Low carb diet versus Low calorie
Replies
-
Late to the post so this may have been covered but of course you're going to lose weight if you eliminate an entire food "group". But your body wasn't meant to function that way.
Like one person said, less calories in than out. Plain, simple.0 -
Late to the post so this may have been covered but of course you're going to lose weight if you eliminate an entire food "group". But your body wasn't meant to function that way.
Like one person said, less calories in than out. Plain, simple.
No one doing a low carb plan is cutting out an entire food group. No one has said NO carb, but LOW carb, major difference.
And its not as simple as calories in, calories out..............If it were that simple for a lot of us, I would still be thin as a rail.0 -
Have a deficit of 3500 calories, lose a pound. Fact. Be it by low carb, high carb, low fat, high fat, only eat when standing on a chair, just eat in direct bright sunlight, only use a fork with two prongs ... 3500 calories is 3500 calories.0
-
Have a deficit of 3500 calories, lose a pound. Fact. Be it by low carb, high carb, low fat, high fat, only eat when standing on a chair, just eat in direct bright sunlight, only use a fork with two prongs ... 3500 calories is 3500 calories.
I no longer believe that............There is a difference in the type of foods we eat and how you gain or lose weight. It's not as simple as calories in / calories out.
I used to believe that Conventional Wisdom and then my eyes were opened and I see the bigger picture.........
With doing a very low carb eating plan I was eating upwards of 2,200 calories per day and the weight was dropping off me........
Eating 1,200 - 1,400 calories, low fat I didn't lose weight like that and in fact started gaining.0 -
Interestingly, I've been losing weight easily eating 1,800 to 1,900 calories composed of 45 to 50 percent carbs.0
-
Unfortunately, 3500 is not always 3500 calories, because our bodies metabolize different nutrients in different ways. I don't know much about low-carb diets, so my comment is not specific to those, but eating very few carbohydrates can be harmful if done without proper guidance from a specialist.
The problem is that the main 'fuel' our body uses is glucose (our brain uses it almost exclusively), and if it is not available in sufficient quantity, say in a very low-carb diet, our body has to metabolize the stored fat in a way that it can be used to 'replace' glucose: it forms ketone bodies, from which the brain can also get energy. When these are formed, most of the energy from the stored fat is not used, so calories basically go down the drain - that is why the weight loss is so fast. Small amounts of these ketone bodies don't do much harm, but too much and they make the blood acidic, and this can be *very* dangerous.
I am not a specialist in the subject, but I hope I was able to explain some points and highlight the importance of proper guidance when attempting a low-carb diet. As I said, I am not aware of how Atkins, for example, works, and it probably incorporates enough carbs as to not be dangerous, but I still thought the explanation could be useful. And just to conclude, if you eat less calories that you spend while maintaining the usual nutrient proportions, you *will* lose weight, maybe not as fast, but probably in a safer way
Sorry for the huge post,
Just a medical student passing by ;D0 -
Interestingly, I've been losing weight easily eating 1,800 to 1,900 calories composed of 45 to 50 percent carbs.
I am willing to bet that if you were to compare our food diaries that they would be similar.............
If you are a clean eater, then you are pretty much eating a controlled carb eating plan without it being dubbed a particular plan.
The whole point is for the clean eaters - it is still pretty low / controlled carb due to eating natural foods.
The problem is, no one wants to admit that in the grand scheme of things that when we get to maintenance we are pretty much eating the same...........no one wants the "low carb" stigma attached to them.0 -
Bump0
-
Interestingly, I've been losing weight easily eating 1,800 to 1,900 calories composed of 45 to 50 percent carbs.
I am willing to bet that if you were to compare our food diaries that they would be similar.............
If you are a clean eater, then you are pretty much eating a controlled carb eating plan without it being dubbed a particular plan.
The whole point is for the clean eaters - it is still pretty low / controlled carb due to eating natural foods.
The problem is, no one wants to admit that in the grand scheme of things that when we get to maintenance we are pretty much eating the same...........no one wants the "low carb" stigma attached to them.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 426 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions