Lessons Learned - Cardio vs. Weights
TrailNurse
Posts: 359 Member
We all learn from trial and error and I have been obsessing lately about doing more cardio and how I "thought" MORE cardio would take this layer of fat off my awesome muscles. Well, I decided to do 20 straight days of cardio (elliptical, running, jump rope, stair master, etc.) for two hours a day to see if it made a difference. Now mind you I have been working out with weights 5 days a week for a year now so I have a nice muscle base. After 20 days of nothing but cardio I can safely say I didn't lose a damn thing but probably muscle. I actually feel more "giggly" in my legs and arms and my clothes fit exactly the same. I don't look as defined and I also lost muscle strength. Today I started back lifting and I lost about 5-10 pounds per exercise/set. While the trial was a bit disappointing I believe I satisfied that part of me that was obsessing about cardio and I will never do that again.
I am going back to what I know works and that is a little bit of cardio and a whole lot of weights!!!!!
I am going back to what I know works and that is a little bit of cardio and a whole lot of weights!!!!!
0
Replies
-
I think you are making the right choice.
I used to do both weights and cardio 6 days a week. One hour of each. Felt spent after each workout. Didn't lose a darn thing. Started doing Stronglifts (minimal cardio) and lost 7 lbs in 14 weeks.
Welcome back to the world of lifting heavy things. :drinker:0 -
Yes I beleave you are right
The muscle that you have been building has been burning the fat off. (From Lifting Weights)
IMO cardio is for the heart but there are some other benifits that come from it as well.
The whole thing about lifting is some times confusing...You may stay the same weight on the scale but lose size...ie on the waist etc.
Muscle burns fat, but muscle weighs more than fat....Keep lifting.
ps: Congrats on your acheivement...You did well and should be proud!
D0 -
WOW, thank you for sharing!!! I do less lifting on days that include cardio. I'd rather be lifting!0
-
Today I started back lifting and I lost about 5-10 pounds per exercise/set.
Ummmm....what?0 -
Today I started back lifting and I lost about 5-10 pounds per exercise/set.
Ummmm....what?
The little round heavy things that you pick up.0 -
wont do that again.... your're lucky you didnt lose more strength than that... i know I did when I was injured...0
-
That's interesting as through trial and error I noticed the exact opposite of you. Guess we are just different.
Your next experiment should be just doing nothing for 20 days then go back to the weights. You'll probably notice a good deal more than just 5-10 lbs missing from your lifts.0 -
That's interesting as through trial and error I noticed the exact opposite of you. Guess we are just different.
Your next experiment should be just doing nothing for 20 days then go back to the weights. You'll probably notice a good deal more than just 5-10 lbs missing from your lifts.
Yup, same for me!0 -
I agree! Weights make such a difference, especially when you take body composition into account. I'd rather be a tight 135 than a flabby, skinny-fat 120 any day!
Yay for knowledge!
Also, you did two hours a day? That's dedication!0 -
Interesting experiment.
If you wanted to lose some body fat you would have been better off lifting weights and doing cardio, or lifting weights and eating less.
I think it is quite well known that the body prefers when in calorie deficit to use muscle as fuel first before using fat as it considers the muscle less essential to the bodies survival, kind of saves the fat for last when it really needs it. That is why you must keep lifting weights to let it know you still need that muscle
0 -
Definitely get the weights in there. It helps a lot0
-
Why not do both?
Weights for body composition, cardio for fitness...........0 -
I think it is quite well known that the body prefers when in calorie deficit to use muscle as fuel first before using fat as it considers the muscle less essential to the bodies survival, kind of saves the fat for last when it really needs it.
No that's a myth - glycogen and fat are the primary sources of energy.0 -
I think it is quite well known that the body prefers when in calorie deficit to use muscle as fuel first before using fat as it considers the muscle less essential to the bodies survival, kind of saves the fat for last when it really needs it.
No that's a myth - glycogen and fat are the primary sources of energy.
Ok I will take your word for it, I am no expert. But from what I have read you have to keep lifting heavy when in calorie deficit to hold onto your muscle. So that is definitely what I will keep doing.
Where does your muscle go then in calorie deficit if you have plenty of fat it could use for fuel instead?0 -
I lost 20 pounds two months, to sum up, the following points:
First. Resolutely do not eat snacks, eat also eat fruit, eat watermelon summer
Second, do not need too deliberately suppress their own needs, do not force yourself to eat if the great, which has nothing to do with weight loss, it should be more comfortable life, is not it?
Third, good breakfast, good quality, you can eat like this all the time to focus on the eradication; lunch to eat, without any restraint, try to eat, the purpose of doing a day in addition to ensuring the supply of nutrients, there an important objective is to make the evening as the state is not in a very hungry at night can amount to eat fruit, recommend bananas (satiety), cucumber and pineapple (helps burn fat), kiwi (dimension c of the king, incidentally beauty ), the other at night before going to bed can drink a small cup of yogurt.0 -
Since I have been weight training I have a noticed a bigger difference in my body shape, I agree weights all the way!0
-
I'm not sure why people think this is an either/or. I do both. The strength training is definitely making a difference in my body composition, but the cardio helps too, in terms of creating a calorie deficit leading to weight loss. In fact, whenever I find myself frustrated that the scale hasn't moved in a week or two, I increase my cardio for a couple of days, and off goes a pound! I could accomplish the same by eating less, but I prefer to exercise more instead. I don't get why so many on here think that's so awful. I agree that lifting weights is important, but I see no reason not to also do cardio exercise to facilitate weight loss.0
-
weights are an amazing way of getting into shape!! something that I do is interval cardio strength training everyday after I have stretched as my warm up! it allows for my heart rate to get to a nice pace and makes you sweat which Is what we want!
heres my example of what I do as warm up!
200m rowing
15 squats
20 crunches
1 min jumprope
I do this 4 -5 times over with 1 min rest between the jumprope and the rowing
so super simple but wow does this kick the treadmill/stairmaster in the teeth!!0 -
Yes you have to use your muscle to keep it but that's the same if you are in deficit, surplus or maintenance.I think it is quite well known that the body prefers when in calorie deficit to use muscle as fuel first before using fat as it considers the muscle less essential to the bodies survival, kind of saves the fat for last when it really needs it.
No that's a myth - glycogen and fat are the primary sources of energy.
Ok I will take your word for it, I am no expert. But from what I have read you have to keep lifting heavy when in calorie deficit to hold onto your muscle. So that is definitely what I will keep doing.
Where does your muscle go then in calorie deficit if you have plenty of fat it could use for fuel instead?
Totally agree that weight/strength training is vital when losing weight as it's much easier to retain muscle rather than diet down and then build back up.
Using active muscle for exercise fuel is the last resort rather than the first resort - it's a problem for very lean ultra marathon runners rather than ordinary people.
So for this experiment the loss of strength was due to not doing weight training for 20 days rather than doing 20 days of cardio.0 -
I'm not sure why people think this is an either/or. I do both. The strength training is definitely making a difference in my body composition, but the cardio helps too, in terms of creating a calorie deficit leading to weight loss. In fact, whenever I find myself frustrated that the scale hasn't moved in a week or two, I increase my cardio for a couple of days, and off goes a pound! I could accomplish the same by eating less, but I prefer to exercise more instead. I don't get why so many on here think that's so awful. I agree that lifting weights is important, but I see no reason not to also do cardio exercise to facilitate weight loss.
cardio only burns calories while you are doing the cardio but if you incorporate some resistance and interval training into your cardio it can work wonders as you experience something called after burn - this is when your calorie burning continues even though you are not doing cardio
the reason why cardio is important to do while exercising is endurance, cardio exercises the heart and lungs which are needless to say VERY important for exercise0 -
Yes you have to use your muscle to keep it but that's the same if you are in deficit, surplus or maintenance.I think it is quite well known that the body prefers when in calorie deficit to use muscle as fuel first before using fat as it considers the muscle less essential to the bodies survival, kind of saves the fat for last when it really needs it.
No that's a myth - glycogen and fat are the primary sources of energy.
Ok I will take your word for it, I am no expert. But from what I have read you have to keep lifting heavy when in calorie deficit to hold onto your muscle. So that is definitely what I will keep doing.
Where does your muscle go then in calorie deficit if you have plenty of fat it could use for fuel instead?
Totally agree that weight/strength training is vital when losing weight as it's much easier to retain muscle rather than diet down and then build back up.
Using active muscle for exercise fuel is the last resort rather than the first resort - it's a problem for very lean ultra marathon runners rather than ordinary people.
So for this experiment the loss of strength was due to not doing weight training for 20 days rather than doing 20 days of cardio.
yeah I see what you're saying. You lose the muscle through lack of use, not because it becomes your bodies primary fuel source. That's good at least I am still doing the right thing in regards to the weight training. I thought I might be able to stop and still get ripped up for a moment there 0 -
Thank you for sharing!0
-
Nvm.0
-
I'm not sure why people think this is an either/or. I do both. The strength training is definitely making a difference in my body composition, but the cardio helps too, in terms of creating a calorie deficit leading to weight loss. In fact, whenever I find myself frustrated that the scale hasn't moved in a week or two, I increase my cardio for a couple of days, and off goes a pound! I could accomplish the same by eating less, but I prefer to exercise more instead. I don't get why so many on here think that's so awful. I agree that lifting weights is important, but I see no reason not to also do cardio exercise to facilitate weight loss.
cardio only burns calories while you are doing the cardio but if you incorporate some resistance and interval training into your cardio it can work wonders as you experience something called after burn - this is when your calorie burning continues even though you are not doing cardio
the reason why cardio is important to do while exercising is endurance, cardio exercises the heart and lungs which are needless to say VERY important for exercise
But there you go assuming a dichotomy and tsk tsking me for *only* doing cardio when I clearly stated that it is not all I do.
Obviously, I am also burning calories in kettlebells class, for example, but there is only so much of that my body can endure per day/week. So if I want to attain a larger calorie deficit via adding exercise on a given day, I add 20-40 minutes on the elliptical after doing my strength training workout. I'm not choosing between the two, I'm doing both. Some people on here (not necessarily you, the person I'm replying to) seem to think that adding that extra cardio *does nothing at all for weight loss* or is even *detrimental to weight loss*, and that is not true. Weight loss is fundamentally calories in vs. calories out, by whatever means an individual chooses to use.0 -
I'm not sure why people think this is an either/or. I do both. The strength training is definitely making a difference in my body composition, but the cardio helps too, in terms of creating a calorie deficit leading to weight loss. In fact, whenever I find myself frustrated that the scale hasn't moved in a week or two, I increase my cardio for a couple of days, and off goes a pound! I could accomplish the same by eating less, but I prefer to exercise more instead. I don't get why so many on here think that's so awful. I agree that lifting weights is important, but I see no reason not to also do cardio exercise to facilitate weight loss.
cardio only burns calories while you are doing the cardio but if you incorporate some resistance and interval training into your cardio it can work wonders as you experience something called after burn - this is when your calorie burning continues even though you are not doing cardio
the reason why cardio is important to do while exercising is endurance, cardio exercises the heart and lungs which are needless to say VERY important for exercise
Yeah, no.
Even steady state cardio triggers an EPOC response. The magnitude is less however than a resistance based / interval training session due to the intensity of the exercise - not simply because weights or intervals are some how magic.
To offest this you must consider that in general people are able to do less intense exercise for longer which results in greater overall calorie expenditure generally.
So, what do you think has the most calorie expenditure for me over the course of a given day
1) my 2 hour training cycle ride
2) my 40 minute weights session.
The answer I hope is obvious.0 -
Thanks for sharing. Confirmed for me that I need to increase my weight lifting.0
-
You are right. Lifting and gaining muscle is very important. Who wants to loss weight and be still out of shape.0
-
Thanks for sharing, I finally got a chance to read up on this. Here is a free book that might help you with these questions. I haven't finished reading, but basically sums up all that was discussed here.
10 Tips for Losing 10 Pounds in 20 Days
http://bfitandlive.com/blog/freebook0 -
Today I started back lifting and I lost about 5-10 pounds per exercise/set.
If you took a break from lifting for 20 days, you can't expect to jump in day 1 and do your max you were at before.. it takes a bit. Of course 2 hours of cardio a day sounds like an absolute nightmare.0 -
I'm sorry what were you saying?
I got distracted by your picture!
Holy Hotness!!!!
Someone pass the weights!0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.3K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 424 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions