I Like Big

Fullsterkur_woman

Wait...you mean I can't say boner here?

It expresses sexual arousal. Penis does not.

How does replying "penis" in a thread named "I like Big" not imply arousal? Eh?

Implying arousal means banned words all of the following words &/or phrases should also be banned: wood, hard, wet, pitching a tent, chub, chubby, etc.

If "wet" is out, then "moist" has to go too (and we know how much women everywhere love *that* word)! What a Charlie Foxtrot.

Fullsterkur_woman

Implying arousal means banned words all of the following words &/or phrases should also be banned: wood, hard, wet, pitching a tent, chub, chubby, etc.

Im with arghbowl on this. Boners are out but the boobs thread survives and thrives? (not that I'm complaining). It just seems very arbitrary.

Arbitrary, and a moving target. When one euphemism becomes no longer socially acceptable, it is replaced by another surreptitiously. This is a documented linguistic fact.

I would like to propose "Jeeves" as a replacement. You know, because of his stiff upper lip and all.

Vain_Witch

BIRD!!!

MysteriousMerlin

afros. my goal in life is to have one myself.

HELLO! :drinker:

jenifr818

Wait...you mean I can't say (redacted) here?

It expresses sexual arousal. (redacted) does not.

How does replying (redacted) in a thread named "I like Big" not imply arousal? Eh?

Implying arousal means banned words all of the following words &/or phrases should also be banned: wood, hard, wet, pitching a tent, chub, chubby, etc.

Somewhat cleaning up this hot mess so this doesn't get deleted (hopefully). This is why we can't have nice things :sad:

Someone really likes to redact things I take it?

It's better than actually doing work on the day before Thanksgiving break

I was actually agreeing with you. I was saying the arbitrary moving target is why we can't have nice things. Unfortunately, things tend to get lost with just text :ohwell:

arghbowl

Wait...you mean I can't say (redacted) here?

It expresses sexual arousal. (redacted) does not.

How does replying (redacted) in a thread named "I like Big" not imply arousal? Eh?

Implying arousal means banned words all of the following words &/or phrases should also be banned: wood, hard, wet, pitching a tent, chub, chubby, etc.

Somewhat cleaning up this hot mess so this doesn't get deleted (hopefully). This is why we can't have nice things :sad:

Someone really likes to redact things I take it?

It's better than actually doing work on the day before Thanksgiving break

I was actually agreeing with you. I was saying the arbitrary moving target is why we can't have nice things. Unfortunately, things tend to get lost with just text :ohwell:

I actually only quoted you to see how you did the bold text.

That being said, with the arbitrary binary opposition of words semantics winds up winning this one.

arghbowl

Wait...you mean I can't say (redacted) here?

It expresses sexual arousal. (redacted) does not.

How does replying (redacted) in a thread named "I like Big" not imply arousal? Eh?

Implying arousal means banned words all of the following words &/or phrases should also be banned: wood, hard, wet, pitching a tent, chub, chubby, etc.

Somewhat cleaning up this hot mess so this doesn't get deleted (hopefully). This is why we can't have nice things :sad:

Im with arghbowl on this. Boners are out but the boobs thread survives and thrives? (not that I'm complaining). It just seems very arbitrary.

As well as "spank, bang, pass" threads galore. Let's all just spank each other while we're at it.



PS - I like big butts; I cannot lie. You other brothers can't deny when a girl walks in with an itty bitty waist and a round thing in your face you get redacted!

Cali_Chica

Conversations

MercenaryNoetic26

Polish hot dogs