Plus, muscle weighs more than fat.
    Me: [Facepalm]

    Divorce him.
  • bcattoes
    bcattoes Posts: 17,299 Member
    Options
    Oh, this again. Everything in the world weighs 1 lb. Nothing weighs more than anything else. I'm a geek cuz I knows this. :yawn:
  • ryry_
    ryry_ Posts: 4,966 Member
    Options
    I'll take things taken out of context for 200 Alex.
  • InForBacon
    InForBacon Posts: 1,508 Member
    Options
    I'll take things taken out of context for 200 Alex.
    I think she's calling me fat.