Build muscle in a calorie deficit

Hey there,
This is my first forum question. Is it possible to build muscle in a calorie deficit but keepin ur protein high (1g/lb).
Consider this question from 3 point of views
Beginner, Overweight, and advanced.
My supplements are:
Whey protein
Casein protein
BCAA for cardio sessions
fish oil
CLA
Jack3d
«1

Replies

  • KarenJanine
    KarenJanine Posts: 3,497 Member
    Beginner: possibly
    Overweight: possibly
    Advanced: unlikely

    ETA assuming 'beginner' and 'advanced' are in relation to a progressive strength training programme.
  • lauren3101
    lauren3101 Posts: 1,853 Member
    You may gain a tiny amount in the beginning but it will be negligible, so really the answer is no.

    You will however burn fat so your existing muscles will be more prominent. The only way to gain muscle is to lift heavy and eat at a small surplus.
  • I have been lifting weights on calorie deficit for the past 4 months and I have gained alot of muscle.
    My scale wont move cause I have been building muscle and losing fat simultaneously.
    Yes its not a plateau cause I checked by not lifting for 2 weeks and dropped weight.
    So I feel like this is a myth, u can build muscle on a calorie deificit!!
  • DrMAvDPhD
    DrMAvDPhD Posts: 2,097 Member
    I have been lifting weights on calorie deficit for the past 4 months and I have gained alot of muscle.
    My scale wont move cause I have been building muscle and losing fat simultaneously.
    Yes its not a plateau cause I checked by not lifting for 2 weeks and dropped weight.
    So I feel like this is a myth, u can build muscle on a calorie deificit!!

    No. Your scale dropped when you didn't lift because your muscles had time to recover so they retained less water.
  • ninerbuff
    ninerbuff Posts: 48,976 Member
    I have been lifting weights on calorie deficit for the past 4 months and I have gained alot of muscle.
    My scale wont move cause I have been building muscle and losing fat simultaneously.
    Yes its not a plateau cause I checked by not lifting for 2 weeks and dropped weight.
    So I feel like this is a myth, u can build muscle on a calorie deificit!!
    Feel what you want, but to add muscle, you add weight. Adding weight means a calorie surplus. You've already confirmed that by not lifting you lost weight. Did you lose muscle then? All you lost was water retention since the muscle recovery process takes a good amount of it for the process. Body recomp is possible, but a LONG painstaking program.
    Seeing more muscle doesn't mean you've actually built it.

    A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness industry for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition
  • jacksonpt
    jacksonpt Posts: 10,413 Member
    I have been lifting weights on calorie deficit for the past 4 months and I have gained alot of muscle.
    My scale wont move cause I have been building muscle and losing fat simultaneously.
    Yes its not a plateau cause I checked by not lifting for 2 weeks and dropped weight.
    So I feel like this is a myth, u can build muscle on a calorie deificit!!

    What you think you see happening is not what's actually happening.


    To your original question...
    Yes, I believe it is possible, though for most people it will be painfully slow. Even if you are genetically lucky, you won't see noticeable/meaningful gains in weeks or months.
  • arghbowl
    arghbowl Posts: 1,179 Member
    Seeing definition & fat loss =/= building muscle
  • phjorg1
    phjorg1 Posts: 642 Member
    it's possible in 4 different scenarios. And note I said possible. Even with these 4, it's more likely you're not gaining anything.

    1) You're really fat

    2) You're completely untrained

    3) You used to be really muscular, lost it, and are trying to regain it

    4) On roids.

    As you can see, the above are all temporary situations that will eventually result in plateau. Once that happens, the only way you're gaining lean mass is eating above your tdee with a proper resistance training template.
  • jacksonpt
    jacksonpt Posts: 10,413 Member
    it's possible in 4 different scenarios. And note I said possible. Even with these 4, it's more likely you're not gaining anything.

    1) You're really fat

    2) You're completely untrained

    3) You used to be really muscular, lost it, and are trying to regain it

    4) On roids.

    As you can see, the above are all temporary situations that will eventually result in plateau. Once that happens, the only way you're gaining lean mass is eating above your tdee with a proper resistance training template.

    anything? or anything significant?
  • phjorg1
    phjorg1 Posts: 642 Member
    it's possible in 4 different scenarios. And note I said possible. Even with these 4, it's more likely you're not gaining anything.

    1) You're really fat

    2) You're completely untrained

    3) You used to be really muscular, lost it, and are trying to regain it

    4) On roids.

    As you can see, the above are all temporary situations that will eventually result in plateau. Once that happens, the only way you're gaining lean mass is eating above your tdee with a proper resistance training template.

    anything? or anything significant?
    the body is always in a state of flux, so saying 'anything' is prob too absolutist. Will not see anything noticeable might be better.
  • akaMrsmojo
    akaMrsmojo Posts: 762 Member
    it's possible in 4 different scenarios. And note I said possible. Even with these 4, it's more likely you're not gaining anything.

    1) You're really fat

    2) You're completely untrained

    3) You used to be really muscular, lost it, and are trying to regain it

    4) On roids.

    As you can see, the above are all temporary situations that will eventually result in plateau. Once that happens, the only way you're gaining lean mass is eating above your tdee with a proper resistance training template.


    It could also be the person is under estimating calorie intake.
  • BarackMeLikeAHurricane
    BarackMeLikeAHurricane Posts: 3,400 Member
    Beginner: yes
    Overweight: yes
    Advanced: slowly
  • I have been lifting weights on calorie deficit for the past 4 months and I have gained alot of muscle.
    My scale wont move cause I have been building muscle and losing fat simultaneously.
    Yes its not a plateau cause I checked by not lifting for 2 weeks and dropped weight.
    So I feel like this is a myth, u can build muscle on a calorie deificit!!
    Feel what you want, but to add muscle, you add weight. Adding weight means a calorie surplus. You've already confirmed that by not lifting you lost weight. Did you lose muscle then? All you lost was water retention since the muscle recovery process takes a good amount of it for the process. Body recomp is possible, but a LONG painstaking program.
    Seeing more muscle doesn't mean you've actually built it.

    A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness industry for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition

    Wen I lost weight I saw more definition in the muscle but they where flatter cause of water loss.
    wat do u mean by Seeing more muscle doesn't mean you've actually built it.
  • RGv2
    RGv2 Posts: 5,789 Member
    Lifting on a deficit maintains muscle mass (as best as you can) while you lose fat. This is why the scale doesn't move, and as you are mainly losing fat while maintaining muscle mass these uncovered muscle aren't new. It what you maintained.

    FYI, no chance you gained "a lot" of muscle in 4 months......calorie deficit or not.
  • pcastagner
    pcastagner Posts: 1,606 Member
    Question is not well defined.

    What is "in a deficit"? Every moment? Every day? Some days? Monthly?

    Time not well defined in these sorts of questions.
  • Ang108
    Ang108 Posts: 1,711 Member
    I have been lifting weights on calorie deficit for the past 4 months and I have gained alot of muscle.
    My scale wont move cause I have been building muscle and losing fat simultaneously.
    Yes its not a plateau cause I checked by not lifting for 2 weeks and dropped weight.
    So I feel like this is a myth, u can build muscle on a calorie deificit!!

    From what I learned in my serious weight lifting days I think one loses weight by eating less and spending more energy/calories ( calorie deficit ). During the phases I built muscle I had to eat more. I now wonder how it is possible to eat less for weight/ fat loss and eat more for building muscle at the same time.
    I think what you believe is muscle gain is actually muscle definition......I just can't believe that anyone would build significant muscle and lose weight/fat at the same time.....of course you are welcome to prove me wrong, but please with something more scientific than a statement of fact.
  • ninerbuff
    ninerbuff Posts: 48,976 Member
    I have been lifting weights on calorie deficit for the past 4 months and I have gained alot of muscle.
    My scale wont move cause I have been building muscle and losing fat simultaneously.
    Yes its not a plateau cause I checked by not lifting for 2 weeks and dropped weight.
    So I feel like this is a myth, u can build muscle on a calorie deificit!!
    Feel what you want, but to add muscle, you add weight. Adding weight means a calorie surplus. You've already confirmed that by not lifting you lost weight. Did you lose muscle then? All you lost was water retention since the muscle recovery process takes a good amount of it for the process. Body recomp is possible, but a LONG painstaking program.
    Seeing more muscle doesn't mean you've actually built it.

    A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness industry for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition

    Wen I lost weight I saw more definition in the muscle but they where flatter cause of water loss.
    wat do u mean by Seeing more muscle doesn't mean you've actually built it.
    Everyone has muscles. To what degree of muscularity will depend on genetics and whether one trains with correct nutrition. Being "ripped" doesn't necessarily mean one built muscle. Going from pot belly to six pack doesn't indicate that ab size was increased.

    A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness industry for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition
  • pcastagner
    pcastagner Posts: 1,606 Member
    I have been lifting weights on calorie deficit for the past 4 months and I have gained alot of muscle.
    My scale wont move cause I have been building muscle and losing fat simultaneously.
    Yes its not a plateau cause I checked by not lifting for 2 weeks and dropped weight.
    So I feel like this is a myth, u can build muscle on a calorie deificit!!

    From what I learned in my serious weight lifting days I think one loses weight by eating less and spending more energy/calories ( calorie deficit ). During the phases I built muscle I had to eat more. I now wonder how it is possible to eat less for weight/ fat loss and eat more for building muscle at the same time.
    I think what you believe is muscle gain is actually muscle definition......I just can't believe that anyone would build significant muscle and lose weight/fat at the same time.....of course you are welcome to prove me wrong, but please with something more scientific than a statement of fact.

    If you are very fat, it's possible.

    If you have muscles that just haven't been used much, they will grow. Traps is a good example. Or shoulders.

    Yeah, I'm now finding I have too run a surplus after workouts to grow. But I don't have to run a surplus all week. Or every day. I don't have to stop fitting into my pants.

    I'm building muscle slowly this way, but leaning out as well. All while staying in the same clothes (although shirts and jackets are getting tight up top and my thighs hold up the pants instead of the waist.
  • jacksonpt
    jacksonpt Posts: 10,413 Member
    I have been lifting weights on calorie deficit for the past 4 months and I have gained alot of muscle.
    My scale wont move cause I have been building muscle and losing fat simultaneously.
    Yes its not a plateau cause I checked by not lifting for 2 weeks and dropped weight.
    So I feel like this is a myth, u can build muscle on a calorie deificit!!

    From what I learned in my serious weight lifting days I think one loses weight by eating less and spending more energy/calories ( calorie deficit ). During the phases I built muscle I had to eat more. I now wonder how it is possible to eat less for weight/ fat loss and eat more for building muscle at the same time.
    I think what you believe is muscle gain is actually muscle definition......I just can't believe that anyone would build significant muscle and lose weight/fat at the same time.....of course you are welcome to prove me wrong, but please with something more scientific than a statement of fact.

    If you are very fat, it's possible.

    If you have muscles that just haven't been used much, they will grow. Traps is a good example. Or shoulders.

    Yeah, I'm now finding I have too run a surplus after workouts to grow. But I don't have to run a surplus all week. Or every day. I don't have to stop fitting into my pants.

    I'm building muscle slowly this way, but leaning out as well. All while staying in the same clothes (although shirts and jackets are getting tight up top and my things hold up the pants instead of the waist.

    Do you IF and/or carb backload?
  • pcastagner
    pcastagner Posts: 1,606 Member
    I have been lifting weights on calorie deficit for the past 4 months and I have gained alot of muscle.
    My scale wont move cause I have been building muscle and losing fat simultaneously.
    Yes its not a plateau cause I checked by not lifting for 2 weeks and dropped weight.
    So I feel like this is a myth, u can build muscle on a calorie deificit!!

    From what I learned in my serious weight lifting days I think one loses weight by eating less and spending more energy/calories ( calorie deficit ). During the phases I built muscle I had to eat more. I now wonder how it is possible to eat less for weight/ fat loss and eat more for building muscle at the same time.
    I think what you believe is muscle gain is actually muscle definition......I just can't believe that anyone would build significant muscle and lose weight/fat at the same time.....of course you are welcome to prove me wrong, but please with something more scientific than a statement of fact.

    If you are very fat, it's possible.

    If you have muscles that just haven't been used much, they will grow. Traps is a good example. Or shoulders.

    Yeah, I'm now finding I have too run a surplus after workouts to grow. But I don't have to run a surplus all week. Or every day. I don't have to stop fitting into my pants.

    I'm building muscle slowly this way, but leaning out as well. All while staying in the same clothes (although shirts and jackets are getting tight up top and my things hold up the pants instead of the waist.

    Do you IF and/or carb backload?

    I do lean gains. I try to concentrate Carbs at night, and lots of them if I have a big workout planned the next day. On surplus days I don't worry so much about protein, and try to focus on fats and carbs. On deficit days I eat lots of protein.

    My post workout meals are sometimes 2000 calories.

    I'm not saying the difference in gains isn't HUGE when eating at a weekly surplus. Because it is. And I'm not saying I didn't lose muscle along the way from 210 to below 160. I definitely did.

    So I think a better question is: can I go from fat to lean while gaining muscle? And I think the answer is: some of your muscles might grow but by the time you lose 50 or more pounds you will not have put on and kept any significant fat free mass.
  • FrnkLft
    FrnkLft Posts: 1,821 Member
    Nothing significant. That said, since you have to eat at a surplus to realize the kinds of gains you really want, take the time now to cut to your goal bodyfat % before lifting. Otherwise after you gain all the fat that comes with a bulk, you'll have twice the work to do when cutting.

    Continue to lift heavy to maintain what you have, and consider any size gains to be a bonus. Muscle glycogen storage (chemical energy) and water retention also makes them look bigger, without having actually built any new muscle tissue. This is what creatine does, fyi. And what creatine giveth, creatine taketh away.
  • FizikallyFit
    FizikallyFit Posts: 180 Member
    So if your wanting to lose weight and get more defined muscle you can lift and eat at a deficit. but once you have lost enough weight, then you can up to a small surplus to build that muscle and not lose anymore????
  • pcastagner
    pcastagner Posts: 1,606 Member
    So if your wanting to lose weight and get more defined muscle you can lift and eat at a deficit. but once you have lost enough weight, then you can up to a small surplus to build that muscle and not lose anymore????
    Yes. And the smaller your surplus, the more your gains will be muscle. They will be slower tho.
  • FrnkLft
    FrnkLft Posts: 1,821 Member
    So if your wanting to lose weight and get more defined muscle you can lift and eat at a deficit. but once you have lost enough weight, then you can up to a small surplus to build that muscle and not lose anymore????
    Yes. And the smaller your surplus, the more your gains will be muscle. They will be slower tho.

    Yeah for example, when I started I weighed 160lbs with *around* 20% bodyfat. Then I continued to lift weight to maintain the muscle, and lost weight down to 142 at 15% bodyfat.

    At that point, I changed my diet to include roughly +500 calories above maintenance, continued lifting heavy, and gained about 12 lbs, 6 of which were muscle and 6 of which were fat. Now I am cutting down again to 142... but this time I will be at 10% bodyfat.

    The result is that my muscles grew in size, and at the lower bodyfat %, they will be more visible (toned / defined).

    To illustrate the point, if I had to eat 500+ calories for 16 weeks to gain 6 lbs of muscle, how much muscle do you really think you are going to put on if you were eating -500 calories.
  • timbrom
    timbrom Posts: 303 Member
    Most research and the experience of people much more experienced than I indicate that (absent chemical enhancement) under completely optimal conditions, eating at a large surplus and lifting regularly following a solid program, that adding about 2 lbs of muscle a month is about the most that anyone can hope for.

    So, if under optimal conditions you are limited to 2 lbs a month of muscle, how much do you think you can add under suboptimal conditions?

    Adding muscle is _hard_.
  • pcastagner
    pcastagner Posts: 1,606 Member
    Most research and the experience of people much more experienced than I indicate that (absent chemical enhancement) under completely optimal conditions, eating at a large surplus and lifting regularly following a solid program, that adding about 2 lbs of muscle a month is about the most that anyone can hope for.

    So, if under optimal conditions you are limited to 2 lbs a month of muscle, how much do you think you can add under suboptimal conditions?

    Adding muscle is _hard_.

    I'd be thrilled with a pound a month, provided I can wear the same pants and not need special ones for bulking.
  • Mr_Knight
    Mr_Knight Posts: 9,532 Member
    Yeah for example, when I started I weighed 160lbs with *around* 20% bodyfat. Then I continued to lift weight to maintain the muscle, and lost weight down to 142 at 15% bodyfat.

    Woah. You didn't "maintain" anything, that's a loss of about 8 pounds of LBM, or nearly half of the total lost weight.
  • FrnkLft
    FrnkLft Posts: 1,821 Member
    Yeah for example, when I started I weighed 160lbs with *around* 20% bodyfat. Then I continued to lift weight to maintain the muscle, and lost weight down to 142 at 15% bodyfat.

    Woah. You didn't "maintain" anything, that's a loss of about 8 pounds of LBM, or nearly half of the total lost weight.

    I said *around*... my bf% was higher when I started. I didn't bother with the math for that figure, but I guess it was closer to 24%.

    Here's my full explanation of at least the bulking cycle:

    "Real Numbers on Muscle Gain (muscle to fat ratio) READ"
    http://www.myfitnesspal.com/topics/show/1099747-real-numbers-on-muscle-gain-muscle-to-fat-ratio-read
  • tonynguyen75
    tonynguyen75 Posts: 418 Member
    In a non-athletic individual, it's possible to gain noticeable muscle quickly (even in a caloric deficit).
  • FrnkLft
    FrnkLft Posts: 1,821 Member
    Was going to reply, nevermind.